2011/8/1 Matthew Buchanan matthew.ian.bucha...@gmail.com:
Please comment on whether this is okay, and if so if anyone wants to help.
it is OK if the local mapping community agrees to that and finds the
imported data useful, suitable, accurate and up to date. If there is
no local community to
2011/7/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
suppose there's a node that has been created by user A with no tags on it.
Suppose the node has later been moved by user B. A has not accepted the CT,
while B has.
Will the node have to be removed when we go to phase 5 of the license
2011/6/17 Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com:
On Friday, 17 June 2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer o...@amen-online.de wrote:
I read your other mail on that topic. I don't personally have any
objection to addressing weaknesses in the definition of active
contributor.
If we take the voting issues
2011/6/6 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
wrote:
On 05.06.2011 02:09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Frederik the great is only interested in remapping Silesia
(Schlesien)
2011/5/15 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use
cc-by-sa data in the future.
Some say that we aren't able to use CC-BY-SA data now because we
2011/5/6 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
A friend of mine recently did a lot of mapping which was then removed by
someone else in preparation for an import. Shit happens.
really? Where was that?
Cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
Sorry that I come quite late with this, it might be too late, and it
was bothering me occasionally already for some months: if we really
decided in the future to change the license, isn't 3 weeks a little
short for such an important issue? I am referring to the time span
required for an active
there is this page in the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
to document and keep trace.
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Excuse me if this question has already been raised. I am currently
involved in a project that has chosen OSM as cartographic base for a
portal for tourists. There will be an ontology to allow for semantic
research and the idea is to display POIs, pictures and other
multimedia content on an OSM map
2011/3/11 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
Be more specific about your ontology. How does your ontology interact
with an unmodified OSM database?
the ontology objects were planned to work aside from OSM and to only
have spatial connection to the cartographic data, but I encouraged
them to use
2011/2/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
I know that at OSM we always used to say: If the layers are separable
then you can have different licenses on each; if not, then not.
Of course this would result in a map that can *not* be copied under
CC-BY-SA because it is virtually impossible to
2010/11/17 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
I don't think a change to public domain licensing could cause any
compatibility problem.
PD but still with certain conditions respected: no re-engineering,
attribution, etc. like requested by the OdbL? As far as I understand
this, while the tiles
2010/11/17 Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:20:39 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw: isn't a rendering a derived database as well?
A database of pixels? I would not regard a printed map as a database.
And neither would I the electronic
2010/9/28 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 28 September 2010 21:03, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The question I am asking myself is: Is the ability to import as much
government data as possible really worth the hassle? And my personal answer
is a clear no; because to me,
2010/9/23 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi:
What is hard is to give attribution and show the license. Of course I can
add Access constraints element to the service metadata
ows:AccessConstraintsData from OSM, license
CC-BY-SA/ows:AccessConstraints
I'd say that is satisfying
AFAIK SRTM-data is licensed PD. OSMC
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMC_Reitkarte is composed of (at
least) 2 different layers, and I vaguely remember this was due to
licensing issues OSM-SRTM. The cyclemap on the other hand is using
one layer with OSM and SRTM combined. I'd prefer the
2010/9/22 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Grant Slater wrote:
The NASA SRTM filled dataset is PD licensed. No issue.
The 3rd party void filled SRTM is often not PD licensed. Some sets are
explicitly non-commercial.
This is the case with the map that Martin mentioned, it uses the
2010/9/7 ed...@billiau.net:
I got far enough through the Australian Copyright Act at the weekend to
discover that this won't extend to Australia.
does this count, given that the contract (CT) is British law?
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing
2010/8/29 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I haven't made a statement about the Kosovo information. I'm sure that
whoever has imported it has made sure it would be compatible with future
2010/8/31 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
actually I feel that you treated this issue a little negligent. The
import guidelines stated since 5 March 2008 (quote):
At the time of writing (spring 2008),
well spring isn't in March (here)
spring starts
2010/7/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/20 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
If you find a planet on a bus there's no contract you may be affected
by. There may be copyright, which may protect
2010/7/20 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
If you find a planet on a bus there's no contract you may be affected
by. There may be copyright, which may protect the content. If
there's nothing written on it then you basically have to assume All
rights reserved, provided there's any
2010/6/3 Phil Monger phil...@gmail.com:
I want OSM to be used in this way, but properly - and with according
advantages given to end users. Companies *need to know* they
cannot assert copyright over the mapping they take in this way.
+1
cheers,
Martin
2010/4/19 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
do we really want to require the 38th party down the line to still
attribute OSM no matter how diluted the OSM content has become?
yes. Why should it have become diluted? If you give this up, you do
almost the same then releasing PD, and that's
24 matches
Mail list logo
