Re: [linux-audio-dev] [SOURCE] rt monitor to kill runaway RT processes

2002-08-30 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:12:07PM +0200, Stefan Westerfeld wrote: I am very interested in that. In all the discussions we had about the RT issue in aRts, things usually came to the point: basically, it is a kernel bug, that as soon as you use RT prio, your system becomes unstable. Especially

[linux-audio-dev] a jack question

2002-08-30 Thread Likai Liu
given kernel capability patch applied, does jackd give real-time capability to existing running process (normal user) that decide to become a jack client? liulk

Re: [linux-audio-dev] a jack question

2002-08-30 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
given kernel capability patch applied, does jackd give real-time capability to existing running process (normal user) that decide to become a jack client? yes, it gives the needed capabilities to the audio thread that gets created for each new client (not the whole application, of course).

[linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Charles Read
Hi folks, is there a music notation program for linux that really does the job well - you play your MIDI keyboard and a reasonable approximation to a score appears on your screen? I've tried rosegarden but the editing facilities are a bit primitive and it doesn't really print

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread jjbenham
Last time I did a score in CMN. If I were to do what you want to do I would try Rosegarden or Muse to create a raw midi file. Then I would export that then import it into lilypond. I would then edit it by hand. I actually like this idea better than working with Finale. Finale was always

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Richard Bown
On Friday 30 August 2002 19:41, Charles Read wrote: Hi folks, is there a music notation program for linux that really does the job well - you play your MIDI keyboard and a reasonable approximation to a score appears on your screen? I've tried rosegarden but the editing facilities are a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread cannam
Richard Bown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's true that our printing facilities are a bit limited at the moment I would say that if you want really good printing, you should probably accept a non-WYSIWYG approach and use Lilypond as your printing engine at least, even if you use an

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Brian Redfern
One thing lacking on any platform is notation software with user adjustable pitch tables that supports midi tuning standard. I have a lot of experience working with altered tunings and pitch tables studying balinese gamelan, my C/C++ skills still suck right now, but I sent my girlfriend away for

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Ivica Bukvic
To me it seems like you do not have to have an application aware of pitches (unless you feel uncomfortable using conventional notation for custom-assigned pitches -- i.e. c is c, c# is a bit flat, d is more like c# etc. so you'd need 2 conventional octaves for one 24-pitch microtonal octave).

[linux-audio-dev] Proposal of LADSPA port hint DATA_PRESENT

2002-08-30 Thread robbins jacob
I suggested this a while ago and the more i thought about it the more i thought it was a good idea, hopefully others can set me straight:) /* Hint LADSPA_HINT_DATA_PRESENT indicates that the data item should be used to signal that the audio stream has stopped. It must be used in conjunction

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Question regarding network coding

2002-08-30 Thread rm
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:49:32PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote: Hi all, I am already aware of some networking stuff, but am not sure as to how to make client aware that the server has finished sending the struct (since some values, like strings can be of different lengths, I can not simply