Quoting Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2007-04-18T16:22:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached. Was meant to send it first time round. doh. Patch is against
last version you sent me. For Alan's benefit, new verbatim version
attached (0.11)
Thanks! I merged it and pushed it out to
On 4/19/07, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is not a serious problem but I just take notice of this, so please let
me know whether this is a common behavior for Heartbeat or not, if you know
anything about it.
There are two nodes, a virtual IP (IPaddr) is running on one of them.
On 4/18/07, 池田淳子 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I'm sorry to ask a lot of questions at a time...
Let's just put it this way.
I just try to replicate the circumstances that is a temporary blackout of
the interconnect LAN.
When some nodes resolve their Split-Brain,
(1) If the LAN recovers
On 4/19/07, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Beekhof
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 4:29 PM
To: High-Availability Linux Development List
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] transition graphs during
devname is passed to scanf which will fill in a string of up
to 20 bytes + trailing '\0'. So make devname 21 bytes long accordingly.
Index: lha-STABLE_1_2-ipv6addr/heartbeat/resource.d/IPv6addr.c
===
---
while reading over the IPv6addr code I notices that there is an overrun in
find_if() in the case where the prefix is 128. In this case,
mask.s6_addr[16] will be accessed twice, but that array only
has 16 elements.
The patch below takes the simple approach of just treating 128 as a corner
case and
Hi,
while looking into the source due to our recent problems, I see there are
several macros, which could be replaced by static (inline) functions, e.g. in
GSource.c.
Is there a reason to use macros? Do you mind if I convert this into functions?
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Bernd Schubert wrote:
while looking into the source due to our recent problems, I see there
are several macros, which could be replaced by static (inline)
functions, e.g. in GSource.c.
Is there a reason to use macros? Do you mind if I convert this into
functions?
My
i dont see any reason _not_ to make these particular macros
functions... they're only used in the c-file that defines them and not
being used to break out of loops or anything.
On 4/19/07, Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 19 April 2007 14:10:45 David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 19
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
i dont see any reason _not_ to make these particular macros
functions... they're only used in the c-file that defines them and not
being used to break out of loops or anything.
I'll throw my 2c worth, which is that I also think
On 4/18/07, Jose Jerez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using heartbeat v2 for some time now and a happy customer
I am :-) but I need your help for a configuration a little bit more
complex.
The system is SLES-10 and heartbeat 2.0.7
We have a group of apache servers each one of them in a
On 4/18/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-17T19:40:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easiest way is to model after an existing resource agent, Xen for
example.
I've found the Dummy one a good start in the past. Simple, and shows
the basic required components.
Yeah, but
Hello,
thanks for reading this, as it's with ancient v2.0.5., please tell me
that this problem can not happen with recent version of heartbeat.
Problem description:
yesterday in one of our 2node HA-Clusters a successful takeover
happened, where the failed node was resetted, so far so good.
Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/17/07, Keisuke MORI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The official document on the web mentions about how to
distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
as
No idea about my questions ?
Benjamin Watine a écrit :
Hi all
I have two questions about Heartbeat v2 configuration :
1. IPv6addr : I've tried to configure virtual IPv6 address for a
resource group. Because I didn't find documentation about this script, I
did it like IPaddr, but it don't
Thanks Andrew I'll give it a try, or maybe wait for that service pack
and ask another question in the list (due soon) ;-)
On 4/19/07, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/07, Jose Jerez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using heartbeat v2 for some time now and a happy customer
I
On 4/19/07, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/18/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-17T19:40:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easiest way is to model after an existing resource agent, Xen for
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
thanks for reading this, as it's with ancient v2.0.5., please tell me
that this problem can not happen with recent version of heartbeat.
Problem description:
yesterday in one of our 2node HA-Clusters a successful takeover
happened, where
On 4/18/07, Serge Dewailly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I think I'm doing something wrong, but after many serach can't where I'm
going wrong...
I'm working on a two nodes setup wit hdrbd + filesystem + xen virtual
machines.
I made a group for each xen resources :
group1 = drbd0 +
Hi Andrew!
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
beosrv-c-2 is the failed node right?
it was beosrv-c-1 that failed, beosrv-c-2 took over.
do you have logs from there too?
attached (messages about Gmain_timeout removed, there were too many
of them)
The problem now is that cibadmin -m reports:
CIB on
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew!
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
beosrv-c-2 is the failed node right?
it was beosrv-c-1 that failed, beosrv-c-2 took over.
then i'm afraid your use of the dont fence nodes on startup option
has come back to haunt you
beosrv-c-1 came up but
On 4/18/07, Benjamin Watine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I have two questions about Heartbeat v2 configuration :
1. IPv6addr : I've tried to configure virtual IPv6 address for a
resource group. Because I didn't find documentation about this script, I
did it like IPaddr, but it don't seems
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
then i'm afraid your use of the dont fence nodes on startup option
has come back to haunt you
beosrv-c-1 came up but was not able to find beosrv-c-2 (even though it
_was_ running) and because of that option beosrv-c-1 just pretended
beosrv-c-2 wasn't running and happily
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On 4/18/07, Benjamin Watine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I have two questions about Heartbeat v2 configuration :
1. IPv6addr : I've tried to configure virtual IPv6 address for a
resource group. Because I didn't find documentation about this script, I
did it like
On 4/13/07, Piotr Kaczmarzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using version 2.0.8 and I tried to provide a highly-available squid
service. I wrote my own OCF script which was tested in two versions:
ver 1. 'Start' function started squid, waited a few seconds, then tried to
connect to port
--- Doug Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried setting up colocation constraints similar to
those shown in the example referenced in the URL
above,
and it complained about the identical ids:
...
I'm going to change the ids to be unique and try
again, but wanted to point this out since it
I made the ID change indicated below (for the colocation constraints),
and everything configured fine using cibadmin. Now, I started JUST the
drbd master/slave resource, with the rsc_location rule setting the
expression uname to one of the two nodes in the cluster. Both drbd
processes come up and
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:55:07PM -0400, Bjorn Oglefjorn wrote:
Alan, what is the list operation? The node names are always FQDNs and
always match.
Do they?
From your CIB:
primitive id=test-1_DRAC class=stonith type=external/drac4
provider=heartbeat
operations
op
Hello,
thanks for this discussion.
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the PE makes zero distinction between them and since it's the one
doing the asking i believe that it is its meaning that counts.
yes, think so, too.
both ask the same question: Is
Hi Doug,
I personally could not get the DRBD OCF to work, I am
using drbd .7x, what about you? I never tried a
master/slave setup though. I created my own drbd OCF,
it is on my site along with the CIB scripts.
http://www.theficks.name/bin/lib/ocf/drbd
You can even use the drbd CIBS as a
Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
thanks for this discussion.
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the PE makes zero distinction between them and since it's the one
doing the asking i believe that it is its meaning that counts.
yes, think so, too.
both
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/18/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-17T19:40:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easiest way is to model after an existing resource agent, Xen for
example.
I've found the Dummy one a good start in the past. Simple, and shows
the basic
Peter Kruse wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
then i'm afraid your use of the dont fence nodes on startup option
has come back to haunt you
beosrv-c-1 came up but was not able to find beosrv-c-2 (even though it
_was_ running) and because of that option beosrv-c-1 just pretended
beosrv-c-2 wasn't
Xinwei Hu wrote:
The known issue is that I don't know how to daemonize in bash,
so the pingd RA needs a little tweak also.
You can't daemonize in bash, unless your OS comes with some executable
that daemonizes arbitrary programs (I think some flavours of Linux do).
--
Carson
Yan Fitterer wrote:
In the attached pe-warn, why is resource R_audit being started on
idm01 when there is an INFINITY constraint with uname eq idm04?
BTW - idm04 is in standby at the moment. That should hardly matter. I
expect the resource to be cannot run anywhere.
I really hope it's not
Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
This is not a serious problem but I just take notice of this, so please let
me know whether this is a common behavior for Heartbeat or not, if you know
anything about it.
There are two nodes, a virtual IP (IPaddr) is running on one of them.
If the IPaddr is taken
Alan Robertson wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Xinwei Hu wrote:
The known issue is that I don't know how to daemonize in bash,
so the pingd RA needs a little tweak also.
You can't daemonize in bash, unless your OS comes with some executable
that daemonizes arbitrary programs (I think some
37 matches
Mail list logo
