On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:21:45 -0200, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org
wrote:
Is there a reason why we don't simply preinstall that key in the apt
keyring before shipping the filesystem?
It's a good question. I'm going to borrow James W.'s opinion here who
will know of any unforseen
Hi,
Back up now, and hopefully much happier.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:37:40 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
James will send a mail when its back up.
--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for
Hi,
That sounds good to me.
Thanks,
James
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:07:10 +0530, Deepti Kalakeri
deepti.kalak...@linaro.org wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to upgrade Jenkins on ci.linaro.org to align with the
jenkins and ec2 plugin version on https://android-build.linaro.org/.
ci.linaro.org
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:14:35 -0500, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
There will be a newly released version in the PPA that will contain
the support. Until that happens bzr will the only option. However
we're getting ahead of ourselves as the new formatted images aren't in
production yet.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson paul.lar...@linaro.org wrote:
I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
vs.
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:23:12 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
2. use directory structure matching the project group names used on
offspring.linaro.org; e.g. natty-hwpacks, natty-images, oneiric-hwpacks,
oneiric-Images, etc.
This would be a useful step in removing the need to
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:27:38 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
on the same front I see we still redirect ubuntu-build to offspring ... can
we flip that
around? e.g. make offspring.l.o redirect to ubuntu-build?
Yes, just file an RT to request the change.
Thanks,
James
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:37:15 -0500, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
Thanks for the update James. Say related we have the following hwpack
directory names:
efikamx-oneiric
igep-oneiric
imx51-oneiric
omap3-oneiric
omap3-x11-base-oneiric
overo-oneiric
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson paul.lar...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
james.wes...@canonical.comwrote:
Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
predicated on renaming the top level.
The main reason I like
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 17:40:42 +0100, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
See, for example:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
...a similar problem seems to have
Hi Tom,
That's a cool idea, thanks for doing it.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:23:52 -0500, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi All,
As part of the 11.09 cycle I've completed an extension to live-build3
that add linaro-media-create. This means with this branch of linaro's
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:48:55 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
2. do we need to update
https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/WorkItemsHowto#Work_items_in_the_whiteboard
?
I think we should. BUGREPORTED seemed to fill a void as David and I
were going through each item that the
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:20:12 -0500, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi All,
I'm setting up a new machine and I'm guessing I must have missed a
step or a file.
When I debuild -S -sa it's complaining about my secret key not being found.
gpg: skipped Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org:
Hi,
IS would like to upgrade the porter boxes from maverick to natty, which
should make them more stable.
This will require a reboot, and the upgrade may cause issues for some
tasks, so please be aware and plan accordingly.
The plan is to start with jenipapo at 1900UTC on Sept 26. The others
Allow the caller to set the output directory for the deb packages
using an environment variable.
---
scripts/package/builddeb |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
index ea33db3..dea0190 100644
---
Hi,
Here are two patches that are needed for the kernel CI effort. I would
appreciate reviews on my first kernel patches to be submitted, and guidance
for where to send them to get them accepted upstream.
Needed in order to run the target when cross-building.
Needed in order to stop jobs in
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:09:29 +0300, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org
wrote:
Hi,
Here are two patches that are needed for the kernel CI effort. I would
appreciate reviews on my first kernel patches
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:13:32 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
It just does it by name.
Thinking more about this.
Replacing a kernel is a pretty normal operation. I think if we just
generated a script that had the relevant paths from the build and
posted that on the
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:19:49 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-gen-script-to-download-and-prog-builds
For making downloading a programming builds easy.
That one should be done as an addition to the existing
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:02:34 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 16 September 2011 10:39, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:19:49 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:26 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
I'm writing up some notes on building Android from scratch and
replacing the kernel in an Android build from one built locally, and I
realized that's it a bit of a chore to extract the kernel config that
got used.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:52:53 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:52:40AM +0530, Sudhangathan B S wrote:
My boot time measurement markers are:
Timer start is at the plug-in (i.e. at the instant when overo-fire is
powered)
Timer end is when all
Hi,
This is now fixed, and the other pages will be updating over the next
hour or so.
The problem was a bug that only seems to manifest in production, so I've
rolled back for now until we can investigate and fix it.
Thanks,
James
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:59:20 +0100, Dave Martin
Hi,
For your information.
Thanks,
James
---BeginMessage---
Tomorrow, you may notice a blip in Launchpad's availability around
08.30 UTC. Believe it or not, this is good news.
As you know, we'd been rolling out database changes once a month, with
a 90 minute period where Launchpad was
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:46:32 +0100, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
This doesn't make much sense as
dpkg-query -l multiarch-support
That's not the package that's complaining.
But shouldn't it depend on a version of dpkg-dev that supports
multiarch?
Maybe it's that we need a
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:36:54 +0530, Vishal Bhoj vishal.b...@linaro.org wrote:
I had question, Can we commit multiple projects into gerrit in a single
commit so that review would be easy ?
asac pfefferz: we struggled above a bit how we can make a multi project
change show up as a single gerrit
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:51:25 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
Anyhow, we have a few ways to solve this issue. I would say that as
long as we reference trees whose shas are reachable from the branches
in the remote git, then we should be fine. From a manifest
perspective, we
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever
done. One instance was trying to sync u-boot and the other was trying
to sync the TI LT kernel. John Rigby suggested the branch approach and
it
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:38:22 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
It sounds like you are advocating using a model where we use tags to
ensure that the referenced revisions are reachable from a head, and then
refer to the sha ids of the revisions in the manifest. Is that
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:12:30 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
Can we tag across all the gits in the manifest?
I think you can do anything you want with
repo forall git tag foo
However, we've already established that tags aren't currently sufficient
to keep all these refs
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:50:51 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Because we push everything upstream.
While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
provide a [potentially temporary]
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide
immovable references to the state of a set of git trees so that people
can
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:19:35 +0800, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
I think you missed my point, if I tagged it, you CAN check it out. So
reachability is not the issue.
I think there are two things here:
The first is that repo currently only fetches branches, and not
tags. This means
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:44:35 +0800, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
The first is that repo currently only fetches branches, and not
tags. This means that simply tagging isn't enough to ensure that you
have the object in your repo.
Not sure what your repo means but I get the
Great idea!
https://code.launchpad.net/~james-w/linaro-image-tools/increase-default-image-size/+merge/72038
Thanks,
James
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:56:35 +0200, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Using linaro-media-create (version
linaro-image-tools_0.4.8-0ubuntu1~lucid1_all) to
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:02:02 +0530, Deepti Kalakeri
deepti.kalak...@linaro.org wrote:
Hello,
I am using jenkins for continuous integration work.
I have a requirement where I need to trigger a job as part of the post build
step of a job.
For example I have a job to build a source and I
Thanks, this looks like great information. Deepti, does this work for
you?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:57:56 +0530, Venkatraman S ven...@linaro.org wrote:
1. You should check the This build is parametrized box for the
downstream (Sanity testing) job. Then the parameters for these
To your knowledge should those hwpacks work? If yes, then
I'll open a bug so we can track this issue.
All hwapcks should work :-)
In my opinion it's better to have a bug and close it quickly, than to
miss something.
If you get an image that doesn't boot then file the bug, don't ask
whether
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:19:59 +0200, Loïc Minier loic.min...@linaro.org wrote:
What's your QEMU version (qemu-arm-static)? Old versions of QEMU have
bugs and limitations in their emulation of ARM instructions which might
cause weird failures such as segfaults when installing the hwpack.
It
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:26:15 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
Paul,
I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I
just recently tested:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166
It works great and I'd like to
Hi,
https://github.com/jenkinsci/repo-plugin
is a new plugin for Jenkins to provide a repo SCM provider.
This means that you can have Jenkins watch for changes via repo, and
trigger actions based on that.
I don't think this is useful to us with the things that we currently do,
but may be
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:25:17 +0100, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
I'm seeing the same thing:
$git push linaro HEAD
Counting objects: 5, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 454 bytes, done.
Total 3
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:57:59 +0100, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@linaro.org
wrote:
Hello,
Following today's work session preparing to switching Gerrit, everything
is ready for the cutover now:
First build from Gerrit repositories is finished successfully:
Hi,
Have you tried the omap3 hardware pack with a Linaro image? That
contains the 3.0 kernel I think, so may give a comparison point.
Thanks,
James
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:29:25 +0200, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:18:09 +0200, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2011 12:58 PM, James Westby wrote:
Hi,
Have you tried the omap3 hardware pack with a Linaro image? That
contains the 3.0 kernel I think, so may
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:34:25 +0200, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
bernhard.rosenkran...@linaro.org wrote:
On 28 July 2011 21:37, Angus Ainslie angus.ains...@linaro.org wrote:
I have a android manifest that builds fine on my local build server
with -j4 for concurrent makes.
Have you tried doing a
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:37:38 -0600, Angus Ainslie angus.ains...@linaro.org
wrote:
I have a android manifest that builds fine on my local build server
with -j4 for concurrent makes.
The same manifest fails to build on android-build.linaro.org The log is here
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:48:11 +0100, James Tunnicliffe
james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
A couple more observations:
First we have duplication of hardware packs, but not the checksum
files and GPG signatures to go with them. The hardware packs are
hardware, not distribution specific, so it
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:48:06 +0100, James Tunnicliffe
james.tunnicli...@linaro.org wrote:
Release is a YY.MM release and a milestone is alpha/beta/eac/release
candidate/final. I realise that we are being far more agile than we
were and we probably won't have anything before a release
Hi,
I've just made some small improvements to status.linaro.org to make it
easier to keep running.
Firstly, at the bottom of every page is now the time at which the page
was last updated. If it's more than an hour ago then the site isn't
updating.
If it's not updating then follow the Update log
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:00:24 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:27:01 -0400
James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This sounds good to me.
I wonder if we should have the testing sandboxes use the same version
of Jenkins though
Hi,
This sounds good to me.
I wonder if we should have the testing sandboxes use the same version of
Jenkins though? If it doesn't we could have deployment failures due to
using features from the new version.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:39:26 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 00:39:20 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
We wish to make this change to reduce the integration and testing
burden near the release, which will make that time more stressful, and
lead to more time being spent on development.
- We'll be doing a full CI
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:28:36 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
android.git.linaro.org would be similar to https://git.linaro.org ...
e.g. you go there and get a gitwebview for all the android trees we
host.
you could put gerrit under android.git.linaro.org/gerrit, sure, but
others
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:32:59 -0400, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org
wrote:
I'll write up a spec on doing the tested merge involves.
I've got the first draft of this at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Specs/BuildTestedMerge
Please take a look at let me know any comments
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:25:59 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
hi,
great news.
I think we should use a different hostname for gerrit. like
review.android.linaro.org. With that we have the option to make a dedicated
android git host using the android.git.l.o name eventually.
I
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:06:08 +0300, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
Yes. 3 consecutive days without any glitches.
+1 on my side.
Fathi,
Do you want to switch this week? (I can't tell you exactly when we can
switch as it relies on the availability of an IS sysadmin to make the
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:46 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
can we somehow smoke test the infrastructure continuously till
tomorrow and then reassess tomorrow afternoon?
We didn't add any extra stress, but all everything has been built twice
now with no builder issues. Do we have
change through the Gerrit lifecycle.
From there I'd want to hook up auto-merging and per-change build validation.
-Zach
On 13 June 2011 19:34, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Zach,
We have a request in the queue to set up Gerrit for the Android team,
and I know it's
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:28:42 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
couldn't we inject a big amount of test builds in the queue to achieve
full utilization for 24 or 48 hours or so? of course, queuing them as
low priority so they don't make our real builds the cycles. Lets see
what james
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:25:18 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
I thought we had worked out a special way how to ensure that patches
that go to upstream gerrit get considered? Or was that just discussion
that we still have to finish?
No, we didn't agree to complete something like
Hi,
http://irclogs.linaro.org/
Logs are now kept from our public channels so that you can refer back to
previous converations and catch up on things that happened while you
were away if needed. They can also come up in google searches which can
be useful.
If you would like a channel
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:16:27 -0300, Ricardo Salveti
ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote:
The unhandled fault shouldn't be related with the usb errors. From my
experience with Beagle xM the USB port will trigger the reset once the
disk is consuming more power than beagle can provide. As I know
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
Today, the builders are unstable.
They have just had new hard disk enclosures added, and should be more
stable now. Let's monitor for a few days and see if they are
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:57:03 -0400, anmar.ou...@linaro.org
anmar.ou...@linaro.org wrote:
As long as we can a private space for the LTs, I think it is a great idea.
It looks as though mumble may support password-protecting channels,
which may be a good idea for LTs anyway?
I don't think it uses
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:47:04 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote:
Is being able to externally specify the job/test identifier a
requirement?
Not from the build service's point of view.
It makes it easier right now as currently there isn't somewhere for us
to store the
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
Today, the builders are unstable. It requires:
1. check the build status everyday as the notifications are broken.
Notifications are now working.
I can live with
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:10:08 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote:
Something I don't completely have a plan for in my head at the moment is
connecting the dots, or preserving identity between componenets (as I
think Zygmunt put it). We have a build, which will trigger a
Hi Fathi,
Given the results of last week's weekly testing, do you think we should
now flip the switch to move to using the images built by
ubuntu-build.linaro.org (offspring.linaro.org as was)?
If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
Thanks,
James
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:47:59 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
paul.sokolov...@linaro.org wrote:
As for our mirror service, adding such support in maintainable manner
would require its complete rewrite (which will also allow to implement
other functionality and improvements).
Adding support for what
] Error 255
make: *** [deb-pkg] Error 2
Any idea of why this could be ?
Thanks and Regards,
Deepti.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.orgwrote:
Hi,
I just tried .39 and there's no OMAP4, so the headers install if I use
the omap2plus_defconfig.
I
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:22:23 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
No, we shouldn't have to adjust our hosting. Take a look at
http://android.git.kernel.org/ where all the Android trees are hosted.
What does this mean for the hosting of Gerrit though. Does this mean
that Gerrit
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:13 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
* All bugs in a 'High' or 'Critical' state should be highlighted to the Linaro
Release Team: Please, add it to the wiki page 'Bugs' section for the next
release meeting. The release meeting calendar can be
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:02:00 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 14 June 2011 15:36, James Westby james.wes...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:13 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
* All bugs in a 'High' or 'Critical' state should
for $KERNELRELEASE on $debarch
+ This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $debarch
.
This is useful for people who need to build external modules
EOF
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:14:09 -0400, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:31:21 -0600, Matt Waddel
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:03:41 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 14 June 2011 07:52, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:22:23 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
No, we shouldn't have to adjust our hosting. Take a look
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:41:33 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
paul.sokolov...@linaro.org wrote:
So, where do we go from here? Unless there's tip export feature
directly out of remote repo for bzr (bzr export seem to requite local
working copy), we'd need to play mirror, this time bzr, again %).
You can
Hi Zach,
We have a request in the queue to set up Gerrit for the Android team,
and I know it's something that you consider very important. We haven't
yet talked specifics of the configuration of Gerrit, and so I don't yet
have a solid idea of what work there is for the Infrastructure team
there.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:31:21 -0600, Matt Waddel matt.wad...@canonical.com
wrote:
AIUI, the config errors you listed need to be fixed by going through
the kernel configuration and enabling or disabling these options as
requested. So in the first example from the failure log you sent:
. If all of that is successful then it would
replace the current LEB tip with the staging tree and start again?
Thanks,
James
-Zach
On 13 June 2011 19:34, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Zach,
We have a request in the queue to set up Gerrit for the Android team,
and I know
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:24:38 +0100, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
I'm looking for a copy of the ddeb (ie the debug info) for the omap
kernel in the 1105 release. That used to be here:
Hi,
Currently
https://launchpad.net/lava/+milestone/11.06
says that 11.06 is June 16 while
https://launchpad.net/linaro-android/+milestone/11.06
says June 30 and
https://launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+milestone/11.06
doesn't say when it is.
We need one date per-milestone or we will get
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:29:38 -0500, Kate Stewart kate.stew...@canonical.com
wrote:
This is a format that can go outside the packages (as well as in), so
can be used without marshalling the entire Debian community to adopt it.
So, am not advocating it be pushed by Linaro engineering for
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:17:02 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Sorry I'm getting into this conversation a bit late but is there also
a need to figure out what toolchain was used to build this hwpack and
the way in which the toolchain was configured (v7-a, neon,
Hi,
Apologies for asking you directly what could probably be looked up, but
the spec isn't very easy to digest.
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:59:46 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
PackageName: linux-linaro-omap 2.6.38-1002.3
#https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:45:35 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 June 2011 16:30, James Westby james.wes...@canonical.com wrote:
We should put this info somewhere else (use Vcs-* perhaps?) so that we can
provide
this information for other packages too.
You can add
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:37:18 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
The spec says:
4.6Source Information
4.6.1Purpose: This is a free form text field that contains additional
comments about the origin of the package. For instance, this field
might include comments indicating
Hi Kate,
Thanks for the information. I have some responses inline. To be clear
I'm veering in to commentary on the format itself for a lot of this,
rather than specific statements on whether I think Linaro should use it
or not.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:05:54 -0500, Kate Stewart
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:41:05 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org
wrote:
This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
from. We had a couple of false starts but I think we agreeing that there
Hi,
I'd like to add an extra constraint on the design if possible. As
everyone has pointed out we want an index in to this stuff that users
will use, so I think my constraint has a place. It has been complained
about many times, but it's not going to go away without some work on our
part.
On Tue, 17 May 2011 11:54:18 +0300, Alexandros Frantzis
alexandros.frant...@linaro.org wrote:
1. Do other engineers feel this way?
I can certainly say that trying to have a release in the same week as
the deadline for drafting specs/workitems and creating slides for the
public plan reviews has
On Thu, 26 May 2011 20:23:40 +, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org
wrote:
Issues
==
[Bug 788765] linaro-image-tools bootargs broke panda LEB in revision 342
linaro-media-create generates a boot.scr that contains too many arguments to
setenv bootargs. To workaround the issue until
On Thu, 26 May 2011 19:17:55 -0300, Ricardo Salveti
ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Fathi Boudra fathi.bou...@linaro.org wrote:
Issues
==
[Bug XX] Vexpress hardware pack 20110526 failed to build. Please use:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 13:11:37 -0300, Guilherme Salgado
guilherme.salg...@linaro.org wrote:
But when compressed the free space doesn't make any difference, does it?
I've gzipped a 2GB desktop image last week and it went down to around
500MB IIRC.
That's a good point, I forgot that we are
On Tue, 24 May 2011 09:22:14 -0500, Tom Gall tom_g...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
So that's 5 images { nano, server, alip, LEB, developer}
x 9 board types { beagle (C Xm), IGEP, imx51, iMX53,
Overo, Panda, Orion, U8500, Versatile Express}
x1 file system type
On Tue, 24 May 2011 18:36:18 +0100, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
It really feels like it could be time to promote the work items
to a real entity in launchpad. Has this been discussed before?
Many times.
It's not something that the Launchpad team is likely to work on at all
this
On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:45:35 +0200, Jeremiah Foster
jeremiah.fos...@pelagicore.com wrote:
It certainly is technically possible. The git-http-backend file allows
one to use http and https as transports. Whoever is the admin for the
Linaro git repos would need to make some changes to the apache
On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce images
for everything rather than trying to second guess which we can get
away with not generating.
While that's a nice sentiment, we can't ignore the
On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:32:27 +0100, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 20 May 2011 17:12, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce
Hi,
I just moved linaro-image-tools trunk to be owned by a new team, so that
it is no longer using linaro-maintainers, which wasn't really
appropriate here.
The new branch is at
https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-image-tools/linaro-image-tools/trunk
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
