Re: xinetd start up script

2004-06-15 Thread Lucius, Leland
Ranga, The rcxinetd script in the xinetd rpm provided with SLES8 works fine. But, if you just wanted to get a more current version from the net, then what I usually do for that is download the latest i386 srpm from ftp.suse.com and rebuild it. Leland -Original Message- From: Linux on 390

Re: gcc binary for OS/390 USS

2004-06-14 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Anyone know of gcc binary for OS/390 USS? > I need either that or 'netcat' server/client binary for > OS/390 USS. I want > to use this to signal our Linux LPAR when the OS/390 side is > ready to do > snapshot. > > Does anyone have it or point me to a source? > Haven't used it in a while, b

Re: Linux/390 in production

2004-06-14 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > I was recently informed that there are only about 30 sites > worldwide running Linux/390 in production. Is this accurate? > Well, this ought to be an interesting article. Will you let us know when it's done? Leland -- F

Re: My DR readiness results

2004-06-11 Thread Lucius, Leland
> We snapshotted 6 Linux volumes (0x2300 - 0x2305) to another > set (0x230A to > 0x230F) , I then modified the zipl.conf and fstab on the new > boot volume > (0x230A) and IPLed from 0x230A. Linux booted OK, but from > 0x2300, eventhough on the HMC console I specified IPL address > as 0x230A. Lo

Re: Ghosting zSeries Linux

2004-06-08 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Why not use Amanda and save yourself the pain of rolling your > own network backup system? > Are you an Amanda going out yet? You two have been seeing each other for quite some time now. ;-D Leland (Hmmm...Amanda...Adam...na) -

Re: MVSNFS another question - exporting HFS files

2004-06-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
You'll need to mount it and export it with something like: /hfs/mountpoint The "/hfs/" comes from your HFS() prefix attribute in the NFS attributes file. Leland > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Mike Caughran > Sent: Monday, June 07, 20

Re: IBM take a hint

2004-06-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > While searching for IBM's redbooks I came across this... > http://www.discountmagazineplanet.com/cover_view.cfm?tid=10946 > &CFID=16283647&CFTOKEN=54858430&sid=2 > > Think IBM should take a hint. :-) > I like IBM's version better. I can understand those!!! ;-) Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-06-04 Thread Lucius, Leland
Sorry, didn't get a chance tonight. Hopefully will get to it at work tomorrow. Leland > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Lucius, Leland > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 7:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-06-03 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Do a short transfer and tcpdump it. Look at the window size offered by > the server in the "syn" frame, that is a good guide to the buffering. > Got a window of 32767 from Linux to z/OS and 65535 from z/OS to Linux using lukemftp. Must dash right now, but it appears that changing the sndbuf siz

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-06-03 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Hmmm, good point. Let me see if I can play with the buffer size under > z/OS. > Well, I can set the default TCP buffer size to different values for the z/OS stack and we have it set to 65535, so I'd say it's on the largish size. But, I don't know if the FTP server issues a setsockopt() to set a

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-06-03 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Specifically ftp ? The reason I ask is that the old BSD ftp client > always set 8K buffer limits and many vendors who reused the BSD > client code in other products never got around to fixing that. > > Linux has it fixed, I'd have assumed z/Os did but you never know.. > Hmmm, good point. Le

Re: Linux Consoles?

2004-06-02 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Can someone point me in the right direction to get me > started? Is there > even a better method? Thanks. > Do you already have syslogd running under z/OS? If so, just go over to your Linux image and do a "man syslog.conf". In there you will find how to log remotely. It involves updating

Re: Looking for a Redbook....

2004-05-31 Thread Lucius, Leland
Here ya go... http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/unix/redbook/ Leland -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5/31/2004 2:22 PM Subject: OT: Looking for a Redbook Hi, folks. Sorry for this off topic post, but I need some help from the li

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
I don't know if this high school dropout can handle this, but let me try. I got me a hipersocket with an MTU of 57344 (on both ends), so: For the biggie: tux:~ # ping -f -A -c 100 -s 57308 10.2.32.3 PING 10.2.32.3 (10.2.32.3) 57308(57336) bytes of data. --- 10.2.32.3 ping statistics --- 100 pac

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > 3.82KB/s??? Is that supposed to be MB/s > Uh, can we all say...oops! ;-) Yes, that was supposed to be MB/s. Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain proprietary and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named a

Re: New Presentations

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Rob van der Heij The Art of Squeezing Penguins > How much juice do you get out of one of those. I'm pretty lazy...could I just use one of these? http://www.jackspowerjuicer.com/ Leland (Rob's been a busy little beaver lately) -

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Maybe someone could try with NFS instead of FTP > > > > Is anyone running NFS over HiperSockets to z/OS??? > > > I tried that as well. Unfortunately, I can't remember (and > didn't write > it down) the throughput. Let me see if I can get some #s real quick. > Okay, I NFS mounted an HFS di

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > Maybe someone could try with NFS instead of FTP > > Is anyone running NFS over HiperSockets to z/OS??? > I tried that as well. Unfortunately, I can't remember (and didn't write it down) the throughput. Let me see if I can get some #s real quick. Leland

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Ummm...you have to have the same MTU on both sides. Make > sure you have > MFS (OS= in IOCDS) at 64K. > Oops, I did mislead with that didn't I? Sorry, 'bout that. Here's the interface: hsi0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:10.2.32.30 Mask:255.255.255.0

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > Just a thought. > Do you have to change the MTU size at all? I think it > defaults on linux to 1500. > Just a thought. Does the MTU size even play into the > hipersockets at all? > Yepper, it does. I'm currently running with a 56KB MTU (on z/OS side) and have tried lower. Never could

Re: Did some extensive hipersocket testing/benchmarking.... need help interpreting results.

2004-05-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > 125 Storing data set /it/public/Su810_001.iso > 100% |*| 595 MB2.68 > MB/s--:-- > ETA > 250 Transfer completed successfully. > 624885855 bytes sent in 03:41 (2.68 MB/s) > Depressing isn't it? I've never been able to get much (or any) better than wh

Re: Attempting to get hipersockets configured in linux

2004-05-27 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > in /etc/rc.config (which was blank) > > > pepin:/ # more /etc/rc.config > NETCONFIG="_0 _1" > IPADDR_1="192.168.252.13" > NETDEV_1="hsi1" > IFCONFIG_1="192.168.252.13 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > For this linux guest the hipersocket address assigned is > 192.168.252.13 as opposed to the exam

Re: SuSE vs Red Hat

2004-05-27 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > > > > You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard > > that there > > > is a mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a lot of > them being > > > SuSE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > > Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available. > > > No, it's NOT R

Re: SuSE vs Red Hat

2004-05-27 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > > You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard > that there > > is a mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a lot of them being > > SuSE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. > > > Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available. > No, it's NOT Red hats can co

Re: SuSE vs Red Hat

2004-05-27 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard > that there is a mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a > lot of them being SuSE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. > Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available. Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communica

Re: Anyone what to sell me SuSE Linux for s/390?

2004-05-19 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Thanks, I called them this 3 hours ago and still have not > heard back from them:-( OH well, maybe > it's time to roll my own. > Haven't tried it, but this may save you some time... http://sinenomine.net/debian/media.php Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any a

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> John, everyone, do you all know who they were? I'd rather not get > involved into that subject, especially since it's against what we do > here. > Well if you mean where all the other Luddites are, there's a rapper that's seems to be very proud of being a Luddite. Heck, he even proclaims it to th

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> (Gawd I am *such* a Luddite!) > All praise King Ludd! Leludd -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.e

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> -Original Message- > From: John Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the chuckle... :-D Leland -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Dumb Query: is there an equivalent package in REXX? > Now there's a thought!!! Using Regina and the new Rexx/DW, we could write a smashing little client that we could all call our own. Doggone it! Now I'm torn between trying to FileZilla and Rexx/FTP. ;-) Leland ---

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > I checked out fiezilla. Unfortunately it likes to insert "/" > > when I use > > something like "userid.tso.cntl" as the directory. > > > I've found where this is occurring, but will have to wait > until I get home to play with it as I don't have the tools > here at work. > Well, I was (s

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-12 Thread Lucius, Leland
> I checked out fiezilla. Unfortunately it likes to insert "/" > when I use > something like "userid.tso.cntl" as the directory. > I've found where this is occurring, but will have to wait until I get home to play with it as I don't have the tools here at work. There are provisions in the code fo

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-12 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Leland: > > I dont have a C/C++ compiler on Win32. If you can help, that would be > great. > Okey dokey. I'll take a gander and see what I'd be up against. I see the "amount" of source is quiet large, but that may be deceiving. We'll see... Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communi

Re: OT - open source Windows FTP client?

2004-05-12 Thread Lucius, Leland
> I checked out fiezilla. Unfortunately it likes to insert "/" > when I use > something like "userid.tso.cntl" as the directory. Perhaps I > can patch the > source. > Are you thinking about updating it? If not, maybe I can take a look. I'd not heard of FileZilla, but at first glance, it is

Re: cpint error messages

2004-05-08 Thread Lucius, Leland
Use cpint_load to set everything up. Leland > -Original Message- > From: Jim Sibley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 6:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cpint error messages > > I have cpint-2.1.0-1.1.s390x.rpm on a 2.6.5 s390x kernel. > > When I enter >

Re: What should glob() return for ".*/.."

2004-05-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > According to the Single Unix Specification (which is the > space the z/OS > UNIX guys play in, since "UNIX" branding is so important to them), the > z/OS return is not "wrong". Support for what GNU implements > as GLOB_PERIOD > > is not required, but _optional_. > Did you find GLOB_PERIOD

Re: What should glob() return for ".*/.."

2004-05-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > z/OS is showing > the same kind of thing I've seen on z/VM (OpenVM). > I have never heard the reason why the OpenExtensions support > (both z/OS and z/VM) does not list the dot and dotdot directories. > Even more strange is that it does return the '.' and '..' when using '.*' as the pattern. I

Re: how to "vi" to regain a bad image...

2004-05-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > You must be a lot better typist than I am! > Heck no! Just pretty handy with "cut & paste" ;-D Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain proprietary and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. Any unauthoriz

Re: What should glob() return for ".*/.."

2004-05-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > I think z/OS is wrong. The only difference in the Linux and > AIX case is the order, which probably depends on the filesystem used. > Yepper, I believe you're correct about z/OS. And it seems that AIX sorts the individual matching nodes, while Linux sorts the matching path as a whole. Me

Re: how to "vi" to regain a bad image...

2004-05-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
And sed works nicely too. And there's always the option of just using "cat >filename" and just reentering the whole bloody thing. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What should glob() return for ".*/.."

2004-05-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
Given a directory with these contents: . .. .testdir .testfile What is the "correct" and expected results? On Linux, I get: 0: '../..' 1: './..' 2: '.testdir/..' On AIX, I get: 0: './..' 1: '../..' 2: '.testdir/..' On z/OS USS, I get: Thanks much, Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

Re: TurboLinux Enterprise Server 8

2004-05-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Of more interest to me, though, is where your colleague _got_ the .iso > files. I just looked over the Turbolinux web and FTP sites, > and didn't see > anything remotely resembling CD images. > I went through the exercise too. No luck here either. Leland -

Re: Central processor is looping when 64 bit linux is IPLed

2004-05-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
Hi Srinivas, Did you "dadsfmt" and "fdasd" the volume? I ask because the first 4 bytes at should be C9D7D3F1 (or IPL1), the 4 bytes at 001 should be C9D7D3F2 (or IPL2) and the 4 bytes at 002 should be E5D6D3F1 (or VOL1). That's if your using CDL format. I just ran zipl against a

Re: Samba 3.0.2

2004-05-01 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Has anyone happened to create (or know where I can download) a working > srpm for samba 3.0.2a or 3.0.3? It builds, but I need newer heimdal > support, which wants a newer db, which wants... etc etc, if I want to > get a build that supports all the features of samba 3.x. Looks like > those depend

Re: DASD Errors due to R/O

2004-04-28 Thread Lucius, Leland
> However note that this cannot be done from the guestvol > system, since the > boot device is R/O. And if this is done from the basevol > system you will > no longer be able to write to the boot device to maintain it in the > future. " > If you don't mind "custom" patches, you might wanna try the

Re: Thougth I'd mention: disabled wait 000A0000 and loadparm

2004-03-30 Thread Lucius, Leland
Jantje, What distro are you using? Was it the LOADPARM or PARM keyword that you were using? Leland > -Original Message- > From: Jan MOEYERSONS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Thougth I'd mention: disabled wait 000A00

Re: dasdfmt with a 1K block size - still not recommend?

2004-02-18 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > The main reason that I can think of is that the I/O must be a complete > block. By making the physical block == maximum block on the track (or > nearest multiple of the "logical block"), you must read and > write the entire > track in order to get / update any "logical block" contained > wit

Re: dasdfmt with a 1K block size - still not recommend?

2004-02-18 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > As long as you have to use a 3390 track image with > ECKD mapping, the smaller tracksize will cost you > capacity on the image. Probably only the RVA will see > equivalent savings on the backend. Other devices do a > one to one mapping of the full ECKD image. > So, why not format the tracks w

Re: Accessing OS/390data from Linux LPAR.

2004-02-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
I have a standard (non-CICS) sockets example in have Cobol and Rexx. Hollar if ya want 'em. Leland > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Ranga Nathan > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Accessin

Re: Use of 3490 tape

2004-02-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > I *did* ask for volunteers before Xmas ...8-) > I would have too if I'd been around. Finally had some vacation. But, if I'd seen the invite I'd have certainly done it during the vacation. This the FUN kind of stuff. > If you already have the prereqs, it's pretty slick. The one > difficult p

Re: Use of 3490 tape

2004-02-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Yes, but it's not very efficient. Check out > http://sinenomine.net/publications/presentations.php#2004 for my MVMUA > presentation on a way to make use of VM and/or > z/OS-controlled tape w/o > having to attach the drives directly to the Linux system. > Ah man...I wish this was done b4 the hol

Re: Adding Swap Space on the Fly

2004-02-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
Seems to work for me... tux:~ # free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 57112 55824 1288 0672 2116 -/+ buffers/cache: 53036 4076 Swap: 16 83144 81300 tux:~ # cat /proc/swaps Filena

Re: Problem with sysctl and hz_timer on SLES8

2004-02-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
Try: sysctl -w kernel.hz_timer=0 > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Eric Sammons > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Problem with sysctl and hz_timer on SLES8 > > > I am trying to set my SLES8 gue

Re: Weird OSA issue...anyone else???

2004-01-26 Thread Lucius, Leland
> You need to figure out if the cards are responding to ARPs or not. I > realize that you used qetharp, but that tells you what OSA > has loaded into > its own ARP cache, not whether it is responding to ARPs. Use > OSA/SF or > the HMC to look at IP addresses loaded into the cards (which > is n

Re: Weird OSA issue...anyone else???

2004-01-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Hmm. I see the problem at the workstation. Poke around for a bit and > notice that eth1 is not aliased in > modules.conf. Add an alias to modules.conf for eth1 and the > problem goes > away. Cannot be recreated. > ... so it' s fixed ... no ... we remove the update to modules.conf and > cannot re

Weird OSA issue...anyone else???

2004-01-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
Hi folks, I've been running into a problem every so often that I can't track down and thought I'd just throw it out here to see if I get any bites. I have 2 Gbit OSAs that I share among my guests and use VIPA to provide failover in case one goes down. So, every guest has an eth0, eth1, and an lo

Re: Question on Backups

2004-01-12 Thread Lucius, Leland
venue Service - Room 6527 > Constitution Avenue, N.W. > Washington, D.C. 20224 > > Voice: (202) 927-4188 FAX: (202) 622-6726 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Lucius, Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 0

Re: Question on Backups

2004-01-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
> 2) I believe "Upstream S/390 Linux" (by Innovation Data > Processing) can do the above, does anyone currently use this > product, any "war stories" you'd be willing to relate? > We ran Upstream on L/390 for a while (until we found out we weren't licensed). We still use Upstream to backup our Win

Re: LVM problems on SLES8 SP3 beta

2003-11-12 Thread Lucius, Leland
Michael, > I have been runing 54 for few days and seems to work. > However this release broke OSA connection, it fails to init > osa card in boot > time and hangs, haven't found any solution yet. > Has SuSE updated you past -54? For the fun of it, I downloaded -60 from X86-64 dist and OSAs seem t

Re: history of Linux/390

2003-11-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
Any history research of Linux on the IBM mainframe should also include: http://linas.org/linux/i370-bigfoot.html Leland > -Original Message- > From: Marian Gasparovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: history of Linux/3

Anyone running UC4 on L390?

2003-10-27 Thread Lucius, Leland
If so, what DB do you use? Thanks much, Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.

Re: Secure FTP clients for Linux

2003-10-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Well "lftp" is s'posed to support it, but I've not tried it: > > http://lftp.yar.ru/ > I should say, I've used lftp before, just not the ssl related stuff. Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the

Re: Secure FTP clients for Linux

2003-10-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
Well "lftp" is s'posed to support it, but I've not tried it: http://lftp.yar.ru/ Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. Any unauthorized review, use, d

Re: DB2/Connect "db2" command hangs intermitently

2003-10-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Yes I've seen it, but haven't been able to track it to anything. > Well, ya know what? I can settle for knowing that it's not just me for now. ;-) It doesn't "seem" to cause any problems, so we'll just watch for more patterns. BTW: Readdressed and change portnames on all my guests' OSAs las

DB2/Connect "db2" command hangs intermitently

2003-10-23 Thread Lucius, Leland
Has anyone else seen a problem where the "db2" command hangs? It requires a "kill" but everything else works just fine before, during, and after the "hang". It doesn't seem to matter what "db2" subcommand you perform and you can turn right around and reissue the same command and it will work. Th

Re: autostart of Samba

2003-10-21 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > it-rnlinux1:/etc # chkconfig smb on > it-rnlinux1:/etc # chkconfig nmb on > nmb: unknown service > > smb worked > nmb did not see above > > You could always just force the issue: insserv nmbd insserv smbd insserv winbind Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attac

Re: Hipersocket performance

2003-10-19 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Kris may have hit on the reason for this one: the buffer size > for the particular device driver (which is completely > different from the MTU). > Yepper, I'm guessing he's right. I just can't find it. I've done some more testing and I'm getting so many different results without a noticable p

Re: Hipersocket performance

2003-10-19 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > SLES8A --> ZOS1 = ~56KB/sec!! > If anyone is interested, I was able to increase this to around 55MB/sec by changing SLES8A's MTU to 20480. Anything higher and it drops back down to "K/sec". I haven't had a chance to change the ZOS side yet. Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NO

Re: 3270 terminal support under Z/Linux

2003-10-19 Thread Lucius, Leland
You could try: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/7814/ The s3270 allows you to "script and scrape", but I'd imagine you'd have to change your app a bit. Leland > -Original Message- > From: Itschak Mugzach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 7:37 AM > To

Re: Hipersocket performance

2003-10-18 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > Also, one thing I will be trying shortly is z/VM 4.4 and I > was wondering if the new QIOASSIST is available when running > on a z/800? I suspect not. > Welp, no luck on this one. z/VM 4.4 tells me I'm out of luck with: HCP2162I QIOAssist is not available :-( Leland CONFIDENTIALITY

Hipersocket performance

2003-10-18 Thread Lucius, Leland
I'm having an interesting problem with hipersockets that I just can't seem to figure out. Here's the lay of the land: ZOS1 1.4 in LPAR 1 ZOS2 1.4 in LPAR 2 ZVM 4.3 in LPAR 3 SLES8A guest under ZVM1 SLES8B guest under ZVM1 All systems are on a 10.2.32.x/25 network. All are set to use an MTU of

Re: z/VM 4.4 guestlan problems

2003-10-15 Thread Lucius, Leland
tlan problems > > > I know that at least mine is on a V-disk (don't tell Richard! > :), so that's > not a part the problem I'm seeing. From what Richard said, > they've been > seeing this on lots of systems, and they've been working with > Boeblingen > trying to figure it out. Hopefully they will

Re: Can I really install SLES8 into 360MB MDISK if I choose MINI MUM GRAPHICAL SYSTEM ????

2003-10-15 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > snip > One approach would be to install the "Minimum Graphical > System"; this takes approximately 360 MB of an ext3 > filesystem using SLES8. You could then add additional > minidisks to your guest as required. > unsnip > > I tried installing SLES8 into a 1.1GB MDISK yesterday and got

Re: QETH duplicate ip address

2003-10-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> DOESN'T always change. (I thought I say it before...) > ^^^ Boy, that sounded snotty didn't it? It was SUPPOSED to be "saW"!!! :-O Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged inform

Re: MySQL authentication against Windows domain?

2003-10-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
Hi Alex, > Hi, > > If you did get MySQL to authenticate with PAM as that module suggests, > surely it would authenticate by whatever method the linux PAM > system does - > is the base linux system on which the MySQL with that module > been setup to > authenticate of windows? If not, I would sugges

Re: QETH duplicate ip address

2003-10-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
> When you talking about intra-LPAR sharing, do you mean using > a Guest LAN? > Or do you mean shared OSA by multiple guests? In the shared > OSA case, I > don't know why you would see the MAC change. That's something I would > expect of Guest LANs. > I guess I did say that wrong didn't I? What

QETH duplicate ip address

2003-10-13 Thread Lucius, Leland
I've been receiving the following and have been ignoring it since everything appeared to be running okay. But, I got a little curious and thought I'd ask around to see if anyone knows the "right" way to get rid of it. kernel: qeth: setip : return code 0xe005 (duplicate ip address) kernel: qeth:

MySQL authentication against Windows domain?

2003-10-12 Thread Lucius, Leland
Anybody know if you can use winbind to authenticate MySQL users against a Windows domain? I'd hate to have to store yet another set of blasted passwords somewhere. Ideally, it would be nice if I could grant access to a domain user OR group. Best I could find was the pam_mysql_auth module, but it

Re: linux-2.4.21-s390-kerntypes-june2003.diff and arch/s390/insta ll.s h

2003-10-09 Thread Lucius, Leland
And there's a "similar" version for the 2.4.19 (ibm) kernel over at: http://www.homerow.net/zlinux/kernelfixes.htm Leland CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named abov

Re: Error building Samba-3.0

2003-10-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
> -Original Message- > From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Error building Samba-3.0 > > Looks like you're right about heimdal 0.4e, I get weird > errors trying to connect to the AD. > > Have yo

Re: Hercules 3.00 announcement

2003-10-04 Thread Lucius, Leland
> The way the channel subsystem operates > and interfaces with devices is another example. > Cool! I reckon I should go over to the group and see what's up. Leland

Re: Hercules 3.00 announcement

2003-10-04 Thread Lucius, Leland
> Dynamically loaded module support for devices, > instructions, and > operator console panels (Jan Jaeger, David "Fish" > Trout, Ivan > Warren) > Wow. I can't believe you guys are still caring around every device types baggage in the DEVBLK for each device. Why sh

Re: Hercules 3.00 announcement

2003-10-04 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > There's been a lot of work by a lot of folks in this release. > Quite a bit of restructuring has happened in order to provide > the dynamic loading function, which is intended to make > extending Hercules for new devices and new instructions much > easier. It's been quite a qhile since the last

Re: Error building Samba-3.0

2003-10-02 Thread Lucius, Leland
From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Error building Samba-3.0 Which functions fail? I'll try it here and see if it behaves the same way. > -----Original Message- > From: Lucius, Leland [mailt

Re: Error building Samba-3.0

2003-10-02 Thread Lucius, Leland
Authentication works fine though. Samba builds just fine against this version of heimdal, and is authenticating against AD, but it might be still using the old NT mechanism. I have to fiddle with it some more. > -Original Message- > From: Lucius, Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Error building Samba-3.0

2003-10-02 Thread Lucius, Leland
So did you guys also update the heimdal package? According to the notes in the SuSE packaging directory, it "suggests" that this might be required. -Original Message- From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

Re: Swapgen on real dasd

2003-09-19 Thread Lucius, Leland
Cool. At the same time can you add 4096 byte block support? I tried but failed in pipe fitting school and never quite figured out how to use teflon tape. ;-) Actually no big deal. I just haven't played with it enough yet. Thx, Leland -Original Message- From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAI

Piping LPD -> SFTP

2003-09-17 Thread Lucius, Leland
Anybody know of a simple way of piping data from an LPD server to an SFTP server? I've banged together a simple filter that "works", but I was just wondering if I even need to do that. Thanks much, Leland

Re: size of distributions (redux) - "The button"

2003-09-08 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > However, if anyone uses the HMC reset button or IPL > button or activate/deactivate button on the HMC, the > LPAR Linuxes often are damaged. > You got me to wondering about the LPAR mode. If VM is able to "postpone" the RESET or IPL, allowing it's guests to terminate properly, then shouldn't L

Re: size of distributions (redux) - "The button"

2003-09-08 Thread Lucius, Leland
Jim, > > > Tzafrir wote: > > > > "Why not make "the button" cause a proper shutdown?" > > "The button" is either system reset or IPL (clear). If > there's a way to convey that to the software, it would > be cool, but I doubt it. > Jim, Do you run your Linii under VM or LPAR? Leland

Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt

2003-09-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > > http://www.it.fht-esslingen.de/~zimmerma/software/ltools.html > > > > Seems to already work under windows, linux and solaris. Only for > > ext2/3, though. > > > Excellent! While it won't "directly" help, this (and the > other links mentioned on the page) will be GREAT reference material.

Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt

2003-09-07 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > http://www.it.fht-esslingen.de/~zimmerma/software/ltools.html > > Seems to already work under windows, linux and solaris. Only > for ext2/3, though. > Excellent! While it won't "directly" help, this (and the other links mentioned on the page) will be GREAT reference material. Thank a heap!

Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt

2003-09-06 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > I like to remind folks that file systems live within logical > volumes. In a simple world your ext2/3 fs would be > habitating within a single disk partition. However, what do > you do for md, lvm or evms volumes? You would not have the > logical volume manager code that is capable of unders

Re: Linux File System Access From Other OS', was possible enhance ment idea for dasdfmt

2003-09-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > > Leland, > > I'm not looking for read-write access, and your comment about > chmod implies > that you might go that route. I don't think that will ever be safe. > Perfectly valid point. I was going to do the port for us "system" types and figured that we would be careful enough to keep from

Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt

2003-09-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
I have looked into this, but from a z/VM standpoint. I had to table it until I got some other things cleaned up. If interest is high, I will move it closer to the edge of the table and it might fall off sooner. ;-) What I had planned was this... Port portions of the e2fsprogs distro, mainly th

Re: How do I build vmlinuz manually?

2003-09-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
> The "make image" leaves an "image" file in arc/s390x/boot > Ugh, that's supposed to be "arch/s390x/boot" (or arch/s390/boot).

Re: How do I build vmlinuz manually?

2003-09-05 Thread Lucius, Leland
I always use: make image modules install modules_install For the "make install" to work, you have to either apply my "kerntypes" patch or have your own "installkernel" script. The "make image" leaves an "image" file in arc/s390x/boot that should be usable. That's where the install target gets i

Re: SuSE SLES8 64-bit + dasdfmt

2003-09-02 Thread Lucius, Leland
> > When did that happen? I've used the -n form of the command > previously (without devfs support) and it worked well. > Ugh, did I talk out of my arse again? I'll have to give it a try. Unfortunately, I'm off for an overnight R&R with NO computer (I don't know if I really like that idea. ;

Re: SuSE SLES8 64-bit + dasdfmt

2003-09-01 Thread Lucius, Leland
Hi Gerard, > SuSE Instsys zlnx01:/root # cat /proc/dasd/devices > 356c(none) at ( 94: 0) is dasda : unknown > 3575(none) at ( 94: 4) is dasdb : unknown > 3576(none) at ( 94: 8) is dasdc : unknown > 3577(none) at ( 94: 12) is dasdd : unknown Are you installing SuSE under VM?

Re: Merge SuSE updates and original CDs???

2003-08-30 Thread Lucius, Leland
Another little note...It's really quite simple to do. I merged the contents of all "suse" directories from the SLES8 CDs, the SP2 CD, and all the current online updates into a new "suse" directory. I then copied the "content", "media.1/media", and "media.1/products" from the SP2 CD to my new base

  1   2   3   >