In this sample I explicitly disable beam subdividing (which should be
off anyway by default).
\relative c' {
\set subdivideBeams = ##f
\times 2/3 { f16[ g f g f8] }
}
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
However, the beam gets subdivided. I want to have this:
3
I'm running into build errors when attempting to build version 2.10.25
in the Fedora development build system. It builds fine on a Fedora 7
system. The failure appears to be related to fontforge. Fedora 7 has
fontforge 20061220, and the development (future Fedora 8) is now at
20070511. The end
I have tried to implement the solution to my piece and I found a problem in
one of the bars. Here it is:
%
\new Staff {
\time 3/4
\key ees \major
<<
\relative {
eeses'4 des des |
}
\\
\relative {
8
|
}
Hello,
How can I execute lilypond-book from the Mac OS X application? I suppose
the file is inside the Lilypond.app folder somewhere, but if I simply
try to enter in terminal something like
lilypond-book test.tex
I get a command-not-found error. How could I include this command in my
de
Then it was just fluke or Lilypond's forgiving nature that this
rendered properly *this* time. This is sometimes disconcerting --
Lilypond tries so hard to figure out what you intended that it will
allow a mistake and lead someone new at it astray.
To answer a previous poster who asked If I woul
Hello,
I get this error on all but the most rudimentary piano scores in version
2.10.28.
Here's a snippet which I've tried to pare down as much as possible:
\version "2.11.28"
lh = { \change Staff = lower}
rh = {\change Staff = upper}
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\score {
\new PianoStaff {
You might have more luck with a low-end monochrome laser printer. When
I had a laser, its toner cartridge lasted just forever. I've been
thinking of getting another, because I'm always having to buy ink for my
inkjet.
Francois Planiol-Auger wrote:
I think of buying a dot-matrix printer, to r
Hi David,
On 7/27/07, David Fedoruk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd better clarify something which is not apparent in the small
> amountof score I've posted here. The top voice is the voice which will
> continue as the main voice. The lower one, in this case pops in for
> two bars, drops out fo
I have done what you suggested. Please check the devel-list for the pdf with my
proposal.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-07/threads.html___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
Sorry Neil, that last reply got sent before I was finshed writing it.
This is the code I just tried:
\version "2.11.27"
\include "english.ly"
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key e \major
\time 3/4
\mark "Allegro"
ef[d ef f g af ]
Hi David,
You don't need invisible notes for this kind of situation; just use the
proper syntax for polyphony, so that the upper voice remains in the main
voice context:
<< {
\grace bf16
\voiceOne %make stems point up for this voice after grace note
cf2 af'4~ |
2007/7/27, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (maybe it was a .27 bug, or something in my previous installation was
> corrupted...).
It's definitely a .27 bug; I was able to reproduce it with another
installation of .27, on a different OS.
V.V.
__
2007/7/27, David Griffel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes I get the same message with many of my scores since installing 2.11.28.
> It took a while to realise that the score was in fact compiling OK despite
> the alarming message.
Yes; I reinstalled 2.11.27 and everything is fine.
V.V.
_
Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
>
> I'm getting a weird "insane spring constant" error message with
> lilypond 2.11.28 using the following minimal code:
>
>
Yes I get the same message with many of my scores since installing 2.11.28.
It took a while to realise that the score was in fact compilin
I like the chords you propose.
Daniel Tonda Castillo
2007/7/27, PabloZum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> This is a proposed Arial-based font that could be included in future
> versions of LilyPond.
>
> Actually, it's more a range of possibilities than a new font. Placing
> chord extensions like b9 and
Hello:
When I add your suggested it trhrows the bar check out after that
line: the first error is :
Sonata_Emajor_K530.ly:118:88: warning: barcheck failed at: 1/8G-1/16
gf[bf \grace af16 gf8 f ef df ]
Then things continue with multiple errors. It renders something but it
is missing a page
Adam Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This may be a bit off-topic but I figure others here may be using
> ConTeXt to make books out of Lilypond files. I signed up for the
> ConTeXt mailing list a couple days ago but still need to get
> approved, impatient as always me.
>
> I bel
2007/7/27, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> yes indeed; why don't you just add an invisible second voice? Here's a
> version that works:
Oh, and by the way I would add a natural d! at bar 67 (left hand)...
Regards,
V.V.
___
lilypond-user mai
2007/7/27, David Fedoruk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First, I'd like to thank the Lilypond programmers for a great job! I
> finally finished typesetting two of these Scsarlatti Sonatas, one of
> which was from the ubiquitous Longo edition.
I didn't know this sonata; it looks awesome! Do you plan to po
Hello:
First, I'd like to thank the Lilypond programmers for a great job! I
finally finished typesetting two of these Scsarlatti Sonatas, one of
which was from the ubiquitous Longo edition. After sitting at
keyboard and trying to read both, the Longo edition is no longer good
enough. Its almost un
Gosh!
I'm getting the same message again! (in another score)
This time, it disappears if I remove the Time-signature-engraver (but
as it happens, I don't want to remove it...)
Can anybody tell me what's "insane" about the following snippet?
\include "italiano.ly"
\layout {
\context { \St
Mats Bengtsson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> There's a separate property for beamed notes, see
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-02/msg00266.html
> with followups.
Thank you very much.
I've been experimenting for a few hours. These "\override Beam #'positions =
#'($value . $val
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:33:38AM +0200, Tao Cumplido wrote:
> The thing here is that you split your parts and in the score
> block you create two piano staves whereas one is completely
> sufficient.
> the time signature appears because the staff with the melody line
> begins after the line break.
Maybe this could be added to the LSR;
I said "perfect solution" in my last message but i go on with some tests and
now i wonder ...
***
1- If we simply transpose an octave higher our last exemple, the output
On 7/27/07, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
> > p.s. On a side-note, can anyone explain to me the difference between
> > "first-note" and "next-note" in the BarLine space-alist?
>
> See the documentation for the "break-aligned-interface"
> in the program refere
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:58:02AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> >Aha! That works, but not quite as you described. I had to use "s"
> >rests, otherwise the unwanted staff line still showed up.
>
> The first line will not show up if you:
> 1. use R rests (which you really *should*, since "s
> > > i tried:
> > > \once \override Stem #'length = #4
> > > g8 [ a ]
> > >
> > > This does not have any effect.
>
> Apparently this override doesn't work when using manual [ ] beaming.
> Why?
Stem lengths under beams are handled with the beamed-length property.
Cf. the override-nest.ly regress
Hi Ed,
Aha! That works, but not quite as you described. I had to use "s"
rests, otherwise the unwanted staff line still showed up.
The first line will not show up if you:
1. use R rests (which you really *should*, since "s" is a skip
not a rest!!);
2. include \context { \RemoveEmpty
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:33:38AM +0200, Tao Cumplido wrote:
> The thing here is that you split your parts and in the score
> block you create two piano staves whereas one is completely
> sufficient.
> the time signature appears because the staff with the melody line
> begins after the line break.
Hello Joe, hello everybody,
I noticed a discussion on -devel recently about that; I don't know if
this is related, or if I'm doing something wrong.
I'm getting a weird "insane spring constant" error message with
lilypond 2.11.28 using the following minimal code:
%%%snippet%%%
\version "2.11"
\
Hi !
I already had this problem (i searched a long time why ):
Point-and-click don't work with the paper landscap format :-)
When you work put in portrait !
\paper { #(set-paper-size "a4" )
regards
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
Hi !
I already had this problem :
The paper landscap format don't work for Point-and-click :-)
When you work put in portrait !
\paper { #(set-paper-size "a4" )
I have
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailma
In the 80's dot-matrix printers were already able to print graphics of good
quality. At that time, the problem was more the screen resolutions...
Currently, the cost of a dot-matrix may not be lesser than an ink-jet
printer. It depends on the contry you live in. Check also the cost of the
inks in
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/7/26, Tao Cumplido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The only problem is that I can't find a way to place the chords above
the staff now.
Any solutions?
If I remember correctly, this is something like:
\new Staff = mystaff { \new Voice = music {%add notes here...
}}
\ne
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-05/msg00031.html
and several other emails in the mailing list archives.
/Mats
Daniel Tonda Castillo wrote:
Greetings:
Sorry for the cross-posting but I think I've found a bug.
When I put a section like this in a lilypond file and comp
2007/7/27, Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Final (?) note/tip on this: if anyone else finds Lilypond's default
> beginning-of-measure spacing too small in general (i.e., even without
> "modifiers" like accidentals and arpeggios), you can add a little
> more space using:
>
> \override
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
p.s. On a side-note, can anyone explain to me the difference between
"first-note" and "next-note" in the BarLine space-alist?
See the documentation for the "break-aligned-interface"
in the program reference.
/Mats
___
li
It's a pity that we don't have something similar to the
tie-configuration property but for slurs, so it would be
possible to specify to which note in the chord an
incoming (or outgoing) slur should be connected.
That would have provided a much nicer solution to
the problem below.
/Mats
Gilles
2007/7/27, Ledocq-Boccart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have just done a "cut and try" test as I (i.e. newbie) cannot do
> otherwise as yet.
Thank you for testing. Everything works fine since I installed 2.11.28
(maybe it was a .27 bug, or something in my previous installation was
corrupted...).
Re
There's a separate property for beamed notes, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-02/msg00266.html
with followups.
/Mats
Peter Terpstra wrote:
Dear readers,
How can i change the stem length so that the voice two fits between voice
one and three?
i tried:
\once \overrid
Han-Wen (et al.): Thanks for 2.11.28!
Joe: Thanks for the spacing fixes, which have appeared in 2.11.28 --
things look *so* much better now (in particular, I've been testing
initial accidentals and arpeggios), and I've been able to extract my
(incredibly numerous) tweaks!
Final (?) note/t
2007/7/27, Peter Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > i tried:
> > \once \override Stem #'length = #4
> > g8 [ a ]
> >
> > This does not have any effect.
Apparently this override doesn't work when using manual [ ] beaming.
Why?
V.Villenave
___
lilypond-
Hello Valentin,
Valentin Villenave a écrit :
...However, I've just discovered that when I specify a different
global-staff-size, the compilation goes fine, no error messages... but
the .pdf (as well as the .ps) output is just one empty page!
I have just done a "cut and try" test as I (i.e. n
Hello all,
On 2007-Jun-4, at 17:08, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
As far as I can see from the implementation, the alignment
is hardcoded to be #LEFT at the start of a melisma.
How much would it cost to sponsor the "soft-coding" of this value?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Hi Siska,
Do you have any idea on how to suppress the global barline settings
(if I understand the terminology well, this is supposed to be
called 'barline engraver'),
but only for those few bars, not for the entire score?
I don't believe you can globally affect the barline_engraver itself.
Hello,
I tried out the '\override SpanBar #'transparent = ##t' command, and
although it really removes the barlines between staves, the problem is,
that if I introduce a barline in a staff (or I put the repeat volta
command) I still get the barlines in every stave.
Do you have any idea on h
Peter Terpstra in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> i tried:
> \once \override Stem #'length = #4
> g8 [ a ]
>
> This does not have any effect.
lilypond version is 2.10.25
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
h
Dear readers,
How can i change the stem length so that the voice two fits between voice
one and three?
i tried:
\once \override Stem #'length = #4
g8 [ a ]
This does not have any effect.
Kind Regards,
Peter
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
l
> Mark Dewey wrote:
>
> > I've heard tell that there is a LilyPond extension or plugin for MediaWiki
> > (that's the software they use with Wikipedia). I have a wiki
> > (HymnWiki.org) that uses LilyPond files quite a bit . . . so, I'm
> > interested in finding out what the plugin is for, what it
Hello,
I use lilypond 2.10.25 and jEdit with lilypondtool under WinXP sp2 and when I
have larger scores the point-and-click links are not available in jEdits pdf
viewer anymore.
They are still present though when I open it with Acrobat.
I attached a file where the problem occurs.
It's not reall
Hi!
I think of buying a dot-matrix printer, to reduce costs specially with the
draft-prints with lilypond.
But does it works (does it prints graphics?)? I found nothing serious about it
in the archiv or in the web.
I never used a dot-matrix before...
Of course I will continue to use my ink-jet
Ok, sorry, I misunderstood your problem.
The thing here is that you split your parts and in the score block you create
two piano staves whereas one is completely sufficient.
the time signature appears because the staff with the melody line begins after
the line break.
you have to add rests like
52 matches
Mail list logo
