Hi,
here is the data:
VSWITCH info on LPAR1 (guest1) during stage 6:
VSWITCH SYSTEM PVTSWTCH Type: VSWITCH Connected: 3Maxconn:
INFINITE
PERSISTENT RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting:
OFF
VLAN Aware Default VLAN: 0410Default Porttype:
Access
Native
I am using layer 3 vswitch...
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Offer Baruch offerbar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
here is the data:
VSWITCH info on LPAR1 (guest1) during stage 6:
VSWITCH SYSTEM PVTSWTCH Type: VSWITCH Connected: 3Maxconn:
INFINITE
PERSISTENT RESTRICTEDNONROUTER
Hi list,
Is there a read/write CMS file system in the current distros? On a SLES
11 SP2 system, I search for CMS and only find:
│cmsfs │CMS Filesystem driver and uti│
│lcms │Utilities for the Little CMS │
│liblcms1 │Libraries for the Little CMS │
│liblcms1-32bit│Libraries
Linux guest move its memory to target z/VM member during relocating. Then
it quiesce and resume on target z/VM.
How to understand quiesce? What state of linux when it is in quiesce
time? Is idling? shutdown? or something?
--
For
Essentially not running from the CP dispatcher perspective. CP will be
doing work to action the LGR so I assume any time attributed to the guest
would be system time, but I might be inaccurate in saying that as I didn't
write that part of LGR.
Richard
- -
Richard J Moore - FIET, FBCS, CEng,
You want the cms-fuse driver which is in s390-utils. The original includes
the cmsfs utils but is not R/W.
Also, beware of an acronym collision where cms can mean content
management system. That's obviously not what you want.
On Aug 30, 2012 5:18 AM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Rick,
You want the cms-fuse driver which is in s390-utils.
D'oh - I had it all along. Thanks for the quick reply.
Mike MacIsaac mikemac at-sign us.ibm.com
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On 30 August 2012 11:43, Lu GL Gao lu...@cn.ibm.com wrote:
Linux guest move its memory to target z/VM member during relocating. Then
it quiesce and resume on target z/VM.
How to understand quiesce? What state of linux when it is in quiesce
time? Is idling? shutdown? or something?
See it as
We are trying to update some of our Linux guests through YaST2/Online
Updates and are receiving the following message:
There was an error in the repository initialization
This is now occurring on all our Linux guests. Is this issue on our side
or Novell's side? There is not much more information
http://www.citrix.com/lang/English/lp/lp_2328330.asp
quote
The survey carried out on 1000 adult americans of age 18 and more paint a
disturbing picture: 54% of americans do not know what the cloud is and claim to
never have used it. But, from these, 95% use it regularly for online banking,
So, does data delivery from the cloud qualify as fallout?
Big Data: The Mushroom Cloud ... all kinds of privacy violations can
be considered fallout.
(chuckles)
Some links (watch folding):
http://tagteamtech.com/another-look-at-cloud-computing-from-the-new
And ... ?.
http://gigaom.com/cloud/some-of-amazon-web-services-are-down-again/
Shane ...
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390
On 8/30/2012 at 08:58 AM, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
peabre...@pepco.com wrote:
We are trying to update some of our Linux guests through YaST2/Online
Updates and are receiving the following message:
There was an error in the repository initialization
This is now occurring on all
A few years ago, my father asked me about cloud computing. I told him that
it was the same as the old days when we used teletypes and 110 baud rubber
cup modems. The equipment is smaller, lighter, and quieter but the concept
is the same.
Paul
Shane G wrote:
And ... ?.
http://gigaom.com/cloud/some-of-amazon-web-services-are-down-again/
(chuckles) Correlation, not causation.
Though I hope there are no cloud hosting sites in NOLA... or, if there
are, that the cloud, itself, is resilient.
When a unified theory of Human Personality is
This doesn't surprise me - I'm not sure when we started calling data stored
on servers a 'cloud' - but I cringe every time I hear it.
Is this really any different then not knowing what a catalytic converter
is, but driving anyway?
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:39 AM, McKown, John
No, the freeze does not cause the buffers to be written to disk. It
wouldn't be any different than taking a point-in-time copy of the disks.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Aria Bamdad a...@bsc.gwu.edu wrote:
Just curious, could this functionality be used somehow to allow for a
On 30 August 2012 17:11, Aria Bamdad a...@bsc.gwu.edu wrote:
Just curious, could this functionality be used somehow to allow for a
**consistent** disk snapshot using flashcopy for a live Linux guest? What
I
mean is that currently, we have to shutdown the guest, do the flashcopy and
then
This was an interesting issue. We had a local NFS repository configured
and enabled to all our Linux server guests. I had no idea what was going
on as this was working fine last night. I ran a:
zypper update
which revealed the that there was no access to the offending NFS
repository. This
Actually, Linux on System z has a hibernate function (stop and write
memory to disk.) What it doesn't have is the laptop suspend
function - freeze everything and stop, but don't write to disk.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think the disk
Reminds me of Mr Al Nino who once got a lot of phone threats because of the
storms
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
True, no solution is as safe as shutdown/snapshot/restart in terms of
ensuring consistency but I think it would be nice if there was some
mechanism within Linux that would alert the kernel of this and would allow
for a relatively consistent snapshot of the virtual machine, assuming
perhaps we stop
On Thursday, 08/30/2012 at 11:28 EDT, Scott Rohling
scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't surprise me - I'm not sure when we started calling data
stored
on servers a 'cloud' - but I cringe every time I hear it.
Is this really any different then not knowing what a catalytic converter
is,
On 8/30/2012 at 11:56 AM, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
peabre...@pepco.com wrote:
I was unaware that the unavailability of one repository prevents the whole
process, even when the Novell?s repositories are enabled and selected.
Does this make sense?
Not without more details on
Y'know, about 12-13 years ago, IBM had that funky e drawn up for
e-business, trying to sell a computing utility.. the next
generation Universal Server Farm.
Oddly enough, the utility IBM envisioned is partially implemented as
the cloud... and IBM didn't get it's marque into it, did they?
Way
I don't think the disk snapshot from a freeze would be any better in terms
of data integrity. You're still snapshotting a disk with things like open
files - and the guest is in an unknown state processing wise.
If there was a facility to restore disks and then resume processing where
the guest
I cringe because I really have no idea what the word means any more.. I
read something about CMS yesterday - 'cloud managed services'. ;-) I'm
likely just not adjusting well - I admit it...
I suppose I really cringe because it's a word I hear more and more from
customers and always have to
What it doesn't have is the laptop suspend
function - freeze everything and stop, but don't write to disk.
CP STOP and BEGIN?
Mike MacIsaac mikemac at-sign us.ibm.com
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
The suspend/resume thing exists already -
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/5cb5ed706d254a8186256c71006d2e0a/57e3c8123412429186257910006ab443/$FILE/l0wadp00.pdf
The CP STOP command may also be good enough. Yes, you could have lost data in
open files, but this would be no
It depends on your approach for DR.. is a physical backup the only method?
Typically, it's a hybrid .. use physical backups to restore as much as
you can (hopefully enough to run linux and be able to start backup clients
to restore) - and then use backup/restore clients to go to logical
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:16:53 -0700
Paul Dembry p...@trifox.com wrote:
A few years ago, my father asked me about cloud computing. I told him that
it was the same as the old days when we used teletypes and 110 baud rubber
cup modems. The equipment is smaller, lighter, and quieter but the concept
Just curious, could this functionality be used somehow to allow for a
**consistent** disk snapshot using flashcopy for a live Linux guest? What I
mean is that currently, we have to shutdown the guest, do the flashcopy and
then restart the guest. Is there a way we can tell the Linux guest to
I wonder if anyone would like to share their experiences with regards
to automated shutdown/restart of linux guests for DR snapshot purposes.
We recommend a combination of file-level backups run from within the virtual
machines to a designated backup server that is NOT one of the application
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David
Boyes
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:47 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LGR guest quiesce
Just curious, could this functionality be used somehow to allow for a
**consistent**
1-Stop running major applications/database servers, etc 2-issue a command
on linux to flush buffers (sync) and put guest into frozen/sleep mode 3-Take
your flashcopy outside the guest 4-issue another command on linux to
resume
I'm not sure how that would work... if the guest is in suspended
Just curious, could this functionality be used somehow to allow for a
**consistent** disk snapshot using flashcopy for a live Linux guest? What I
mean is that currently, we have to shutdown the guest, do the flashcopy and
then restart the guest. Is there a way we can tell the Linux guest to
I've seen similar pictures with letters 'MMH' (Miracle Happens Here)
linked to said cloud.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:33 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Too true to be
I think the word cloud came about long before the actual implementation. I've
seen diagrams where the Internet is pictured as a cloud between two other
points. I think it was shown as a cloud because you couldn't tell how the
data was being routed around inside it. One packet may take one path
I've noticed on SLES 11 that when DBUS starts, these messages appear
Aug 30 14:52:21 zlinux-maint console-kit-daemon[10197]: GLib-CRITICAL:
g_async_queue_unref: assertion `queue-waiting_threads == 0' failed
Aug 30 14:52:24 zlinux-maint console-kit-daemon[13304]: WARNING: Could not
determine
On 8/30/2012 at 05:57 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
I've noticed on SLES 11 that when DBUS starts, these messages appear
Aug 30 14:52:21 zlinux-maint console-kit-daemon[10197]: GLib-CRITICAL:
g_async_queue_unref: assertion `queue-waiting_threads == 0' failed
Aug
Maybe this daemon is unnecessary on z - or at least, under z/VM - where the
console access is logged in the operator consoles?
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On 8/30/2012 at 05:57 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
I've
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe this daemon is unnecessary on z - or at least, under z/VM - where the
console access is logged in the operator consoles?
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On
SR 10789865971 has been submitted.Gregg, doesn't look like it can be
removed. Other things have a dependency on it.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:29 PM
To:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
SR 10789865971 has been submitted.Gregg, doesn't look like it can be
removed. Other things have a dependency on it.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
On Friday 31 August 2012 03:27 AM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
I've noticed on SLES 11 that when DBUS starts, these messages appear
Aug 30 14:52:21 zlinux-maint console-kit-daemon[10197]: GLib-CRITICAL:
g_async_queue_unref: assertion `queue-waiting_threads == 0' failed
Aug 30 14:52:24 zlinux-maint
45 matches
Mail list logo
