How would you go about backing up the linux server if
there wasn't one. One idea I can think of is NFS
mounting the linux filesystem on a mchine that has a
client. Any others?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on
The problem was due the auto configuration of the lcs
token ring adapter. When I added a entry for the lcs
adapter in the chandev.conf the problem disappeard and
the modules now load flawlessly.
Any idea why is this happening?
--- "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks an awful lo
> By the way we installed the RSD product under LINUX/390 with
> tomcat, under USS with Webshere, and under Intel Suse Linux
> with tomcat. I am glad to report the customer liked the
> performance under LINUX/390 best. The vendor recommended 1
> GIG memory for intel. 256M seemed fine on 390. I did
> Perhaps NOW my family's Homestead Configuration Manager will allow me to
> install my old 486 with Linux in the kitchen. Perhaps. Anybody got an old
> Tenet terminal so I can put the CPU in the basement? Counter space is
> precious. Maybe an LCD screen on the side of the toaster, and keyboard in
> I am curious how much virtual storage other people have given to virtual
> machines running tomcat.
We start at 128M and increase by 32M increments for guests running Java
apps. Most seem happy in 192 or 256M machines, with lots of VDISK swap.
--db
Hello again from Gregg C Levine
I beg to differ. The only reason why IBM did that, is because somebody
actually paid them to do it, or something along those lines. Besides
it's good advertising. Besides the messages behind the recipes were
fun. I certainly hope David got a good laugh when he saw mi
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 22:19, John Ford wrote:
> Perhaps NOW my family's Homestead Configuration Manager will allow me to
> install my old 486 with Linux in the kitchen. Perhaps. Anybody got an old
> Tenet terminal so I can put the CPU in the basement? Counter space is
> precious. Maybe an LCD scree
One more post - you don't need CLASSPATH at all.
It ended up the tomcat doc I was using was old and the example in it was for a
SUN JRE.
I had JAVA_HOME set to /opt/IBMJava2-s390-14/jre
Should be /opt/IBMJava2-s390-14
To use SDK not JRE
By the way we installed the RSD product under LINUX/390 wit
So the question remains, why doesn't SLES8 not recognize the vdisk swap that
is defined, CMS formatted and RESERVEd the same way as it was for SLES7?
On Friday 21 March 2003 02:48 pm, you wrote:
> > Dave Jones of Sine Nomine has written an EXEC that will do
> > just what you want, in the guest's C
At 21:32 20.03.2003, you wrote:
>That presentation is on the http://www.linuxvm.org/presentations website
>under session 9333.
>
>-Original Message-
>The documentation that comes with the FCP microcode is pretty detailed.
>There was a presentation at the last SHARE on SCSI support and the
>
Perhaps NOW my family's Homestead Configuration Manager will allow me to
install my old 486 with Linux in the kitchen. Perhaps. Anybody got an old
Tenet terminal so I can put the CPU in the basement? Counter space is
precious. Maybe an LCD screen on the side of the toaster, and keyboard in a
drawer
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
> > Since we all know telnet is horrible in this day and age, why isn't it
> > dropped entirely?
> > them find another way. Shouldn't we just end the debate and
> > get rid of it?
>
> I'd love this if it were possible.
>
> However, I work daily with wor
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Mark D Pace wrote:
> Okay - got that.
>
> But I am actually using SLES 7 and it doesn't seem to like the swap
> signature. Is there something different between SLES 7 & 8 as far as the
> swap goes?
>
What kernel objects? How big is swap?
--
Cheers
John.
Join the "Linux
This is no less significant than IBM keeping score for the US Open tennis
tournament :)
> -Original Message-
> From: John Summerfield [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: recipie macros now available for download
>
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
> Since we all know telnet is horrible in this day and age, why isn't it
> dropped entirely? Is there any function it can do that SSH cannot? Every
> time someone brings up Telnet, they are smacked down by everyone telling
> them find another way. Shouldn't
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, David Boyes wrote:
> Since I got about 50 requests for the recipie macros, I've put them up
> for download at http://www.sinenomine.net/fun. The package is a single
> tar file with the macros, some scripts to process the recipies into
> nicely formatted pages and/or print ful
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Why would you want to allow people already logged on to the system to telnet
> into the system again?
root pts/25 numbat.computerd Fri10am 19:25m 0.02s 0.02s -bash
debian pts/26 numbat.computerd Fri10am 19:08m 0.02s 0.02s -bash
summer pt
Oracle uses only a trivial amount of floating point. I would be *very*
surprised if you could measure the amount of CPU time wasted in simulating
the Hex Floating point.
Oracle requires raw devices only for the Real Application Cluster (RAC)
support. Most Oracle on zLinux shops use normal file s
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, David Andrews wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:03, John Summerfield wrote:
> > If it has any redeeming features, I've long forgotten them.
>
> Well, Windows only comes with a telnet client (though not a very good
> one). This pretty much obligates you to install e.g. putty o
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Jeremy Warren wrote:
> Does anyone know of a simple/quick way to setup a GUARANTEED read-only
> access to a linux guest?
>
> Maybe some type of read-only telnet/ssh daemon? I couldn't find a switch
> to either of them.
Of course not. Think on what they do.
> Basically I ne
My QDIO/QETH problem has been resolved. We upgraded to the latest k_timer
kernel patches and the qeth unresolved reference during modprobe
disappeared. Thanks everyone and special thanks to Alan and Jay for your
help with this extremely elusive problem.
Al Schilla
State of Minnesota.
-Original
> Dave Jones of Sine Nomine has written an EXEC that will do
> just what you want, in the guest's CMS startup phase:
> http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/SWAPGEN.EXEC
Mr. Nit Picky sez that Jones' EXEC does exactly the right thing.
There is no reason to CMS FORMAT an FBA volume. Unless you're
u
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:49:54 -0500, Adam Thornton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:21:54PM -0600, Richard Troth wrote:
Warning to all:
The night Marilyn and I had some stew Dave had made
(it was really good!) she went into labor with our first child.
Presumably not *every* mem
> Not that it's any of my business, but wouldn't Wi-Fi be more
> appropriate? Reeling out the cable behind you as you drive
> has to be annoying.
You silly English person! [insert the rest of that monologue here]
The ethernet connects the various lap-tops in the Suburban
with each other and wi
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:56:33PM -0600, Richard Troth wrote:
> No cinnamon rolls for her
> if she wrecks the Suburban with the ethernet in it!
Not that it's any of my business, but wouldn't Wi-Fi be more
appropriate? Reeling out the cable behind you as you drive has to be
annoying.
Adam
>No, but you're probably not using the whole device as swap, which is
>what swapgen does. We don't put any sort of label on it, just treat it
>as an extent of 512-byte blocks.
>So instead of
>swapon /dev/dasdb1, you want to swapon /dev/dasdb
>Adam
DOH!- Thanks Adam.
Mark D Pace
Senior
> > The night Marilyn and I had some stew Dave had made
> > (it was really good!) she went into labor with our first child.
>
> Presumably not *every* member of the L/390 community is going to meet
> the pre-reqs necessary for those conditions to apply.
Pre-reqs ... isn't that RPM's job to handle
OK, last food-related post. I've created a mailing list for those of us
who want to continue to discuss food for penguinistas. You can
subscribe by sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the command:
subscribe penguin-food firstname lastname
Posts can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] We can swap rec
FYI for the folks at marist maintaing the ibmtcp-l list. Aproxmitely
every 5 minutes I am getting an e-mail from this server with nothing in
it. I know this happened before within the last 3 or 4 months.
Regards,
Steve G.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Have you considering completely scrapping telnet and using SSH instead?
> See recent threads about why telnet should not be used for any reason,
> any time.
Just to be nit-picky, the telnet *client* is still very useful.
A great number of other protocols
> Since we all know telnet is horrible in this day and age, why isn't it
> dropped entirely?
> them find another way. Shouldn't we just end the debate and
> get rid of it?
I'd love this if it were possible.
However, I work daily with workstations that have virtually every operating system in
co
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:31:32PM -0500, Mark D Pace wrote:
> But I am actually using SLES 7 and it doesn't seem to like the swap
> signature. Is there something different between SLES 7 & 8 as far as the
> swap goes?
No, but you're probably not using the whole device as swap, which is
what swap
> Since we all know telnet is horrible in this day and age, why isn't it
> dropped entirely?
> them find another way. Shouldn't we just end the debate and
> get rid of it?
If the OS vendors are prepared to supply an alternative client capable
of supporting encrypted traffic with their operating s
You don't install Putty, it is a single .exe. Copy it anywhere to your HD.
You can run it off a floppy if you want. I don't think the reason we still
have telnet is because windows doesn't include an ssh client.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fargusson.Alan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
Okay - got that.
But I am actually using SLES 7 and it doesn't seem to like the swap
signature. Is there something different between SLES 7 & 8 as far as the
swap goes?
Also - my swap disk is defined in the user direct, so I removed the part
where it defined the tdisk and replaced
v_addr hardc
Mark,
RXDASD is available from the IBM VM download page at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages.
Dave Jones
Sine Nomine Associates
Houston
- Original Message -
From: "Mark D Pace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Sles8 and V-
Probably because many windows users don't have the option of installing an SSH client
on their own workstation due to the policy of the employer. It isn't always feasible
to make other departments install an SSH client to access your system.
It would be nice if Microsoft would distribute an SSH
I can't seem to find RXDASD that is the target of NUXLOAD. Any ideas on
how I can find this?
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 850.219.5050
http://www.mainline.com
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 15:33, David Andrews wrote:
> Also, I guess some governments still don't like encryption, and the last
> I knew packet radio didn't allow it.
Very few, and mostly totalitarian states. Amateur radio is one that
does forbid it worldwide (pretty much), but telnet is still the wr
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 04:12:48PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> I would recommend using firewall rules rather than DENY/ALLOW as they
> are stronger protections. I'd recommend exterminating telnet entirely
> but providing you have total trust in anyone on your local lans, no
> wireless links and so on
On Friday, 03/21/2003 at 10:33 EST, David Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:03, John Summerfield wrote:
> > If it has any redeeming features, I've long forgotten them.
>
> Well, Windows only comes with a telnet client (though not a very good
> one). This pretty much obl
Since we all know telnet is horrible in this day and age, why isn't it
dropped entirely? Is there any function it can do that SSH cannot? Every
time someone brings up Telnet, they are smacked down by everyone telling
them find another way. Shouldn't we just end the debate and get rid of it?
> -
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:10:56AM -0500, Mark D Pace wrote:
> I can't seem to find RXDASD that is the target of NUXLOAD. Any ideas on
> how I can find this?
Oops. Guess we ought to put that on the web site:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/#rxdasd
Adam
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:03, John Summerfield wrote:
> If it has any redeeming features, I've long forgotten them.
Well, Windows only comes with a telnet client (though not a very good
one). This pretty much obligates you to install e.g. putty on Windows
machines in order to communicate with sshd
I agree. If you have a small internal user base to support telnet
functionality to your machine, then I would seriously
look into using OpenSSH and eliminate telnet. If they are telnet'ing from
other Unix type os'es, then SSH clients
should be available for them and there are telnet clients for W
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 21:15, Kharnas, Simon wrote:
> Hello, Mark.
>
> I am trying to limit the telnet logon from the outside world. I thought that
> DENY and ALLOW files can limit that access, so that the outside (i.e.
> Internet users) would not be able to logon to the server on a regular basis.
>
Since I got about 50 requests for the recipie macros, I've put them up
for download at http://www.sinenomine.net/fun. The package is a single
tar file with the macros, some scripts to process the recipies into
nicely formatted pages and/or print full books with indexes, and the
original 100 or so
Does anyone know of a simple/quick way to setup a GUARANTEED read-only
access to a linux guest?
Maybe some type of read-only telnet/ssh daemon? I couldn't find a switch
to either of them.
Basically I need to grant read-only access to a system to a group of users
so they can look at an applicatio
Try http://www.cbttape.org/
On Thursday 20 March 2003 17:38, you wrote:
> I got some very useful exec's from these tapes. The one I really
> would like to find again is the 'VTAM EXEC' can anyone point me
> to an updated version of this exec.
>
> vr,
>
> P. Abruzzese
> > In fact, Oracle was one of the folks who lobbied the most for getting
> > 'raw' (uncached by the Linux kernel) device access, and this did in
> > fact turn out to improve Oracle performance (on Linux/Intel).
Well,
How do i get this done om Linux 390?
Then there is reputed to be floating around the Internet a slash-n-burn
version of JCL, still very much in alpha.
You could get ahold of that and turn it into a "real" JCL, tying it in with
some of the utilities mentioned in the earlier replies, and just forget about
the "Linuxisms" side of thi
At http://sinenomine.net/events/ is a link to the attendee list for next
week's meeting. If you've signed up please check it out and get back to the
list if you are not listed.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, David Boyes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:12:27AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, David Boyes wrote:
> > > 31-bit systems are limited to 2G storage).
> > Is that actually true if you're running a 2.4 kernel and glibc 2.2?
>
> 2048M is the largest
I'd prefer to have ext3 instead of ext2 - it's a little safer.
And I'd divide it up this way - / and /usr get reiserfs, since the journal
only stores meta-data, while for the /var and /home I would give them ext3,
since that also stores the most recent as-yet-unsaved data as well.
My /boot runs
I've written up my sticky gingerbread recipe and sent it to Dave.
I've also found and downloaded the whole usenet cookbook and run it
through rcnroff | a2ps | ps2pdf and created a 912 page pdf of the current
cookbook.
http://194.105.168.44/recipe.pdf (imperial measures) - doesn't include my
recip
55 matches
Mail list logo
