Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

ha scritto: What happens if you use Lilypond 2.19.84 Why you don't suggest 2.20 (new stable)? I am slow ... I hadn't noticed 2.20 has been released already ... Thanks for the reminder :-) MT

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

ommand line I get an error > "lilypond is not a commmand,." > > When I fix this I'll test with a.ly and comment the results. > > Cheers > Pablo > > El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 22:30, Urs Liska () > escribió: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 19.03.2020, 22:30 +0100 s

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

line I get an error "lilypond is not a commmand,." When I fix this I'll test with a.ly and comment the results. Cheers Pablo El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 22:30, Urs Liska () escribió: > Am Donnerstag, den 19.03.2020, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Pablo Cordal: > > I don't think so,

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

Am Donnerstag, den 19.03.2020, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Pablo Cordal: > I don't think so, because I compile a.ly from Frescobaldi with no > problem (it uses the same lilypond.exe than the command line). Now > I'm installing 2.20.0 version of lilypond, when it's ready I'll > comment

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

I don't think so, because I compile a.ly from Frescobaldi with no problem (it uses the same lilypond.exe than the command line). Now I'm installing 2.20.0 version of lilypond, when it's ready I'll comment the results. El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 22:24, Kevin Barry () escribió: > Is it possi

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

> started to compile it... and returned an error. I attach image and >> >> the a.ly file. I compile the >> >> a.ly inside Frescobaldi with no problems. >> > >> > What happens if you compile a minimal example with only >> > >> > \version "2.18.2" >> > { c' } >> > >> > in it? >> > >> > What happens if you use Lilypond 2.19.84 >> > >> >> Why you don't suggest 2.20 (new stable)? >> http://lilypond.org/windows.html >> >> >> >>

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

the a.ly inside Frescobaldi with no problems. What happens if you compile a minimal example with only \version "2.18.2" { c' } in it? What happens if you use Lilypond 2.19.84 Why you don't suggest 2.20 (new stable)? http://lilypond.org/windows.html

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Pablo Cordal wrote: Hi folks, I just copied the file in C:\Users\ana and lilypond found the file, started to compile it... and returned an error. I attach image and the a.ly file. I compile the a.ly inside Frescobaldi with no problems. What happens if you compile

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

El 19/3/20 a las 19:07, Pablo Cordal escribió: > Hi, > > I'm doing the easy first test with this issue. I created a file a.ly > and put it in c: > > When I run the command prompt lilypond doesn't find the file (I attach > the results). > > Anybody knows what am I doing wrong? > >

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi Pablo, Don't know anything about Visual Basic, but it's the lilypond.exe binary that you need to call to do the work for you directly. I am sure Visual Basic can call external commands?

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

visual basic program where I enter some notes in lilypond language and then I press the button "save". Then the program creates a .ly file. Then I go to Frescobaldi, open the file and compile it --> a pdf and midi files are created, then I can listen to the midi file. What I need i

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

Dear Pablo, Il giorno gio 19 mar 2020 alle ore 17:25 Pablo Cordal ha scritto: > What I need is to generate the pdf and midi file from visual basic directly. > Is there any way I can use the compile functionality of Frescobaldi from > visual basic? "compile functionality

Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

in lilypond language and then I press the button "save". Then the program creates a .ly file. Then I go to Frescobaldi, open the file and compile it --> a pdf and midi files are created, then I can listen to the midi file. What I need is to generate the pdf and midi file from visual b

Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora 31

Il giorno dom 15 mar 2020 alle 12:33, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: A new install of Fedora 31, Frescobaldi installs but the documentation reader is missed up. Moving the cursor over the page seeming drop down windows appear half filled with images of parts of the page and you cant read

Frescobaldi on Fedora 31

A new install of Fedora 31, Frescobaldi installs but the documentation reader is missed up. Moving the cursor over the page seeming drop down windows appear half filled with images of parts of the page and you cant read the docs. Everything is pristine, with the exception that I have added GNOME

Re: Frescobaldi 3.1.1 doesn't even start

> Dear Massimiliano, > > Il giorno sab 7 mar 2020 alle ore 17:08 Massimiliano Viel > ha scritto: >> I checked today the last version of Frescobaldi for macOS on an iMac >> mid-2011 with 16 GB Ram and macOS 10.13.6. >> After a few second after double-clicking the icon

Re: Frescobaldi 3.1.1 doesn't even start

Dear Massimiliano, Il giorno sab 7 mar 2020 alle ore 17:08 Massimiliano Viel ha scritto: > I checked today the last version of Frescobaldi for macOS on an iMac mid-2011 > with 16 GB Ram and macOS 10.13.6. > After a few second after double-clicking the icon it just crashes without &

Frescobaldi 3.1.1 doesn't even start

Hi everybody, I checked today the last version of Frescobaldi for macOS on an iMac mid-2011 with 16 GB Ram and macOS 10.13.6. After a few second after double-clicking the icon it just crashes without comments. Any hint? Thank you! massimiliano

Re: Frescobaldi from git broken?

rup >: >> > > >> > > Thomas Morley writes: >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from >> > > > 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb >

Re: Frescobaldi from git broken?

Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley : > > Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley > : > > > > Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > > > > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > > > > >

Re: Frescobaldi from git broken?

Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley : > > Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e.

Re: Frescobaldi from git broken?

Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > Thomas Morley writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from > > 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb > > > > Even an input of nothing m

Re: Frescobaldi from git broken?

Thomas Morley writes: > Hi, > > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from > 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb > > Even an input of nothing more than > { s1 } > results in a gs-error: > > Starting lilydevel 2.19.84 [Untitled]... > Proc

Frescobaldi from git broken?

Hi, I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb Even an input of nothing more than { s1 } results in a gs-error: Starting lilydevel 2.19.84 [Untitled]... Processing `/tmp/frescobaldi-ua0f6js5/tmp2h4kg_nt/document.ly' Parsing... /tmp

Re: Frescobaldi Music View

Hi Guy, thanks for reporting, registered as https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1247 The music view has undergone *substantial* modifications, actually Wilbert has completely rewritten the code, which already shows great improvements in functionality and carries even further

Frescobaldi Music View

Howdy Frescobaldi users -- after a recent update to v3 and v3.1, the music view now defaults to 100%. It did not use to do this. Everytime I open a score, I now have to set the view to Page or Width, etc. I cannot find a Configuration option to tell Music View my preferred view (Page). Am I

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Yes, open multiple lilypond source files in multiple tabs in window 10.Can you send me images of lilypond setting to check what is the difference between your working setting and my not working seeting. Thanks,Ming Sent from Mail for Windows 10 

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Do you mean multiple LilyPond source files in different tabs? This works for me on Windows 10. --- Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:40 AM yming tsang wrote: > > I install frecobaldi 3.1.1 in window 10. The score wizard is working. > > However, I cannot open multiple lilypond

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

I install frecobaldi 3.1.1 in window 10. The score wizard is working. However, I cannot open multiple lilypond file. Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Score Wizard now works on Ubuntu 19.10. --- Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:08 AM Michael Rivers wrote: > > The Score Wizard is fixed for Windows 10 in the latest version, 3.1.1. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html >

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

The Score Wizard is fixed for Windows 10 in the latest version, 3.1.1. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno gio 2 gen 2020 alle ore 01:13 Michael Rivers ha scritto: > The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). I > uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works > fine. Il giorno gio 2 gen 2020 alle ore 04:10 Guy Stalnaker h

Re: Getting Frescobaldi to use my poppler

(via Gmail) On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 9:42 AM Kevin Cole wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:39 PM Federico Bruni wrote: >> >> >> See this issue: >> https://github.com/frescobaldi/python-poppler-qt5/issues/14#issuecomment-506735413 >> >> Try

Re: [Frescobaldi] ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Mac OS X Mojave- I previously reported that Frescobaldi 3.1 installed from the disk image reported an error when convert-ly was requested. There were a few other minor anomalies. I have now installed frescobaldi (3.1) from MacPorts and everything I’ve tried works as advertised. Thanks

Re: Getting Frescobaldi to use my poppler

On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:39 PM Federico Bruni wrote: > > See this issue: > > https://github.com/frescobaldi/python-poppler-qt5/issues/14#issuecomment-506735413 > > Try this: > wget > > https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/hg/sip/raw-file/79f89221765d/sipdistutils.p

Re: Getting Frescobaldi to use my poppler

It seems you're not the only one. A similar problem (poppler and sipdistutils) was encountered by another, and a solution proposed -- though not marked as accepted by the questioner.

Re: Getting Frescobaldi to use my poppler

Il giorno ven 3 gen 2020 alle 09:28, Knute Snortum ha scritto: I noticed that the minimum version for poppler was 0.82 for Frescobaldi 3.1 and I didn't have a package that high, so I built poppler from source. It's installed in /usr/local/. But when I run Frescobaldi and look

Getting Frescobaldi to use my poppler

I noticed that the minimum version for poppler was 0.82 for Frescobaldi 3.1 and I didn't have a package that high, so I built poppler from source. It's installed in /usr/local/. But when I run Frescobaldi and look in the versions tab of the About window, it is still using the old poppler. So I

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

:12 PM Michael Rivers wrote: > The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). > I > uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works > fine. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html > >

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On 1/1/2020 7:31 PM, Michael Rivers wrote: The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). I uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works fine. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html Correct. Same here. Score

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). I uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works fine. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Windows installer available (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!)

I had also an error after installing Frescobaldi 3.1. I deinstalled the program and installed 3.1 again. This time it started  without any error. Thanks a lot for Frescobaldi Bernhard Am 01.01.2020 um 19:18 schrieb SoundsFromSound: > Wilbert Berendsen-2 wrote >> Dear friends, >&g

Re: Windows installer available (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!)

Wilbert Berendsen-2 wrote > Dear friends, > > thanks go to Jörg Hoffmann for creating a full Windows installer for > Frescobaldi 3.1. > > https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/releases > > All the best! > Wilbert > > > -- > Wilbert Berends

Frescobaldi Windows10

A huge thank you to everyone involved. Installation without any hiccups and so far all the old "bugs" have been sorted. Thanks again a very good job . Regards Peter

Re: Windows installer available (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!)

Hi Ming, yming tsang wrote > I got the error message when I run frecobaldi. I just installed Frescobaldi 3.1 on Win10. When launching for the first time, I had the same error message. Maybe I should have de-installed Frescobaldi 3.0 before? So I de-installed Frescobaldi 3.1 and just

Re: Windows installer available (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!)

Il giorno mar 31 dic 2019 alle ore 16:13 MING TSANG ha scritto: > Any place I can download frecobaldi 3.0.0.2 and reinstall v3.1 so that I can > continue running frecobaldi. Previous releases are still available on GitHub: https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/releases Best wishes. Davide

Windows installer available (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!)

Dear friends, thanks go to Jörg Hoffmann for creating a full Windows installer for Frescobaldi 3.1. https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/releases All the best! Wilbert -- Wilbert Berendsen (www.wilbertberendsen.nl)

Re: Frescobaldi doesn’t recognise python-ly

Am Montag, den 30.12.2019, 17:59 +0100 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > Hello everybody, > > after upgrading to Ubuntu 18.04 I freshly installed Frescobaldi (and > python-ly) according to the guide in the wiki (except for writing > the > ~/bin/frescobaldi within gedit, because some

Re: Frescobaldi doesn’t recognise python-ly

it from the ‘echo’ calls in <https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux#step-by-step-instructions>… Shouldn' that read: export PYTHONPATH=~/python-ly:$PYTHONPATH ??? Obviously, yes. Thanks, that fixes it. I never read up on sh basics… There's also

Re: Frescobaldi doesn’t recognise python-ly

On 30.12.19 18:11, Ralf Mattes wrote: The most sensible explanation for that would be an error in the bash file, so I attach it in case someone else can see one… Where did you get this shell script from? I tried to assemble it from the ‘echo’ calls in <https://github.com/frescoba

Re: Frescobaldi doesn’t recognise python-ly

python-ly:$PYTHONPATH ??? Cheers, RalfD > (I cloned the repos directly in the home directory, so ~/python-ly > should be the correct location) > > @Urs: Should the wiki guide be updated to point to the repos in the > frescobaldi organisation instead of wbsoft? > > Best

Frescobaldi doesn’t recognise python-ly

Hello everybody, after upgrading to Ubuntu 18.04 I freshly installed Frescobaldi (and python-ly) according to the guide in the wiki (except for writing the ~/bin/frescobaldi within gedit, because somehow the first echo line wouldn’t work… and I cloned both repos from github.com/frescobaldi

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Original-Nachricht Il giorno lun 30 dic 2019 alle ore 10:21 Thomas Scharkowski ha scritto: Output of: find /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework -type f -name 'python*' [...] and output of: find /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework -type f -name 'python*' [...]

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno lun 30 dic 2019 alle ore 10:21 Thomas Scharkowski ha scritto: > Output of: > find /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework -type f -name 'python*' > [...] > and output of: > find /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework -type f -name 'python*' > [...] Thanks. Just to confirm the

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Original-Nachricht Il giorno dom 29 dic 2019 alle ore 11:18 Thomas Scharkowski ha scritto: I installed the Frescobaldi 3.1 dmg and it works. Only one problem: convert-ly called from frescobaldi gives this message: arch: posix_spawnp: /System/Library/Frameworks

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno dom 29 dic 2019 alle ore 11:18 Thomas Scharkowski ha scritto: > I installed the Frescobaldi 3.1 dmg and it works. > Only one problem: convert-ly called from frescobaldi gives this message: > arch: posix_spawnp: > /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/b

Re: Frescobaldi Quick key for Lily button

Urs, et al. Thank you, ƒg On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:22 PM Urs Liska wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 29.12.2019, 10:44 -0500 schrieb Freeman Gilmore: > > In Frescobaldi is there a quick key that can be used in place of > > the Lily button? > > There are a number of preset shortcut

Re: Frescobaldi Quick key for Lily button

Am Sonntag, den 29.12.2019, 10:44 -0500 schrieb Freeman Gilmore: > In Frescobaldi is there a quick key that can be used in place of > the Lily button? There are a number of preset shortcuts to trigger LilyPond compilations: * Ctrl+M Regular compilation *with* point-and-click *

Re: Frescobaldi Quick key for Lily button

Am Sonntag, den 29.12.2019, 10:44 -0500 schrieb Freeman Gilmore: > In Frescobaldi is there a quick key that can be used in place of > the Lily button? There are a number of preset shortcuts to trigger LilyPond compilations: * Ctrl+M Regular compilation *with* point-and-click *

Re: Frescobaldi Quick key for Lily button

Am 29.12.19 um 16:44 schrieb Freeman Gilmore: In Frescobaldi is there a quick key that can be used in place of the Lily button? Yes, it’s Ctrl+M.    And one that will also clear the Music View or better one that would do both?    The problem is that the old view may not be updated when

Frescobaldi Quick key for Lily button

In Frescobaldi is there a quick key that can be used in place of the Lily button? And one that will also clear the Music View or better one that would do both?The problem is that the old view may not be updated when you compile something that doe not show an error message. I would like

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

I forgot to mention: I am on macOS Catalina 10.15.2 I installed the Frescobaldi 3.1 dmg and it works. Only one problem: convert-ly called from frescobaldi gives this message: arch: posix_spawnp: /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python2.7: Bad CPU type in executable

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/releases The application bundle should work on macOS 10.12 Sierra and later: otherwise, please report the failure (either with a GitHub issue or by email to me). It might work also on previous versions of macOS: if it does, please let us know (either

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/releases The application bundle should work on macOS 10.12 Sierra and later: otherwise, please report the failure (either with a GitHub issue or by email to me). It might work also on previous versions of macOS: if it does, please let us know (either

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

> On Dec 28, 2019, at 5:15 PM, Stanton Sanderson >> >> What is the behaviour you are observing? > > Away from my machine. Will report ASAP. Davide, As you stated, the edited file is temporary and must be saved first to replace an existing pdf. Sorry for the noise. Stan

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Stan > On Dec 28, 2019, at 3:45 PM, Davide Liessi wrote: > > What is the behaviour you are observing? Away from my machine. Will report ASAP.

Re: Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Seems to be. I just verified it a couple of times on Mojave.  No sound output without doing it first.  No MIDI events show in the flashing green light on Qsynth unless doing it first. J. On 12/28/19 13:29, Davide Liessi wrote: > Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 21:54 John Helly > ha scritto:

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

ich is attached as a PDF, as >> a non-programmer it’s gobbledygook to me. > > Can you try running it again and checking the error messages in the > Console application when Frescobaldi crashes? That was what I attached to my previous e-mail, unless there is something different you are looking for.

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

ompile it, the new PDF replaces the old one. If I change an existing document, DO NOT save it and compile it, the viewer shows the new PDF, which is saved in a temporary location, and the old PDF is not replaced. This is the usual behaviour of Frescobaldi. It would be a bug if after changing,

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

c 2019 alle ore 22:24 John Helly ha scritto: > I confirm same behavior. I can reproduce the issue. Issue opened at https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1232. I will investigate it. Best wishes. Davide

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

> On Dec 28, 2019, at 3:23 PM, John Helly wrote: > > I confirm same behavior. > J. > > On 12/28/19 13:11, Stanton Sanderson wrote: >> (Mac OS Mojave (current), Frescobaldi 3.1 from dmg) Another behavior noted (change from previous versions): the new pdf generated

Re: Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 21:54 John Helly ha scritto: > 1. Audio MIDI Setup.app Are you sure this step is necessary? As far as I understand it should not be. > I have a bunch of macs and could help with testing; if that's useful. Thanks for the offer: it might indeed be very useful,

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

I confirm same behavior. J. On 12/28/19 13:11, Stanton Sanderson wrote: > (Mac OS Mojave (current), Frescobaldi 3.1 from dmg) > > An anomaly noted: document conversion from 2.19.2 to 2.19.83 fails with the > following error message reported: > >> ImportEr

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

y running it again and checking the error messages in the Console application when Frescobaldi crashes? Thanks. Davide

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

(Mac OS Mojave (current), Frescobaldi 3.1 from dmg) An anomaly noted: document conversion from 2.19.2 to 2.19.83 fails with the following error message reported: > ImportError: Bad magic number in > /Applications/Frescobaldi.app/Contents/Resources/site.pyc > > > The docume

Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

with Qsynth and works fine but dependent on the following startup order (as before): 1. Audio MIDI Setup.app 2. Qsynth + soundfont specification in Qsynth setup (also need to turn up gain knob) 3. Frescobaldi 3.1.app Thanks for the great work.  I have a bunch of macs

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Sorry, forgot to copy the list. On 12/28, ma...@masonhock.com wrote: > On 12/28, Urs Liska wrote: > > Ubuntu 16.04 is a LTS release with (IIRC) five years of support. So it > > is not unreasonable for someone to use it. However, we (Frescobaldi) > > seem to have been hit b

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Am 28.12.19 um 14:08 schrieb Ralph Palmer: Hi, Urs - On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 AM Urs Liska <mailto:li...@openlilylib.org>> wrote: Ubuntu 16.04 is a LTS release with (IIRC) five years of support. So it is not unreasonable for someone to use it. However, we (Fr

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

I have my own question. In the INSTALL document it states that Poppler 0.82.0 or greater is required. On my Ubuntu 19.10 system I have only version 0.80.0 and I'm having trouble building it from source. Also, my Poppler seem to be tied to python3-poppler-qt which is at 0.24.2-3build5. So will

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On 2019-12-28 1:11 a.m., Andrew Bernard wrote: Thank you Wilbert and the team. With an existing Ubuntu 19.04 Frescobaldi 3.0.0 installation, all I had to do was install from the tarball and add the following: apt install python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine Running Fedora 31 and an existing 3.0.0

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 5:08 AM Ralph Palmer wrote: > As I've said before, I'm a novice at command line Linux, but I'm attaching a > screenshot of my command line search (locate) for QtWebEngine and QtWebKit. > I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. > > Hope this helps, > > Ralph Try this. First

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! How to install with windows?

Hi, Wilbert: Thank you for the new version of Frecobalsi v3.1. I am a window 10 user, I have a hard time installing the new frecobaldi v3.1. I download the frecobaldi 3.1.tar.gz and extract it to a folder. Then I click on setup .py NOTHING happen. I need help to install. Thank again, Ming

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! How to install with windows?

What to do to install Frescobaldi 3.1 on windows? Kind regards Bernhard Am 27.12.2019 um 11:20 schrieb Wilbert Berendsen: > Dear Friends, > > Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! There are many new features. > > Most notably: > > - A new Fonts dialog to select fonts for text,

Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Wilbert & Davide, Sincere thanks for the wonderful update and rapid port to Mac. I am in awe! Happy New Year to you and your families. Stan Illinois, USA

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Hi, Urs - On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 AM Urs Liska wrote: > Ubuntu 16.04 is a LTS release with (IIRC) five years of support. So it > is not unreasonable for someone to use it. However, we (Frescobaldi) > seem to have been hit by this five-year term since we're dealing with a > chan

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 10:19 Jacques Menu ha scritto: > I’ve switched to it on Mac OS 10.14.6 (Mojave, which still allows 32bit apps > to be run), and it runs fine. Good to know! Anyway, the application bundle contains only 64 bit code. Best wishes. Davide

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Hello Wilbert and Davide, Thanks a lot for the great job issuing this Frescobaldi 3.1 release! I’ve switched to it on Mac OS 10.14.6 (Mojave, which still allows 32bit apps to be run), and it runs fine. Will let you know should any issue arise. A happy new year 2020 to all lilyponders! JM

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno ven 27 dic 2019 alle ore 11:21 Wilbert Berendsen ha scritto: > Please give packagers some time to prepare Windows/MacOSX installers, > they will be announced when ready. The Mac installer (DMG containing application bundle) is now available at https://github.com/frescobaldi/fresc

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

to use it. However, we (Frescobaldi) seem to have been hit by this five-year term since we're dealing with a change in the Qt framework that has phased out support for a module over (again, IIRC) 2-3 years. So all *current* Linux distributions ship with a Qt version that only includes QtWebEngine

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Thank you Wilbert and the team. With an existing Ubuntu 19.04 Frescobaldi 3.0.0 installation, all I had to do was install from the tarball and add the following: apt install python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine since the majority of the dependencies I already have in place. I hope this tiny sliver

Lilypond/Frescobaldi on Catalina using Docker

mailing list, I missed it. Based on the helpful guide here https://kylebaldw.in/posts/2019/running-lilypond-on-catalina/, I have 64-bit Lilypond working from Frescobaldi on MacOS Catalina. You can get my scripts and Dockerfiles on Github: https://github.com/shevvek/lilypond-docker. The images

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On 12/28, Simon Albrecht wrote: > I happen to have a little problem with that as well; here on my Ubuntu > 16.04 machine neither apt nor synaptic can find any variation of > qtwebengine5. There are several variations of webkit or so, but that’s > probably something different, right? What can I do?

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

> Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! There are many new features. Well done folks and thanks for the continued effort! [release notes snipped] > Please give packagers some time to prepare Windows/MacOSX installers, > they will be announced when ready. I tried to give it a go unde

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On 27.12.19 17:10, Kevin Cole wrote: If I'm installing on my machine, do I need QtWebEngine? (I can't find that through Ubuntu Software, either.) As to the Qt stuff, I find using synaptic ("sudo apt install synaptic") a bit more helpful than the Ubuntu Software installer. Slightly

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Dear Frescobaldi devs, that sounds absolutely great and I chime into thanking you a lot for this great software! Best, Simon On 27.12.19 11:20, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Dear Friends, Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! There are many new features. Most notably: - A new Fonts dialog

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Hi Ralph, Frescobaldi 3.1 will *eventually* end up in the repositories of the various distributions, but that's beyond our control. On Ubuntu 18.04 it is very simple to "install" Frescobaldi directly from the Git repository. The section "Step-by-step Instructions" on

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Thank Wilbert & Urs & the developer team whom I do not know! Frescobaldi remains after years of use one if the best computer programs I've ever used. I am always grateful for it and for you. Regards, Guy -- “Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

own directory in my /home directory, then > extracting it there, but I still cannot figure out how to install it, even > after reading the install file. I would greatly appreciate some further > advice about how, what, and where I need to install Frescobaldi 3.1 and > associated

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 9:50 AM Ralph Palmer wrote: I confess that I'm a bit of a novice regarding installation via tarball. > > I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. > > I cannot find Frescobaldi 3.1 in my Ubuntu Software app. > > I downloaded the tarball, but I'm u

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:21 AM Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > Dear Friends, > > Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! There are many new features. > > Wonderful! > I am very grateful to many co-developers that now contribute on a > regular basis: Urs Liska, Peter Bjuhr, and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >