Re: Frescobaldi: errors with 2.23.80

Le 01/11/2022 à 22:23, Knute Snortum a écrit : (I'm hoping this is the best place to post Frescobaldi issues.) I have found that Frescobaldi emits errors when in the Layout Control view with Display control points checked. Remember this? https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues

Frescobaldi: errors with 2.23.80

(I'm hoping this is the best place to post Frescobaldi issues.) I have found that Frescobaldi emits errors when in the Layout Control view with Display control points checked. The first error has to do with the new way Guile 2 deals with the format function. This is my proposed fix

Frescobaldi and Python 3.11

Hi, Frescobaldi is facing an issue that prevents it from launching under Python 3.11 beta. https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1453 Python 3.11.0 will be released tomorrow, and it's a matter of weeks until Fedora 37 is also released, with Python 3.11.0. Thus the Frescobaldi

Re: Frescobaldi preferences location (windows)

: Computer\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\frescobaldi Probably it appears at a second location, a sub-path of Computer\HKEY_USERS As far as I know, one of them is just a copy of the other. Cheers, Klaus

Frescobaldi preferences location (windows)

Hi, I'm in the horrible situation of having to setup a new (windows) laptop, as the display on the old one has b0rked. So, I need to reinstall Lilypond and Frescobaldi. I'd spent quite a bit of time tweaking the Frescobaldi preferences to exactly how I wanted them, and don't really want to have

Re: Lilypond/Frescobaldi on Mac Os 12

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 2:56 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 06/10/2022 à 14:27, Mark Mathias a écrit : > > I am introducing an orchestra teacher friend to Lilypond/Frescobaldi. > > We tried to install Lilypond on a Mac Os 12 notebook, but got an error > > message saying Lilyp

Re: Lilypond/Frescobaldi on Mac Os 12

Le 06/10/2022 à 14:27, Mark Mathias a écrit : I am introducing an orchestra teacher friend to Lilypond/Frescobaldi. We tried to install Lilypond on a Mac Os 12 notebook, but got an error message saying Lilypond wasn't compatible with that version. Our next step will be to install it on her

Re: Lilypond/Frescobaldi on Mac Os 12

> Am 06.10.2022 um 14:27 schrieb Mark Mathias : > > I am introducing an orchestra teacher friend to Lilypond/Frescobaldi. We > tried to install Lilypond on a Mac Os 12 notebook, but got an error message > saying Lilypond wasn't compatible with that version

Lilypond/Frescobaldi on Mac Os 12

I am introducing an orchestra teacher friend to Lilypond/Frescobaldi. We tried to install Lilypond on a Mac Os 12 notebook, but got an error message saying Lilypond wasn't compatible with that version. Our next step will be to install it on her home PC, but at some point it would be nice

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

I have compiled a set of step by step instructions for getting point and click going with gvim on Alma Linux. I'll start a new thread as this one is becoming longish. Andrew

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

; > > On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > > > On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote: > > > > > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous > > > > > attempts > > > > > to

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

uis > : > > > > As far as editing music sheet is concerned,Io remember having been using > jEdit, a text editor written in Java, with a Lilypond extension displaying > the PDF with links to the Lilypond code like Frescobaldi does it. > > > > That was a long time ago,

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

Am So., 4. Sept. 2022 um 08:51 Uhr schrieb Silvain Dupertuis : > > As far as editing music sheet is concerned,Io remember having been using > jEdit, a text editor written in Java, with a Lilypond extension displaying > the PDF with links to the Lilypond code like Fres

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

As far as editing music sheet is concerned,Io remember having been using jEdit, a text editor written in Java, with a Lilypond extension displaying the PDF with links to the Lilypond code like Frescobaldi does it. That was a long time ago, maybe before I even had Frescobaldi, but it would

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

optionally, > specify the name (or perhaps use QSynth for this), or use #> ps -ef > to see the fluidsynth process id, then check in Frescobaldi if that > process ID/name shows in the midi preferences config? > > It's flyidsynth that converts midi to sound. If I remember rig

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

in server mode and, optionally, specify the name (or perhaps use QSynth for this), or use #> ps -ef to see the fluidsynth process id, then check in Frescobaldi if that process ID/name shows in the midi preferences config? It's flyidsynth that converts midi to sound. If I remember rightly all Frescoba

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 00:52 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Using Alma Linux 9 I can get Frescobaldi running with flatpak. I > just > installed it - no messing around. See attached image. > > Have not tried Alma Linux 8.6. > > I have not hammered it to test but t

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 06:50 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 02/09/2022 à 22:43, J Martin Rushton a écrit : > > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous > > attempts > > to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its > > dependen

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

I have just discovered from a query in the Google Groups Frescobaldi group that Frescobaldi 3 uses Qt5. In my stupidity I was reading the frescobaldi.org download and build instructions for Frescobaldi 2 (may be better if that were deleted by now). Therefore, I will start anew! Andrew

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

Dear all, I answered elsewhere (https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1454, https://groups.google.com/g/frescobaldi/c/dUQPO85jUL0), but for the sake of completeness: Il giorno sab 3 set 2022 alle ore 03:24 Andrew Bernard ha scritto: > Part of the process to install Py

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

Fair enough. I spent all afternoon on it. I am utterly unable to get Qt4 going on Alma Linux despite decades of being a UNIX programmer. I think it's futile. I conisdered doing the port of Frescobaldi to Qt6 but that is a large job, and besides, may destabilise other peoples installs A few

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

; It's > absurdly complicated. And Qt4 has been obsoleted anyway, making this > all > that much harder. > > How committed are you to Alma Linux? At this point I would recommend > a > distro that you don't have to fight with, such as Ubuntu, which has > frescoba

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

spent another couple of hours clearing out previous > > > > attempts > > > > to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its > > > > dependency > > > > hell. > > > > > > > > Is there any alternative to Fresco

Re: Installing Frescobaldi 3.1.3 on Mac with MacOS 12.1

On 2 Sep 2022, at 17:29, Knute Snortum wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 12:30 AM Michael Hendry > wrote: >> >> Thanks to Omer and Jean for getting me back on the Frescobaldi road again. >> >> I’m now able to open, edit and compile lilypond source documents

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

Le 02/09/2022 à 22:43, J Martin Rushton a écrit : I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency hell. [...] I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps. Would it work for you to us the Frescobaldi

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

that much harder. How committed are you to Alma Linux? At this point I would recommend a distro that you don't have to fight with, such as Ubuntu, which has frescobaldi in the repo anyway. If you cannot or will not change from Alma Linux I can push on. Do let me know. Andrew On 3/09/2022 9:37 am

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 22:46:01 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote: > On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote: > > > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous > > > attemp

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

am, J Martin Rushton wrote: I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency hell. Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi? I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps.

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

ous >>> attempts >>> to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its >>> dependency >>> hell. >>> >>> Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi? >> >> An editor (emacs) + LilyPond + PDF viewer (xpdf). >> (My choices in parenthe

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote: > > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous > > attempts > > to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its &g

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote: > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts > to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency > hell. > > Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi? An editor (emacs) +

Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi

Hi Martin, that depends on what you consider an alternative to Frescobaldi. Lilypond can be used with any text editor. There is a quite powerful Lilypond module for VSCode, maybe that is something along the lines of what you are looking for? Cheers, Valentin Am Freitag, 2. September 2022, 22

Alternative to Frescobaldi

I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency hell. Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi? I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps. -- J Martin Rushton MBCS

Re: Installing Frescobaldi 3.1.3 on Mac with MacOS 12.1

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 12:30 AM Michael Hendry wrote: > > Thanks to Omer and Jean for getting me back on the Frescobaldi road again. > > I’m now able to open, edit and compile lilypond source documents again, but > I’m getting a lot of warnings about deprecated code which I’d

Re: Installing Frescobaldi 3.1.3 on Mac with MacOS 12.1

Thanks to Omer and Jean for getting me back on the Frescobaldi road again. I’m now able to open, edit and compile lilypond source documents again, but I’m getting a lot of warnings about deprecated code which I’d like to get rid of. When I attempt to use ‘convert.ly’ (via Frescobaldi’s Tools

Re: Configuration problems following new installation of Frescobaldi

Le 30/08/2022 à 16:40, David Wright a écrit : On Tue 30 Aug 2022 at 09:27:03 (+0200), Jean Abou Samra wrote: Le 30/08/2022 à 08:56, Michael Hendry a écrit : I stopped using Frescobaldi and Lilypond at the beginning of the Covid pandemic

Re: Configuration problems following new installation of Frescobaldi

On Tue 30 Aug 2022 at 09:27:03 (+0200), Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > > > > Le 30/08/2022 à 08:56, Michael Hendry a > écrit : > >cite="mid:f07d2e1c-86fb-4b51-8cb9-dff22577c...@gmail.com"> > I stopped using F

Re: Configuration problems following new installation of Frescobaldi

Le 30/08/2022 à 12:10, Michael Hendry a écrit : On 30 Aug 2022, at 08:27, Jean Abou Samra wrote: Le 30/08/2022 à 08:56, Michael Hendry a écrit : I stopped using Frescobaldi and Lilypond at the beginning

Re: Configuration problems following new installation of Frescobaldi

On 30 Aug 2022, at 08:27, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 30/08/2022 à 08:56, Michael Hendry a écrit : >> >> I stopped using Frescobaldi and Lilypond at the beginning of the Covid >> pandemic and since then I have bought a new iMac with Monterey and >> transferr

Re: Configuration problems following new installation of Frescobaldi

Le 30/08/2022 à 08:56, Michael Hendry a écrit : I stopped using Frescobaldi and Lilypond at the beginning of the Covid pandemic and since then I have bought a new iMac with Monterey and transferred files across, Trying to get back up and running, I’ve installed

Configuration problems following new installation of Frescobaldi

I stopped using Frescobaldi and Lilypond at the beginning of the Covid pandemic and since then I have bought a new iMac with Monterey and transferred files across, Trying to get back up and running, I’ve installed Frescobaldi 3.1.3, which appears to be functioning perfectly, but I get

Re: Installing Frescobaldi 3.1.3 on Mac with MacOS 12.1

0:48, Michael Hendry wrote: >> >> Dear LilyPond Users, >> >> I unsubscribed from the list during lockdown and the subsequent lack of >> musical opportunities, and in the meantime I’ve got a faster Mac running >> Monterey. >> >> I downloaded Frescobaldi-3.1.

Re: Installing Frescobaldi 3.1.3 on Mac with MacOS 12.1

Le 29/08/2022 à 19:48, Michael Hendry a écrit : Dear LilyPond Users, I unsubscribed from the list during lockdown and the subsequent lack of musical opportunities, and in the meantime I’ve got a faster Mac running Monterey. I downloaded Frescobaldi-3.1.3-x86_64.dmg and installed it, but am

Installing Frescobaldi 3.1.3 on Mac with MacOS 12.1

Dear LilyPond Users, I unsubscribed from the list during lockdown and the subsequent lack of musical opportunities, and in the meantime I’ve got a faster Mac running Monterey. I downloaded Frescobaldi-3.1.3-x86_64.dmg and installed it, but am prevented from running it because ‘“Frescobaldi.app

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

acport > (https://www.macports.org/install.php) and invoked "sudo port install > frescobaldi". Installation stopped when asked to install Xcode. It took me > trying to figure out what Xcode was for and finding the huge > "Xcode_11.3.1.xip" file and in

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

Il giorno gio 18 ago 2022 alle ore 11:48 Jean Louis THIRY ha scritto: > Being on Mojave (10.14) This explains also why you were not hit by the 'use_xcode' problem, since it does not affect 10.13 and 10.14. > Everything around qt5 seems to be a weak point of Frescobaldi, Indeed: I appr

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

Dear Jean-Julien, Il giorno gio 18 ago 2022 alle ore 08:52 Jean-Julien Fleck ha scritto: > Well, it’s unlikely. I happen to have frescobaldi installed via a fresh new > MacPort procedure (after upgrading to MacOs Monterey) just last week and the > missing sdk message I encountered wa

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

; result of this .sdk file being installed in the wrong order? is it possible >> to uninstall Frescobaldi using some magic formula like "sudo port uninstall >> frescobaldi" and do an install again so that the installer finds the sdk >> file. Especially will there be a d

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

, Jean Louis THIRY a écrit : > > I have a question about the installation. Could this erratic behavior be a > result of this .sdk file being installed in the wrong order? is it possible > to uninstall Frescobaldi using some magic formula like "sudo port uninstall > f

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

Hello Jean-Louis, Le jeu. 18 août 2022 à 03:10, Jean Louis THIRY a écrit : > > I have a question about the installation. Could this erratic behavior be a > result of this .sdk file being installed in the wrong order? is it possible > to uninstall Frescobaldi using some magic formul

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

Hello Jean, I think I have made quite a bit of progress in the great forest of my ignorance. I took your advice first and installed Macport (https://www.macports.org/install.php) and invoked "sudo port install frescobaldi". Installation stopped when asked to install Xcode. It took

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

I'd be more than happy to set up a Virtual Machine for you, with root access, so you can install different versions of Frescobaldi and have people try it out, accessible via a web browser (Apache/Guacamole) Lemme know if you are interested, and what kind of Linux and or window manager you want

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

Hello, Adding back the list in copy, please keep it so that everyone can participate and benefit from the answers in the future. Le 16/08/2022 à 10:25, Jean Louis Thiry a écrit : I just type "Frescobaldi" in the terminal. In the 'frescobaldi' folder there is actually a setup.py

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

great regret quite ignorant in terms of computer language: On my machine I use Frescobaldi 3.0 (which works pretty well and suits my needs perfectly except “convert.ly <http://convert.ly>" and “musicxml2ly" which don't work beyond lilypond 2.20.). Upgrading to 3.1 is impossib

[was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]

language: On my machine I use Frescobaldi 3.0 (which works pretty well and suits my needs perfectly except “convert.ly" and “musicxml2ly" which don't work beyond lilypond 2.20.). Upgrading to 3.1 is impossible (issue: Crash: "Could not find QtWebEngineProcess" #1244 o

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

) and whose subject line is: "Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2". Nothing exciting in this title which is a response to the announcement of version 3.2 of Frescobaldi which has existed since May 2022. On the other hand I have already exposed my problem before on this list and I asked my ques

ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

Hello friends, Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you for your answers even if they don't really answer mine. In fact, to ask my question I just replied to an existing thread on this list, several months old (May 2022) and whose subject line is: "Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2". Nothin

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

I know. My complaint is that this is not an announcement but only a question, so it breaks list conventional protocol. I know this is a small point but it is wrong, and as said above, it got me all excited about a new Frescobaldi release for nothing, so it was misleading. Not a big deal

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

Le 14/08/2022 à 07:05, Eef Weenink a écrit : The text is AAN not ANN. It is Dutch for “TO”. Any mailprogram using Dutch as regular as language will show “To” as “Aan”. For all kinds of "ANNouncements", "ANN" is customary on mailing lists. For example, see the archives of this list:

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

Sorry, my mailer very clearly shows the subject line as: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2 And in any case why you you put TO in the subject line? Andrew On 14/08/2022 3:05 pm, Eef Weenink wrote: The text is AAN not ANN. It is Dutch for “TO”. Any mailprogram using Dutch as regular as language will show

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

e a pedantic pest, the Subject line prefix ANN: > is normally only used for program announcements such as a new release. I got > all excited because I thought you were announcing a new Frescobaldi release. > So it's misleading. No great harm, but just saying a bit about list usage. > > > Andrew > >

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

Without wanting to sound like a pedantic pest, the Subject line prefix ANN: is normally only used for program announcements such as a new release. I got all excited because I thought you were announcing a new Frescobaldi release. So it's misleading. No great harm, but just saying a bit about

Re: Frescobaldi 3.2

Not really answering your question, butFrescobaldi, not "Fresco Baldi", was named after the Italian composer Girolamo Frescobaldi:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girolamo_Frescobaldi:-) MT Oorspronkelijk bericht Fresco Baldi: 2.20.0–Fresco Baldi: 3.0.0

ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2

Hello friends, I’m sending that message again as my problem is still complete I installed Frescobaldi 3.2 (Mac/ Mojave) following the procedure proposed in the “install” file (Terminal). It worked fine and the application is called "Python", but the surprise is in the info box whic

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

This reminds me that I think what we are after is a return to the concept of thin-client computing (X-Terminals etc), which always was a good idea and still is, in my view. Interesting to see that you can now run Windows 11 in the cloud fully supported by Microsoft, albeit expensive. There are

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

Hello Mike, You have presented a solution here, but no context or rationale at all (unless I missed something). Would you be willing, as I asked, to present the use cases you see for this, a little about the overall concept, why it's needed, where is it going, what are the long term

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

d > wrote: > > > > How many people need that? Doesn't everybody have a laptop? Let's hear > from the OP. I'm curious. > > > > Andrew > > > > > >> On 8/08/2022 1:15 pm, Knute Snortum wrote: > >> Well, I can imagine that it would be usefu

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

. Will keep ya posted - thanks for the interest :) M. On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 6:12 PM Knute Snortum wrote: > Interesting. Some thoughts: > > a) how do you get code into and out of the web Frescobaldi? Copy and > Paste? If you give people access to a browser, they can use Google > Drive o

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

re. "perhaps better that anything outside of /home/* not even be visible" Indeed, agree 100% ... but I couldn't find a linux file manager that disallowed access in that way. Could you recommend something? It wasn't a high priority because the site is running inside a KVM virtual machine that

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

Le 08/08/2022 à 19:02, William a écrit : I’d like to say something else about this web application that OP should keep in mind, in case others haven’t brought this up yet. As all of us know, lilypond includes many features that are designed to be helpful for users who know what they are doing

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

I have often thought of a different approach. Rather than a web verson of Frescobaldi I would like to see a remote server - similar to Lilybin - with an API that can be called from within the normal Frescobaldi program. All fancy editing and viewing features of Frescobaldi would already

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

ople need that? Doesn't everybody have a laptop? Let's hear from > the OP. I'm curious. > > Andrew > > >> On 8/08/2022 1:15 pm, Knute Snortum wrote: >> Well, I can imagine that it would be useful to be able to move from >> computer to computer, when you don't

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

was very grateful for lilybin at that moment — there was no way to install > lilypond on any machine in the building at that moment — and I'm sure in a > similar situation, I might be grateful for a web-accessible version of > Frescobaldi. For the record, I do not have a laptop. Also, it

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

Hi David, > Hooray for sightreaders. Agreed! Especially sight-readers who also happen to play [at least] five different wind instruments — sometimes in the same piece! (In that show, Kishan played flute, piccolo, clarinet, bass clarinet, and recorder.) Cheers, Kieren.

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi Andrew, > >> What is the use case for this? > > > It was the opening night of my musical, “Robin Hood: The Legendary > Musical Comedy”. The curtain was at 8PM. At 7:30PM, I realized I had > not arranged and printed out the piccolo part for the overture, as I > had

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

ent — and I'm sure in a similar situation, I might be grateful for a web-accessible version of Frescobaldi. Cheers, Kieren.

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

On 08/08/2022 08:49, Andrew Bernard wrote: Was just asking, not condemning the idea. Still interested to hear the OP. Sorry. But when people make assumptions about other people, it does tend to push my buttons ... My wife is disabled, my in-laws are elderly, and all too often I'm providing

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

Was just asking, not condemning the idea. Still interested to hear the OP. Andrew On 8/08/2022 4:50 pm, Wols Lists wrote: On 08/08/2022 06:30, Andrew Bernard wrote: How many people need that? Doesn't everybody have a laptop? WHY SHOULD THEY? You're making the classic - false - assumption

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

On 08/08/2022 06:30, Andrew Bernard wrote: How many people need that? Doesn't everybody have a laptop? WHY SHOULD THEY? You're making the classic - false - assumption that "everyone else is just like me". A lot of people ONLY have chromebooks, tablets, or (gasp) even just a mobile phone.

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

How many people need that? Doesn't everybody have a laptop? Let's hear from the OP. I'm curious. Andrew On 8/08/2022 1:15 pm, Knute Snortum wrote: Well, I can imagine that it would be useful to be able to move from computer to computer, when you don't necessarily have Frescobaldi installed

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

Someone left this [see attached screenshot] , so I saved it... it's in the 'demo' session folder. M. On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 5:33 PM Mike Blackstock wrote: > oops, apparently the hash tag in the url is important: > https://static.blackstock.media/guacamole/#/ > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 5:27 PM

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 4:21 PM Andrew Bernard wrote: > > What is the use case for this? Well, I can imagine that it would be useful to be able to move from computer to computer, when you don't necessarily have Frescobaldi installed, especially if you can save to the cloud. -- Knute Snortum

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

What is the use case for this? Andrew

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

Interesting. Some thoughts: a) how do you get code into and out of the web Frescobaldi? Copy and Paste? If you give people access to a browser, they can use Google Drive or another cloud product. b) Any possibility of getting LilyPond version 2.22.2 and 2.23.11? -- Knute Snortum On Sun

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

Hi Mike, small correction: The # is what coders call a _hash,_ a _hash tag_ is a certain way of specifying tags in content by prepending a hash originating from twitter. I do like that this thing comes with KDE Dolphin installed, but I’m not sure if this will really be that usable. What we

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

Mike - one immediate thing to note - the current privileges expose the root of the file system. Maybe there are no files outside of /home/* that can be opened, but perhaps better that anything outside of /home/* not even be visible. Will explore more later (Zoom with family now). Regards, Guy S

Re: Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser [URL correction]

oops, apparently the hash tag in the url is important: https://static.blackstock.media/guacamole/#/ On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 5:27 PM Mike Blackstock wrote: > Demo at https://static.blackstock.media/guacamole > > Login: guest > Password: guest > > Click one of the unused demo sessions. > > -Mike >

Prototype Frescobaldi in the browser

Demo at https://static.blackstock.media/guacamole Login: guest Password: guest Click one of the unused demo sessions. -Mike -- https://blackstock.media

Re: debug scheme part working with Frescobaldi

Eef Weenink wrote: I have several lines of scheme, somewhere is probably an syntax error. The only message I get is form lilypond log: there is an error in the line # begin etcetera. (that is the first line of the scheme segment). I want to zoom in, and see what specific problem there is,

Re: debug scheme part working with Frescobaldi

I don't know if this is helpful but debug print statements, the last resort of the desperate, are sometimes useful. % simple debug print #(define (dbg . args)    "Simple debug console print."    (cond     ((not (null? args)) (display (car args)) (display " ") (apply dbg (cdr

Re: debug scheme part working with Frescobaldi

Le 20/07/2022 à 08:22, Eef Weenink a écrit : I use 2.22 and arranger.ly <http://arranger.ly> (from Giles Thibault) My question is more general. (and maybe mostly related to Frescobaldi as an enviroment). I have several lines of scheme, somewhere is probably an syntax error. Th

Re: debug scheme part working with Frescobaldi

I use 2.22 and arranger.ly<http://arranger.ly> (from Giles Thibault) My question is more general. (and maybe mostly related to Frescobaldi as an enviroment). I have several lines of scheme, somewhere is probably an syntax error. The only message I get is form lilypond log: there is an

Re: debug scheme part working with Frescobaldi

Am Di., 19. Juli 2022 um 21:40 Uhr schrieb Eef Weenink : > > So I am start working with scheme parts in my liypond files (using > arranger.ly). Using Frescobalid to input all > When compiling I keep getting messages: > > GUILE signaleerde een fout voor de hier beginnende expressie > > It would be

debug scheme part working with Frescobaldi

So I am start working with scheme parts in my liypond files (using arranger.ly). Using Frescobalid to input all When compiling I keep getting messages: GUILE signaleerde een fout voor de hier beginnende expressie It would be nice to know what error I made. I read I should

Re: Frescobaldi incantation for lilypond docker image?

Jean, Knute, many thanks! It Just Worked (TM). No dependency-hell. Most refreshing (although I do feel a bit stupid). > On 13 Jul 2022, at 17:02, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > >> 2. If I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely, what is the recommended way >> for Frescobal

Re: Frescobaldi incantation for lilypond docker image?

/lilypond:devel lilypond foo.ly The challenge is getting a locally-installed Frescobaldi 3.2 to run this image. In Frescobaldi's Preferences, I've set the lilypond command to: docker run -v $(pwd):/app -w /app jeandeaual/lilypond:devel lilypond But when I try to run lilypond from within Frescobaldi, I

Re: Frescobaldi incantation for lilypond docker image?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 AM Graham King wrote: > > I'm looking for a way to run a recent lilypond version on Ubuntu 18.04. I would think you could just download LilyPond from the GNU/Linux download page: https://lilypond.org/unix.html -- Knute Snortum

Frescobaldi incantation for lilypond docker image?

a locally-installed Frescobaldi 3.2 to run this image. In Frescobaldi's Preferences, I've set the lilypond command to: docker run -v $(pwd):/app -w /app jeandeaual/lilypond:devel lilypond But when I try to run lilypond from within Frescobaldi, I get the following error: Traceback (most

Re: Playback using Frescobaldi?

On 6/23/2022 9:15 AM, Kira Garvie wrote: I hope I can figure something out from your answers I don't see anyone asked this: What operating system are you using? Windows, Linux, Mac? -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: Playback using Frescobaldi?

it still is, but I cannot say for certain. Other users on this >> > email list may have more recent experience with MacOS. >> >> You can install QSynth/fluidsynth via MacPorts (probably still also via >> Homebrew, it’s a matter of taste). >> >> Same as

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >