Hi there,
Would it be accurate to assume that custom hex/rgb colors in fret diagrams
are not supported as of now?
Sincerely,
Nikita
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:29 AM Nikita Borisenko wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> Putting quotes around it does
Hi Jean,
Thanks for the quick response.
Putting quotes around it doesn't really help. The expression gets ignored
and the dot comes with the default black color in this case.
Sincerely,
Nikita
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:18 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > Quick question on coloring dots i
> Quick question on coloring dots in fret-diagrams. There is an option to use
> predefined colors from normal, CSS or X11 palettes which works perfectly well
> in the fret-diagram-verbose with the snippet below:
>
> > (place-fret 3 6 3 dodgerblue2)
>
> For some reason
Hi Everyone,
Hope you are doing well.
Quick question on coloring dots in fret-diagrams. There is an option to use
predefined colors from normal, CSS or X11 palettes which works perfectly
well in the fret-diagram-verbose with the snippet below:
> (place-fret 3 6 3 dodgerblue2)
For some reaso
> There is something I do not like about the fret diagrams in
> Lilypond:
>
> The diagrams are "open" on the side pointing towards the bridge of
> the instrument, with the strings "sticking out" on that side. How
> could I achieve closed rectangles in Li
.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Mittwoch, 19. April 2023, 20:15:38 CEST schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > There is something I do not like about the fret diagrams in
> > Lilypond:
> >
> > The diagrams are "open" on the side pointing towards the bridge of
> > the instrument, with
> There is something I do not like about the fret diagrams in
> Lilypond:
>
> The diagrams are "open" on the side pointing towards the bridge of
> the instrument, with the strings "sticking out" on that side. How
> could I achieve closed rectangles in Li
There is something I do not like about the fret diagrams in Lilypond:
The diagrams are "open" on the side pointing towards the bridge of the
instrument, with the strings "sticking out" on that side. How could I
achieve closed rectangles in Lilypond like e.g. the "Mu
For future reference. I have no idea if this is the most Lilypondic way of
accomplishing what I want, but it works.
#(set-global-staff-size 14)
\layout
{
indent = 0
}
and using
\noBreak
if necessary
I'm trying to create a rhythm chart for guitarists that have specific voicings
shown in fret diagrams. It's mostly correct, except I have two measures on the
first line and three on the remaining. What I want is four measures per line.
I'll fess up to being a beginner with Lilypond
lto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 7:14 PM
>To: Peter Gentry
>Cc: lilypond-user
>Subject: Re: Fret Diagrams
>
>Hi Peter,
>
>2016-01-31 19:29 GMT+01:00 Peter Gentry <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk>:
>> This may be trivial but searches of t
This may be trivial but searches of themanuals etc have not born fruit.
How do you prevent the markup N.C. appearing where there is a note rest. In
fact N.C. does not always appear sometimes once in a
bar sometimes twice for no immediately apparent reason.
If r1 is replaced by R1 then no
Hi Peter,
the N.C. symbol ("no chord") appears for rests r but not for full
measure rests R and obviously not for invisible (spacer) rests s. And it
appears for every single rest, so in case of
r2 r4 g
you get
N.C. N.C. G
for a single measure.
You have several choices to avoid this:
a)
es context will cause the noChordSymbol
markup to be displayed.
So:
It has nothing to do with Fret Diagrams, but ChordNames.
Everywhere you wrote rests the noChordSymbol appears for each rest.
>
> If r1 is replaced by R1 then no "N.C." markup.
R1 is a MultiMeasureRest not a Rest,
\markup
\override #'(fret-diagram-details . (
(number-type . arabic)
(finger-code . in-dot))) {
\fret-diagram #"s:3;f:1;6-3-2;5-2-1;5-5-4;4-4-3;"
% percent sign is for comments
% s:3 tells lilypond to make diagram 3x normal size
% f:1 is to show
BB writes:
> \markup
> \override #'(fret-diagram-details . (
> (number-type . arabic)
> (finger-code . in-dot))) {
> \fret-diagram #"s:3;f:1;6-3-2;5-2-1;5-5-4;4-4-3;"
> % percent sign is for comments
> % s:3 tells lilypond to make diagram 3x normal size
> % f:1 is to
Many Thanks! Works well, even with "R" instead of "I". Perfect!
On 26.12.2015 12:57, pls wrote:
BB writes:
\markup
\override #'(fret-diagram-details . (
(number-type . arabic)
(finger-code . in-dot))) {
\fret-diagram #"s:3;f:1;6-3-2;5-2-1;5-5-4;4-4-3;"
% percent
I just tried your code but get a different PDF result? See attachement.
I get a warning in German:
Warnung: staff-affinities sollten nur abnehmen
Might mean something like
staff-affinities should always decrease
On 08.11.2015 12:23, pls wrote:
Thomas Morley writes:
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2015-11-08 12:23 GMT+01:00 pls :
>> Hi Harm,
>>
>> I finally managed to test your code and I really, really like it! I
>> especially like the option to
>> turn the annotations on and off.
>
> Glad you like it.
>
> Ofcourse
2015-11-08 12:23 GMT+01:00 pls :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> I did some experiments, result attached.
>>
>> Please test. There is a README in it.
>>
>> Please be aware it's experimental code, not ready yet to put up a
>> patch,
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I did some experiments, result attached.
>
> Please test. There is a README in it.
>
> Please be aware it's experimental code, not ready yet to put up a
> patch, although it compiles as far as I tested...
> (some debugging code is
2015-11-08 14:52 GMT+01:00 pls :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2015-11-08 12:23 GMT+01:00 pls :
>
>>> Hi Harm,
>>>
>>> I finally managed to test your code and I really, really like it! I
>>> especially like the option to
>>> turn
2015-11-08 16:15 GMT+01:00 BB :
> I just tried your code but get a different PDF result? See attachement.
> I get a warning in German:
>
> Warnung: staff-affinities sollten nur abnehmen
>
> Might mean something like
> staff-affinities should always decrease
>
Did you
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2015-11-01 19:55 GMT+01:00 pls :
>> Hey all,
>>
>> currently it's possible to add fingering indications (any character) inside
>> of dots or "below" the strings. (In my attachment in landscape orientation
>> it's rather to
Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2015-10-29 23:53 GMT+01:00 pls <p...@philomelos.net>:
>
>>
>> My use case: I have created a huge library of predefined fret
>> diagrams (https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-predefined-fretboards)
>> a
Hey all,
I would like to override some fingering information of predefined fret
diagrams. The relevant information should be in the
/dot-placement-list/ of the fret-diagram-interface (see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals-big-page#fret_002ddiagram_002dinterface).
But I
Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2015-10-29 19:24 GMT+01:00 pls <p...@philomelos.net>:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I would like to override some fingering information of predefined fret
>> diagrams. The relevant information should be in the
>
2015-10-29 19:24 GMT+01:00 pls <p...@philomelos.net>:
> Hey all,
>
> I would like to override some fingering information of predefined fret
> diagrams. The relevant information should be in the
> /dot-placement-list/ of the fret-diagram-interface (see
> http://lilypond.org
2015-10-29 23:53 GMT+01:00 pls <p...@philomelos.net>:
>
> My use case: I have created a huge library of predefined fret
> diagrams (https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-predefined-fretboards)
> and I would love to be able to e.g. display those diagrams with chord steps,
&g
Dear lilypond users,
I am new to lilypond so I half expect my question to be so ridiculous... I
hope that you believe me when I say I made every effort within my still
confused mind to solve this issue to no avail. Here goes...
In Frescobaldi, I input:
\version 2.18.2
\markup \fret-diagram
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n179073/Fret-Diagram.ly
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fret-Diagrams-in-Open-Office-Writer-tp179068p179073.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 25 Jul 2015, at 15:45, Socrates Leptos socrateslep...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear lilypond users,
I am new to lilypond so I half expect my question to be so ridiculous... I
hope that you believe me when I say I made every effort within my still
confused mind to solve this issue to no
On 26.05.2015, at 23:58, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Let's try again. I have checked this version; it has the warning code.
Yes, it does. Looks very good to me!
Thanks a lot,
patrick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On 26.05.2015, at 04:34, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 5/25/15 5:25 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Works great! Thanks a million!
Thanks for your feedback.
Should/Could LilyPond issue a warning message in the case of open strings
whenever wrong fingers (not 0) are
On 5/26/15 2:44 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
I¹m sorry to ask but I checked the translation-function files several
times: Did you inadvertently send me an unchanged file? diff did not show
any difference between this file and the last file.
If diff didn't how the difference, then there
On 25.05.2015, at 01:16, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 5/23/15 11:59 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
\transpose f g { f,-1 c-3 f-4 a-2 c'-1 f'-11 }
Here's a revised version of translation-functions.scm. It will generate
barres only if fingers are indicated, and multiple
On 5/25/15 5:25 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Works great! Thanks a million!
Thanks for your feedback.
Should/Could LilyPond issue a warning message in the case of open strings
whenever wrong fingers (not 0) are ignored? Or is it better to
silently set the fingers to 0?
Example: d-1 a d'
On 5/23/15 11:59 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Maybe I should back the code back to where a barre will be indicated
only
if the fingers are specified in the chord, and no barre will be
generated
when an open chord is transposed. That would be a straightforward fix.
It would never
On 23.05.2015, at 22:06, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 5/23/15 6:34 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Here is another test case for your patch:
\version 2.19.20
\new FretBoards {
d-1 a c'-1 fis' a'-11
g,-1 d f-1 b d'-1 g'-11
\transpose g a { g,-1 d f-1 b
On 5/23/15 6:34 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Here is another test case for your patch:
\version 2.19.20
\new FretBoards {
d-1 a c'-1 fis' a'-11
g,-1 d f-1 b d'-1 g'-11
\transpose g a { g,-1 d f-1 b d'-1 g'-11 }
}
These chords can be played with one finger! ;)
So what
that needs to be
changed: the first f major chord in the first example under the heading
Automatic fret diagrams
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-fretted-strings#automatic-fret-diagrams)
It’s in a prominent place and to be honest: this example initially
On 23.05.2015, at 06:22, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
+ some chords lead to unwanted barre indicators, e.g.:
+ d-1 a d¹ f¹ or
+ e, b,-3 e-3 gis-3 b e¹ (wrong fingers!)
I will look into those. Thanks.
Here is another test case for your patch:
\version 2.19.20
\new
predefined diagrams, shifting a chord shape up and
down the fretboard is easy.
LilyPond¹s automatically-generated fret diagrams solve almost all of the
above issues. The only drawbacks I can see are:
+ the missing barre indications (which you fixed in the meantime! Thank
you very much!)
You're
allow \transpose to do the right thing on both chords and
single notes, relative to fingerings. So \transpose is almost guaranteed
*not* to work effectively on automatically-generated fret diagrams.
Understood!
That is *why* there is a predefined fretboard capability defined in
LilyPond
On 21.05.2015, at 02:44, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-20 13:16 GMT+02:00 pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de:
Begin forwarded message:
From: pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: how to add barre indications to automatic fret diagrams?
Date: 20. Mai 2015 13:12:30 MESZ
from an F chord (with barred 6, 2, and 1) in my opinion.
Yes, the pattern on strings 3, 4, and 5 is the same. But the hand pattern
on the chord is different.
I thought about this issue quite a bit when I was creating predefined fret
diagrams. There, we introduced the idea of a chord shape
predefined fret
diagrams. There, we introduced the idea of a chord shape. There is a
function that shifts a chord shape by N frets (offset-fret). At present,
it adds N to the fret number for every dot. I thought about setting the
fret number to N for every open string, but elected not to do
On 21.05.2015, at 21:06, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 5/21/15 8:39 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
I thought about this issue quite a bit when I was creating predefined
fret
diagrams. There, we introduced the idea of a chord shape. There is a
function that shifts
thing on both chords and
single notes, relative to fingerings. So \transpose is almost guaranteed
*not* to work effectively on automatically-generated fret diagrams.
That is *why* there is a predefined fretboard capability defined in
LilyPond. You are free to define the set of chords you want
On 5/21/15 8:39 AM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
I thought about this issue quite a bit when I was creating predefined
fret
diagrams. There, we introduced the idea of a chord shape. There is a
function that shifts a chord shape by N frets (offset-fret). At
present,
it adds N
sorry forgot one
\version 2.18.2
barre = #(define-music-function (barre location str ) (number?)
#{
\once \override FretBoard.before-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
;(display (ly:grob-property grob 'dot-placement-list))
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'dot-placement-list
(cons `(barre 6 1
a snippet illustrating your
code and some other overrides of details of automatically generated fret
diagrams. Something like that:
\version 2.19.15
barre = {
\once \override FretBoard.before-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
;(display (ly:grob-property grob 'dot-placement-list))
(ly:grob-set
get me started. I think this should
be added to the snippet repository. I could prepare a snippet illustrating
your code and some other overrides of details of automatically generated
fret diagrams. Something like that:
\version 2.19.15
barre = {
\once \override FretBoard.before-line
On 5/19/15 12:45 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
LilyPond¹s automatic fret diagrams really are a very helpful feature!
More often than not it helps to not having to predefine and store a
diagram in a lookup table. But it has one little drawback: it doesn¹t
automatically include
predefined fret diagrams and not about adding barre indications to
automatically generated fret diagrams.
patrick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Patrick,
maybe
Hi all,
LilyPond’s automatic fret diagrams really are a very helpful feature! More
often than not it helps to not having to predefine and store a diagram in a
lookup table. But it has one little drawback: it doesn’t automatically include
a barre indication when several strings
On 19.05.2015, at 21:47, Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com wrote:
you can check here see if that's what you want.
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=fret-diagram
Thanks, but unfortunately these snippets are all about customizing predefined
fret diagrams and not about adding barre
On 11/12/13 8:46 AM, Patrick Thomas pa...@pdpthomas.com wrote:
How can I increase the vertical spacing between lines of chord names and
fret diagrams?
Change the nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing. See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spac
ing-within-systems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 03:15:34 +
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Have you read through the Learning Manual? If you're trying to work
your way through the Notation Reference without having read through
the Learning Manual, it will be
On 11/1/13 4:35 PM, Renato renn...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:56:17 +
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 10/31/13 8:47 AM, Renato renn...@gmail.com wrote:
For \markup fret diagrams, you override the fret-diagram
diagrams over a
staff scenario):
1) use fret-diagram-details to set the various parameters it offers.
It would be best to set this once and for all instead of for every
single chord
For \markup fret diagrams, you override the fret-diagram-details
property of a TextScript object (see
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, I'd like to produce a sheet with guitar chord diagrams. For now I
have this, which is a good start
\version 2.16.2
\markup{first set of chords}
\markup{
\fret-diagram #s:3;f:1;6-x;5-3-1;4-2;3-o;2-1;1-1;
\fret-diagram
this once and for all instead of for every single
chord
For \markup fret diagrams, you override the fret-diagram-details property
of a TextScript object (see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/snippets/fretted-strings
Customizing markup fret diagrams):
\override TextScript #'(fret-diagram
On 2/13/12 9:27 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
On 14/02/12 11:50, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 2/13/12 3:13 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
If I have a succession of fret diagrams above the chords on a stave,
how
do I align the fret diagrams vertically
If I have a succession of fret diagrams above the chords on a stave, how
do I align the fret diagrams vertically. In the example below, the chord
names at the top of all three fret diagrams are aligned vertically, but
the fret diagrams for A and C have more space below the chord name and
sit
Hi Nick,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
If I have a succession of fret diagrams above the chords on a stave, how
do I align the fret diagrams vertically.
Why not:
\override TextScript #'padding = #1.5
HTH,
David
On 2/13/12 3:13 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
If I have a succession of fret diagrams above the chords on a stave, how
do I align the fret diagrams vertically. In the example below, the chord
names at the top of all three fret diagrams are aligned vertically, but
the fret
On 14/02/12 11:50, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 2/13/12 3:13 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
If I have a succession of fret diagrams above the chords on a stave, how
do I align the fret diagrams vertically. In the example below, the chord
names at the top of all three fret
FretBoard #'fret-diagram-details #'fret-count = #6
\chordmode {
\repeat unfold 10 {c''1}
}
}
\context Staff {
\repeat unfold 10 {s1}
}
I saw this post about how to create empty fret diagrams but it didn't work
for me it produced 10 C major chords.
So I modified
On 7 July 2011 04:36, Jay Lee jkl...@mac.com wrote:
Anybody? Or is it really not possible?
The easiest method is to define the markup first, then insert it into
the verbose list:
flatSeven = \markup { \concat { \flat 7 } }
\markup {
\override #'(fret-diagram-details . ((finger-code .
Neil Puttock n.puttock at gmail.com writes:
snip
The easiest method is to define the markup first, then insert it into
the verbose list:
flatSeven = \markup { \concat { \flat 7 } }
\markup {
\override #'(fret-diagram-details . ((finger-code . in-dot)))
\fret-diagram-verbose
On 7/7/11 10:21 PM, Jay Lee jkl...@mac.com wrote:
Neil Puttock n.puttock at gmail.com writes:
snip
The easiest method is to define the markup first, then insert it into
the verbose list:
flatSeven = \markup { \concat { \flat 7 } }
\markup {
\override #'(fret-diagram-details .
Jay Lee jkllee at mac.com writes:
snip
#'(
(place-fret 4 1 5)
(place-fret 3 4 ,flatThree)
(place-fret 2 4 5)
(place-fret 1 4 R)
Jay Lee jkllee at mac.com writes:
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
snip
And if you want to used a lilypond flat symbol, you can do that as
well.
You'll need to make the fingering a lilypond markup.
snip
Anybody? Or is it really not possible?
Carl
James.
On 30 Jun 2011, at 05:24, Jay Lee jkl...@mac.com wrote:
I guess we need to add something to the documentation indicating that the
fingering in the verbose syntax can be a number, a string, or a lilypond
markup.
Let me know what/where as I have a tidy-up patch that I've been
I've tried various kinds of syntax, but can't seem to include the \flat symbol.
\addChordShape #'DominantSeventh
#ukulele-tuning
#'(
(place-fret 4 1 5)
(place-fret 4 4 b7)
(place-fret 4 6 R)
Have you tried
(markup #:flat)
?
I'm not sure if it'll work, but it's worth a shot!
Cheers,
MS
On Jun 30, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Jay Lee wrote:
I've tried various kinds of syntax, but can't seem to include the \flat
symbol.
\addChordShape#'DominantSeventh
mike at apollinemike.com mike at apollinemike.com writes:
Have you tried
(markup #:flat)
snip
(place-fret 4 4 b7)
snip
Yes. But it doesn't work. I've tried:
(place-fret 4 4 {\flat}7)
(place-fret 4 4 {\flat}7)
(place-fret 4 4 {\flat}7)
(place-fret 4 4 \markup{\flat}7)
On 6/29/11 10:13 PM, Jason Lee jkl...@mac.com wrote:
Thank you so much!
Another question, what about open strings? Can they be marked up
individually too with R, b3, b7, etc?
Jay,
Please keep these discussions on-list, so all can be kept informed.
The only string labels we have are
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
On 6/29/11 10:13 PM, Jason Lee jkllee at mac.com wrote:
Thank you so much!
Another question, what about open strings? Can they be marked up
individually too with R, b3, b7, etc?
snip
What did you have in mind?
Carl
Ideally, I
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
snip
And if you want to used a lilypond flat symbol, you can do that as
well.
You'll need to make the fingering a lilypond markup.
snip
I haven't been able to work out the syntax for using the lilypond \flat
symbol in the finger-dot (see elsewhere
LilyPonders,
I think I'm trying to push LilyPond's fretboard diagrams beyond it's limit in
trying to use fretboards to display scale patterns and intervals rather than
chords and fingerings. So this post is either a request to be able to do
something LilyPond cannot do, or a request to add such
Jay Lee jkllee at mac.com writes:
What I want to do is to change the in-dot finger-code to reflect not
fingerings,
but scale intervals in scale and arpeggio diagrams of the entire
fretboard or
part of a fretboard.
Here is the complete example:
\version 2.14.0
#(define-public
On 6/29/11 5:36 PM, Jay Lee jkl...@mac.com wrote:
LilyPonders,
SNIP
I would like to be able to re-label the in-dot numbers to use 'b3' and 'b7'
instead of '3' and '7' for the flat-third and flat-seventh intervals
respectively, and to be able to use 'R' instead of '1' for the root.
I
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
On 6/29/11 5:36 PM, Jay Lee jkllee at mac.com wrote:
LilyPonders,
SNIP
I would like to be able to re-label the in-dot numbers to use 'b3' and 'b7'
instead of '3' and '7' for the flat-third and flat-seventh intervals
respectively, and to
Am 12.03.2011 21:39, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
[...]
[1] Searching the internet, there seems to be the general opinion
that mandolins aren't supposed to play chords at all, but it sounds
cool ;-)
A quick search for mandolin chords on google showed lots of places with
chord diagrams for mandolin.
Am 12.03.2011 21:39, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 3/12/11 1:19 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 11.03.2011 18:52, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
Why not just use a FretBoards context?
Good question; it looked way too complicated for my purposes.
I need some chords played on a mandolin, and
Am 11.03.2011 18:52, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 3/11/11 2:34 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 10.03.2011 19:52, schrieb Keith OHara:
Marc Hohlmarcat hohlart.de writes:
I try to put fret diagrams at the beginning of a piece.
My input file looks like this:
\new ChordNames
On 3/12/11 1:19 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 11.03.2011 18:52, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
Why not just use a FretBoards context?
Good question; it looked way too complicated for my purposes.
I need some chords played on a mandolin, and there are no
predefined fretboard diagrams for
Am 10.03.2011 19:52, schrieb Keith OHara:
Marc Hohlmarcat hohlart.de writes:
I try to put fret diagrams at the beginning of a piece.
My input file looks like this:
\new ChordNames \chordmode {
g:m
}
\new Lyrics \lyricmode {
\markup { \fret-diagram #w:4;4-o
On 3/11/11 2:34 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 10.03.2011 19:52, schrieb Keith OHara:
Marc Hohlmarcat hohlart.de writes:
I try to put fret diagrams at the beginning of a piece.
My input file looks like this:
\new ChordNames \chordmode {
g:m
}
\new
- Original Message -
From: Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
To: Lilypond-User lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:26 AM
Subject: Putting fret diagrams in a separate score
Hello list,
I try to put fret diagrams at the beginning of a piece.
My input file looks like
Marc Hohl marc at hohlart.de writes:
I try to put fret diagrams at the beginning of a piece.
My input file looks like this:
\new ChordNames \chordmode {
g:m
}
\new Lyrics \lyricmode {
\markup { \fret-diagram #w:4;4-o;3-o;2-1;1-3; }
}
Warning
Hello list,
I try to put fret diagrams at the beginning of a piece.
My input file looks like this:
\version 2.13.50
\score {
\new ChordNames \chordmode {
g:m
}
\new Lyrics \lyricmode {
\markup { \fret-diagram #w:4;4-o;3-o;2-1;1-3; }
}
\layout { ragged-right
Wow! You're absolutely right! Thanks so much! Wonder why that error
doesn't bork the diagram completely?
Gordon+
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Can anybody help me with fret diagrams?
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID
I tried out my first fret diagrams just recently and I ran into a puzzling
situation.
Whereas in standard guitar tuning, the A major chord diagram would look like
this:
aFretDiagram = \markup
\fret-diagram #6-o;5-o;4-2;3-2;2-2;1-o:
And the standard A7 diagram would look like
the colon in the end makes it! (should be semicolon)
Father Gordon Gilbert wrote:
I tried out my first fret diagrams just recently and I ran into a puzzling
situation.
Whereas in standard guitar tuning, the A major chord diagram would look
like
this:
aFretDiagram = \markup
\fret
On 4/28/10 6:39 PM, keith Luke kkll...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl,
This is exactly what I was looking for.
Thank you very much.
Aloha,
Keith
I believe that we have a big set of predefined ukulele chords in the
development release 2.13.x. You may find it easier to use a FretBoards
I'm using ^\markup \fret-diagram #w:4;4-o;3-o;2-o;1-3; but I would like
to use fret diagrams with barre.
I tried ^\markup \fret-diagram #c:4-1-1;4-3;3-2;2-1;1-1;, but it shows
guitar barre fret diagrams.
How can I print ukulele chord fret diagrams that show only four strings?
I'm attaching
On 4/28/10 2:34 PM, keith Luke kkll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using ^\markup \fret-diagram #w:4;4-o;3-o;2-o;1-3; but I would like to
use fret diagrams with barre.
I tried ^\markup \fret-diagram #c:4-1-1;4-3;3-2;2-1;1-1;, but it shows
guitar barre fret diagrams.
How can I print ukulele
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo