Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

OK, I did find the "Home" button. I'm sure the "Update" button is there, but I sure don't see it. Also, is there a need to update to 7.4 if I am not a member of Family Search? I think I must be particularly dull this morning. Jane S. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Jane Sarles wrote: > Wher

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Jane Sarles wrote: > OK, I did find the "Home" button. I'm sure the "Update" button is > there, but I sure don't see it. Also, is there a need to update to 7.4 > if I am not a member of Family Search? > First, out of consideration of those few still on dial up, and to keep things clear, please

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

On 2010/02/01 15:43, Jane Sarles wrote: > OK, I did find the "Home" button. I'm sure the "Update" button is > there, but I sure don't see it. Also, is there a need to update to 7.4 > if I am not a member of Family Search? As Gene said, on the rhs of the 'Legacy Home' tab is a panel labelled 'Upd

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

That's what I was looking for! Thanks Mike. Very little change for us who are not LDS members so it may be as well to hang on until the LDS search becomes available to all. I think it unfair that I can log in to the LDS site to do transciption work for them, yet I am not allowed to use this update

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Norman, Whether you update or not is your choice, but a number of bugs have also been sorted. I am not LDS either (and I do transcription for them) but I consider the update worth installing. Ron Ferguson _ Create your Website with Legacy, see

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

<> A lot of LDS thought it unfair that they had to wait 2 years longer than some other to use the program as well. Consider it a beta test that is gradually expanding. Carl Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

You have to pay this time, or choose Basic, if you are in Deluxe, you have a choice. Rich in LA CA --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Jane Sarles wrote: > From: Jane Sarles > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 5:43 AM > OK,

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

LDS want us all online as quick as possible. Rich in LA CA --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Carl Cox wrote: > From: Carl Cox > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 8:30 AM > < log in to the LDS site to do transcription >

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

or choose Basic, if you are in Deluxe, you > have a choice. > Rich in LA CA > > --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Jane Sarles wrote: > >> From: Jane Sarles >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 5:43

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

hit 1/1. I may have misread it, but if that is not the case, someome might 'lose' the Deluxe if done out of 'order'. Rich in LA CA --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Ron Ferguson wrote: > From: Ron Ferguson > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.c

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

Geoff Rasmussen Millennia Corporation ge...@legacyfamilytree.com www.LegacyFamilyTree.com -Original Message- From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:31 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating I have Deluxe

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

he updates, will lose deluxe if not paying at update time. Rich --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Geoff Rasmussen wrote: > From: Geoff Rasmussen > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 3:43 PM > Rich, > > I think you may

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

ing oldFS daily, I will wait until 7.5 > comes out. Was I accurate that a deluxe user, downloading the updates, will > lose deluxe if not paying at update time. > Rich > > --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Geoff Rasmussen wrote: > >> From: Geoff Rasmussen >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG]

RE: [LegacyUG] help

To do the family justice, you really need a scientific 3-D charting program. That is probably prohibitively expensive if even available to anyone outside labs. 2-D will be hard to make understandable even on several pages, which would also be very confusing. Maybe someone doing DNA charting

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Rich, you're confusing me. I initially paid for the Legacy Deluxe program but all updates have been free. What fees are you talking about? Sally Miller Hindley In a message dated 2/1/2010 7:29:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, fourpa...@verizon.net writes: That wasn't what I meant. I forgot when

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

u Ron, but guess I'll be looking for new software. Syble Glasscock --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Ron Ferguson wrote: From: Ron Ferguson Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 3:23 PM Norman, Whether you update or not is your choice, bu

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

; out of it, and have only an update for fixing any bugs. I really do > appreciate all the help this group has given me, a special thanks to you > Ron, but guess I'll be looking for new software. > Syble Glasscock > > --- On *Mon, 2/1/10, Ron Ferguson * wrote: > > > F

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -Original Message- From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:29 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Syble, I too feel a little cheated with all the build up to the new update but 'don't throw the baby out with the bathwater'. Legacy is still the best family history program I have ever used in my 15 years of doing it. Ron, I did update the software as soon as it became available, loaded the nFS m

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Norman, There are two aspects to this update: 1) Direct acces for LDS members to Register ( or whatever it's called) Lds data, and 2) Direct access to the new FS search. The former is working, but at present FS does not allow direct access to its new data. I am sure that you would not wish to dep

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

It fixed a backup issue that I had. And of course it is very useful for LDS Legacy users. Our turn will come. I, for one, am not complaining. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

t.att.net - Original Message - From: "Ron Ferguson" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:16 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating Norman, There are two aspects to this update: 1) Direct acces for LDS members to Register ( or whatever it's called) Lds data, and 2) Direct ac

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

I have to agree with Ruth's frustration here, although I'm not quite ready to leave the program just yet. Back in August I reported a number of bugs in the formatting of GEDCOM files exported from Legacy. Not a single one was fixed in the September update, which I was okay with because it came out

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

From: salude...@aol.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 4:44 PM > Rich, you're confusing me.  I > initially  paid for the Legacy Deluxe program > but all updates have been free.  What  fees are >

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

gacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Ruth Nerud [mailto:baber...@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 4:40 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

- From: "Steve Voght" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating I have to agree with Ruth's frustration here, although I'm not quite ready to leave the program just yet. Back in August I reported a number of bugs in the formatting

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

ssage, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -Original Message- From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:11 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating This is what I read on the web page. I left i

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

On 2010/02/02 20:11, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: > This is what I read on the web page. I left it for a few days. On > reading it while awake, I notice that 7.0 is not in the list. Oops. > "This download will overwrite earlier versions with Legacy 7.4 > Standard Edition. If you are using the Deluxe E

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

cyUsers.com Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 12:13:20 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Updating Fixed Items: LDS Screen - Fixed an error 5 problem. Descendant Book Reports - Fixed a problem where duplicate lines were referring the reader to the wrong page number. Descendant Book

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

- From: roy_delos_re...@comcast.net To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: 03 February 2010 11:20 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating Sherry said: [QUOTE] Although it doesn't affect many of us, the nFS feature is critical for our LDS users. But be assured, the programmers haven't for

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Dear Ruth, Well, I have to agree that it would be good to get some bugs fixed before introducing new features, but I have at last managed to get the reports to do what I want, with a little help from Adobe Acrobat to add pages, like fan charts, that Legacy book reports can't do (yes - I know it wo

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

roy_delos_re...@comcast.net wrote: > Sherry said: > > [QUOTE] > Although it doesn't affect many of us, the nFS feature is critical for our > LDS users. But be assured, the programmers haven't forgotten the rest of > us! > [UNQUOTE] > > I'm just curious. > Why a small minority of Legacy users and t

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

Ferguson wrote: > From: Ron Ferguson > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 3:56 AM > The development of the nFS features > is largely determined by family Search > (LDS) and the way and speed they are releasi

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

I am one of the non-LDS Legacy users, that uses Family Search regularly. I have said this, lets get off this non-issue. Rich in LA CA --- On Wed, 2/3/10, Jenny M Benson wrote: > From: Jenny M Benson > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Dat

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

[mailto:normd...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 02 February, 2010 3:48 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Updating Syble, I too feel a little cheated with all the build up to the new update but 'don't throw the baby out with the bathwater'. Legacy is still the

Re: [LegacyUG] Updating

eough" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:03 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Updating Folks - we should all take a deep breath and relax! Also keep in mind that these genealogy programs are working in parallel with the LDS/Family History arm that is rolling out their program worldwide. &g

RE: [LegacyUG] Updating

Amen! Legacy has always proven itself to its usersbe patientit'll all work out. Jeanne > From: murke...@aol.com > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Updating > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:03:21 -0600 > > Folks - we should all

Re: [LegacyUG] test

Carl Cox wrote: > My ISP declared all Legacy Spam. I hope it is corrected. > > Carl Contact your ISP and get them to remove the block. Ron Ferguson _ Create your Website with Legacy, see Tutorials at: http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family

Re: [LegacyUG] test

It shouldn't be marked spam if Legacy is in your contact list. Evert 2010/2/9 Carl Cox : > My ISP declared all Legacy Spam. I hope it is corrected. > > Carl > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > >   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > >   htt

Re: [LegacyUG] test

On 2010/02/09 17:58, Evert van Dijken wrote: > It shouldn't be marked spam if Legacy is in your contact list. Why not? The ISP gets the mail before you do. If they decide it's Spam, then you might not get to see it. -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://ww

RE: [LegacyUG] test

ure mail received is another matter. This is something that your email program can easily do if you turn off the ISP filters. Brian in CA > -Original Message- > From: Mike Fry [mailto:mike...@iafrica.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:03 AM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUs

Re: [LegacyUG] test

o:mike...@iafrica.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:03 AM >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] test >> >> On 2010/02/09 17:58, Evert van Dijken wrote: >> >> > It shouldn't be marked spam if Legacy is in your contact list. >

Re: [LegacyUG] test

On my providers website (www.xs4all.nl) I can add addresses to my contact list and these addresses are not blocked by my provider. Evert 2010/2/9 Mike Fry : > On 2010/02/09 17:58, Evert van Dijken wrote: > >> It shouldn't be marked spam if Legacy is in your contact list. > > Why not? The ISP gets

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On 2010/02/20 02:23, Colin Liddell wrote: > Just noticed an odd thing regarding the relationship indication above a > persons name in Legacy. On one branch it goes to my gg grandfather but > above my gg grandmother there is nothing. > When I click on my ggg grandfather's name and bring it up, there

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

Thanks Mike, that did the trick! I would have thought it would be automatic and follow on once the relationship was established and set Colin. - Original Message - From: Mike Fry To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:48:25 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >I would have thought it would be automatic >and follow on once the relationship was established and set It used to be that way in V6. -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:48:25 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >I would have thought it would be automatic >and follow on once the relationship was established and set It used to be that way in V6. Dennis Kowallek (LTools) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools Ano

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:36:35 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:48:25 +1000, "Colin Liddell" > wrote: > >>I would have thought it would be automatic >>and follow on once the relationship was established and set > >It used to be that way in V6. > >Dennis Kowallek (LTools) >http:

Re: [LegacyUG] subscribing

Yes, you are were doing something wrong. Your error is that due to the link wrapping, it got broken. You need to manually paste in the part that reads "80c8a&ml=3&domain=LegacyUsers.com" (without the parenthisis). When you just click on the link you are getting only the first part of the URL (that

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:36:35 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:48:25 +1000, "Colin Liddell" > wrote: > >>I would have thought it would be automatic >>and follow on once the relationship was established and set > >It used to be that way in V6. > >Dennis Kowallek (LTools) >ht

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On 2010/02/20 08:15, Colin Liddell wrote: > Why would the programmers do that, was there a problem with it? None known. Except that with the growth of the database and ever-lengthening extent of the inter-connected main tree, the time taken to assign each new person their appropriate relationship

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

- Original Message - From: Mike Fry To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship On 2010/02/20 08:15, Colin Liddell wrote: > Why would the programmers do that, was there a problem with it? None known. Except t

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:15:03 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >Why would the programmers do that, was there a problem with it? I don't know if they ever actually posted a reason publicly. I surmise that when V7 introduced relationships for non-blood relatives, that the time it took to recompute rel

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

- Original Message - From: Dennis M. Kowallek To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 10:10 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:15:03 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >Why would the programmers do that, was there a pr

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:13:06 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >A couple of times I have toyed with the the idea of going back to v6, i >might give it more thought. I don't know if that's possible if you use SourceWriter. I seem to recall others saying that SourceWriter sources don't export well to

RE: [LegacyUG] Relationship

t; To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:15:03 +1000, "Colin Liddell" > wrote: > > >Why would the programmers do that, was there a problem with it? > > I don't know if they ever actually posted a re

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

Brian L. Lightfoot wrote >Yet at the same time, the computing power in the average household has >gone up tremendously. Most users are no longer running 500 MHz >processors but rather 2.0 and greater GHz dual core and quad core >processors. Available system RAM is now usually a minimum of 2 GB on >

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

ay, February 20, 2010 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship Brian L. Lightfoot wrote >Yet at the same time, the computing power in the average household has >gone up tremendously. Most users are no longer running 500 MHz >processors but rather 2.0 and greater GHz dual core and quad co

RE: [LegacyUG] Relationship

last blood relationship setting would certainly keep me from entering new individuals! More than an hour before I could continue?! CE -Original Message- From: Ruth Nerud [mailto:baber...@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 9:05 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re:

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

my suggestion and am happy to stay with the Manual Set Relationship feature. Ruth - Original Message - From: "CE Wood" To: Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 1:13 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationship Legacy displays the closest relationship rather than the closest DIRECT relat

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:34:48 -0600, "Ruth Nerud" wrote: >That's why I mentioned having the option of Manual or Automatic because I >know not everyone would use the feature, but you do have a point I didn't >think of and that's the time it would take to automatically set >relationships every time

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

- Original Message - From: Dennis M. Kowallek To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 12:46 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:13:06 +1000, "Colin Liddell" wrote: >A couple of times I have toyed with

RE: [LegacyUG] subscribing

Same problem here! From: Chuck Cloud [mailto:ccl...@collinscom.net] Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 2:36 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] subscribing You have requested a subscription to the LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com mailing list. To be added to the list you mu

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

CE Wood wrote >Legacy displays the closest relationship rather than the closest DIRECT >relationship. Maybe I'm being dense, but I don't know what you mean by "closest" and "closest direct" relationship. Please will you explain? -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.Le

RE: [LegacyUG] Relationship

[mailto:ge...@cedarbank.me.uk] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 4:24 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship CE Wood wrote >Legacy displays the closest relationship rather than the closest DIRECT >relationship. Maybe I'm being dense, but I don't know

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship

onversion tool. > > Brian in CA > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com] >> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 4:10 AM >> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship >> >>

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

Inta Warner wrote: > This question probably has a blindingly obvious answer - but I can't > find it. I am a relatively new comer to Legacy and family history. > Instead of using the to do list (I find it rather cumbersome since I > have HEAPS of to do items!)I have decided to tag individuals whose

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

Inta, It sounds to me that you might want to look into the To Do Tasks instead of just relying on tags. In the To Do Tasks, you can list everything you want to research for a person and include locality and the repository (i.e., LDS Family History Centre) where you are to search. You can then ea

RE: [LegacyUG] tags

Thanks Ron - sleep soon and sleep well! Peter -Original Message- From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: Friday, 26 February 2010 2:05 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] tags Inta Warner wrote: > This question probably has a blindin

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

Detailed Search. For this search you on ly need to use the first line and set as follows: Individual, Tag 1, Equals, Tagged.>> Easier than getting mixed up with Boolean operations - :-) Click on Name List icon on top, find Search on bottom, click on Show all tagged # (1,2,3 ...) Your list

RE: [LegacyUG] tags

@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] tags <Find>Detailed Search. For this search you on ly need to use the first line and set as follows: Individual, Tag 1, Equals, Tagged.>> Easier than getting mixed up with Boolean operations - :-) Click on Name List icon on top, find Search on bott

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

Carl Cox wrote: > Detailed Search. For this > search you on ly need to use the first line and set as follows: > > Individual, Tag 1, Equals, Tagged.>> > > Easier than getting mixed up with Boolean operations - :-) > > Click on Name List icon on top, find Search on bottom, click on Show > all

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

Detailed Search route, because this is one of the best functions available in Legacy, and when used fully has the ability to answer many of the "how do I find" questions which appear regularly on this list. Compared with many searches found in other software it is much more powerful.>> I tot

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

Carl Cox wrote >Detailed Search route, because this >is one of the best functions available in Legacy, and when used fully >has the ability to answer many of the "how do I find" questions which >appear regularly on this list. Compared with many searches found in >other software it is much mor

Re: [LegacyUG] tags

to whether visible or not. Either way gets you the list you want. Ed - Original Message From: Carl Cox To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 11:30:22 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] tags I totally agree. However, when you want to find a list of already tagged

Re: [LegacyUG] LTools

You need to contact LTools, this is a Legacy List for Legacy and the product which the company sells. Ltools has its own User Group, but I'm afraid I don't have the URL to hand. It should be on the Zippersoftware site though. Ron Ferguson _ Crea

RE: [LegacyUG] LTools

@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] LTools You need to contact LTools, this is a Legacy List for Legacy and the product which the company sells. Ltools has its own User Group, but I'm afraid I don't have the URL to hand. It should be on the Zippersoftware site though. Ro

Re: [LegacyUG] error

What site? Ron Ferguson _ Create your Website with Legacy, see Tutorials at: http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ferg

Re: [LegacyUG] error

Gail, Try this page to sign up for LUG. (Copy and paste, if necessary) If it still doesn't work, I will see you Friday and we can try to figure it out. Carolyn From: "gailk...@aol.com" To: LegacyUserGroup@Legacy

Re: [LegacyUG] error

Sorry, it was meant to be a personal reply! From: "gailk...@aol.com" To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Tue, March 2, 2010 6:59:15 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] error can't register as site doesn't pop up Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyF

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

AS soon as LDS releases it to the public - you will be all set. Until then - it does nothing. Keith -- Keith A. McKain Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64 Email: mckainances...@gmail.com On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:43 AM, glove wrote: > I still don't get this FamilySearch thing - is it p

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Graham, I am not an LDS member, therefore, I cannot speak for those that are, however, I have found FamilySearch.org to be an excellent resource. I have found clues that, after further research and verification, actually helped to break through some brick walls. FamilySearch Labs also has some int

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

arles Apple [mailto:apple1...@embarqmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 14 March 2010 1:13 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch Graham, I am not an LDS member, therefore, I cannot speak for those that are, however, I have found FamilySearch.org to be an excellent resour

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

and clues, that need further research, verification, and accurate source citations. Charles -Original Message- From: Kath [mailto:terrigal2...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 9:47 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch The main issue I have

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

.com] Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 9:47 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch The main issue I have with LDS records are that they aren't verified or sourced. Any LDS member can put information up that is just based on family talk. Nevertheless it is a g

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

rch web site? So, I would appreciate your clarifying your statement. Cathy-0 - Original Message - From: "Kath" To: Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 9:46 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch > The main issue I have with LDS records are that they aren't verifie

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

- From: Cathy-0 [mailto:chorn0...@optimum.net] Sent: Sunday, 14 March 2010 2:57 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch Kathy, While you mentioned below that LDS records aren't verfied, you didn't mention where you found these "unverified" records.

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

them all through the same perspective. Charles From: clark1...@aol.com [mailto:clark1...@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 10:16 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch Please be careful about lumping all "LDS re

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Just wanted to add a bit more information on the LDS records. 1. Ancestral File - as noted below - submitted by researchers - a repository of family trees. Some are very good, some are totally horrible. 2. IGI - as noted below - from 2 sources - submitted by researchers, and extracted from recor

Re: [LegacyUG] APOLOGY

I am completely humbly apologetic. It was a post I wanted to share with my contacts, but I forgot that the LUG address was within my contacts. I rarely do this anyway, so be assured it will not happen again. humbly Dawn in NJ On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Sherry/Support wrote: > This is *co

RE: [LegacyUG] APOLOGY

of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Dawn Del Guercio [mailto:njheart2he...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:48 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] APOLOGY I am complete

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Is there any estimate when Family Search will be made available to non LDS members? Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from ol

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Michael, The new.FamilySearch has been in beta for a few years. There are all sorts of rumors when it will be available. I am on the test team and it is on .99 which means it is getting closer for release (Closer is relative). Having said that, it will probably (My assumption) only be available t

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

What is the difference between this and http://pilot.familysearch.org? Jane Visit my websites at www.wmwebmasters.com and www.jftwd.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacy

RE: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Jane Fabiano-Turner wrote: > What is the difference between this > and http://pilot.familysearch.org? I'm not sure what you mean by "this," but the link you posted (Family Search Pilot, or sometimes called Family Search Labs) involves actual records (e.g., indexes and digital images of original

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

So if you are not an LDS member then all this new FamilySearch functionality that is now in Legacy is useless? This new stuff is for LDS only? On 3/15/2010 9:49 PM, Connie Sheets wrote: > Jane Fabiano-Turner wrote: > > >> What is the difference between this >> and http://pilot.familysearch.org? >

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Michael, No, that is incorrect. Only yesterday Geoff, yet again, stated that the increased functionality which Family Search will make available to the general public, ie. non-LDS members, will be available in due course. That is when Family Search are satisfied that it is properly debugged etc..

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

On 2010/03/16 12:22, Michael Berry wrote: > So if you are not an LDS member then all this new FamilySearch > functionality that is now in Legacy is useless? This new stuff is for > LDS only? That's what Millennia have been saying all along. If Legacy is to be used by LDS members for Temple work

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Ok, I have a yes and a no. Once 7.5 comes out I assume it will be certified for LDS work and it will be of great benefit for LDS users. I can see how this will be of great use to LDS members but, will it do anything for the rest of us? And is there any time estimate or is it simply that it will

Re: [LegacyUG] FamilySearch

Michael, Both answers are correct!! At present Mike is right, the function is only of benefit for LDS members, but in future, when FS opens the "general database", included in Legacy is the facility allowing access to all Legacy users. There is now time schedule at present. Ron Ferguson ___

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >