Hi
Sorry, are you sure modifying the active directory?
Atte
José María Fernández Domingo
Tecnocom Norte
-Mensaje original-
De: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] En nombre de koray
Enviado el: jueves, 04 de noviembre de 2010 20:32
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: HCP
Alan,
Indeed I should have said LOGOFF/LOGON instead of IPL the guest.
The instruction Koray used was "IPL VM" to activate the changes. As far
as I know we do not have to IPL VM every time the directory changes. And
I can't even remember when we performed a POR.
Regards, Berry.
-Original Me
Shane,
An IPL doesn't clear the (virtual) hardware environment of the guest,
and that's the way it should be. For instance, when I test a new CMS I
can link the MAINT 490 instead of the 190. Or when I need a bit more
storage to edit a large CMS file I can use DEF STOR to increase my
default. I do
Excuse me?
If you re-IPL a virtual machine surely it resets its environment according to
USER DIRECT? A virtual subset of the existing IOCDS, with the virtual addresses
and user(sic)-defined storage?
What do you inherit from a previous instance of a virtual machine? Bit confused
here, but I fr
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Thompson
wrote:
> Excuse me?
>
> If you re-IPL a virtual machine surely it resets its environment according to
> USER DIRECT? A virtual subset of the existing IOCDS, with the virtual
> addresses and user(sic)-defined storage?
Incorrect. An IPL of the vir
Hi Anthony,
I think the confusion is the word IPL. When we mention "IPL" we mean
executing the command IPL *OR* logon a machine. But they are not always
the same thing. If you logon a machine (and I mean logon a machine that
is not running) you get the configuration as set in the directory.
Usuall
Hah. I see. CMS IPL re-boots the OS within the existing VM. LOGON/LOGOFF resets
the VM. Bit like the difference between re-IPLing z/OS and re-activating the
hardware partition it lives in.
Thanks Berry/Rob
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
I have seen this happen as well; when trying to boot from san disks.
Do you have your root filesystem on a san disk? Can you post your user
direct entry for a user that fails?
When you logged all the way out of your Linux guests you reset that
user. A lot of different things could have happened at
I am trying to use the channel-to-channel driver with the IBM
Communications Processor on Z, SLES10sp2. This worked once, but after
a reinstall with a new version of commserver, I'm unable to get the
ctcmpc to start.
When I execute the command:
echo 0.0.0400,0.0.0401 >/sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Roger Evans wrote:
> LNXCCL:/etc/rc.d # echo 0.0.0400,0.0.0401
>>/sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/ctcmpc/group
> -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
Wasn't it with quotes around the argument? Like
echo "0.0.0400,0.0.0401" > group
Rob
--
Hi again to all,
after doing lots of research i found the problem is somewhere in linux,
let me explain.
- I checked all dasds, there were no offline or unattached.
- No overlap in diskmap file.
- I compared direct user file with the old backup and i saw there is no
change with disk mappings.
-
I just cut and pasted into my startup script from the readme file at
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27006164
to wit:
¨¨
Load the ctcmpc device driver
# /sbin/modprobe ctcmpc
Configure the read & write i/o device addresses for a ct
On 05.11.2010 13:44, Roger Evans wrote:
When I execute the command:
echo 0.0.0400,0.0.0401>/sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/ctcmpc/group
as per instructions from the device drivers, Features and Commands
manual, i get an error message. Like this:
LNXCCL:/etc/rc.d # echo 0.0.0400,0.0.0401
/sys/bus
On Friday, 11/05/2010 at 12:59 EDT, Shane wrote:
> We are talking about a hipervisor running (nominally) directly on the
> hardware - not a user-space application like VBox.
> In my naivety I would expect z/VM to be *very* aware of an interrupt
> for a guest IPL. If there are changes in the (z/VM)
Thanks, Peter, Rob
THe devices 400 and 401 didn't show up on the output from lscss, even
though they were listed in the VM USER DIR for the virrtual machine.
I took a tip from the other thread today and logged the machine off and
on. That seems to have fixed the problem. The lscss shows the
d
Hello,
My personal vision:
I think this model was planned for CMS (or equivalent) users, not for the
new "plug and play" systems, like zVM itself and Linux.
Example: when we attach a dasd to Linux or second level zVM, they recognize
the new resource and puts it online, "automagically". So, the s
On Friday, November 05, 2010 09:37:35 am you wrote:
> I just cut and pasted into my startup script from the readme file at
>
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27006164
>
> to wit:
> ¨¨
> Load the ctcmpc device driver
>
> # /sbin/modprobe c
On Friday, 11/05/2010 at 10:50 EDT, Clovis Pereira
wrote:
> I think this model was planned for CMS (or equivalent) users, not for
the
> new "plug and play" systems, like zVM itself and Linux.
> Example: when we attach a dasd to Linux or second level zVM, they
recognize
> the new resource and puts
On 11/3/10 4:55 PM, "koray" wrote:
> What i did is, created the printer using IPP (socket) with IBM
> Proprinter driver, the result was pages of garbage characters for a text
> file writing just "test" inside. Then i converted the text file to
> postscript using paps , the result was same.
> Th
Think of it this way:
The directory definition of a guest are the "specs" used to construct its
virtual machine when it logs on.
Re-iplling a guest without logging off/on is the same as rebooting your
windows box without making physical changes to it, changes to the "specs"
aren't seen.
(There are
I noticed that he did a
X USER DIRECT C
Then
DIRECTXA USER
Hopefully he does have a USER DIRECT on A or B.
I always do a DIRECTXA USER DIRECT C to make sure I pick the one C.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Michael Harding
Sent
Koray,
Did you try to IPL 102 and see if it comes up.
Is the /boot is also on Minidisk 102 as well?
You also should mount "/dev/dasda1 to /mnt " to see if the "/boot"
is still on that partition.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mail
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of koray
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:24 AM
> Subject: Re: HCPGIR450W and HCPGIR453W after editing user direct
>
-snip-
> - I ipled from SLES11 DVD and choosed boot installed system, it boots!
Hi Eddie,
thanks for the tip!
yes i did ipl from minidisk 102, and /boot is on Minidisk as well.
But /dev/dasda1 seems as a part of LVM group. Maybe i remembered wrong.
Anyway, i dont know why all these changed but now i need to change the
default boot minidisk from 100 to 102, my 8 guests have t
On 05.11.2010 22:16, Mark Post wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of koray
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: HCPGIR450W and HCPGIR453W after editing user direct
-snip-
- I ipled from SLES11 DVD and choosed boo
Hi Koray,
Go back to the process of your directory change.
Is MAINT or DIRMAINT the leading directory owner? (take a look at the
DIRMAINT 1DB, if there is a recent USER BACKUP chances are DIRMAINT was
leading)
Are you sure the correct directory has been put online? Did you have a
DIRECT USER on t
Hi Berry,
The owner is MAINT i guess, because i'm doing all these editing things
with MAINT user. I found the file PROFILE EXEC, in TCPMAINT user area
(sorry, i dont know the big iron's terminology, i found it with "filel
* * *" command with TCPMAINT user) which runs Linux guests
automatically dur
Hi Koray,
Lets try a step by step approach. Start by verifing that you are running with
the correct directory. And second, try to find out what the correct IPL
processes are for the guests.
I would expect that your zVM guy has handed the correct instructions and that
you indeed have to edit DI
Thanks Alan and Berry and everyone else who responded.
Alan this wasn't my intent. When I said "immediately" I meant
"immediately upon receiving the (guest) IPL interrupt".
And I agree with Berry - dynamic changes can (and should) be carried
forward. Changes to what I called the z/VM environment -
29 matches
Mail list logo
