Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Thorkil Wolvendans
At 02:49 18-9-03 +0200, you wrote: See 1.9 CVS: * Quarter tones are now supported. They are entered by suffixing `ih' for a half-sharp and `eh' for a half-flat. Hence, the following is an ascending list of pitches: ceses ceseh ces ceh c cih cis cisih cisis That's great! Th

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Peter Lutek
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: See 1.9 CVS: * Quarter tones are now supported. They are entered by suffixing `ih' for a half-sharp and `eh' for a half-flat. Hence, the following is an ascending list of pitches: ceses ceseh ces ceh c cih cis cisih cisis excellent... thankyou! i

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > quarter-tone accidentals, on the other hand, have a long history of > common usage and are well-entrenched in the current notational lexicon > available to composers AND readable by performers. in my many years of > work as a performer in the field of avant-garde con

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Nathan Hurst
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:53:56 +0200 Thorkil Wolvendans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think what you suggested must be sufficient, for I don't think > people will start asking about 1/3 sharps and/or 3/5 flats, but that > is because I don't believe these kinds of accidentals exist. Actually, the d

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Peter Lutek
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: My real problem is: where does it end? We can add quarter tone accidentals by doubling the alteration field, we now have 0 = natural, 1 = sharp 2 = double sharp. We could do 0 = natural 1 = 1/2 sharp 2 = sharp 3 = 3/4 sharp 4

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Thorkil Wolvendans
At 12:57 17-9-03 +0200, you wrote: The point isn't what symbols to use (designing them isn't so difficult), but how to represent them internally. If we change that, we will break a lot Scheme and C++ code. That is is inevitable, but I'd rather get it right for once and for all. I think what you sug

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Well, I don't think people will start mumbling about 1/3 sharps really > fast, because as far as my knowledge goes, that's pretty hard to > achieve...(correct me if I'm wrong - I'm only a simple composer molesting > the piano all day..! ;) > But I would recommend the

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-17 Thread Thorkil Wolvendans
At 00:11 17-9-03 +0200, you wrote: My real problem is: where does it end? We can add quarter tone accidentals by doubling the alteration field, we now have 0 = natural, 1 = sharp 2 = double sharp. We could do 0 = natural 1 = 1/2 sharp 2 = sharp 3 = 3

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-16 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > AFAIK this is not yet available. i highly endorse your request for > inclusion of this much-needed feature! > > perhaps, in the meantime, someone has a work-around?? The need hasn't really arised yet, although I do remember someone hacking around, substituting doub

Re: Quarter-tones

2003-09-16 Thread plutek
AFAIK this is not yet available. i highly endorse your request for inclusion of this much-needed feature! perhaps, in the meantime, someone has a work-around?? best- -p > Hi everyone! > I checked the Lily-documentation but couldn't find anything about it: > quater-tones. Is it possible to ma