Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web pag
Thanks for all answers!
Why do I get better response time when I use small disks in RVA?
3390-3 and 3390-9 disks are emulated the same way (thinking about data
spreaded across all physical devices)?
My goal is to have high data troughput rate.. I want to share data to
clients (with ftp,nfs,samb
> Why do I get better response time when I use small disks in RVA?
> 3390-3 and 3390-9 disks are emulated the same way (thinking
> about data
> spreaded across all physical devices)?
You can have only one I/O in progress to each physical device at a time
(since Linux doesn't do PAV yet). If you us
James,
I'll add my two cents, but I'll first add the disclaimer that I've read
and written about this, but don't use it in production from day to day (so
add two grains of salt to the two cents :))
> All the documentation they have shown me indicates that it can get time
> from an SNTP time sourc
well from what I've been told, all they want to be able to do is have the
primary and secondary domain controllers get the time from an NTP/SNTP
source. Everyone else will synch to the PDC/SDC They tried to do this
against my z/os SNTP server (which I have all sorts of things getting time
- all the
When I clonedisk, it usually takes a long time and I get messages like
this now and then.
DVHDRC3428I placed online.
DVHDMC3850W Unable to obtain link to 010C for step 1 in work unit
DVHDMC3850W 13090747; CP LINK return code was 105.
DVHDMC3850W Unable to obtain link to 010F for step 1 in work uni
I don't know about Active Directory. When I was doing Windows stuff I found
that the only way to do this was with a third party product. Because we had no
money we ended up not doing it.
One of the reasons I don't do Windows anymore is this kind of thing. One of
the reasons that Windows ends
When I did a DIRM DASD, I found this:
DASD USEDEXT VOLUME LIN030 LIN031 LIN032
GROUP REGION VOLUMESTART SIZE (END) OWNER ADDR SA
NOTES
-- -- -- --
-
**LIN030 0 1
Hello Ranga,
the CP link fails because someone else has the disk you are cloning
linked.
Lookup message HCP105E for explanation.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/13 5:16 >>>
When I clonedisk, it usually takes a long tim
OK, I recall that. There was indeed an overlap. An arithmetic problem :-)
I went from 1651 start to 1551, overlapping 100 cylinders.
Sorry, did not notice it :-)
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvin
Preaching to the choir, Alan. I think we managed to get them to talk to
the z/os time server I alread had established... time will tell.
"Fargusson.Alan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tb.ca.gov> To
Sent by
Tom,
I've installed both SLES 8 and SLES 9 (64 bit) under z/VM 5.1.0. I had
lots of problems, but most were due to my inexperience with Linux. Actually
installing the files was not a problem, though. I used an FTP server on
my Windows XP system named GuildFTP (a successor to War, I gather). I
Ok installing Suse 9.0 has been, still is, may always be, a bear.
SMB installs is the best/easiest from this clients perspective.
So, while I have some time to sit back and wait for the return of my
disk drives, it is time to dot the 't's and cross the 'i's.
When SMB seemed to be a total no-go, I t
Well, the ntptrace command says that avi-lis.gw.lightning.net is a stratum 1
server. That would make yours a stratum 2. I just tried to verify that
from one of my systems, but I don't get any response from
avi-lis.gw.lightning.net. For that matter, it doesn't show up in any of the
lists at http:
I downloaded the CD images by starting at:
http://www.novell.com/linux/, selecting
"Novell Linux Downloads and Evals" on the right hand side of the page,
Then "Download SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9" in the middle of that page,
Then "SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 for IBM zSeries and S/390" in the
Thanks
Yep, that is where I got the iso images from. BTW, I noticed you didn't
say what size your CD6 was. Do you have one available to quickly check
its size?
I've ordered the CDs. I should get the CDs well before I get the
mainframe disk drives back to try NFS.
I'll do the md5sum tomorrow when
679772160 SLES-9-i386-RC5-CD6.iso
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 5:05 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 9.0 CD Validation
Thanks
Yep, that is where I got the iso
You had me going there for a moment.
This is s390, not i386
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
Post, Mark K wrote:
679772160 SLES-9-i386-RC5-CD6.iso
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 5:05 PM
Here is the specific files I have stored on my system.
SLES-9-s390x-RC5-CD6.iso 64 Bit version; Size = 664,592,384
I ran md5sum SLES-9-s390x-RC5-CD6.iso which yielded:
74301159228f91a4da4a2bb78cb607aa *SLES-9-s390x-RC5-CD6.iso
SLES-9-s390-RC5-CD6.iso 32 Bit version; Size = 664,590,336
I ra
So when did you download your s390 version?
I just downloaded it again. (Suse 9.0 on intel with Netscape).
The chksum was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> md5sum SLES-9-s390-RC5-CD6.iso
94b427218460e44488f610610e6b73b8 SLES-9-s390-RC5-CD6.iso
which was bad.
And still only 19MB out of 633.8 MB shown on the
Just to check, I started a new download. It's currently at 168MB and
climbing.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:54 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 9.0 CD Validat
21 matches
Mail list logo
