But at the same time, understanding what the monitor is telling me is
absolutely complex. It's a lot of data to make sense of, especially how it
coorelates together. I can get a sense of it, but I'm not sure that if
something was really wrong I would be able to pinpoint the issue.
-Original
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:52:31 -0500, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some people don't yet have enough backing from management to do that. Too
many people keep hearing that Linux is free (instead of Free), and they
don't understand why it gets so expensive. Of course, doing things the
I too deal with this all the time. Many Pof C's consist of clients
dumping PC server workload exactly as is into linux virtual machines.
Not going to be kind to a Z box.
When I ask for Z performance data or PC and SUN server data I usually
get a blank stare. One client that is having major
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:37:12 -0500, David Kreuter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
linux. Watch out: if Z P of C's are done improperly we will lose many
opportunities to get linux on VM shops up running and stable - with
acceptable performance and costs.
We're just in the front lines with zSeries.
Please see the What's new page at:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.shtml
Change summary:
June 2003 stream:
- Kernel 2.4.21: Recommended kernel bug fixes and retrofitted lcs
driver from April 2004 stream kernel 2.6.5
Happy
I deal with this also. The problem I have is that I can't justify the cost of
the tools when the PC solution works, and is actually less money when you add
the cost of all the other stuff on the mainframe.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Does anyone here know how to make the IBM IHS 2.0 wbe server for linux do
the equivalent of a '-VV' trace on the z/os HTTP server?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 10:56, James Melin wrote:
Does anyone here know how to make the IBM IHS 2.0 wbe server for linux do
the equivalent of a '-VV' trace on the z/os HTTP server?
If you set LogLevel debug in httpd.conf, is the output still to vague?
I've had some success performing a 'strace'
Hi Folks,
for those who build Distributions or want to try new things first: today
Linus merged much of our patches into the Bitkeeper tree,
including new development for virtual server integration:
- the DCSS block device driver now has a new parameter:
as kernel parameter
On Friday, 12/03/2004 at 06:13 CET, Carsten Otte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
boot linux with class E privileges
have dcssblk built-in (not as module), and add the kernel parameter
dcssblk.segments=SWAPPING
reboot linux with kernel parameter active
run mkswap: mkswap /dev/dcssblk0
save
On Dec 3, 2004, at 11:13 AM, Carsten Otte wrote:
Hi Folks,
for those who build Distributions or want to try new things first:
today
Linus merged much of our patches into the Bitkeeper tree,
YAY!
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe /
I'm getting permission denied when trying to download Samba 3.0.9-17
packages from sernet.de.
URL: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/sles8-s390/
Can whomever it is that maintains this please open up the permissions
on the files?
Thanks
*Brandon Darbro
Our current workload consists of a dozen Linux Oracle servers in a 1-cpu LPAR.
CPU usage stays around 50% with very occasional spikes to 100%. I feel we have
good resource allocation for these servers via SHARE REL. Default MAX is NOLIMIT
and my question is whether LIMITSOFT would be of any
If NOLIMIT is set then it's possible for the share leftover when everyone has
had their SHARE satisfied can be consumed by a single virtual machine. Using
LIMITSOFT means this leftover will be shared according to the value set.
Imagine an apple pie. After everyone has had 1 slice and there's
Any one seen this before using a lcs device?
Pinging the gateway
PING 65.212.159.1 (65.212.159.1): 56 data bytes
lcs_fix_multicast_list failed to add multicast entry e001 multicast address
table
Can whomever it is that maintains this please open up the
permissions on the files?
Brandon, I've let Volker L know... I seriously doubt he's on this list.
In the meantime if you are very anxious, I can send you a
samba3-3.0.9-17.src.rpm. I can also send you s390 compiled rpms, but
cannot
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:43:01 -0500, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then shutdown this Linux and bring up your class G exploiters. :-)
Would you be surprised to hear some people prefer to run a simple EXEC
in a MAINT userid that creates the segment? ;-)
Rob
--
Rob van der Heij
Neale,
I did a quick grep of the mailing list archives, and got a hit. According
to Andy Cathrow on 2 Apr 2002 14:17:24, The lcs module appears to load
normally - apart from the multicast error (that the documentation says to
ignore). So, I would say that the message given is not the cause of
I am posting this on behalf of my colleague. We need to install Samba and
join that with Active Directory, which requires Kerberos and Open LDAP.
We have a problem installing TLS certificate.
Anyone travelled this road before?
TIA.
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
19 matches
Mail list logo
