Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

Cool, thanks! Michael Stahl wrote: > On 20/10/11 09:00, Noel Grandin wrote: >> Hi >> >> Building on Windows using Visual Studio, running into a build error in >> ScriptProviderForJava. >> >> Trimmed build log attached. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Thanks, Noel Grandin > > have had this problem myself to

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||42178 Version|unspecified

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

Here is my build_error.log http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3450416/build_error.log build_error.log As I already stated, when I remove all mentions of adabasui, I no longer get the adabasuilo.so error, but I still get the sdbtlo.so error. I am not sure if adabasui is the problem, or if

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: writerperfect/source

At 9:48pm -0400 Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 7:24pm -0400 Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Fridrich Štrba wrote: for (std::map::const_iterator iter = mHash.begin(); - iter != mHash.end(); ++iter) + iter != mHash.end(); iter++) Err, in terms of coding style, is a pre to post increment operator mer

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: writerperfect/source

At 7:24pm -0400 Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Fridrich Štrba wrote: New commits: commit 38cf494f90d19d1673773437cd52e8f0cfbf4eb5 Author: Fridrich Štrba Date: Tue Oct 25 01:11:49 2011 +0200 White-space change to fix messy mix of different coding styles [...] diff --git a/writerperfect/source/filte

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] error checking in Base ODBC

On 10/24/2011 05:59 PM, Terrence Enger wrote: I shall proceed with that. And, unless somebody tells me otherwise, I shall indulge myself with OSL_ENSURE() on the return values. Note that OSL_ENSURE, OSL_ASSERT, and OSL_FAIL should only be used for logic errors (i.e., the program detects that

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Cherry-pick to 3-4? commit f33232a3ff67d7a4def830fa6fda78ef5f255ae7

See fdo#36950 for discussion. It doesn't seem to make sense to push a backport of the commit to the 3-4 branch, as we don't know if it actually helps the problem. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation error in binfilter/bf_svx/

Hi Stephan, Le 24/10/2011 13:04, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : > On 10/24/2011 12:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >> [...] >> error: 'fprintf' was not declared in this scope >> dmake: Error code 1, while making >> '../../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/svx_xattr.obj' > > Oops, had erroneously been pushed. F

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in ScFiltersTest

Hey, 2011/10/24 Eike Rathke : > Hi, > > On Thursday, 2011-10-20 23:53:39 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > >> Kohei, Eike: Any ideas why our xls import of these cells goes wrong in >> a windows build. It seems that none of our Linux or mac builds has a >> problem with this cell import. I'm looking i

Re: [Libreoffice] IDL "hyper" / Java "long"

> ... .idl parser takes 'unsigned' of 'unsigned hyper' > and ignores the 'hyper' > I tried with "unsigned asdf" and obtained an error: "Illegal syntax or missing type in parameter declaration: syntax error, unexpected IDL_IDENTIFIER, expecting IDL_HYPER or IDL_LONG or IDL_SHORT" in

Re: [Libreoffice] IDL "hyper" / Java "long"

On 10/24/2011 08:46 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: Why, however, it should work if the .idl file instead uses unsigned hyper I do not know. Wild guess: may it be that the .idl parser takes 'unsigned' of 'unsigned hyper' and ignores the 'hyper', effectively mapping that to an unsigned 32-bit value and g

Re: [Libreoffice] IDL "hyper" / Java "long"

Hi MarcinGutman, On Saturday, 2011-10-22 00:42:32 +0200, MarcinGutman wrote: > > Calc add-ins do not support functions that take or > > return UNO type hyper. > > .. however, it should work if the .idl file instead > > uses unsigned hyper ... You omitted some words that slightly change the meani

Re: [Libreoffice] IDL "hyper" / Java "long"

Hi, On Friday, 2011-10-21 18:37:34 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > As I wrote at > , Calc > add-ins do not support functions that take or return UNO type hyper. > > So I think that explains why an add-in using hyper in the .idl file > does

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Frac function in calc/BASIC

Hi Regina, On Friday, 2011-10-21 13:20:42 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > For CALC there are some problems. A function FRAC is not defined in > ODF1.2 [1]. Markus already gave a hint why we wouldn't even need a FRAC function in Calc as MOD(x,1) does it. However, the naming question remains for

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in ScFiltersTest

Hi, On Thursday, 2011-10-20 23:53:39 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Kohei, Eike: Any ideas why our xls import of these cells goes wrong in > a windows build. It seems that none of our Linux or mac builds has a > problem with this cell import. I'm looking if perhaps my mingw build > shows the sam

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in tail_build

On 20/10/11 09:00, Noel Grandin wrote: Hi Building on Windows using Visual Studio, running into a build error in ScriptProviderForJava. Trimmed build log attached. Any ideas? Thanks, Noel Grandin have had this problem myself today, the command for compiling java files does not do the right

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about resource-IDs

Hi Regina, 2011/10/24 Regina Henschel : > Hi all, > > I want to add some line ends, which are used in UML diagrams, to > standard.soe. Problem is the localization of the names of that new line > ends. Please correct me where I'm wrong in the following: > > In svx/source/dialog/sdstring.src the res

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Cherry-pick to 3-4? commit f33232a3ff67d7a4def830fa6fda78ef5f255ae7

Hi Tor, Tor Lillqvist píše v St 19. 10. 2011 v 10:42 +0300: > OK, so technically not possible as cherry-pick because of the git repo > combination, I guess, but anyway, should this fix be cherry-picked to > the 3.4 branch? It is supposed to fix the Windows build so that a > 64-bit Explorer extensi

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] error checking in Base ODBC

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 10:32 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 11:11 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > > Hmm. Is my question really of no interest? Or did I just time it > > badly with respect to the big conference? > > It's the wrong list really, libreoffice-dev is a better cho

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED][PUSHED-3-4] cherry-pick to fix .sdw import in 3-4

Caolán McNamara píše v Pá 21. 10. 2011 v 14:07 +0100: > I want to cherry-pick the attached commit back to 3-4, the .sdw import > of the binfilter is broken otherwise as timar noted. Looked fine => pushed into 3-4 branch, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Eliminate ambiguous conversion to cppu::OWeakObject (in svx/form)

On 10/22/2011 11:52 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: Similar to the previous patch. pushed, too Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Eliminate ambiguous conversion to cppu::OWeakObject (in reportdesign)

On 10/22/2011 11:48 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: This fixes the following error: /source/libo/libo/reportdesign/source/core/sdr/ReportDrawPage.cxx:96:24: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'SvxShapeControl' to base class 'cppu::OWeakObject': class SvxShapeControl -> class SvxShapeTex

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Use NSString in template specification instead of objc_object (in macosxspell)

On 10/22/2011 11:45 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: This fixes the following warnings: /source/libo/libo/lingucomponent/source/spellcheck/macosxspell/macspellimp.cxx:176:39: error: reference to type 'const value_type' (aka 'objc_object *const') could not bind to an rvalue of type 'id' postspdict.p

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] SystemFlavor NSStrings should not be const (in vcl/aqua/.../dtrans/)

On 10/22/2011 11:43 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: This fixes an issue where const NSString* is assigned to a non-const NSString* field in FlavorMap. The NSString cannot be const when passed to an objective-C method expecting a non-const value (the NSStrings from flavor map are passed to such metho

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Argument to setTitle cannot be const (in fpicker/aqua)

On 10/22/2011 11:41 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: This fixes the following warning: /source/libo/libo/fpicker/source/aqua/ControlHelper.cxx:244:39: error: cannot initialize a parameter of type 'NSString *' with an lvalue of type 'const NSString *' I did not see another solution so quickly than r

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 40701, which changed state. Bug 40701 Summary: Base crashes with runtime error when "Find Record" button is clicked with certain documents https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40701 What|Old Value

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3-4][PUSHED-3-4] Revised patches: fdo#40701 Base crashes when "Find Record" button is clicked

Lionel Elie Mamane píše v Pá 16. 09. 2011 v 23:50 +0200: > Here are revised patches as per Eike's comments. > > They fix fdo#40701, which is a crasher, a regression and a "most > annoying 3.4 bug". > > There are two versions of it: > * The one suggested by Eike > * The one preferred by me You c

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] hyphenation fixes

On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:18 +0200, Németh László wrote: > I'm sorry, here are the missing patches. Many thanks for the integration. ok, pushed all these now. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Continuation of Fix for Bug fdo#41997 clean VCL enumeration

Hi Olivier, On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 08:08 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Here is the patch to clean further, as requested. Wonderful ... thanks for that :-) I'll push it to the feature/gtk3 branch which I hope to merge tomorrow. Thanks, Michael. -- micha

[Libreoffice] Question about resource-IDs

Hi all, I want to add some line ends, which are used in UML diagrams, to standard.soe. Problem is the localization of the names of that new line ends. Please correct me where I'm wrong in the following: In svx/source/dialog/sdstring.src the resource-IDs of kind RID_SVXSTR_LEND0 are connected

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [REVIEW] patch for fdo38286 EDITING: Crash when inserting a constant in a query

julien2412 píše v So 22. 10. 2011 v 02:33 -0700: > I commited (48cdc0318b348c51742339b243dc05546148b335) and pushed on Master > the patch by adding a comment too. > I put the fdo bug to "resolved". > > I let you see about 3.4 since it needs review. The check for "pNode->count()" makes perfect se

Re: [Libreoffice] make check fails in ScFiltersTest

Hi Markus, On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:53 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > Kohei, Eike: Any ideas why our xls import of these cells goes wrong in > a windows build. It seems that none of our Linux or mac builds has a > problem with this cell import. I'm looking if perhaps my mingw build > shows th

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] vcl: Printing UI "page range" autofocus

Hi Maxim, Michael, At 15:24 24-10-2011, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Maxime, On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:52 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > At 06:50 22-10-2011, Maxim Iorsh wrote: > >When the user selects "Pages" radio button in the Range section, it is very > >reasonable to expect that she would n

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 41022, which changed state. Bug 41022 Summary: Activation Order Crashes Address Database https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41022 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] vcl: Printing UI "page range" autofocus

Hi Michael, Christophe, The accessibility issue is important indeed. I think a solution could be to automatically move the focus only in response to mouse click, and not keys (either tab or up/down arrow). This could solve the problem of keyboard / screen reader users. >From the technical point o

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][PUSHED] patch for fdo#41022 Activation Order Crashes Address Database

Petr Mladek píše v Po 24. 10. 2011 v 14:52 +0200: > Petr Mladek píše v Po 24. 10. 2011 v 11:23 +0200: > > Could you please test the attached patch? You might apply it using: > > > >git am 0001-activation-order-crashes-address-database-fdo-41022.patch > > It did not sort the very last element

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Also use .NET2003 build fix for Clang (in toolkit)

On 10/24/2011 01:26 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Pushed, thanks. [had forgotten to add the PUSHED marker] ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Build: Turning off Debug after enabling it for a module

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:27 +0200, Andor E wrote: > I did remove unxlngi6.pro. The configure.log shows that debug is > turned off. I might have to add, that I'm building OOo. Well - I'd grab someone on IRC (#libreoffice-dev on irc.freenode.net) to ask, we need a lot more information about

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] vcl: Printing UI "page range" autofocus

Hi Maxime, On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:52 +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > At 06:50 22-10-2011, Maxim Iorsh wrote: > >When the user selects "Pages" radio button in the Range section, it is very > >reasonable to expect that she would now want to specify the range. Thus > >moving > >the focus automa

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for fdo#41022 Activation Order Crashes Address Database

Petr Mladek píše v Po 24. 10. 2011 v 11:23 +0200: > Could you please test the attached patch? You might apply it using: > >git am 0001-activation-order-crashes-address-database-fdo-41022.patch It did not sort the very last element "FaxNumber" from the sample document. Well, it was a simple

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] vcl: Printing UI "page range" autofocus

Hi, At 06:50 22-10-2011, Maxim Iorsh wrote: When the user selects "Pages" radio button in the Range section, it is very reasonable to expect that she would now want to specify the range. Thus moving the focus automatically to the page range edit box would save the user a mouse click. Unreques

Re: [Libreoffice] Trouble of showing LibreOffice/OpenOffice toolbar back

Hi Noel & co. I'll CC the public dev list on this since it may be of wider interest. On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 11:24 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > something like this should work ( although doesn't on master or 3.4 > but... does appear to work on 3.3 :-/ ) seems like this really is a > regress

Re: [Libreoffice] Build: Turning off Debug after enabling it for a module

Hi, I did remove unxlngi6.pro. The configure.log shows that debug is turned off. I might have to add, that I'm building OOo. Thanks eymux On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:00 +0200, Andor E wrote: >> I have done a build debug=t on a m

Re: [Libreoffice] Build: Turning off Debug after enabling it for a module

Hi there, On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:00 +0200, Andor E wrote: > I have done a build debug=t on a module. Now every time I build this > module, debug symbols are build - no matter, if I have the debug > parameter or not. Is there a trick to turn a debug build off? That is odd :-) quite possi

[Libreoffice] Build: Turning off Debug after enabling it for a module

Hi, I have done a build debug=t on a module. Now every time I build this module, debug symbols are build - no matter, if I have the debug parameter or not. Is there a trick to turn a debug build off? Greetings eymux ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOff

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Also use .NET2003 build fix for Clang (in toolkit)

On 10/22/2011 11:47 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: By far the quickest is to use the already existing fix for .NET2003 for clang as well. In the future, this is something that possibly should be avoided in the class hierarchy, there are more classes in the code base that expose a similar problem.

Re: [Libreoffice] unowinreg.dll usage

Hi Michael, *, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 23/10/11 14:10, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > >> Tor I am not whining because it is dll, I am asking because it is >> another weird file libreoffice requests me to download, and for this >> one I was unable to think of any usage.

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation error in binfilter/bf_svx/

On 10/24/2011 12:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Compiling: binfilter/bf_svx/source/xoutdev/svx_xattr.cxx /home/jbf/LibO/master/clone/binfilter/binfilter/bf_svx/source/xoutdev/svx_xattr.cxx: In member function 'virtual binfilter::SfxPoolItem* binfilter::XFillAttrSetItem::Create(SvStream&, USHOR

[Libreoffice] Novell/SUSE - license statement ...

Someone pointed out that we don't have one of these for SUSE employee's contributions which is a fair point :-) so here it is: In line with our general corporate policy, code contributed to open source projects will be made available under the terms of that project's license.

[Libreoffice] compilation error in binfilter/bf_svx/

Hi, I have a problem with binfilter (./g pull -r this morning, make clean, make), compilation fails with the following message: Compiling: binfilter/bf_svx/source/xoutdev/svx_xattr.cxx /home/jbf/LibO/master/clone/binfilter/binfilter/bf_svx/source/xoutdev/svx_xattr.cxx: In member function 'virtual

Re: [Libreoffice] unowinreg.dll usage

On 23/10/11 14:10, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: Tor I am not whining because it is dll, I am asking because it is another weird file libreoffice requests me to download, and for this one I was unable to think of any usage. interesting that it is now downloaded; back in OOo it used to be cross-compile

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] String::CompareIngoreCaseToAscii

On 21/10/11 16:04, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi August, Well - of course, it'd be nice to have some more complex tests of StarBasic (and VBA) macros, potentially loaded from .bas files inside a unit test. Noel - do you have any really nasty syntax / built-in basic functionality corner

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for fdo#41022 Activation Order Crashes Address Database

Hi Julien, you rock that you tracked it down to the problematic code. julien2412 píše v So 22. 10. 2011 v 07:34 -0700: > Hello, > > I propose the patch attached to correct the bug. > I had put the backtrace of the error in the tracker. > > It compiles ok and it doesn't crash. It seems to respec

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status and Keyword

Jan Holesovsky schrieb: - you do not have to know about the keyword to set the status, because the UI for that is more convenient than typing the keyword - and resetting it back to NEW / RESOLVED is easier too; I am afraid in many cases the reporters forget to reset the keyword after having pro

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status and Keyword

Hi Rainer, On 2011-10-24 at 07:10 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > I left some notes concerning use of "NEEDINFO Status" and "NEEDINFO > Keyword" on > . > > If you believe that discussion is required we should do that on >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] String::CompareIngoreCaseToAscii

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 07:59 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > The funny thing is that it broke a "make check" build but not a > tinderbox's plain "make" build (which also executes the unit tests, but > appears to cluster them at the end of the build, when sfx2 has already > been built anyway).

Re: [Libreoffice] NEEDINFO Status and Keyword

Hi Julien, IMHO there is no need to correct those 7 reports with a bulk change. Currently it's enough if we try to use "the Bugzilla dashboard" fairly unique and modify deviations when we see them and also do comments or similar in the bugs. But if NEEDINFO Status shouldn't be used, would i

Re: [Libreoffice] NEEDINFO Status and Keyword

Hi Rainer, I've used this status recently and I'm sorry for this. I'm going to reread the links you had given me about bugtracking : http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport and http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details and correct this. But if NEEDINFO Status shouldn't be used, wo