Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem - Unrecognized Event Date
On 25/04/2014 04:09, Cathy Pinner wrote:
> However, I think there is a bug in that you don't seem to be able to
> override the problem checking for this particular event OR override
> the date checking for the individ
On 25/04/2014 04:09, Cathy Pinner wrote:
> However, I think there is a bug in that you don't seem to be able to
> override the problem checking for this particular event OR override
> the date checking for the individual.
>
> Jenny, have you been able to exclude a problem like this?
Yes and no! I
Paula,
I don't think there is a viable alternative for this sort of date.
Nothing else makes English sense.
I guess if you really can't stand the PP alert, you can put the date
in the notes and write a sentence override for this event.
However, I think there is a bug in that you don't seem to be
Legacy would recognize “to 1977” …
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston ON
From: Paula Ryburn [mailto:paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: April 24, 2014 11:13 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem - Unrecognized Event Date
I have one event where I want to say
On 24/04/2014 16:12, Paula Ryburn wrote:
> So, what would be your recommendation on "until 1977" ... "through
> 1977" has same result. Just enter what I want and ignore the PP?
> Because I apparently cannot tell Legacy to ignore the PP, because
> nothing happens when I click on it in the Event sc
(not intended to I think).
Thanks,
--Paula
From: Ward Walker
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem - Unrecognized Event Date
I try to word everything so that it makes sense both now and at any point
in t
On 21/04/2014 23:40, Jay 1FamilyTree wrote:
> Actually, After 1980 would be recognized by more genealogy software
> programs if imported from a gedcom rather than from
>
Maybe so, but "After 1980" means something entirely different to "From
1980".
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group guidel
Actually, After 1980 would be recognized by more genealogy software
programs if imported from a gedcom rather than from
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:15 PM, R G Strong-genes
wrote:
> the correct recognized date is “From 1980”
>
> *From:* Howlanddavisii
> *Sent:* Monday, April 21, 2014 3:40
the correct recognized date is “From 1980”
From: Howlanddavisii
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 3:40 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem - Unrecognized Event Date
In trying to clean up my Potential Problems, my sister has an unrecognized
event date. I
Ward:
Thanks for the suggestion; it has resolved the problem. Now to look for
others and do something similar.
Howland Davis
-Original Message-
From: Ward Walker
To: legacyusergroup
Sent: Mon, Apr 21, 2014 4:24 pm
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Potential Problem - Unrecognized Event
I try to word everything so that it makes sense both now and at any point in
the future (e.g., 10 years from now). The word ‘present’ would be completely
ambiguous. I would try to get the event to read nicely while leaving the end
date out. You might have to use the notes field instead of the da
11 matches
Mail list logo
