There is an error in the following:
Create some directories now that are needed for tests, but will also be
used as a part of installation:
mkdir -pv /lib/{firmware,udev/devices/pts}
mkdir -pv /lib/firmware -- This is not needed as
directory
I see that pkgconfig has been removed from LFS and BLFS
Can the *.pc files be removed from /usr/lib/pkgconfig or are they still
needed?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 03/20/2014 08:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've noticed that our instructions for e2fsprogs put chattr and lsattr
into /usr/bin. Shouldn't these be in /bin?
-- Bruce
If you follow Filesystem Hierarchy Standard version 2.3 they are not in
placed into /bin.
I have not found them in that
Why is the installation of the headers in the book like this
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install
cp -rv dest/include/* /tools/include
instead of
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/tools/include headers_install
??
Would the latter be just the same or am I missing something here?
--
On 03/02/2014 09:22 AM, thomas wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2014, 08:36 -0500 schrieb baho utot:
Why is the installation of the headers in the book like this
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install
cp -rv dest/include/* /tools/include
instead of
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/tools/include
On 03/02/2014 10:13 AM, William Harrington wrote:
On Mar 2, 2014, at 8:22 AM, thomas wrote:
If I remember right, at least in previous versions of the kernel
sources
the target directory had been cleared before the headers were written.
That would be no good for the /tools/include dir but
On 12/29/2013 05:54 AM, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 10:15:22 +0100
From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] xz instructions from chapter 6
Le 28/12/2013 22:20, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Aleksey
Ok who swiped the patch ;)
Any one know where this took off to?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 08/13/2013 12:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
Ok who swiped the patch ;)
Any one know where this took off to?
perl-5.18.1-libc-1.patch is the same.
-rw-rw-r-- 1 1611 Mar 16 perl-5.16.3-libc-1.patch
lrwxrwxrwx 124 May 28 perl-5.18.0-libc-1.patch -
perl-5.16.3-libc-1
On 05/31/2013 07:33 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:39:25 +0200
Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote:
On 06/01/2013 12:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[snip]
Is there any interest in LFS for the Pi?
-- Bruce
Yes, absolutely. However, think as much as I can, I can not think
On 05/31/2013 08:21 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:36:14 -0400
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 05/31/2013 07:33 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
[snip]
See, that just might work. If I can convince the rest of the
household to permanently open port 80
On 05/15/2013 03:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
William Harrington wrote:
On May 15, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Not quite. I just put that out as an example of fetching via
svn/ftp/http and some examples of using regex expressions.
The changes are not great, but the edited diff below
In the change log:
[bdubbs] - Upgrade to gettest-0.18.2.1. Fixes #3298.
It should be gettext
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I have the following files installed when building udev-202
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/api-index-full.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/ch01.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/home.png
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/index.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/index.sgml
On 04/01/2013 09:49 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 09:35 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
This is in the Change log for the the SVN book that I just rendered
[matthew] - Upgrade to Udev-lfs-198-3 to fix issues with libdrm
installation in BLFS. Thanks to Nico P for the report
Confused again :)
Is the following still required with this --disable-install-libiberty
switch?
from the book...
Workaround a bug so that GCC doesn't install libiberty.a, which is
already provided by Binutils:
sed -i 's/install_to_$(INSTALL_DEST) //' libiberty/Makefile.in
or does just using
On 04/01/2013 11:45 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 10:16 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Confused again :)
Is the following still required with this --disable-install-libiberty
switch?
from the book...
Workaround a bug so that GCC doesn't install libiberty.a, which is
already
On 11/19/2012 08:29 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Paige Thompson wrote:
https://github.com/paigeadele/erraticOS/blob/master/usr/src/binutils-build/config.log
I just need to understand why these files are being linked this way
and what I need to do to fix it:
On 10/03/2012 09:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:52:14PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Actually it goes much farther for me. It isn't just this package or
that package but a general direction of linux seems to going down hill (
in my opinion) faster that a snowball headed
On 10/04/2012 08:15 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:50 -0400, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
The file system is ext3 the same as on each box. Rsync is not an option
as only the desktop machine has it at this time.
cp -av doesn't work either, the copy
On 10/03/2012 12:18 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
[putolin]
I am sorry to see this discussion turning into - If AAA succeed in
moving linux to BBB I am moving to *BSD - XXX is a solution trying
desperately to find a problem - The whole thing reminds me of a
patient with cancer - godzilla
On 10/02/2012 10:14 AM, Chris W. wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
good basis for this. My goal was to eventually replace SysVinit
completely with systemd. I fully
On 10/02/2012 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
If Lennart and redhat succeed in moving linux to systemd I am moving to
*BSD. I have talked to many BSD developers ( there was a linux fest on
saturday here) and they plan on sticking to a scripts base init
system. I am currently
On 10/02/2012 06:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I am just getting aggravated with the direction of linux with the
cgroups etc.
# CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
Lucky you. Until I get a LFS/BLFS desktop running I am stuck with cgroups
I'll be glad when I get LFS/BLFS built to KDE
On 10/02/2012 07:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I am wondering about making a change to LFS to combine some of the root
directories and /usr. Looking at the sizes on a fairly complete system:
22M /lib
4.9M/bin
7.6M/sbin
1.4G/usr/lib
300M/usr/bin
15M /usr/sbin
It
On 09/26/2012 09:19 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
$ cat /media/LFS72/etc/lfs-release
SVN-20120916
Built almost each package twice: with DESTDIR (I think only one did not
support some kind of DESTDIR) and without.
[putolin]
I cannot remember anymore, but think that one of
On 09/27/2012 12:16 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 27-09-2012 09:33, Baho Utot escreveu:
On 09/26/2012 09:19 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
$ cat /media/LFS72/etc/lfs-release
SVN-20120916
Built almost each package twice: with DESTDIR (I think only one did not
support some kind
I have just completed a LFS-7.0 build and I had some problems booting.
When I was going through the boot scripts I noticed that there are some
consistences with the book that is carry forward to the svn book.
In this section at the end I stills refers to
FYI
It appears that Gentoo has forked udev
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html
They want to produce a standalone udev
Maybe you folks are interested?
--
Ineptocracy
(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of
On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
FYI
It appears that Gentoo has forked udev
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html
They want to produce a standalone udev
Maybe you folks are interested?
It is worth watching. Our technique of using a custom Makefile
On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If gentoo succeeds then you have just another package
configure;make;make install ;)
I've always thought that configure (autotools) is overkill for linux
only packages, The kernel doesn't
On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If gentoo succeeds then you have just another package
configure;make;make install ;)
I've always thought that configure
On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If gentoo succeeds then you have just another package
configure
On 08/28/2012 05:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote
I have this enabled in this
--with-db=gdbm
maybe add it to this package, since gdbm is used in the base system?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 08/28/2012 06:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have this enabled in this
--with-db=gdbm
maybe add it to this package, since gdbm is used in the base system?
It's the default:
checking gdbm.h usability... yes
checking gdbm.h presence... yes
checking for gdbm.h
I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
sysvinit packages.
I know that the way LFS installs packages the sysvinit package would
over write the util-linux but.
Which should really be kept?
--
On 08/28/2012 06:30 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 08/29/2012 12:28 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
sysvinit packages.
I know that the way LFS installs packages the sysvinit
On 08/28/2012 06:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
sysvinit packages.
I know that the way LFS installs
On 06/01/2012 01:13 PM, Armin K. wrote:
[putolin]
Ah yes ... Some apps use those for loading modules. For example,
cyrus-sasl is one of those, but I've patched it not to use them, but the
.so ones directly. Among those is mpg123 which also uses .la files by
default but they can be
understimate the difficulties
of trying to see if my binary build matches yours using the same
instructions and the same versions of everything.
ĸen
I have placed my build of LFS 6.8 using Arch linux pacman package
manager onto github.
The URL: github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
Have a look
On 05/19/2012 09:26 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I've been holding back bringing this up on-list for a while because I
intended to do the bulk of the work and then present a working system to
the community for comment and review. I still intend to do that, but
given some recent discussions, I
On Sunday 29 January 2012 10:46:19 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Sigh.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTA0OTY
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
-- Bruce
I believe LFS is now working in this direction
Myth #8: The /usr merge will
On Monday 30 January 2012 12:35:54 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2012 10:46:19 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Sigh.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTA0OTY
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
-- Bruce
On Monday 30 January 2012 06:26:52 pm Gerard Beekmans wrote:
I think this concept is one of all/most the old farts are moving on...to
be taken over by the youngens who are now thinking that they are the
masters when thye haven't a clue for history.
I will take the ways of unix from the
On Monday 30 January 2012 07:40:11 pm Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Just don't fall into change for the sake of change.
Good point.
Lookup the bumblebee fiasco on google,
The bumble devs had a line rm -rf /usr /libwhat ever in a install
script so you installed the app and your /usr was
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 01:23:01 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm sure that systemd solves a problem for 1% of users, but for 99%,
it's not needed. I recently installed Fedora 16 on a virtual system
with exactly one partition. The listing below is what I got for a
simple 'mount' command.
On Thursday 12 January 2012 04:32:49 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to discuss the direction of LFS with respect to where upstream
developers appear to be going.
Currently we use sysvinit and udev as the basis of bringing up LFS. We
do not use an initd/initramfs or systemd.
LFS now
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 11:40:59 pm Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Now that I have access to SVN again, let me throw together a 1.0.1
tarball and upload it, with the recent changes I've made. (This does
include at least hackish support for /run.) That would have a better
chance of working than
On 01/03/2012 10:20 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:36:18PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
On 01/03/2012 03:44 PM, Ren? GARCIA wrote:
Hi,
I am using LFS 7.0 with LVM2/ext4 for all partitions excepted /boot
which is a primary partition using ext4.
I haven't followed the Bryan
Is the lvm hint by Bryan Kadzban still viable/relavent?
I would like to boot LFS installed to a lvm partition.
I have a 2 TB drive that I use and it is currently booting Arch linux on lvm.
I would like to convert to use LFS/BLFS. I would like to get away from Arch
now because of the bloat
of a LVM2 group you can still add grub the option
rd_LVM_VG=yourVGname to the linux line to enable a specific LVM2 group
when in initramfs.
I'm sorry but I don't have a step by step hint to give you. I needed
many reboots to manage LFS7 to run on LVM2.
Regards,
René
Le 03/01/2012 21:50, Baho
On 10/26/10 22:44, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Drew Ames wrote:
Now I have another question. How do I make the patch in the link above
into a .patch file that I can apply?
Do I fill out the Submitted By, Date, Initial Package Version,
Upstream Status, Origin, and Description, at the top, paste in
On 10/26/10 12:03, Michael Schmidt wrote:
Hi everybody!
I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when
installing LFS, is that there is no generic package management system
that you can use to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I
know, that the point of lfs
54 matches
Mail list logo
