> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
> Behalf Of Mauro Souza
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:25 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: RHEL 5.4 install
>
> I've seen this problem with Microsoft-based ftp servers
> before. Looks
Hello list,
We are having a problem with a file system. We are using lvm. The
message is telling us we have a problem with dm-7. How do we tell which
logical volume is represented by dm-7.
Thanks,
ROn
--
For LINUX-390 subscr
pvscan?
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
pieter.har...@brabantwater.nl
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] Namens Ron Foster at
Baldor-IS
Verzonden: woensdag 24 februari 2010 15:15
Aan: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
The only way I figured out how to do it is to compare the minor
numbers of the /dev/dm-* files with the /dev/mapper/* files and match
them up.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> We are having a problem with a file system. We are using lvm. The
> me
lvdisplay -m /dev//
will display the physical volumes and extents for a logical volume.
Pvscan will tell what physical volumes belongs to what volume group, if any.
Lvscan will tell what logical volumes are defined.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
pieter.har...@brabantwater.nl
tel +31-73-6837133 /
Thank you guys for pointing me to the right direction, It is now up and
running.
Regards
Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Agblad
Tore
Sent: 19 February 2010 04:11 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: RMF Setup
You sh
Exploiting IBM System z Cryptographic Hardware using JSSE
More details are available at TechDocs :
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP101632
This study measures performance and throughput for the Java™ Secure Socket
Extension (JSSE) on Linux® for IBM System z® with
Looking at a SLES10 machine, there it is the same:
nlzlx114:~ # ll /dev/disk/by-path/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 14 00:38 ccw-0.0.0200 -> ../../dasda
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 14 00:38 ccw-0.0.0200-part1 ->
../../dasda1
So here too, if dasda1 would have been deleted in the /dev/ di
I don't know. But this weekend we didn't move or add dasd. This weekend
we moved the entire guest. So zipl didn't change. The guest was running
with the (virtual) hardware for at least 9 months.
Berry.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
But if it is indeed a racecondition then I would expect different
results for an IPL. We have booted the guest about 5 times, each time we
didn't get dasde1 and dasdkk1. And we have never seen it before (or at
least, that I know off).
Berry.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mai
Yes, there were two problems.
1) The 2GB/multiprocessor problem (although adding an additional
processor didn't help, but also DEFINEing 2GB of storage DID.)
2) The installation process does not like IIS FTP server.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 P
We do have the /etc/services file but it's the one which is distributed
with SuSE 10. So no, although there are a lot of FTP service ports
mentioned in that file I don't see anything specific to VSFTP or which
explains why proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range is seemingly ignored
by VSFTP daemon.
Hi Listers,
Has anyone noticed that the SLES11 " shutdown -h now" seems to take much longer
that under SLES9 or SLES10 ?
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This
On 02/24/2010 09:26 AM, Bernie Wu wrote:
Hi Listers,
Has anyone noticed that the SLES11 " shutdown -h now" seems to take much longer
that under SLES9 or SLES10 ?
I have a vanilla, fairly minimal, SLES11 install that was just finished
and it completed in under 60 seconds, '...WITHIN 60'. Wh
On Wednesday, 02/24/2010 at 10:16 EST, "Scully, William P"
wrote:
> We do have the /etc/services file but it's the one which is distributed
> with SuSE 10. So no, although there are a lot of FTP service ports
> mentioned in that file I don't see anything specific to VSFTP or which
> explains why
Hi Rich,
It's the barebones install ( ala Cookbook ). After this "md: stopping all md
devices.", you can count to about 11-12 Mississippi's ( I don't own a
stopwatch :-) before it actually comes down whereas under SLES9/SLES10 the
count is usually 1-3 Mississippi's.
The information contained
I just shut down SLES11, that part of the shutdown was about 3 or 4
seconds. Best guess, no stopwatch. Then again, measuring by either
guesses, stopwatch or "mississippi's" is inaccurate at best (I'm sure
Rob is having a good chuckle).
In my case I don't consider the time any different. Is you
Am Mittwoch 24 Februar 2010 17:31:47 schrieben Sie:
> Hi Rich,
> It's the barebones install ( ala Cookbook ). After this "md: stopping all md
> devices.", you can count to about 11-12 Mississippi's ( I don't own a
> stopwatch :-) before it actually comes down whereas under SLES9/SLES10 the
> c
>>> On 2/24/2010 at 09:48 AM, "van Sleeuwen, Berry"
wrote:
> Looking at a SLES10 machine, there it is the same:
>
> nlzlx114:~ # ll /dev/disk/by-path/
> total 0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 14 00:38 ccw-0.0.0200 -> ../../dasda
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 14 00:38 ccw-0.0.0200-part1 ->
> .
On Wednesday, 02/24/2010 at 10:02 EST, "Frank M. Ramaekers"
wrote:
> 2) The installation process does not like IIS FTP server.
It would be nice to know if the RHEL installation media (CD, DVD, .iso)
contains any soft (symbolic) links. I think Windows supports only ISO
9660:1999 with Joliet exte
20 matches
Mail list logo
