There is an error in the following:
Create some directories now that are needed for tests, but will also be
used as a part of installation:
mkdir -pv /lib/{firmware,udev/devices/pts}
mkdir -pv /lib/firmware <-- This is not needed as
directory i
I see that pkgconfig has been removed from LFS and BLFS
Can the *.pc files be removed from /usr/lib/pkgconfig or are they still
needed?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 03/20/2014 08:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've noticed that our instructions for e2fsprogs put chattr and lsattr
> into /usr/bin. Shouldn't these be in /bin?
>
> -- Bruce
If you follow Filesystem Hierarchy Standard version 2.3 they are not in
placed into /bin.
I have not found them in th
On 03/02/2014 10:13 AM, William Harrington wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 8:22 AM, thomas wrote:
>
>> If I remember right, at least in previous versions of the kernel
>> sources
>> the target directory had been cleared before the headers were written.
>> That would be no good for the /tools/include d
On 03/02/2014 09:22 AM, thomas wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2014, 08:36 -0500 schrieb baho utot:
>> Why is the installation of the headers in the book like this
>>
>> make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install
>> cp -rv dest/include/* /tools/include
>>
>>
Why is the installation of the headers in the book like this
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install
cp -rv dest/include/* /tools/include
instead of
make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/tools/include headers_install
??
Would the latter be "just the same" or am I missing something here?
--
http://linux
On 12/29/2013 05:54 AM, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 10:15:22 +0100
>> From: Pierre Labastie
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] xz instructions from chapter 6
>>
>> Le 28/12/2013 22:20, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>> Aleksey Rybalkin wrote:
Hi.
xz
On 08/13/2013 12:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> Ok who swiped the patch ;)
>>
>> Any one know where this took off to?
> perl-5.18.1-libc-1.patch is the same.
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 1611 Mar 16 perl-5.16.3-libc-1.patch
> lrwxrwxrwx 124 May 28 p
Ok who swiped the patch ;)
Any one know where this took off to?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 05/31/2013 08:21 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:36:14 -0400
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>
>> On 05/31/2013 07:33 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> See, that just might work. If I can convince the rest of the
>
On 05/31/2013 07:33 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>> On Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:39:25 +0200
>> "Armin K." wrote:
>>
>> On 06/01/2013 12:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Is there any interest in LFS for the Pi?
>>>
>>> -- Bruce
>>>
> Yes, absolutely. However, think as much as I can, I c
On 05/15/2013 03:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> William Harrington wrote:
>> On May 15, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Not quite. I just put that out as an example of fetching via
>>> svn/ftp/http and some examples of using regex expressions.
>>>
>>> The changes are not great, but the e
In the change log:
[bdubbs] - Upgrade to gettest-0.18.2.1. Fixes #3298.
It should be gettext
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I have the following files installed when building udev-202
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/api-index-full.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/ch01.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/home.png
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/index.html
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/udev/index.sgml
/usr/sha
On 04/01/2013 11:45 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 10:16 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> Confused again :)
>>
>> Is the following still required with this --disable-install-libiberty
>> switch?
>>
>> from the book...
>> Workaround a bug so t
Confused again :)
Is the following still required with this --disable-install-libiberty
switch?
from the book...
Workaround a bug so that GCC doesn't install libiberty.a, which is
already provided by Binutils:
sed -i 's/install_to_$(INSTALL_DEST) //' libiberty/Makefile.in
or does just using th
On 04/01/2013 09:49 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 09:35 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> This is in the Change log for the the SVN book that I just rendered
>>
>> [matthew] - Upgrade to Udev-lfs-198-3 to fix issues with libdrm
>> installation in BLFS. Than
This is in the Change log for the the SVN book that I just rendered
[matthew] - Upgrade to Udev-lfs-198-3 to fix issues with libdrm
installation in BLFS. Thanks to Nico P for the report, and to Armin for
the fix.
In this section has
6.61. Udev-199 (Extracted from systemd-199)
has the informa
On 11/19/2012 08:29 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Paige Thompson wrote:
https://github.com/paigeadele/erraticOS/blob/master/usr/src/binutils-build/config.log
I just need to understand why these files are being linked this way
and what I need to do to fix it:
erra
On 10/04/2012 08:15 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:50 -0400, Baho Utot
> wrote:
>
>> The file system is ext3 the same as on each box. Rsync is not an option
>> as only the desktop machine has it at this time.
>> cp -av doesn't work ei
On 10/03/2012 09:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:52:14PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> Actually it goes much farther for me. It isn't just this package or
>> that package but a general direction of linux seems to going down hill (
>> in my opinion) fas
On 10/03/2012 12:18 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
[putolin]
> I am sorry to see this discussion turning into - If AAA succeed in
> moving linux to BBB I am moving to *BSD - XXX is a solution trying
> desperately to find a problem - The whole thing reminds me of a
> patient with cancer - In my
On 10/03/2012 11:25 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
>>> While I'm at it, should we remove *.la files in the libraries:
>>>
>>> find /usr/lib -name \*.la -delete
>> As a person who sometimes writes code against libraries in LFS, I'd
>> rather not. But this might fall into the same c
On 10/02/2012 07:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am wondering about making a change to LFS to combine some of the root
> directories and /usr. Looking at the sizes on a fairly complete system:
>
> 22M /lib
> 4.9M/bin
> 7.6M/sbin
> 1.4G/usr/lib
> 300M/usr/bin
> 15M /usr/sbin
>
On 10/02/2012 06:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> I am just getting aggravated with the direction of linux with the
>> cgroups etc.
> # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
Lucky you. Until I get a LFS/BLFS desktop running I am stuck with cgroups
>
>> I&
On 10/02/2012 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> If Lennart and redhat succeed in moving linux to systemd I am moving to
>> *BSD. I have talked to many BSD developers ( there was a linux fest on
>> saturday here) and they plan on sticking to a "scr
On 10/02/2012 10:14 AM, Chris W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
> finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
> good basis for this. My goal was to eventually replace SysVinit
> completely with systemd. I fully
On 09/27/2012 12:16 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 27-09-2012 09:33, Baho Utot escreveu:
>> On 09/26/2012 09:19 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> $ cat /media/LFS72/etc/lfs-release
>>> SVN-20120916
>>>
>>> Built almost each package twice: with
On 09/26/2012 09:19 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> $ cat /media/LFS72/etc/lfs-release
> SVN-20120916
>
> Built almost each package twice: with DESTDIR (I think only one did not
> support some kind of DESTDIR) and without.
[putolin]
>
> I cannot remember anymore, but think that one of 6.57.Sysk
On 08/31/2012 03:34 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> It is stated in LFS that --strip-unneeded should not be used on
> libraries, as the static ones will be destroyed.
>
> I found this page:
> http://www.technovelty.org/linux/
>
> Which states that --strip-unneeded is safe to use on both shared and
> st
I have just completed a LFS-7.0 build and I had some problems booting.
When I was going through the boot scripts I noticed that there are some
consistences with the book that is carry forward to the svn book.
In this section at the end I stills refers to
/etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.
On 08/28/2012 06:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
>>
>> I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
>> sysvinit packages.
On 08/28/2012 06:30 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 12:28 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
>>
>> I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
>> sysvinit packages.
>> I know that
I am building LFS-7.0 but this may also be true of the latest LFS
I have found that mountpoint and its man page is in util-linux and
sysvinit packages.
I know that the way LFS installs packages the sysvinit package would
over write the util-linux but.
Which should really be kept?
--
http:
On 08/28/2012 06:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> I have this enabled in this
>>--with-db=gdbm
>>
>> maybe add it to this package, since gdbm is used in the base system?
> It's the default:
>
> checking gdbm.h usability... yes
>
I have this enabled in this
--with-db=gdbm
maybe add it to this package, since gdbm is used in the base system?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 08/28/2012 05:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>>> On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bru
On 08/28/2012 04:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, B
On 08/28/2012 01:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>>> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>> If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package"
>>
On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> If gentoo succeeds then you have "just another package"
>> configure;make;make install ;)
> I've always thought that configure (autotools) is o
On 08/28/2012 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>> It appears that Gentoo has forked udev
>>
>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html
>>
>> They want to produce a standalone udev
>>
>> Maybe you folks
FYI
It appears that Gentoo has forked udev
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7125718.html
They want to produce a standalone udev
Maybe you folks are interested?
--
Ineptocracy
(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of
On 06/01/2012 01:13 PM, Armin K. wrote:
[putolin]
> Ah yes ... Some apps use those for loading modules. For example,
> cyrus-sasl is one of those, but I've patched it not to use them, but the
> .so ones directly. Among those is mpg123 which also uses .la files by
> default but they can be overwri
months have suggested that this
> problem is no longer present, but don't understimate the difficulties
> of trying to see if my binary build matches yours using the same
> instructions and the same versions of everything.
>
> ĸen
I have placed my build of LFS 6.8 using Arch linux
On 05/19/2012 09:26 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> I've been holding back bringing this up on-list for a while because I
> intended to do the bulk of the work and then present a working system to
> the community for comment and review. I still intend to do that, but
> given some recent discussions, I
On Monday 30 January 2012 07:40:11 pm Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > Just don't fall into change for the sake of change.
>
> Good point.
>
> > Lookup the bumblebee fiasco on google,
> > The bumble devs had a line rm -rf /usr /lib in a install
> > script so you installed the app and your /usr was gon
On Monday 30 January 2012 06:26:52 pm Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > I think this concept is one of all/most the old farts are moving on...to
> > be taken over by the youngens who are now thinking that they are the
> > masters when thye haven't a clue for history.
> >
> > I will take the ways of unix
On Monday 30 January 2012 12:35:54 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 January 2012 10:46:19 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Sigh.
> >>
> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0OTY
> >> http://www.freedeskto
On Sunday 29 January 2012 10:46:19 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Sigh.
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0OTY
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
>
>-- Bruce
I believe LFS is now working in this direction
Myth #8: The /usr merge wi
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 01:23:01 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm sure that systemd solves a problem for 1% of users, but for 99%,
> it's not needed. I recently installed Fedora 16 on a virtual system
> with exactly one partition. The listing below is what I got for a
> simple 'mount' command.
On Thursday 12 January 2012 04:32:49 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'd like to discuss the direction of LFS with respect to where upstream
> developers appear to be going.
>
> Currently we use sysvinit and udev as the basis of bringing up LFS. We
> do not use an initd/initramfs or systemd.
>
> LFS now
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 11:40:59 pm Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Now that I have access to SVN again, let me throw together a 1.0.1
> tarball and upload it, with the recent changes I've made. (This does
> include at least hackish support for /run.) That would have a better
> chance of working t
On 01/03/2012 10:20 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:36:18PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
On 01/03/2012 03:44 PM, Ren? GARCIA wrote:
Hi,
I am using LFS 7.0 with LVM2/ext4 for all partitions excepted /boot
which is a primary partition using ext4.
I haven't followed the
LVM2 group
> when in initramfs.
>
> I'm sorry but I don't have a step by step hint to give you. I needed
> many reboots to manage LFS7 to run on LVM2.
>
> Regards,
> René
>
> Le 03/01/2012 21:50, Baho Utot a écrit :
>> Is the lvm hint by Bryan Kadzban still
Is the lvm hint by Bryan Kadzban still viable/relavent?
I would like to boot LFS installed to a lvm partition.
I have a 2 TB drive that I use and it is currently booting Arch linux on lvm.
I would like to convert to use LFS/BLFS. I would like to get away from Arch
now because of the bloat an
On 10/26/10 22:44, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Drew Ames wrote:
>
>> Now I have another question. How do I make the patch in the link above
>> into a .patch file that I can apply?
>>
>> Do I fill out the Submitted By, Date, Initial Package Version,
>> Upstream Status, Origin, and Description, at the top,
On 10/26/10 12:03, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
>
> I was wondering: one of the things that gives me a headache when
> installing LFS, is that there is no generic package management system
> that you can use to install the basic system software (Chapter 6). I
> know, that the point o
57 matches
Mail list logo
