On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Since we need to get moving towards release, I pushed them both.
>
> Regards,
>
> /Pete
>
> PS: I'm switching to using "OS X:" rather than "Darwin:" as the prefix
> for the platform, as I think it'll provide higher visibility for Ap
Thanks!
Since we need to get moving towards release, I pushed them both.
Regards,
/Pete
PS: I'm switching to using "OS X:" rather than "Darwin:" as the prefix
for the platform, as I think it'll provide higher visibility for Apple
folks. Yeah, I know that technically Darwin is more correct tha
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>
> The following is for #99, modified from the libusb.org ticket #165.
> I think the original patch there is flawed since it does not consider
> Super Speed where Mac OS X 10.8.x supports.
>
> From 4f22847d7d25ccb5caedfa8b72bc18167c9fabee Mon
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>>> I have removed some of the Mac OS X thingy from 1.0.15. They
>>> are good to have but not necessary.
>>
>> Now only issue #83, i
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> I have removed some of the Mac OS X thingy from 1.0.15. They
>> are good to have but not necessary.
>
> Now only issue #83, issue #98 and issue #102 are listed under
> 1.0.15 milestone.
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> I have removed some of the Mac OS X thingy from 1.0.15. They
> are good to have but not necessary.
Now only issue #83, issue #98 and issue #102 are listed under
1.0.15 milestone.
https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues?milestone=11&state=op
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.03.07 03:34, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> The thing is that if I see the date being shift back,
>> I tend to add new things. :-)
>
> Then I guess we need to communicate better.
>
> When I decide to move a date back, it's because I realisticall
On 2013.03.07 03:34, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> The thing is that if I see the date being shift back,
> I tend to add new things. :-)
Then I guess we need to communicate better.
When I decide to move a date back, it's because I realistically think
that the work that's currently being lined up for it
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Also, if you create and assign issues to be fixed to 1.0.15, then of
> course I'm going to be reluctant to go to 1.0.15 without fixing them.
> That's partially why I delayed the release again when you added the Ext
> Descriptors issue on that li
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> This being said, here are the items I'd prefer not to go to release without:
> - #98, for the reason explained above
Okay.
> - Introducing a LIBUSB_CAP_HAS_HID capability, on the model of
> libusb's LIBUSB_CAP_HAS_HOTPLUG. This shouldn't take
On 2013.03.06 02:32, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Right now there are still a few issues open for 1.0.15 release. I think none
> of them are really critical, perhaps with the exception of #97 (64bit issue
> for Mac OS X).
Yeah, sorry for not posting about the 1.0.15 release. I've been trying
to gear up
https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues?milestone=11&page=1&state=open
Right now there are still a few issues open for 1.0.15 release. I think none
of them are really critical, perhaps with the exception of #97 (64bit issue
for Mac OS X).
For example, I myself do not think #83 and #98 are that
12 matches
Mail list logo
