On 08/03/2022, Julian Daich wrote:
> El 6/3/22 a las 14:27, Pen-Yuan Hsing escribió:
>>
>> Dear Julian,
>>
>> Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0?
>>
>> https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2
>>> It
Dear Julian,
Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0?
https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2
It has a strongly-reciprocal variant which is like the GPL but for
physical objects:
https://ohwr.org/cern_ohl_s_v2.txt
Is there something you're trying
On 1/25/22 12:48, Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:16:36 -0500
Richard Stallman wrote:
If you explain in a few lines what issues you include in "hardware
freedom", I could see what attitude or attitudes I have towards those
issues. They may be quite different
Dear libreplanet,
Only a few precious days left, but I just saw the following post by Drew
DeVault titled "Help Chile write free software values, privacy, and
digital sovereignty into their constitution":
https://drewdevault.com/2022/01/19/Help-Chile-promote-digital-freedoms.html
Relevant
Quick note:
There is the Open Source Hardware Association which maintains the
definition of Open Source Hardware here which enshrines the four
freedoms for free software into hardware designs:
https://www.oshwa.org/definition/
Yes, I fully recognize and acknowledge that they use the term
Can you upload it to the Internet Archive? (https://www.archive.org/)
And if you can upload the "source" of your videos that would be even
better! :D
On 09/12/2020, Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss
wrote:
> On 09/12/2020 03:53, msunet wrote:
>> Do you have that iso available somewhere that
On 9/25/20 10:51 AM, Denver Gingerich wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:34:28AM +0800, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
2. To my surprise, the highly proprietary messaging app WhatsApp uses the
GPL-licensed implementation of the Signal protocol developed by Open Whisper
Systems for its self-proclaimed
On 9/25/20 10:35 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
* Pen-Yuan Hsing [2020-09-25 04:35]:
This reminds me of two worrying examples I recently saw where even
GPL-licensed software are still used to create proprietary software!
1. As someone with an academic background, I've seen and used many
statistics
On 9/25/20 10:12 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
* Pen-Yuan Hsing [2020-09-25 04:08]:
... a big
majority of new software published on platforms such as GitLab or GitHub
uses permissive licenses with MIT being one of the most popular. I
distinctly remember a graph published, probably by GitHub
On 9/25/20 9:44 AM, Pedro Lucas Porcellis wrote:
That's really cool! I knew that sourcehut is aiming to be a fully free
replacement for platforms like GitHub, but had wrongly assumed it to use a
permissive license. One more good example of a business around copyleft free
software (maybe we
On 9/22/20 11:08 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
Important topic.
Some links:
https://media.libreplanet.org/mgoblin_media/media_entries/2076/bkuhn-state-of-the-copyleft-union.webm
https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/licenses
see footnotes and links there too, such as
On 9/23/20 6:15 AM, Ali Reza Hayati wrote:
Yes, that is then not any more free software, it becomes proprietary.
Yes. It becomes proprietary and proprietary software is harmful as it
doesn't respect userfreedom.
> ..
What we're talking about is not whether they are free or not, it's
On 9/23/20 5:28 AM, Yasuaki Kudo wrote:
I would really like to hear broad philosophical arguments concerning this.
Although I am no expert, it seems the crux of the problem is "intellectual
property" itself?
Broadly-speaking yes. And when it comes to software, it specifically
concerns
Hi Jim,
1. I'm embarrassed to say that as a dues-paying member of the FSF since
2009, I didn't know there's a team of volunteers who can help compose a
response until this post from you!
Since the paper I linked to was from 2017, the journal will certainly
accept for consideration, but
I'm afraid I have to agree with Marinus on this point.
Interesting idea to `grep` the licenses on a Debian VPS system, but I
think they represent a particular subset of software, many of which have
been core components of GNU/Linux for a long time, when copyleft
licenses likely had a larger
That's EXACTLY why we need Copyleft. We need to push forward and show
that companies and products can be built around licenses like the GPL.
For instance, sourcehut (AGPL) is one of the most promising examples of
a company built around a complete free and open-source ecosystem, and
which truly
(whew, finally changed my registration on this list to my FSF member
alias address! :D)
Ugh.
I don't know if it's by chance, but recently I've read many an opinion
claiming that copyleft free software licenses such as the GNU GPLv3 are,
among other terrible qualities:
1. Viral
2. Cancerous
Hi Roberto,
I don't know if this will fit your needs, but I've been building a
personal list of free software replacements for common proprietary
programs (I know there are many lists like this), and it includes a
section on online forms:
https://gitlab.com/penyuan/libreplacements/#surveys
Dear libreplanet,
I'm not sure of the best place to share this, but given it might be
related to software freedom, I thought I might as well post it here.
I just stumbled upon an upcoming meeting about "Governance of Digitally
Transformed Societies" seemingly under the auspices of the
On 18/03/2019 08:30, Ineiev wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 05:32:35PM +, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
(2) Outside of software, I think it is also crucial to consider
everything else (e.g., teaching material like artwork, multimedia,
text, etc.). Specifically, there should be discussion around free
Hi all,
Much has already been said, so I'd just like to suggest a few quick
things for reference:
(1) There is a very clear and informative graphic delineating the
differences between what is free (as in freedom, not free of charge)
software, open source software, and copylefted software
Dear Libreplanet,
Sorry I'm not quite sure who best to ask, but I recently received a
mailing list posting for a group I'm part of looking for a good "online
membership management system". I'm pasting their requirements below.
Note that AFAIK they are quite cost sensitive since they have
Thanks John for your and the entire team's efforts!
I am wondering: Have you and the other organisers considered depositing
all the editable slides and recordings on Archive.org or Wikimedia
Commons? They both sound like potentially good homes to me.
On 30/03/18 18:10, John Sullivan wrote:
Hi all, just to have it in our collective minds, here's this year's
Global Legal Hackathon:
http://globallegalhackathon.com/
At first glance I think there's a good chance to pitch a project at this
event to hack on. Maybe an improvement on a license? Or developing an
easy-to-use app to
]
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intel_AMT_versions=792147452
Pen-Yuan Hsing:
Dear Libreplanet,
As we all know, a major problem with Intel (and AMD) x86 CPUs is that
they come with a proprietary "Management Engine (ME)" (or "Platform
Security Processor" for AMD) that
Dear Libreplanet,
As we all know, a major problem with Intel (and AMD) x86 CPUs is that
they come with a proprietary "Management Engine (ME)" (or "Platform
Security Processor" for AMD) that is not only non-free but also with
demonstrated security holes.
I just recalled that VIA Technologies
On 08/06/17 06:30, amunizp wrote:
El 7 de junio de 2017 21:02:46 GMT+01:00, Pen-Yuan Hsing
<penyuanhs...@gmail.com> escribió:
Dear libreplanet-discuss,
I have been asked to comment on a draft article about best
practices/principles in publishing academic computer code (e.g.
scient
Dear libreplanet-discuss,
I have been asked to comment on a draft article about best
practices/principles in publishing academic computer code (e.g.
scientific R scripts, Python code, etc.).
Though the article is supposed to be short, I think a huge glaring
problem in this draft is that
Thank you James for the feedback!
For the record the only personal gain I'd like from this is for the
crowdfunding to succeed to I can get a fully libre NAS. :) And therefore
I'm planning to back the project.
Still hoping it will succeed!
On 24/03/17 13:46, James McFarland wrote:
Yes I
or sharing!
Marcus
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Pen-Yuan Hsing <penyuanhs...@gmail.com
<mailto:penyuanhs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
FYI I just noticed the GnuBee Personal Cloud 1 NAS that appears to
be fully free (as in freedom):
https://www.crowdsupply.c
Hi all,
FYI I just noticed the GnuBee Personal Cloud 1 NAS that appears to be
fully free (as in freedom):
https://www.crowdsupply.com/gnubee/personal-cloud-1
Can anyone here tell if it really is 100% freedom-respecting? I've been
waiting for years for a libre NAS and would love to get one
Thank you Aaron for the useful links!
On 20/02/17 17:07, Aaron Wolf wrote:
On 02/20/2017 06:46 AM, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
Dear libreplanet,
I often see online surveys/evaluations done with Google Forms or
Surveymonkey, but these services are not freedom or privacy respecting
Dear libreplanet,
I often see online surveys/evaluations done with Google Forms or
Surveymonkey, but these services are not freedom or privacy respecting.
Are there replacements for them that *are* freedom and privacy
respecting? Thank you!
___
On 2016-10-31 21:20, Zak Rogoff wrote:
Hi everyone,
The FSF's Holiday Giving Guide is scheduled to launch in November, so
I'm putting out a call for product suggestions. Stuff that's new this
year is especially welcome, but we're not limiting ourselves to new
products.
Here's last year's
On 2016-12-01 15:58, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:23:47 +
Pen-Yuan Hsing <penyuanhs...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks! I would love to get the book for myself, but are there
toys/gifts that would be for 3-5 year ol
Thanks! I would love to get the book for myself, but are there
toys/gifts that would be for 3-5 year old kids?
On 01/12/16 13:13, Berkem Dincman wrote:
The book would be for you, with dozens of suggestions. As a Guide for
programming instructions.
1 Ara 2016 ÖS 4:09 tarihinde "Pen-Yuan
1st Edition
1 Ara 2016 ÖS 3:32 tarihinde "Pen-Yuan Hsing" <penyuanhs...@gmail.com
<mailto:penyuanhs...@gmail.com>> yazdı:
Dear libreplanet,
I'm hoping to buy some toys as gifts for a couple kids aged between
~3-5, and I'm hoping to get them (especially the little
Dear libreplanet,
I'm hoping to buy some toys as gifts for a couple kids aged between
~3-5, and I'm hoping to get them (especially the little girls)
interested in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math)
subjects.
Can people recommended some freedom-respecting toys for this
On 02/09/16 16:35, Serge Hooge wrote:
In light of the above items, I believe it will be so useful to have a
free software wiki page or FAQ (or some other thing) where it not
only answers common questions or dispels common misconceptions, but
also elaborates on specific concrete ways to
On 02/09/16 15:59, Serge Hooge wrote:
It appears that the developer has posted an explanation here:
http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license
Quite a shame, really.
I agree, this is quite a shame. I also think it is very important to not
dismiss posts like these, and
On 2016-08-15 04:12, arthur_tor...@comcast.net wrote:
Worth pointing out that there have been successful demonstration cracker
attacks on some cars (Mopars if I recall correctly) where the attacker was able
to do everything from remotely play with the radio station / volume and the
climate
On 2016-07-31 01:07, A. Mani wrote:
In the FOSS software world, a number of developers have sense of brand
loyalty that is influenced by corporate world concerns. This has its
ill effects. How do you see all this?
Best
A. Mani
Sorry I don't quite get what you mean by "sense of brand loyalty"
On 2016-06-06 20:42, John Sullivan wrote:
al3xu5 / dotcommon writes:
If copyright laws didn't exist, then we would not need GPL!
GPL exists just to "circumvent" copyright...
Regards
Unfortunately that's not the case. It's true that the GPL uses the power
of
Here is an article about the current European Interoperability Framework
consultation period:
http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/05/eu-tech-standards-why-frand-not-compatible-with-open-source/
While the article encourages everyone to submit a comment for the consultation to push
for
On 2016-05-05 21:08, Fabio Pesari wrote:
On 05/05/2016 08:05 PM, Dave Rolek wrote:
However, as I suggested in the other subthread, can we build the list in
a wiki form on the LibrePlanet wiki? I appreciate the officialness and
collection done by gnu.org, but it's hard for a community member
On 05/05/16 18:10, Aaron Wolf wrote:
If you are ever talking to people about the importance not just of
software freedom abstractly but of the *principle* of user control over
software and technology, here's powerful resource to describe the abuses
of proprietary software companies:
On 12/04/16 20:06, zerothis baud wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: "zerothis baud" >
Date: Apr 11, 2016 7:28 PM
Subject: RE: The dangers of repository deletion
To:
Cc:
As an amateur archaeologist of videogames, I'd say only a
On 06/04/16 17:17, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:13:33 +0200, Fabio Pesari wrote:
IIRC Matt Lee told me they won't replace Google Analytics
Do you know if anyone has suggested Piwik? I was able to convince
Gitlab to switch to it for their own hosted instance. Granted, they
On 03/04/16 08:06, Fabio Pesari wrote:
On 04/03/2016 03:38 AM, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
Finally, RMS said that since making copies of hardware is costly
compared to software, free hardware is not as urgent of an issue right
now. That might be true, but I propose that since technology will
progress
Thanks for bringing up Snap! I've been wondering if there is a
more-freedom-respecting replacement for Scratch. A few quick questions:
(1) Can Snap! be run completely offline and locally?
(2) What are some CS/Education resources that you follow? I'd like to follow
them, too. :)
(3) Regarding
On 03/04/16 01:38, Dave Rolek wrote:
On 03/30/2016 07:51 PM, IngeGNUe wrote:
On 03/30/16 18:38, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
On 30/03/16 13:45, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:23:26 +0100, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
I really like the idea of copyleft and licenses such as the GPLv3.
What
On 30/03/16 13:45, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:23:26 +0100, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
I really like the idea of copyleft and licenses such as the GPLv3. What is
the closest equivalent of GPLv3 for hardware?
This is rms' position:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-hardware
Hello,
First of all, I acknowledge this list is mainly about free software, but
I believe hardware is closely related so I am risking a question about
it here. If there's a better place for this question, please accept my
apologies and let me know where to go!
I really like the idea of
On 15/03/16 20:47, Fabio Pesari wrote:
Update: I contacted a popular indie game developer and asked him what he
thought about this idea.
He was already familiar with free software since he released one of his
lesser games under the GPL but still, he didn't answer.
His silence left me some time
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the link to snowdrift.coop! I have always wondered about how
modern free (as in freedom) software projects can find a sustainable
source of funding, I think free software advocates need to seriously
tackle this issue, and looks like lots of thought went into your
Thanks for this, I'm interested in such a reader as well.
However, when I go to what seems to be the Bebook's official website at
http://mybebook.com/, all I get is a blank page. Am I trying the wrong
URL or is it something with my browser?
On 03/02/16 21:19, John Sullivan wrote:
I use a
Thanks Andrés, gpodder looks like the most promising solution so far.
I'll pass the message along!
On 03/11/2015, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:
> El 3 de noviembre de 2015 13:08:33 GMT+00:00, Pen-Yuan Hsing
> <penyuanhs...@gmail.com> escribió:
>>
fonts, is it required by
some licenses to provide attribution in my works?
What can be done to clean up the mess?
On 02/11/2015, Thomas HARDING <t...@thomas-harding.name> wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 15:30, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
>
>> Regarding that, I notice that in almost all cases
Great tip about Corehost, never heard of them before. Are there any
other freedom-respecting hosts out there? Might be nice to compile a
list! I'd also prefer hosts that run on 100% renewable energy if there
is one?
On 2015-11-02 04:12, Isaac David wrote:
Corehost offers virtual private
Is there an equivalent mailing list or forum for this topic other than
on IRC?
On 2015-11-02 16:15, Aaron Wolf wrote:
On 11/02/2015 08:07 AM, Zak Rogoff wrote:
Hi everyone,
Does anybody know about a forum or an irc channel or wiki? I've been
looking around and hoping to find one. If not, I'd
13:05:38 +0000
> Pen-Yuan Hsing <penyuanhs...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> (2) I also want to re-iterate my wish to find an equivalent to this
>> mailing list, where people can discuss issues related to free data,
>> free culture, Open Access, etc. in general.
&
Thanks Bruno, great article!
Two quick questions about the article:
(1) In it it said: "The cost of editing for a typical paper is between 1
percent and 3 percent of the cost of funding the research to produce
it." -> Is there a source for this statement? I'd love to see it.
Because I can
ften disappointed by RMS's communication techniques; also, I am
sometimes disappointed by a tendency amongst other freedom promoters
to take not just what RMS says but also how he says it as gospel. As
usual, I think it's good to always do some thinking for oneself.)
Cheers,
Ramana
On 23 Septemb
Thank you very much for those great readings/resources! I love your IBM
and VW examples as well, will use when I talk to others about the
subject. It'll be great if some one has tied all of this into Free
Software, perhaps as a book or documentary!
On 23/09/15 03:56, J.B. Nicholson-Owens
acher that teaching the students to be good citizens
is just as important as the actual coding!
Sorry about the really long reply. but you have really sparked my
excitement on this topic!!! I just wish that I actually know how to
code myself
On 20/09/2015, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <a75...
Hello,
First of all, thanks everyone for your help several weeks ago on the
Freeing of a scientific software I mentioned here. I have a couple
follow up questions which I plan to post in another message, but for now
there is another issue.
I learned that a teacher in a secondary school in
ng to help (also free). I have been involved for the past few
> years and the kids learn a lot!
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 at 19:18 Thomas HARDING <t...@thomas-harding.name>
> wrote:
>
>> Le 17/09/2015 17:10, Pen-Yuan Hsing a écrit :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> >
Sorry I wasn't clear. I was trying to make the exact same point that
Free Software is not referring to $$$ at all. I was saying that a
lot of people get confused and think that Free Software has to be free
of charge, too which is obviously not the case.
That said, I'd love any help or suggestions
On 07/08/15 15:52, Steen Engholm wrote:
Liberating software is against that normal trend to protect, or
profitize, one's work.
Interesting. I'm still fairly new to Free Software, but my understanding
has always been that it is OK to make monetary profit from Free
Software? Or do you mean
On 08/08/15 04:01, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
* Even if they one day want to sell this software, keeping it Free
will actually make it easier.
I'm not sure about easier. I'm not an economist or business
strategist, and I'd be absolutely terrible at selling software; but
business models vary
into exactly what the science is since I don't
think it is very relevant and would take a lot more space, but I can explain if
you are curious.
On 2015-07-31 07:03, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 22:27:28 +0100, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
I have yet to meet these scientists in person
...@libreplanet.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:27:28 +0100
From: Pen-Yuan Hsing penyuanhs...@gmail.com
To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: [libreplanet-discuss] Gratis software being released as
proprietary
Message-ID:
caaeprtfqlcfncgtkvhnaqda_trruynphpmr7jwvwwliky7a
Dear Libreplanet,
I believe I am faced with an opportunity to spread the news about Free
Software this coming weekend, and would love to get your suggestions
on how best to proceed.
In a few days, I will be attending an international wildlife
conservation meeting, and a group of conservation
73 matches
Mail list logo