Hi Gianmaria,
How about:
\version 2.18.2
plus =
#(define-music-function (parser location fingering) (ly:music?)
(let ((music (make-music 'FingeringEvent))
(finger (ly:music-property fingering 'digit)))
(set! (ly:music-property music 'tweaks)
(acons 'stencil
Does exist a 'standard' way to specify violin fingering like -2 or +2?
In fretless instruments we use the notation + or - because for each hand
position (first position, 3rd position etc.) fingers can occupy two
different position, low or high.
For instance in first position, finger 2 on
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 23:24 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote:
Having seen recommendations for Denemo I though I'd try to install it
on my CentOS 7 (basically RHEL 7) system. I'm currently running
Frescobaldi 2.18 and Lilypond 2.18.2-1. I downloaded both the f20
f21 rpms as well as the tarball.
Here again with a better 'minus' look:
\version 2.18.2
#(set-global-staff-size 50)
plus =
#(define-music-function (parser location fingering) (ly:music?)
(let ((music (make-music 'FingeringEvent))
(finger (ly:music-property fingering 'digit)))
(set! (ly:music-property music
Merci Pierre, ca marche tres bien!!!
Any idea why this is not part of the default Lilypond packages?
Thank you, Gianmaria
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Pierre that is fantastic work. I tried a very crude routine to mark the -
sign on a finger number like -2 etc...
but nothing as slick as yours.
This is very useful annotation to denote a descending shift from
somewhere down to
a lower position with finger 2. In sight reading string music that
Yes, I understand. The violin teachear of my daughter use it for her. I'm
not sure it exist a standard way to indicate that low or high finger
position. And probably it is something you use only for beginner.
If you have any suggestion you're welcome.
Ciao, G.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:05 PM,
Hi,
2015-05-11 13:31 GMT+02:00 B~M viola1...@gmail.com:
This is very useful annotation to denote a descending shift from
somewhere down to
a lower position with finger 2. In sight reading string music that makes
what is coming next
very clear. Very helpful.
Personnaly I wouldn't use the
Hi,
2015-05-11 13:38 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari gianmarial...@gmail.com:
Merci Pierre, ca marche tres bien!!!
I'm glad it helps !
Any idea why this is not part of the default Lilypond packages?
No idea...
Cheers,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user
Fantastic work, David! Definitely more involved code than you would expect,
but very thoroughly done, allowing for non-centered alignments even. This
would make an excellent addition to the core code, IMHO. Perhaps called
centered-name-column?
The only thing that I would further request (and this
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hello all,
In the snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=383, the
instrument names are centered [beautifully!] based on the total indent
value.
How would one make the instruments be
Your're absolutely right.
It's a bad habit and a wrong designation. I should have used guide finger
instead.
Pierre
2015-05-11 16:17 GMT+02:00 Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com:
no need to post to list. just wondering where you have seen a portamento
indicated that way.
Stephen
Hi Peter,
Where do you use \RemoveEmptyStaves? Try moving it to the lower Staff and not
the PianoStaff. I don’t know how your score is organised … is that an option
for you?
Yes! This worked well.
Thanks!
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:04 AM, tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fantastic work, David!
Appreciate that!
Definitely more involved code than you would expect, but very thoroughly
done, allowing for non-centered alignments even. This would make an
excellent addition to the core
Do you think a similar approach could solve
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=766 ?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: Kieren MacMillan
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: can
Hi Abraham,
Fantastic work, David!
+1
This would make an excellent addition to the core code, IMHO.
+1
The only thing that I would further request (and this applies to
instrumentName in general) is that the indent variable automatically adjust
itself to be larger to compensate for
I would suggest tweaking the indents to take account of the instrument names,
but setting a warning Indent adjusted to xx to accommodate instrument name.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: tisimst
Cc: lilypond-user
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 4:28
Hi Phil,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Do you think a similar approach could solve
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=766 ?
I don't think so. I don't know how you'd go about changing the indentation
automatically, but I imagine it
Hi David (et al.),
This brings back the days of getting my dissertation--an orchestral
composition--through all the final hoops. Did the explicit requirement of
1.5\in at the left (if I remember correctly) include the instrument name or
not? There never was a conclusive answer. You
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Oh, and some/all of the [Short]InstrumentName settings (e.g., padding)
should be adjustable after the score is “in progress.
=)
This is possible to a limited extent. You can't drop in a change when
you
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi David (et al.),
Not sure what the best practice would be. After all, you do want the
numbers you set for indent and short-indent to exactly match what you
specify.
It depends on how you define
Dear all,
it's a pleasure for me to write my first email in the list. I'm still very
new to Lilypond, so please forgive my ignorance.
We are in the development of an alternative music notation system, based on
proportional pitch and time representation. At the moment we have a
Hi Andrés.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, AndrésPérezLópez
cont...@andresperezlopez.com wrote:
Dear all,
it's a pleasure for me to write my first email in the list. I'm still very
new to Lilypond, so please forgive my ignorance.
Welcome to Lilypond and to the list!
We are in the
Hi David (et al.),
Not sure what the best practice would be. After all, you do want the numbers
you set for indent and short-indent to exactly match what you specify.
It depends on how you define “indent” and “short-indent”… or “margin”… ;)
All kidding aside:
1. Perhaps there could be a
Am 11.05.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
Merci Pierre, ca marche tres bien!!!
Any idea why this is not part of the default Lilypond packages?
For a simple reason: nobody implemented it.
If you can give examples that this is standard notation, you might raise
an enhancement request on
For those of us who use Lilypond to typeset guitar music, we are aware that one
has to apply some slightly dirty tricks to make bends work together with
hammer-on/pull-offs. This is well established, can be found referred to in the
documentation for the guitar bends code, and has been
Oh, and some/all of the [Short]InstrumentName settings (e.g., padding) should
be adjustable after the score is “in progress.
=)
Cheers,
Kieren.
On May 11, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi David (et al.),
Not sure what the best practice would be.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi David (et al.),
This brings back the days of getting my dissertation--an orchestral
composition--through all the final hoops. Did the explicit requirement of
1.5\in at the left (if I remember
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Abraham,
Fantastic work, David!
+1
This would make an excellent addition to the core code, IMHO.
+1
The only thing that I would further request (and this applies to
instrumentName in
29 matches
Mail list logo
