On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for your needs. There's a whole community out there that can pick up
the slack. That's the point. Not whether anybody should be hastily
changing the format of enterprise file systems.
Most certainly. But just the
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and I believe that is one of the reasons Red Hat is less eager
to take s390 patches from IBM under the counter).
What are you inferring here?, IBM patches are now all part of the
mainline kernel.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(and I believe that is one of the reasons Red Hat is less eager
to take s390 patches from IBM under the counter).
What are
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(and I believe that is one of the reasons Red Hat is less eager
to take s390 patches from IBM under
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just think it is unfair to imply that IBM is doing anything under the
counter. If you watch the LKML you will frequently see contributions
from IBM developers.
I did not mean that unfair and should have searched for
But just the fact that the community *can* pick up the
source code does not mean it will happen.
ReiserFS has migrated its development from the NameSys servers to
kernel.org where work is continuing. Edward Shinkin and others continue to
develop the filesystem in spite of Hans Reiser's murder
On 07/14/2008 12:35:26 AM Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 07/10/2008 at 01:02 EDT, Douglas Wooster/Raleigh/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got this after I sent my last post. Being a z/OS Unix user,
I sure *wish* conversions would consistently do EBCDIC NL (x'15')
to/from ASCII LF (x'0A')
On Monday, 07/14/2008 at 10:58 EDT, Douglas Wooster/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 07/14/2008 12:35:26 AM Alan Altmark wrote:
OPENVM GETBFS and PUTBFS, as well as XEDIT, allow you to specify the
end-of-line sequence. The default is NL (0x15). You can also specify
CRLF (0x0D25), CRNL
There are two different problems that you allude to. There were some problems
with Reiser3 that were fixed. I am not convinced that all these were found and
fixed. There is also a problem with the structure of Reiser3 that is not a
problem with Reiser4. This is why Hans and the other
On 07/14/2008 11:07:41 AM Alan Altmark wrote:
On Monday, 07/14/2008 at 10:58 EDT, Douglas Wooster/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 07/14/2008 12:35:26 AM Alan Altmark wrote:
OPENVM GETBFS and PUTBFS, as well as XEDIT, allow you to specify the
end-of-line sequence. The default is NL
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 2:39 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Reiser
[snip]
Long before Linux, many large installations ended up in a similar
situation because their
Building a kernel is not a herculean task by any measure. It is
completely automated and the configuration can easily be done
graphically if you have an X11 server. You probably need to go
looking for some literature before you try to boot up a machine as
expensive as a z10 on a homebrew kernel,
On Monday, 07/14/2008 at 05:55 EDT, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Building a kernel is not a herculean task by any measure. It is
completely automated and the configuration can easily be done
graphically if you have an X11 server. You probably need to go
looking for some literature
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:12 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan
Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Perhaps the distributors are more tolerant of custom kernels on other
platforms - I don't know.
No way. You use a non-official kernel, your whole system becomes unsupported,
no
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:53 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik N Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building a kernel is not a herculean task by any measure. It is
completely automated and the configuration can easily be done
graphically if you have an X11 server. You probably need to
Yes, we have a whole department dedicated to vendor flogging and no one
doing any kernel building. We call that function vendor management
(VM)(not to be confused with voice mail or virtual machine - VF would
have been a better acronym IMHO ;).
Marcy
This message may contain confidential
Erik N Johnson wrote:
There are absolutely lots of problems with ReiserFS. It's best
deployed on a home user's PC. The journaling is great if you lose
power abruptly, but it's faster than some of the more mature
journaling file systems. It doesn't really pose a serious threat to
data integrity
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
But just the fact that the community *can* pick up the
source code does not mean it will happen.
ReiserFS has migrated its development from the NameSys servers to
kernel.org where work is continuing. Edward Shinkin and others continue to
develop the filesystem in spite
Erik N Johnson wrote:
Building a kernel is not a herculean task by any measure. It is
completely automated and the configuration can easily be done
graphically if you have an X11 server. You probably need to go
looking for some literature before you try to boot up a machine as
expensive as a
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Monday, 07/14/2008 at 05:55 EDT, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Building a kernel is not a herculean task by any measure. It is
completely automated and the configuration can easily be done
graphically if you have an X11 server. You probably need to go
looking
Hello List,
I want to dynamically add a cpu to a single cpu SLES10 SP1 server.
If this were a SLES9 server I would echo a 1 into
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online, but only the ../cpu0
directory exists on the SLES10 server. Has the method to do this changed?
Thanks.
--
Jim Fujimoto
County of
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim Fujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I want to dynamically add a cpu to a single cpu SLES10 SP1 server.
If this were a SLES9 server I would echo a 1 into
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online, but only the ../cpu0
Sometimes, I see people on RHEL lists talking about building their own
kernel. My advice generally goes something like
1. Check your support contract (think it says unsupported, it would if
I were the vendor).
2. Use CentOS (or Scientific Linux) on that system.
Sometimes I might also
On Monday, 07/14/2008 at 11:19 EDT, Erik N Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or roll your own completely from scratch. If you don't have a reason
to build a kernel, don't. But if you have a computer capable of
amazing feats of virtualization and there's something to be gained by
making a
Mark Post wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim Fujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I want to dynamically add a cpu to a single cpu SLES10 SP1 server.
If this were a SLES9 server I would echo a 1 into
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online, but only
25 matches
Mail list logo
