I just finished the SVN-20120603 lfs build. The resizecons was still
there, only the manpage removed.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 5/28/12 6:54 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Maybe let's wait before updating anything again, just to be 100% certain
on what the right path is here, and I'll try to reach out to upstream in
the meantime to see if someone there is willing to give me an answer we
can work with.
Well, I posted a
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:45:54PM +0800, xinglp wrote:
I just finished the SVN-20120603 lfs build. The resizecons was still
there, only the manpage removed.
I stopped building 32-bit x86 a long time ago, so I don't have a
build environment to prove the change works. But, a quick test
shows
I thought popt was already removed from pkg-config in git? If so, why
did we add it into the book now instead of at least applying Dan's patch
to remove that dependency?
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I thought popt was already removed from pkg-config in git? If so, why
did we add it into the book now instead of at least applying Dan's patch
to remove that dependency?
Other packages use popt. If it works (appears to be ok) and can be used
by pkg-config, then we
On 6/4/12 3:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I thought popt was already removed from pkg-config in git? If so, why
did we add it into the book now instead of at least applying Dan's patch
to remove that dependency?
Other packages use popt. If it works (appears to be ok) and
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On 6/4/12 3:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I thought popt was already removed from pkg-config in git? If so, why
did we add it into the book now instead of at least applying Dan's patch
to remove that dependency?
Other packages use popt. If it works
On 6/4/12 3:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
hd2u.xml:para role=requiredxref linkend=popt//para
libbonobo.xml:xref linkend=popt//para
libdv.xml:para role=optionalxref linkend=popt/,
rsync.xml:para role=optionalxref linkend=popt/,
samba3.xml:para role=optionalxref linkend=popt/,
inkscape.xml:xref
On 06/01/2012 10:16 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt,
Trying a fresh build, perl 5.16.0 fails to configure.
As user lfs:
$ sh Configure -des -Dprefix=/tools
Directories to use for library searches?
[/lib/../lib64 /usr/lib/../lib64 /lib /usr/lib /tools/lib]
...
What libraries to use?
On 06/04/2012 02:38 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
While I am having other issues with perl ATM, maybe it would be better
to use the new compiler to determine the library search path instead of
the brute force method above (or the one in hints/linux.sh).
hints/linux.sh temporarily redefines gcc to
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 06/01/2012 10:16 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt,
Trying a fresh build, perl 5.16.0 fails to configure.
As user lfs:
$ sh Configure -des -Dprefix=/tools
Directories to use for library searches?
[/lib/../lib64 /usr/lib/../lib64 /lib /usr/lib /tools/lib]
...
What
On 06/04/2012 03:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
chmod 0644 hints/linux.sh
sed -i -e 's|/usr/bin/gcc|/tools/bin/gcc|' hints/linux.sh
sh Configure -des -Dprefix=/tools
make
seems to work. We still need a chmod instruction and the sed is
slightly different. We do lose the need to
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:38 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
That worked for both the separate NPTL linking problems and the host
libs. Bruce, would it be possible for you to try with the original
instructions on your affected host and use this new perl-libc patch? I
didn't check if the sed
On 06/04/2012 03:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:38 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
That worked for both the separate NPTL linking problems and the host
libs. Bruce, would it be possible for you to try with the original
instructions on your affected host and use this new
On 06/04/2012 02:35 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
(perl is another one I'd love to see removed, but I'm not going to
seriously recommend that one :) )
Just curiosity, what are the necessary steps? I was pretty sure that
something obscure in either gcc or glibc builds required it, but I am
all
On 6/4/12 5:20 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:35 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
(perl is another one I'd love to see removed, but I'm not going to
seriously recommend that one :) )
Just curiosity, what are the necessary steps? I was pretty sure that
something obscure in either gcc or glibc
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:30:29 +0100
Jeremy Huntwork jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com wrote:
The current headers-install command in the kernel tree is a perl script,
but there exists a patch to replace it with a very simple shell script
(and I believe the intent is to submit it upstream).
On 6/4/12 7:52 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
So maybe it should just be installed in Chapter 5 and the Chapter 6
page could move to BLFS?
If you removed the dependency in glibc and linux, you wouldn't need to
do either.
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
On 6/4/12 7:54 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On 6/4/12 7:52 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
So maybe it should just be installed in Chapter 5 and the Chapter 6
page could move to BLFS?
If you removed the dependency in glibc and linux, you wouldn't need to
do either.
Oh, I see what you mean though, if
On 6/4/12 8:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
As stated earlier, the goal of LFS is to build a complete and usable
foundation-level system. This includes all packages needed to replicate
itself while providing a relatively minimal base from which to customize
a more complete system based on the
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On 6/4/12 8:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
As stated earlier, the goal of LFS is to build a complete and usable
foundation-level system. This includes all packages needed to replicate
itself while providing a relatively minimal base from which to customize
a more complete
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On 6/4/12 8:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
As stated earlier, the goal of LFS is to build a complete and
usable foundation-level system. This includes all packages needed
to replicate itself while providing a relatively minimal base
from which to
On 6/4/12 10:51 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
OK. Your distro, your rules. :)
For the record, perl is also required for automake. Half of its
installed files (or so) are perl modules, and /usr/bin/automake is a
perl script.
That's another package I would personally remove from LFS (along with
2012/6/5 Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:45:54PM +0800, xinglp wrote:
I just finished the SVN-20120603 lfs build. The resizecons was still
there, only the manpage removed.
I stopped building 32-bit x86 a long time ago, so I don't have a
build environment to
in 6.13, the binutils page, there are sed commands to fix the tests, one is:
sed -i /exception_defines.h/d ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc
though it doesn't seem to change anything :S i can't find any
exception_defines.h in that file.
--
Waleed K. Hamra
Manager of Hamra Information Systems
25 matches
Mail list logo
