Re: PowerVR, 3.3 kernel and omap_drm

2012-05-05 Thread Martin Ertsås
That's the one I'm using. And it seems to be working fine. The problem I encountered was with the libdri2 package, where I had overlooked one of the patches which obviously was needed. - Martin On 05/04/12 18:21, Boudet, Xavier wrote: Hi Can you let me know which version of libdrm-omap1 pack

Re: PowerVR, 3.3 kernel and omap_drm

2012-05-03 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 05/03/12 17:34, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:19:42AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: Hi. I have gotten a lot of help from you guys getting the PowerVR drivers up and running with the 3.3 kernel on the Pandaboard ES

PowerVR, 3.3 kernel and omap_drm

2012-05-03 Thread Martin Ertsås
Hi. I have gotten a lot of help from you guys getting the PowerVR drivers up and running with the 3.3 kernel on the Pandaboard ES. Problem now is that all I tested then, was that X was running. After some more work, we tried out EGL, and found out that this is not working. The 3.3 kernel I'm usin

Possible issues with going from OMAP4 to OMAP5 with Linux

2012-04-20 Thread Martin Ertsås
Hi. We are currently working towards deploying on a OMAP4460 SoC, and are using the kernel from the TI landing team in tilt-3.3, but would be willing to go to 4.4 if necessary. We are currently discussing using the OMAP5432 instead of the OMAP4460, and are wondering which issues we might encounte

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-17 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 04/17/12 10:50, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Martin Ertsås <mailto:marti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Searched through the xf86-video-omap, and doesn't seem to build > anything > but omap_drv.so, but it d

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-17 Thread Martin Ertsås
warning appear, and just ignore it maybe? Do the driver provide dri2 by itself? Thank you so much for your help so far. - Martin On 04/17/12 01:17, Clark, Rob wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: >> True, I renamed that file, since I got the message that it

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-16 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 04/17/12 01:17, Clark, Rob wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: True, I renamed that file, since I got the message that it couldn't find module omap. First I renamed it to omap_drv.so, which gave me the same error, then I tried pvr_drm.so which is the atta

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-16 Thread Martin Ertsås
er to load.. it will attempt to load (if present) omap_pvr_drv.so as a submodule for EXA accel. I'm not entirely sure why it is named pvr_drv.so in your filesystem, but from list of symbols it seems to match what I would expect to be omap_pvr_drv.so BR, -R On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Martin

Re: Linux kernel with rpmsg and possibility for compiling powervr drivers

2012-03-19 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 03/19/12 11:22, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: > Martin, > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Martin Ertsås <mailto:mert...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > The reason we want rpmsg is to get h264 endcoding and decoding using > gstreamer elements. I'm not sure if

Re: Linux kernel with rpmsg and possibility for compiling powervr drivers

2012-03-19 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 03/17/12 01:13, Andy Green wrote: > On 03/17/2012 04:14 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> Mertsas, >> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Martin Ertsas (mertsas) >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from Samsung Mobile >>> >>> Andy Green wrote: >>> On 03/16/2012 10:46 PM, Somebo

Linux kernel with rpmsg and possibility for compiling powervr drivers

2012-03-16 Thread Martin Ertsås
Hi. I'm currently fumbling around in the dark, trying to find a kernel which I can use to compile the powervr drivers, as well as with rpmsg support. Ideally the rpmsg should already be in the kernel, but I can see that this might be hard, and cherry picking is an ok solution. I'm wondering if on