Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

2017-04-28 Thread zs.hassia
with the >'encodingsoftware' then it should compile fine, if it's a general >problem it should choke on the next invalid characters. Result: Starte lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.59 [La-valse-opaline-ende-1.ly]... Processing `c:/users/stephan/appdata/l

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

2017-04-28 Thread zs.hassia
>> I know this problem science 2.19.4? > >2.19.4 of LilyPond or Frescobaldi? The last working Lilypondversion I know is 2.19.41. I detected the first time with 2.19.45 and 49. The problem exist with Frescobaldi 2.18/19 and 3. Win7 and win 10. The report in Fres

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

2017-04-28 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:19 AM Subject: Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows Am 2017-04-28 10:33, schrieb zs.has...@gmx.de: I know this problem science 2.19.4? Can you determine which was the first Frescobaldi release where this happened

XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

2017-04-28 Thread zs.hassia
I know this problem science 2.19.4? After someone asks today on the german forum about this problem, I want to tell the list about that problem. It is not possible after importing the xml-File into Frescobaldi to work with the import result. But the import looks normal. Opening the result with

Re:Midiimport f?r Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-27 Thread Joseph Austin
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 1:21 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > > Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:21:06 +0200 > From: Bernhard Kleine <mailto:bernhard.kle...@gmx.net>> > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: Midiimport f?r

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-27 Thread Robin Bannister
Bernhard Kleine wrote: With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi/Lilypond on win 7. I have seen that VLC mediaplayer has to be supplied with softfonts e.g. fluid-softfonts. The installation proposal, however, does not state how to supply this softfonts to the actual VLC. I

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-27 Thread Richard Shann
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 10:08 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > Hi Carl, > > this has been most helpful and I will organize a keyboard for input. How > to record the tunes and to save them will take some time to learn. > > With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-27 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi Carl, this has been most helpful and I will organize a keyboard for input. How to record the tunes and to save them will take some time to learn. With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi/Lilypond on win 7. I have seen that VLC mediaplayer has to be supplied with softfonts

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-26 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 4/26/17 11:21 AM, "Bernhard Kleine" wrote: >I saw the thread in this group four years ago. Is there any new >information whether a keyboard can be used to produce midi-output which >can be imported into lilypond with a gain of time. Andrew Hawryluk has this web page: http://www.musicbyandr

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
blem: when writing scores to be used in our choir I often make >> mistakes. If I could listen to the music instead of reading the notes I >> might find errors faster. >> >> Any report from experience would be helpful. > > Are you an Emacs user? Wait, the subject tit

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
Bernhard Kleine writes: > I saw the thread in this group four years ago. Is there any new > information whether a keyboard can be used to produce midi-output which > can be imported into lilypond with a gain of time. > > My problem: when writing scores to be used in our choir I often make > mista

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-26 Thread Johan Vromans
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:21:06 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > My problem: when writing scores to be used in our choir I often make > mistakes. If I could listen to the music instead of reading the notes I > might find errors faster. Personally, I use Denemo for this purpose. It does exactly that

Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

2017-04-26 Thread Bernhard Kleine
I saw the thread in this group four years ago. Is there any new information whether a keyboard can be used to produce midi-output which can be imported into lilypond with a gain of time. My problem: when writing scores to be used in our choir I often make mistakes. If I could listen to the music i

Re: Frescobaldi input latency

2017-04-26 Thread Shevek
Yes, this is a project with many large files. Well, I'm glad at least it's a known issue. Unfortunately I don't have the means to contribute to solving it. Here's hoping somebody will! -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fresc

Re: Frescobaldi input latency

2017-04-26 Thread Urs Liska
Am 26. April 2017 15:37:11 MESZ schrieb Shevek : >Does anybody else find the input in Frescobaldi to be sluggish? I find >that >the cursor lags noticeably when typing, navigating by arrow keys, or >selecting with the mouse. I have auto-complete and "synchronize with >cursor

Re: Frescobaldi input latency

2017-04-26 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno mer 26 apr 2017 alle 15:37, Shevek ha scritto: Does anybody else find the input in Frescobaldi to be sluggish? I find that the cursor lags noticeably when typing, navigating by arrow keys, or selecting with the mouse. I have auto-complete and "synchronize with cursor pos

Frescobaldi input latency

2017-04-26 Thread Shevek
Does anybody else find the input in Frescobaldi to be sluggish? I find that the cursor lags noticeably when typing, navigating by arrow keys, or selecting with the mouse. I have auto-complete and "synchronize with cursor position" disabled but point-and-click enabled because I use it. T

Re: [Frescobaldi] cannot add lilypond 2.19.57 to lilypond preference

2017-03-27 Thread MING TSANG
s.com" ; Lilypond-usermailinglist Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [Frescobaldi] cannot add lilypond 2.19.57 to lilypond preference I had the same problem years ago. I wanted to have LilyPond and Frescobaldi installed on a USB stick because I needed to use in a comput

Re: [Frescobaldi] cannot add lilypond 2.19.57 to lilypond preference

2017-03-26 Thread Federico Bruni
I had the same problem years ago. I wanted to have LilyPond and Frescobaldi installed on a USB stick because I needed to use in a computer where I could not install any software. I think I asked for help on lilypond-user, bat cannot find it in the archive. I vaguely remember that the error

Re: [Frescobaldi] cannot add lilypond 2.19.57 to lilypond preference

2017-03-23 Thread MING TSANG
ubject: Re: [Frescobaldi] cannot add lilypond 2.19.57 to lilypond preference I have the same setup and it works fine. What happens if you open a command prompt window and type this: > E:> cd \Lilypond_2-19-57\lilypond\usr\bin> lilypond --version If that give you a version message, I'd try ch

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-11 Thread Klaus Blum
Hi Jones, Am 11.03.2017 um 20:41 schrieb 19joh...@gmail.com: Well, that is really strange. Besides the redistribution problem I've not heard of this poppler problem yet. (I had it on my machine, but in my case it was because of the missing poppler-qt5.dll I have created a new setup which includ

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-11 Thread 19joho66
Hi Klaus, I think your problem is not related to the redistribution pack. You seem to be missing the poppler-qt5.dll which should be in the main Frescobaldi folder. Please check if you can find it there. Cheers Jones Am Freitag, 10. März 2017 17:27:56 UTC+1 schrieb Klaus Blum: > > Hi

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-11 Thread 19joho66
is present. > Strange... > > Cheers, > Klaus > > > Am 11.03.2017 um 20:03 schrieb 19jo...@gmail.com : > > Hi Klaus, > I think your problem is not related to the redistribution pack. You seem > to be missing the poppler-qt5.dll which should be in the main Frescob

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-11 Thread Klaus Blum
main Frescobaldi folder. Please check if you can find it there. Cheers Jones Am Freitag, 10. März 2017 17:27:56 UTC+1 schrieb Klaus Blum: Hi Jones, Am 09.03.2017 um 08:58 schrieb 19jo...@gmail.com : > Please install the Visual Studio 2015 Redistribution pack which you > c

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-10 Thread Klaus Blum
e tried to repair it (no luck), afterwards to deinstall and re-install it, and finally even deinstalled the x64 version that was on my system as well. The problem with frescobaldi persists. Is there a way to check if all components of the Redistribution pack are correctly available to the system

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-08 Thread Gianmaria Lari
Cannot help Marc and Klaus but but I can say that on my windows pc I just installed Frescobaldi 3.0 without problem and looks working normally as the previous version. g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-08 Thread Marc Mouries
I get this error when I run Frescobaldi 3.0.0 on Windows 7. ​ On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Klaus Blum wrote: > Thanks to everyone who helped to make this wonderful tool available for > Windows as well! > > However... I installed Frescobaldi 3.0.0 with the provided Windows >

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-03-07 Thread Klaus Blum
Thanks to everyone who helped to make this wonderful tool available for Windows as well! However... I installed Frescobaldi 3.0.0 with the provided Windows installer, and instead of the music view, I get a simple "Could not load the popplerqt5 module". Sorry if this is a stupid quest

Re: Suggestion for Frescobaldi: engrave parent

2017-03-04 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Urs (and the other Andrew), > On 4 March 2017 at 21:55, Urs Liska wrote: > >> From your post it sounds like this is what you need. But if you're >> talking about the Kayser project you actually need >> >> b) >> You can pin one of the documents to be compiled. You can either check >> LilyPond-

Re: Suggestion for Frescobaldi: engrave parent

2017-03-04 Thread Andrew Bernard
21:55, Urs Liska wrote: > somehow I have the feeling you're missing two available options. > > a) > Frescobaldi has the concept of *master* variables. With these you can > specify in an input file which file should be compiled instead. You can > find the documentation in Frescob

Re: Suggestion for Frescobaldi: engrave parent

2017-03-04 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Andrew, somehow I have the feeling you're missing two available options. a) Frescobaldi has the concept of *master* variables. With these you can specify in an input file which file should be compiled instead. You can find the documentation in Frescobaldi's help at Frescoba

Suggestion for Frescobaldi: engrave parent

2017-03-04 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi List, I'm back to doing engraving work (after Urs has very helpfully helped me get my project back in order), and I've realized something again that I've wished Frescobaldi had as part of its functionality. In my other, tex-based text editor (LyX, which is excellent fo

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-21 Thread Jinsong Zhao
On 2017/2/17 17:58, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Dear friends, I just released the source packages for Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0 and python-ly 0.9.5 today. (I couldn't way until my birthday early March :-)) Frescobaldi 2.20.0 provides a new Manuscript viewer, contributed by Urs

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0

2017-02-21 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno lun 20 feb 2017 alle 17:51, Federico Bruni ha scritto: As soon as the main distros will distribute python-poppler-qt5, things should be easier. BTW, I've just realized that Debian stretch (and therefore LilyDev 5) has already Frescobaldi 3 package: https://packages.debia

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0

2017-02-20 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno lun 20 feb 2017 alle 17:00, bmgxc9 ha scritto: Any linux users out there? Is Frescobaldi 3.0 pretty bug free? I do not want to make the hop until I know for sure, and do not necessarily want to run it in VM if I do not have to... I use Fedora (currently version 25). I'm

Frescobaldi 3.0

2017-02-20 Thread bmgxc9
Hey all, Any linux users out there? Is Frescobaldi 3.0 pretty bug free? I do not want to make the hop until I know for sure, and do not necessarily want to run it in VM if I do not have to... Ty. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-20 Thread SoundsFromSound
this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-Frescobaldi-2-20-0-Frescobaldi-3-0-0-python-ly-0-9-5-tp200225p200310.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-19 Thread kentlarry
Is 2.20 the latest stable version we should all be using now? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 19, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Jacques Menu Muzhic > wrote: > > Hello Wilbert and Davide, > > Thanks a lot to you and the other contributors to Frescobaldi, I just > installed 2.20.0 on

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-19 Thread SoundsFromSound
Davide Liessi-2 wrote > > A pre-built application bundle of Frescobaldi 3 is in the works, but > due to some difficulties in running and packaging Frescobaldi 3 on > Mac, it may not appear very soon. Is there a pre-built bundle of Frescobaldi 3 available for Windows 64 bit at the m

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-19 Thread Jacques Menu Muzhic
Hello Wilbert and Davide, Thanks a lot to you and the other contributors to Frescobaldi, I just installed 2.20.0 on OS X 10.12.3 alright. A great tool! JM > Le 19 févr. 2017 à 22:14, Davide Liessi a écrit : > > 2017-02-17 10:58 GMT+01:00 Wilbert Berendsen : >> I just rele

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-19 Thread Davide Liessi
2017-02-17 10:58 GMT+01:00 Wilbert Berendsen : > I just released the source packages for Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi > 3.0.0 and python-ly 0.9.5 today. (I couldn't way until my birthday early > March :-)) A self-contained application bundle of Frescobaldi 2.20.0 for Mac OS X 1

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-18 Thread Tapani
Wonderful. Thank you. On Friday, 17 February 2017 09:58:47 UTC, Wilbert wrote: > > Dear friends, > > I just released the source packages for Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi > 3.0.0 and python-ly 0.9.5 today. (I couldn't way until my birthday early > March :-)) > >

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-17 Thread Marc Mouries
Thank you for your work. Will you provide a .dmg file for MacOS? On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > Dear friends, > > I just released the source packages for Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi > 3.0.0 and python-ly 0.9.5 today. (I couldn't way until

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-17 Thread Colin Campbell
On 2017-02-17 08:24 AM, SoundsFromSound wrote: Wilbert, Thank you for this release! I'm using v2.20 now and it's working beautifully. However, I've been unable to run Frescobaldi 3 on my Linux Mint laptop, I keep getting errors. I've already installed (what I think is)

Re: OT: Frescobaldi crash on startup

2017-02-17 Thread Partitura Organum
I have more or less the same issue. As of today, clicking a Lilypond-file in Windows explorer opens Frescobaldi as always in my installation, but Frescobaldi crashes immediately. Starting Frescobaldi on its own and then open the same score does work however. There has been no Windows update

Re: OT: Frescobaldi crash on startup

2017-02-17 Thread Robert Schmaus
I'm not sure if this is of any use ... I checked the console output that is generated from the time I start Frescobaldi until it fails. Leading up to the error are the following messages: Frescobaldi if not url.isEmpty(): Frescobaldi AttributeError: 'unicode'

OT: Frescobaldi crash on startup

2017-02-17 Thread Robert Schmaus
Dear List, this is not about Lilypond, so technically, I'm actually asking the wrong list. But I'm pretty sure there's someone who can help me here ... I'm using Frescobaldi 2.18 on a Mac OS 10.12.3. So far, never had any problems. But now, completely out of the blue, Fr

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-17 Thread SoundsFromSound
Wilbert Berendsen-2 wrote > Dear friends, > > I just released the source packages for Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi > 3.0.0 and python-ly 0.9.5 today. (I couldn't way until my birthday early > March :-)) > > Frescobaldi 3.0.0 is feature-wise the same, but

ANN: Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0, python-ly 0.9.5

2017-02-17 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Dear friends, I just released the source packages for Frescobaldi 2.20.0, Frescobaldi 3.0.0 and python-ly 0.9.5 today. (I couldn't way until my birthday early March :-)) Frescobaldi 2.20.0 provides a new Manuscript viewer, contributed by Urs Liska and Peter Bjuhr, some smaller fea

Re: Frescobaldi at GSoC? Call for support

2017-02-03 Thread Jeffery Shivers
d by Google, > which in the case of Frescobaldi is more than questionable, given our > small size. Got it. The most important point is to do the commitment to - if we're selected > - stick with it over the year, most of the time having nothing to do but > ensuring at least one admin is

Re: Frescobaldi at GSoC? Call for support

2017-02-03 Thread Urs Liska
placeholders/switching, I think. Registering as org admin is a "permanent" task, so one has to take over *some* responsibility from "now" to November. *If* the organization is actually accepted by Google, which in the case of Frescobaldi is more than questionable, given our sm

Re: Frescobaldi at GSoC? Call for support

2017-02-03 Thread Jeffery Shivers
usic tree"). > > But while this is *important* it is absolutely *required* that we will > have a second organization admin. Without that we can't even apply. > Really, this is an opportunity to support Frescobaldi development for > those who don't feel able to contribute a

Re: Frescobaldi at GSoC? Call for support

2017-02-03 Thread Urs Liska
work on the underlying document representation stuff (the "music tree"). But while this is *important* it is absolutely *required* that we will have a second organization admin. Without that we can't even apply. Really, this is an opportunity to support Frescobaldi development for

Re: [Frescobaldi] State of Frescobaldi development

2017-01-31 Thread Guy Stalnaker
t you do. I remember that I pay > > nothing for Frescobaldi, this truly excellent application and that it > > is developed evenings-on-weekends-when-time-permits basis. For > > myself, were development stopped today, Frescobaldi meets my needs as > > it is (though I don

Frescobaldi at GSoC? Call for support

2017-01-31 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, we decided to apply for this year's Google Summer of Code program with Frescobaldi. We don't expect the chances to be accepted very high, but it's probably worth the effort. It would give the chance to get more GSoC slots for the wider LilyPond cause, so it's definite

Re: [Frescobaldi] State of Frescobaldi development

2017-01-30 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op Sat, 28 Jan 2017 06:26:53 -0800 (PST) Guy Stalnaker schreef: > I, for one, GREATLY appreciate what you do. I remember that I pay > nothing for Frescobaldi, this truly excellent application and that it > is developed evenings-on-weekends-when-time-permits basis. For > myself, were

Re: [Frescobaldi] State of Frescobaldi development

2017-01-28 Thread Guy Stalnaker
Wilbert, I, for one, GREATLY appreciate what you do. I remember that I pay nothing for Frescobaldi, this truly excellent application and that it is developed evenings-on-weekends-when-time-permits basis. For myself, were development stopped today, Frescobaldi meets my needs as it is (though I

Re: [Frescobaldi] State of Frescobaldi development

2017-01-17 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Wilbert, On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 10:08:42 AM UTC+1, Wilbert wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > I apologize for being so silent in the Frescobaldi world the past > months, and not taking the time to respond to some private e-mails, > which I surely did read and

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-17 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Urs, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > > Ah, try to use SVG as a temporary workaround. > > Urs > > SVG output works (though, since I use a dark color scheme, the output appears as black on dark, which makes it hard to read. But I can cope with that for the time being. Cheer

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-17 Thread Urs Liska
Am 17. Januar 2017 13:16:51 MEZ schrieb "N. Andrew Walsh" : >Hi Wilbert, > >python-poppler-qt4 no longer compiles on my system (I suspect due to >incompatibility with recent ABI changes in sip, but I'm just >speculating), >so I'm trying to install fresco

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-17 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Wilbert, python-poppler-qt4 no longer compiles on my system (I suspect due to incompatibility with recent ABI changes in sip, but I'm just speculating), so I'm trying to install frescobaldi and python-poppler-qt5 from your git repository. I'm encountering an error with python-

Re: [Frescobaldi] State of Frescobaldi development

2017-01-17 Thread Ralph Palmer
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > Dear Friends, > > I apologize for being so silent in the Frescobaldi world the past > months, and not taking the time to respond to some private e-mails, > which I surely did read and highly appreciated! Thanks for all

Re: [Frescobaldi] State of Frescobaldi development

2017-01-17 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Dear Friends, I apologize for being so silent in the Frescobaldi world the past months, and not taking the time to respond to some private e-mails, which I surely did read and highly appreciated! I had so many, and demanding, recitals with Christmas that I even didn't get out a new release

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-17 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:36:06 +0100 "N. Andrew Walsh" schreef: > Hi List, > > I'm wondering if anybody is having recent issues with Frescobaldi. I > run a rolling-release distro (gentoo), so I install/update packages > on an ongoing basis. In this case, the

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-12 Thread Michael Gerdau
Hi Andrew, > according to this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604472, > the 0.24.0 version of python-poppler-qt4 does not compile against > sip-4.19. I'm not even sure where they found the 0.24.0 version, as it's > not in our regular repository. The AUR package for arch gets it from

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-12 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
where they found the 0.24.0 version, as it's not in our regular repository. I also don't find a version of python-poppler-qt that uses qt5, so I'm not sure the solution over at the github issue (where frescobaldi-3* is being run against qt5, and apparently works ok when python-p

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-12 Thread Michael Gerdau
Hi Andrew, > My version of python-poppler-qt4 no longer compiles against sip (version > 4.12 apparently breaks the ABI). So I'm stuck. > > *sigh* and I just got back to working with Lily again (my system also > moved to Guile-2 last summer, so I have *that* problem as well and have > to run off t

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-12 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Michael, On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Michael Gerdau wrote: > I'm also on a rolling release distro (ArchLinux) and they recently > rolled out Python 3.6. As a consequence I had to manually reinstall some > python packages (pyly and poppler integration) that are not part of the > official

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-12 Thread Michael Gerdau
Hi Andrew, > I'm wondering if anybody is having recent issues with Frescobaldi. I run > a rolling-release distro (gentoo), so I install/update packages on an > ongoing basis. In this case, the only package in frescobaldi's > dependency tree that's been updated since m

Re: Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-11 Thread Urs Liska
Am 11.01.2017 um 22:36 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh: > Hi List, > > I'm wondering if anybody is having recent issues with Frescobaldi. I > run a rolling-release distro (gentoo), so I install/update packages on > an ongoing basis. In this case, the only package in frescobaldi

Frescobaldi segfault with PyQt4-

2017-01-11 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi List, I'm wondering if anybody is having recent issues with Frescobaldi. I run a rolling-release distro (gentoo), so I install/update packages on an ongoing basis. In this case, the only package in frescobaldi's dependency tree that's been updated since mid-December is PyQt4,

Re: \displayLilyMusic frescobaldi

2016-11-22 Thread Gianmaria Lari
> If you do this you can write to a file in the filesystem: > > { > \displayLilyMusic #(open-output-file "display.txt") { c'4\f } > } > Oh! Very useful, thank you Andrew!! g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/ma

Re: \displayLilyMusic frescobaldi

2016-11-21 Thread Andrew Bernard
ding. Works fine for displayLilyMusic too. Just tried it now. I suppose you were asking about Frescobaldi, but you can put this in your score. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: \displayLilyMusic frescobaldi

2016-11-21 Thread Gianmaria Lari
achh! I didn't notice it! Thank you, g. On 21 November 2016 at 23:36, Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > Am 21.11.2016 um 23:28 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > > Is there any way to see the \displayLilyMusic output inside Frescobaldi? > > It is printed in the standard out

Re: \displayLilyMusic frescobaldi

2016-11-21 Thread Noeck
Hi, Am 21.11.2016 um 23:28 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > Is there any way to see the \displayLilyMusic output inside Frescobaldi? It is printed in the standard output. You can see it if you activate/select: Tools > LilyPond protocol HTH,

\displayLilyMusic frescobaldi

2016-11-21 Thread Gianmaria Lari
Is there any way to see the \displayLilyMusic output inside Frescobaldi? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Frescobaldi MusicXML import

2016-08-09 Thread imj-muz...@bluewin.ch
Hello Johan, ... but Jeep the original line breaks, to ease score fine tuning. Jacques Menu, iPhone > Le 9 août 2016 à 12:34, Johan Vromans a écrit : > > With MusicXML, import could you please add --no-stem-directions to the > settings? > > Maybe even better (and easier) if MusicXML2ly had a

Frescobaldi MusicXML import

2016-08-09 Thread Johan Vromans
With MusicXML, import could you please add --no-stem-directions to the settings? Maybe even better (and easier) if MusicXML2ly had a power option to "Ignore everything that LilyPond can do better". -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@

German translation (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0)

2016-05-02 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:45:41 +0600 Henning Hraban Ramm schreef: > I started working on the German translation (see attached), but can > proceed only next week. In case someone else is working on that, > please let me know - we can at least proofread each other. Thanks! > Did you consider using

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-26 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:41:53 +0200 David Kastrup schreef: > And I haven't seen _any_ compelling argument yet _why_ there is no > useful common ground between Python2 and Python3 that could do the job > without major rewrites of the current code base. I have maintained the Fresco

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-25 Thread Julien Rioux
On 24/04/2016 12:12 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" No disagreement here. At the very least it would be verification that the ones responsible for doing the GUB part of the transition are comfortable with the basic necessities. I think the only per

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Wright
On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 10:55:39 (+0200), m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: [-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: text/html, Encoding: base64, Size: 4.7K --] [-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] Please configure your client to post a text equivalent of your HTML code. Cheers, David.

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Wright
On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 10:00:38 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote: > Am 24.04.2016 um 09:56 schrieb David Kastrup: > > Noeck writes: > >>> So how do you define "the default" > >> As written before: What ships with the default installation. > > > > So python3 needs to be invoked using #!/usr/bin/python3 in

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" No disagreement here. At the very least it would be verification that the ones responsible for doing the GUB part of the transition are comfortable with the basic necessities. I think the only person likely to be able to upgrade GUB to pyth

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Kastrup
Paul Morris writes: >> On Apr 24, 2016, at 11:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Paul Morris writes: >> >>> IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s >>> python scripts working on python 2.7? >> >> Which ones _aren't_ working with Python 2.7? I run a number of them >>

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Paul Morris
> On Apr 24, 2016, at 11:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > Paul Morris writes: > >> IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s >> python scripts working on python 2.7? > > Which ones _aren't_ working with Python 2.7? I run a number of them > routinely, and I just converted

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Kastrup
Paul Morris writes: > IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s > python scripts working on python 2.7? Which ones _aren't_ working with Python 2.7? I run a number of them routinely, and I just converted some file with midi2ly as well. -- David Kastrup

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Paul Morris
IIUC, wouldn’t the first step be, in any case, to get LilyPond’s python scripts working on python 2.7? Then at that point we could discuss and decide about whether it’s better to switch to python 3 or to support both 2.7 and 3. Searching the LilyPond source code for files with extension “.py” t

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Davide Liessi
limited amount of old code > that requires some effort to make it compatible with both Py2 and Py3 than > that might be worth considering. Writing new code using a common subset > isn't that difficult. That's where the six library can help. Indeed, Frescobaldi 2 (just to m

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Davide Liessi
Python scripts bundled with LilyPond. In Frescobaldi we use the system-provided Python for them. Best wishes. Davide ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Federico Bruni
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:02:19PM +0200, Noeck wrote: > > I will add a comment to the first of these two issues (and mark the second > > as duplicate): > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ > > Which two? They are the

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Noeck
> I will add a comment to the first of these two issues (and mark the second as > duplicate): > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1895/ Which two? They are the same. Probably just a copy-and-paste mistake. For completeness, it

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl
mon subset isn't that difficult. That's where the six library can help.MT Oorspronkelijk bericht Onderwerp: Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0Van: David Kastrup Aan: Werner LEMBERG Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgWerner LEMBERG writes:>> So far we only ha

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> So far we only have an offer for a hard and incompatible transition >> to Python3-only > > Actually, I dislike this. Similar to you, I don't see a convincing > reason to not write python code that is compatible with both version 2 > and version 3. Well, #!/usr/bin/guil

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> So far we only have an offer for a hard and incompatible transition > to Python3-only Actually, I dislike this. Similar to you, I don't see a convincing reason to not write python code that is compatible with both version 2 and version 3. Werner _

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread BB
If anybody likes to check the difference between 2-3 here are just two links https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.0.html http://www.cs.carleton.edu/faculty/jgoldfea/cs201/spring11/Python2vs3.pdf There are many more docs on internet dealing with the version differences ...

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Kastrup
"m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl" writes: > Has anyone considered using the six library? Six has helped me a lot > in my own Python projects to write code that is compatible with both > python2 and python3. Well, as long as we have no one considering doing a gradual python2/python3 transition, there is n

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl
Has anyone considered using the six library? Six has helped me a lot in my own Python projects to write code that is compatible with both python2 and python3. MT Oorspronkelijk bericht Onderwerp: Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0Van: David Kastrup Aan: Urs Liska Cc

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 24.04.2016 um 09:56 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Noeck writes: >> So how do you define "the default" >>> >>> As written before: What ships with the default installation. >> >> So python3 needs to be invoked using #!/usr/bin/python3 in the scripts >> (what happens when

Re: Python 3, was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

2016-04-24 Thread Federico Bruni
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:44:33AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > > As a side-note, midi2ly needs our shipped python-version. It stopps > working even with my system-python, i.e. 2.7.9. > Not sure, whether this requires a bugreport, because there is no bug > with lily's python... > I will add a c

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >