On 12/10/2010 2:06 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>
> What's wrong with RHEL5? You can use packages from
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm
> Yes they don't support dual-master filesystem with OCFS2, but do you
> really need it?
>
> BTW, packaging for RHEL5 really sucks. Lots of things are really
> outda
Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk
> wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> ...
>>> What I
>>> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
>>> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
>>> time.
>> There's a b
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 2:29 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>>
> What I
> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
> time.
There'
On 12/10/2010 2:29 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
>>>
>>> There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot "supported
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> ...
>>> What I
>>> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
>>> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
>>> time
On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> ...
>> What I
>> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
>> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
>> time.
>
> There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forg
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> ...
>> What I
>> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
>> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
>> time.
>
> There's a bit of problem with your requireme
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
> What I
> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
> time.
There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot "supported".
As in try getting any support here f
On 12/10/2010 12:53 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
> trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
> for B.
So perhaps the appropriate question would be where to find the
instruct
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Lumir Jasiok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am successfully running HA SMTP server with two nodes on IPv4, but now
> I want to add support for IPv6 migration between the nodes. What will be
> right format of line in haresources for one resource (postfix)? I am
> ru
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 11:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
for B.
>>>
>>> So perhaps the appropria
On 12/10/2010 11:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
>>> trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
>>> for B.
>>
>> So perhaps the appropriate question would be where to find the
>> instructions for B -
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> See "LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error" from November, that's
> where
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>>>
>
>> This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
>> All this show
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> See "LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error" from November, that's
> where
On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
See "LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error" from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit "unknown error" starting
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
> All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on)
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>> See "LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error" from November, that's
>>> where your pdf led me. By the time I hit "unknown error" starting drbd
>>> resource -- set up exactly as you describe
Hi folks,
I'm trying to build a failover solution using FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE and Heartbeat
from ports (v2.1.4-10).
I've already configured heartbeat in the two peers, but once I start the daemon
using the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/heartbeat script, either CRM and CIB fail to
start.
I've already f
On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>>>
>>>
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>>
>>
>> > This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
>> > All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
>> > Fedora-13 (what the guide was written for).
>>
>> Who would use fedora for anything
>
>
> > This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
> > All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
> > Fedora-13 (what the guide was written for).
>
> Who would use fedora for anything that needed a highly available server?
>
>
I would not, as
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> See "LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error" from November, that's
>> where your pdf led me. By the time I hit "unknown error" starting drbd
>> resource -- set up exactly as you describe, I've spent close to a week
>> trying to replicate the setu
Hi,
I am successfully running HA SMTP server with two nodes on IPv4, but now
I want to add support for IPv6 migration between the nodes. What will be
right format of line in haresources for one resource (postfix)? I am
running heartbeat version 3.0.3.
Currently I have line:
smtp-1 10.0.0.1 po
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:28:06PM +, Preeti Jain wrote:
> Lars Ellenberg linbit.com> writes:
> I will try to implement as you suggested,
> but is there any other way like any parameter in ha.cf or in cib to avoid
> this
> problem.
>
> Like we have Pingd resource agent for fail over in case
The issue has been resolved - somewhat. I'll share what I know in case
it helps anyone else.
To troubleshoot the problem, the mcast address in the ha.cf file was
commented out and that allowed heartbeat processes to at least come up.
That isolated the issue as an mcast address issue.
The ha.
Lars Ellenberg linbit.com> writes:
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:36:05AM +, Preeti Jain wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > I am testing network failure case by removing nic cable on one node and
getting
> > unwanted outcomes as whole cluster gets disturbed and resource appears to
move
> > on d
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Igor Chudov wrote:
>
>> I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
>> based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
>>
>>
>>
> It occurs to me that I've yet to see an actual answer to the original
> poster's question. I've seen lots of
I've moved a little bit further with running linux ha suite on freebsd, few
more problems though:
1. crm node standby/online is not working
issuing following command has no effect and node remains online/standby
> [r...@alice ~]# crm node standby alice.local reboot
> scope=nodes name=standby val
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:36:05AM +, Preeti Jain wrote:
> Hello list,
> I am testing network failure case by removing nic cable on one node and
> getting
> unwanted outcomes as whole cluster gets disturbed and resource appears to
> move
> on different nodes until it gets stabled on one no
Oh, and 2.1.4???
Unless you're on SLES10, please update to a recent Pacemaker version.
Not that this will solve this particular problem, you'll just be
happier with the result.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Bart Pousson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with two nodes that had been running heart
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Bart Pousson
wrote:
> Thanks for the response,
>
> I did do a Google search on both logs before posting to this mailing list.
> This is what has been tried so far:
>
> 1. Several times the service was stopped and started using
> */etc/init.d/heartbeat*, but
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks.
> So I have a robustness pb with Pacemaker/corosync ... you'll tell me
> if it seems normal or not , if I miss something or not :
Perfectly valid testcase, unacceptable result.
Perhaps try with stonith-enabled=false so we can
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> On Thursday 09 December 2010 22:21:57 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> On 9 December 2010 17:09, Igor Chudov wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk
> wrote:
>> >> See "LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error" from November,
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 12/9/2010 4:05 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster
35 matches
Mail list logo
