Hi David,
David Tardon píše v Čt 09. 08. 2012 v 07:17 +0200:
We will loose possible contributors that way. Not an option. Patch submittal
has to work hasslefree and out of the box. This is really critical: there
has
to be no extra step at all for patch submittal otherwise we failed.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:15:48AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
David Tardon píše v Čt 09. 08. 2012 v 07:17 +0200:
irony
It has worked hasslefree and out of the box while we have been using
email.
/irony
It was a precondition for the gerrit work that the email submission +
direct push
be to do with git-review
as we do with other external stuff:
Downloading and installing a local copy in ./download. That would ensure it
to be universally available and be up to date.
Best,
Bjoern
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
for patch submittal otherwise we failed.
Thinking a bit about this, another possibility would be to do with git-review
as we do with other external stuff:
Downloading and installing a local copy in ./download. That would ensure it
to be universally available and be up to date.
I know that michael
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 07:55:45AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I know that michael disagree with me on that, but I prefer dev-tools
to be in ... dev-tools.git
one can install it as he see fit. and you get the version you
want/need regardless where you are in the source tree...
Well,
Quoting Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
Thinking a bit about this, another possibility would be to do with
git-review
as we do with other external stuff:
Downloading and installing a local copy in ./download. That would
ensure
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 07:55:45AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I know that michael disagree with me on that, but I prefer dev-tools
to be in ... dev-tools.git
one can install it as he see fit. and you
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:57:01AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
no it would not, because if I swith to branch 3-5... what version do I
have then ?
If you switch -- the same. ./download would install it into solenv/bin, which
is not changed by git checkout. Also I would suggest to backport
Hi Bjoern,
On 02.08.2012 23:21, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GitReview
so:
- what are the experiences?
- should we recommend it in general?
I am really happy with git review. It has killer features that i don't
want to miss anymore,
in fact
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:19:09PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
But IMHO git-review MUST work out of the box then -- without any setup.
No! You don't dump a copy of git, bash and binutils, don't you?
Because they are install with ~all systems and are available on all system as a
nicely
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:52:03PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:19:09PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
Like described in link above, you have three options here:
pypi-system-wide, pypi-user-local and distro package.
No other options please.
Most people
Python/Perl/Haskell/Brainfuck scripting in the end anyway). If the feedback by
current users of git review is positive and deemed suitable for firsttime
users, I would suggest, if possible, to dump a copy that can work standalone
into the core repo root. Even if it might be outdated compared
From David Ostrovsky david.ostrov...@gmx.de:
David Ostrovsky has uploaded a new change for review.
Change subject: git-review integration: .gitreview for core repository added
..
git-review integration: .gitreview for core
From James E. Blair cor...@gnu.org:
James E. Blair has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: git-review integration: .gitreview for core repository added
..
Patch Set 1: (3 inline comments)
Hi. Hope you don't mind
From Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com:
Björn Michaelsen has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: git-review integration: .gitreview for core repository added
..
Patch Set 1: Looks good to me
15 matches
Mail list logo
