My host system is Fedora(version 5, I believe-how would I check?), and am in
the process of attempting to install/configure binutils, LFS 6.2, page 5.3.1.
I was running into an error running the following command:
binutils-2.16.1/configure --prefix=/tools --disable-nls
I modified the
On 7/10/07, Clyde Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My host system is Fedora(version 5, I believe-how would I check?), and am in
the process of attempting to install/configure binutils, LFS 6.2, page 5.3.1.
I was running into an error running the following command:
run cat
Clyde Reed wrote:
My host system is Fedora(version 5, I believe-how would I check?),
I have not used Fedora 5, but my Debian box says its version in
/etc/debian_version, maybe there is a similar file in Fedora.
What am I missing--what do I need to do to make the configuration work?
I can
i am new to lfs i downloaded the livecd i am using swap file now how can i
resume from that swap file into live cd
please help me
-
5, 50, 500, 5000. Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click here.--
To all those involved in the soon to appear flaming session,... my appologies.
On 10/07/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/07, Ross Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all Ive hit a bit of a stumbling block and cant seem to BASH script
my way out of it :(
As most of you will
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 07:57:42AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
http://gitweb.dwcab.com/?p=gado.git;a=blob;f=spec/linux.spec;hb=HEAD
Kernel documentation is all well and good, but I find it easier to
just untar a _current_ kernel on the rare occasions I need to read
the docs. That gives me
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:32:16PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
Snipped other lists, please don't cross-post, particularly for a
list such as this one where only subscribers are allowed to post.
I've tried this approach (and several variants of it) to attempt this
with the vanilla kernel
Little OT.
Why is System.map optional but recommended?
What is it for?
And what should it be named? I see that instructions
in CLFS
http://cross-lfs.org/view/1.0.0/x86_64/bootable/kernel.html
that it is copied with a name that contains the version.
--Luca
--
On 7/10/07, Luca Dionisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is System.map optional but recommended?
What is it for?
And what should it be named? I see that instructions
in CLFS
http://cross-lfs.org/view/1.0.0/x86_64/bootable/kernel.html
that it is copied with a name that contains the version.
Tijnema wrote:
On 7/10/07, Ross Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all Ive hit a bit of a stumbling block and cant seem to BASH script
my way out of it :(
As most of you will know when building binary packages for UNIX-like
systems the output of
make install
is usually re-directed
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:47:29PM -0300, ICMP Request wrote:
Just to query some of this -
2. Extract it to a dir, usually under /usr/src:
Why ? Apart from when I'm in chroot, I always build in ~/ as a
normal user. If you run into kernel errors when building as root
(seen that twice, I
If your use of 'raw' is the same as mine (the kernel's own
headers, not sanitised for userspace), this is definitely a very
bad idea for 2.6. Fortunately, the kernel can now sanitise its own
headers, which is what we do when we build LFS (fedora uses this,
distros will undoubtedly move to
On 7/10/07, Craig Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a bit confused by sanitise its own headers. I have heard rumor
that the raw kernel headers are recently behaving thereby rendering
the linux-headers package/project irrellavent/obsolete. Is this true,
or do I just not understand the
Which linux-headers project is that? The CLFS one? For x86, there's no
reason to not use the sanitization scripts that are shipped with the
kernel, i.e. make headers_install. Is this what you refer to as the
raw headers?
I am referring to the linux-libc-headers package per the LFS
Heya Ken!
Why ? Apart from when I'm in chroot, I always build in ~/ as a
normal user. If you run into kernel errors when building as root
(seen that twice, I think) you will find that upstream doesn't
really care. For the book, the kernel version has been tested, so
it shouldn't be a
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:47:40PM -0300, ICMP Request wrote:
Heya Ken!
Hello, Mr Request ! ;-)
/usr/include was always the place to put the kernel headers or am I
wrong? Where do you put them?
When I build a new system, I use the kernel's own *sanitised*
headers (since about 2.6.18 or
Hi List!
I write from Argentina! and this is my first time when I write to you!
I have a question:
In chapter 6.60 of LFS 6.2 'Cleaning' the book tell me if I logout when,
when I next login, I will mount virtual files when explain in chapter 6.2.2and
6.2.3 before to re-enter to chroot
17 matches
Mail list logo
