Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 04:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Why NT? (Shane Phelps)
Linux 2.4 Major Advance ("2 + 2")
Re: Why NT? (Shane Phelps)
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: RPM Hell (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: RPM Hell (Donovan
Linux-Advocacy Digest #291, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 06:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Microsoft tentacles squirm deeper into software hosting (Tim Smith)
Re: Global Configuration tool (WAS: Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yesit does)
) (Peter Hayes)
Re: open source is getting
Linux-Advocacy Digest #293, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 08:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Microsoft tentacles squirm deeper into software hosting ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux can be made unstable, too. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux can
Linux-Advocacy Digest #294, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 10:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Exceptions! (WAS: Re: Global Configuration tool) ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("MH")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("MH")
Re: auto run ([EMAIL
Linux-Advocacy Digest #295, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 11:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: you dumb. and lazy. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RPM Hell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why NT? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: rt18139.c ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux Modems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RPM Hell
Linux-Advocacy Digest #296, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 12:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard
Linux-Advocacy Digest #297, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 13:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. (.)
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. (.)
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. (.)
Re: you dumb. and lazy. (.)
Re: you dumb. and lazy. (.)
Re: Big government
Linux-Advocacy Digest #298, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 13:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows 2000 (T. Max Devlin)
Re: you dumb. and lazy. (*)
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #301, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 15:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Deja No News ("David Brown")
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: you dumb. and lazy. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 15:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Deja No News ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Computers, monopoly... (WAS: Re: Big government and big business: why not fear
both - www.ezboard.com) ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Why
Linux-Advocacy Digest #300, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 15:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: open source is getting worst with time. (JM)
Re: open source is getting worst with time. (JM)
Re: Why NT? ("Todd")
Re: Does Linux envy Microsoft? ("Todd")
Re: Linux, it is great. ("Todd")
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #304, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 17:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Remote Kiosk Web Application Administration (Shane Phelps)
Re: RPM Hell (win2k version) ("Les Mikesell")
Re: RPM Hell (Glitch)
Re: RPM Hell (win2k version) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RPM Hell
Linux-Advocacy Digest #305, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 18:13:07 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Vann")
Typical Linsux..They can't even view their own movie!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Vann")
Re: Uptimes (Alan Boyd)
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #306, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 19:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Advocacy? (Andres Soolo)
Re: Need help with NT (Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?=)
Re: Red Hat dead/dying? (Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?=)
Re: Microsoft is 20-years BEHIND other OS vendors
Linux-Advocacy Digest #308, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 21:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Why NT? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: open source is getting worst with time. (T. Max Devlin)
Re: open source is getting worst with time. (T. Max Devlin)
Re: open source is getting worst with time. (T.
Linux-Advocacy Digest #309, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 22:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Advocacy? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Why Advocacy? (Andres Soolo)
Re: Typical Linsux..They can't even view their own movie!!! (J Sloan)
Re: Computers, monopoly... (WAS: Re: Big government and big
Linux-Advocacy Digest #310, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 23:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com (Pyrrus)
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) (Craig Kelley)
Re: OEditors: Xedit vs. vi or emacs (The Ghost In The Machine)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #311, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 00:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (The Ghost In The Machine)
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (The Ghost In The Machine)
Re: Red Hat dead/dying? (Andres Soolo)
Re: linux
Linux-Advocacy Digest #312, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 01:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: open source is getting worst with time. ("Tom Wilson")
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux vs
Linux-Advocacy Digest #313, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 01:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: you dumb. and lazy. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: RPM Hell (win2k version) ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Windows 2000 ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Linux, it is great. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Why Hatred? ("Tom Wilson")
Linux-Advocacy Digest #314, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 02:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Les Mikesell")
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Sucking Linux 2.0.4!!! ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant, but
Linux-Advocacy Digest #315, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 03:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Microsoft tentacles squirm deeper into software hosting (Tim Smith)
Re: Linux is crude and
22 matches
Mail list logo
