On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:52:03PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> > Like described in link above, you have three options here: >> > pypi-system-wide, pypi-user-local and distro package. >> > No other options please. >> >> Most people wont even know what pypi-system-wide is and dont want to know. >> And >> they shouldnt need to. >> >> We will loose possible contributors that way. Not an option. Patch submittal >> has to work hasslefree and out of the box. This is really critical: there has >> to be no extra step at all for patch submittal otherwise we failed. > > Thinking a bit about this, another possibility would be to do with git-review > as we do with other external stuff: > Downloading and installing a local copy in "./download". That would ensure it > to be universally available and be up to date.
I know that michael disagree with me on that, but I prefer dev-tools to be in ... dev-tools.git one can install it as he see fit. and you get the version you want/need regardless where you are in the source tree... Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice