Any example of such situation? For more complex forms probably users
would specify their own forms. Since you know that field's unqueId's
you can just put the msg tags in the page manually.
In Record there is a more flexible way as users can specify a form
template ... se MetaRecord.formTemplate.
Hey guys,
any idea why liftweb.net is down?
Best regards
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I've been happy with the CSV support provided by h2database because
that was already included in the PocketChange example
http://www.h2database.com/html/tutorial.html#csv
But there are over a dozen alternatives I think. Google for java csv
library
It's a good idea IMHO to use a library for
I would like to wish everybody on this list a happy new year.
A year in which it will be fun to learn more about Lift
Greetings,
Ko
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To
Thank you. Happy new year to you too.
Br's
Marius
On Dec 30, 2:12 pm, koveen liep...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I would like to wish everybody on this list a happy new year.
A year in which it will be fun to learn more about Lift
Greetings,
Ko
--
You received this message because you are
It got stuck in the debate concerning whether or not to use Joda Time. I
might have some time next week to work on it. This ticket kind of covers the
issue:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues#issue/89
Derek
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
What
I'll try out that solution Russ, thanks. Although as the solution
gets a bit more complex, and taking into account Marius's advice, it
sounds like this might not be the right direction to go in.
Stepping back a moment, conceptually what I'd like to do is: create a
nice 404.html template (using
Are you using ScalaJPA? It shouldn't be absorbing any exceptions. Perhaps
you have the log4j threshold at INFO instead of DEBUG?
Derek
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:54 PM, James Black planiturth...@gmail.comwrote:
I am having a problem with one entity trying to use @OneToMany, and I
would like to
Google's opinion:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/farewell-to-soft-404s.html
On Dec 30, 10:05 am, Alex Black a...@alexblack.ca wrote:
I'll try out that solution Russ, thanks. Although as the solution
gets a bit more complex, and taking into account Marius's advice, it
On Dec 30, 5:05 pm, Alex Black a...@alexblack.ca wrote:
I'll try out that solution Russ, thanks. Although as the solution
gets a bit more complex, and taking into account Marius's advice, it
sounds like this might not be the right direction to go in.
Stepping back a moment, conceptually
Ouch, it does sound ugly. Is there some alternative way to change the
currently requested URI, for the purposes of sitemap generation and so
on? It seems like the alternative is spinning one's own SiteMap menu
snippet that knows to do this work?
Also, it seems odd there's no way to invoke
Please see my previous reply and the proposed solution.
Br's,
Marius
On Dec 30, 6:12 pm, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote:
Ouch, it does sound ugly. Is there some alternative way to change the
currently requested URI, for the purposes of sitemap generation and so
on? It seems like the
While I totally agree that a plain 404 + markup is much more
straightforward,
breaks internet are too big words :) .. sending back a
302 or 301 tells the UA you asked me for a resource that I know I
don't have but I wont tell
you explicitely, instead I want you to go to this location as an
At any rate, I'm just trying to help Alex, I'm not invested in any
reason other than it's informative to try and solve. Is there any way
to get a templated 404 response?
Sorry Ross, perhaps my response didn't convey my appreciation for your
help, or maybe it came off sounding negative, I
Please open a defect here http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues ...
whether or not this solution will make it in master will be subject
for reviewboard. The solution I proposed has a breaking change by the
introduction of Either[List[String], LiftResponse] instead of
LiftResponse but I don't think
Thank you and Happy New Year to all the Lifter!
Cheer,
Neil
On Dec 30, 9:48 pm, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. Happy new year to you too.
Br's
Marius
On Dec 30, 2:12 pm, koveen liep...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I would like to wish everybody on this list a happy new year.
Oh no problem, I was intending this as a reply to the you guys
Marius used, to make it clear that I don't have a particular use case,
though I do agree about the soft 404s.
-Ross
On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alex Black wrote:
At any rate, I'm just trying to help Alex, I'm not invested in
I opened a ticket: http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/265
I hope I wrote it in a reasonable/acceptable way, its my first ticket.
- Alex
On Dec 30, 11:26 am, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Please open a defect herehttp://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues...
whether or not this
perfect, thanks.
On Dec 30, 6:40 pm, Alex Black a...@alexblack.ca wrote:
I opened a ticket:http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/265
I hope I wrote it in a reasonable/acceptable way, its my first ticket.
- Alex
On Dec 30, 11:26 am, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Please open
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Alex Black a...@alexblack.ca wrote:
I've changed my sitemap from:
Menu(Loc(index, Pair(index :: Nil, false), Home)) ::
Yes, the / directory will be rendered by Lift as /index There's no way
around that one.
Can you explain? I don't understand.
Hi. Actually I started working on it. I put some code on Review Board adding
some new functions to LiftRules. I was going to add the mapper end to the same
review item, but I had to run and left it without even a description but it
references the ticket I created (I filed two really).
Marius
In a 1.1-M8 based
project,http://localhost:8080/andhttp://localhost:8080/indexboth cause the
Home menu item to be
non-clickable. The definition of the Home menu item is Menu(Loc(Home,
List(index), Home))
Understood.
However, in this scenario, when the user clicks on home they get
taken
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anyone object to this approach?
Any source file that's being reviewed (hopefully one or very few at a time)
should be uploaded to Google Docs as a text document. Discussion can consist
of the built in google
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Alex Black a...@alexblack.ca wrote:
In a 1.1-M8 based project,
http://localhost:8080/andhttp://localhost:8080/indexboth cause the Home
menu item to be
non-clickable. The definition of the Home menu item is Menu(Loc(Home,
List(index), Home))
Understood.
David, I'm not trying to anger you, and although you do constantly
reply with helpful information (which I appreciate) the tone of your
messages makes me think you think I am an idiot.
I'd appreciate it if you'd bear with me, I'm only human.
Thanks for explaining. I don't yet fully understand,
Would it not be possible to have a LiftResponse that runs through the regular
plumbing? This way instead of introducing Either you can just use a
TemplateResponse etc.
-
Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Please open a defect here
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Xuefeng Wu ben...@gmail.com wrote:
It's helpful, thank you!
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want a popup a dialog when an exception is thrown from an Ajax
function you can do something like:
import
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Please open a defect here http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues ...
whether or not this solution will make it in master will be subject
for reviewboard. The solution I proposed has a breaking change by the
introduction of
100%.
But that need could be reconciled with my idea in either of two ways:
1. There is discussion taking place, just in the Google Docs file as opposed to
the maling list. Anyone who wants can participate. The point is that I suspect
much of the reason everyone wants better naming but no one is
Overall this feature seems most similar to 'rewriting'. E.g. the url
comes in as http://localhost/foobar;, we don't recognize it, so we'll
re-write it to template 404.
What about Either[RewriteResponse, LiftResponse]? E.g. same as what
Marius suggested but use RewriteResponse instead of String.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:12 AM, koveen liep...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I would like to wish everybody on this list a happy new year.
A year in which it will be fun to learn more about Lift
Thanks! Happy New Year to you too!
Greetings,
Ko
--
You received this message because you are
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Alan M alan.morten...@gmail.com wrote:
My most recent posting was just my interpretation of what was said in
this thread and I was just asking for confirmation. I didn't go
looking for any more answers because I thought I had it.
I've only been monitoring my
It's not rewriting.
I didn't say it was. I just said it seemed most similar to re-writing.
Trying to mix the two will muddy the concept of rewriting and when it
happens.
Makes sense.
As far as I can tell, the two problems you are facing are:
1. There's a non-trivial amount of your
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Alex Black a...@alexblack.ca wrote:
Overall this feature seems most similar to 'rewriting'. E.g. the url
comes in as http://localhost/foobar;, we don't recognize it, so we'll
re-write it to template 404.
It's not rewriting. Rewriting is the change of the
Hi everyone,
Long time lurker, first time poster here, I've been trying to pick up
Lift recently and am stuck with a seemingly simple bind:
div
subject:videos
videos:count/ out of videos:total/ videos
videos:list
div
video:name/ span class=cm some text/span
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Igor igor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Long time lurker, first time poster here, I've been trying to pick up
Lift recently and am stuck with a seemingly simple bind:
div
subject:videos
videos:count/ out of videos:total/ videos
videos:list
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
100%.
But that need could be reconciled with my idea in either of two ways:
1. There is discussion taking place, just in the Google Docs file as
opposed to the maling list. Anyone who wants can participate. The
In Boot.scala (the boot method):
LiftRules.passNotFoundToChain = false
LiftRules.uriNotFound.prepend {
case _ = generate404()
}
In the Boot class:
def generate404(): LiftResponse = {
import scala.xml.Node
val resp: Box[Node] = S.setVars(expandAll - true) {
Hmm that _was_ pretty silly. I guess I have to go over the implicits section
in my Scala notes :)
Thanks for the quick response David.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:19 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Igor igor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
A little background on implicits, maybe it'll help you.
A particular expression will only ever have one implicit conversion
applied -- the compiler will not attempt to chain together implicit
conversions (as I believe that's an NP problem)
So, the arguments to bind(...) are BindParams. There
Cody,
Thanks for such a thoughtful set of feedback.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:11 PM, cody koeninger c...@koeninger.org wrote:
We recently implemented a small, mostly static content site (http://
www.goldenfrog.com/) using Lift. Thought I'd offer up a postmortem on
what worked well and what
I'm confused by your reply.
Firstly, I think I was clear that I'm not going to do anything that you or
David disapprove of. So if my idea is not a good one just scratch it!
In any case I'm confused by what you said. What is hidden about a Google Docs
document? Whoever wants to participate in the
Note: I just realized this was gonig to the list, and individual emails as
well. edited the to and cc fields.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm confused by your reply.
Firstly, I think I was clear that I'm not going to do anything that you or
Okay, I hear what your saying. Personally I think it's partially how you sell
it, but if you think it will supress discussion then I guess we can just
discuss it directly on the list.
What do you say to having, in general, one thread per class being discussed
(that is, assuming people stick to
Guys,
Im having a really strange problem with the context handling in an app
im writing. Essentially, the app is pretty normal, it goes about its
business perfectly well. However, as this will be distributed through
different parts of our company, and could be deployed in different
contexts, I
This is the same issue mentioned in the Postmortem thoughts thread,
that dpp mentioned has an issue at
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues#issue/68
, right?
On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:16 PM, David Pollak wrote:
Lift doesn't seem to have any central place to handle URL issues
related to servlet
Tim, David
Thanks for your answer
/Niels
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:38 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Niels Boldt nielsbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We need to return comma separated values as answer to an request(csv
files), and I
Im not sure it is; I do not require session by session adjustments...
this is a one time, global configuration. Its similar, but not the
same I dont think
I need this urgently in a production application that needs to go out
yesterday (literally) so would appreciate any thoughts.
Cheers, Tim
On
Jetty seems to do questionable things with filehandles, opening
multiple copies of the same template file and keeping them open too
long. Setting ulimit fixes the issue of Too many open files
exceptions failed requests, but it still seems like at most
templates should need 1 access to
Dang.
What sort of test cases did you have in mind? Things that i've come across so
far are:
* form handling (normal forms, not ajax forms) - that is, the location of
action targets
* liftAjax.js - the path needs the context prepended
* Any dispatching needs the context accounted for
Is this
Ok, I tried this, it gets closer.
I noticed one issue: the head merge didn't get done, so I have two
head tags in the result. I'm attempting to set the title in the
404.html template, maybe there is a way I can set the title without
using head merge?
- Alex
On Dec 30, 2:54 pm, David Pollak
Would it be reasonable for me to open a ticket to allow people to
change this default behaviour? Its important to me that when people
are at our site's home page, its just http://oursite.com;, not
http://oursite.com/index;.
Then for people who are using a container where this is a problem, it
Searching turned up a few older threads similar to the problem I'm
seeing, but I couldn't find any solution.
Using just the skeleton project created by lift-archetype-basic, I'm
getting these exceptions out of jetty:
org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Database may be already in use: Locked
by another
Yes I had an open thread on this issue but it's not being seen as a
real issue.
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/78454f767280b4b5/d0f462593ae77072?hl=en#d0f462593ae77072
On Dec 30, 7:15 pm, Nathan Parry npa...@gmail.com wrote:
Searching turned up a few older threads
Hello David.
It's true that if you only have the dependency marked as provided then
yes, it won't run. I am not advocating the use of using scope
provided. That is only if you are programming to the h2 interfaces
directly which you aren't and shouldn't be doing. I am advocating that
you do not
55 matches
Mail list logo
