Hi,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:27:15AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be
wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 22:21:57 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 9 December 2010 17:09, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9,
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:40:34PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/10/2010 12:53 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
for B.
So perhaps the
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 20:39, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with
BTW, here is one more Open Source alternative to Pacemaker for those
who're building HA storage systems: http://www.openfiler.com/
But I really doubt that it's easy ti learn and set up.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Pieter Baele pieter.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 20:39,
On Monday 13 December 2010 17:36:05 Serge Dubrouski wrote:
BTW, here is one more Open Source alternative to Pacemaker for those
who're building HA storage systems: http://www.openfiler.com/
But I really doubt that it's easy ti learn and set up.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Pieter Baele
On Friday 10 December 2010 16:40:16 Serge Dubrouski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
On 12/9/2010 4:05 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouskiserge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 22:21:57 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 9 December 2010 17:09, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
wrote:
See LRM
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Igor Chudov wrote:
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
It occurs to me that I've yet to see an actual answer to the original
poster's question. I've seen lots of dicussion
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error starting drbd
resource -- set up exactly as you describe, I've spent close to a week
trying to replicate the setup that takes
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written for).
Who would use fedora for anything that needed a highly available server?
I would not, as a former
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written for).
Who would use fedora for
On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error starting drbd
resource -- set up exactly as you
On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All
On 12/10/2010 11:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
for B.
So perhaps the appropriate question would be where to find the
instructions for B - or a platform
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 11:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
for B.
So perhaps the
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot supported.
As in try getting any support here for
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit of problem with your
On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 2:29 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit
Serge Dubrouski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a
On 12/10/2010 2:06 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
What's wrong with RHEL5? You can use packages from
http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm
Yes they don't support dual-master filesystem with OCFS2, but do you
really need it?
BTW, packaging for RHEL5 really sucks. Lots of things are really
outdated and
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:36 PM, James Smith james.sm...@m247.com wrote:
I've spent the last several months learning drbd, pacemaker etc ... drbd
itself is surprisingly simple to get up running. Im yet to experience
significant problems with it.
Pacemaker has documentation, but I've
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error starting drbd
Igor Chudov wrote:
Dima, I have a question. If you simultaneously reboot both drbd
servers that are controlled by haresources, does it ever happen that
neither node becomes master?
Yes, they tend to go into split brain if you reboot them too close
together. Doesn't seem to happen if I wait a
On 12/09/2010 04:31 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 12/9/2010 4:05 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouskiserge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try
Igor Chudov wrote:
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
It occurs to me that I've yet to see an actual answer to the original
poster's question. I've seen lots of dicussion about DRBD, heartbeat,
and
Florian Haas wrote:
Pacemaker, however, has superseded Heartbeat v2 over a year and a half
ago, and you should be using it, either on top of Heartbeat 3 or on top
of Corosync.
I think if you actually bothered to look at the thread I refer to,
you'd've seen it was about heartbeat 3.0.3 with
On 12/09/2010 08:12 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Florian Haas wrote:
Pacemaker, however, has superseded Heartbeat v2 over a year and a half
ago, and you should be using it, either on top of Heartbeat 3 or on top
of Corosync.
I think if you actually bothered to look at the thread I refer to,
On 9 December 2010 17:09, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error starting drbd
resource -- set
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Igor Chudov wrote:
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
In theory you could try setting up raid-1 with mdadm where one of the
devices is an iscsi target. That's for drbd -- and you could probably
On Thursday 09 December 2010 22:21:57 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 9 December 2010 17:09, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
Any pointers and suggestions will be gratefully accepted.
Thanks
i
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 19:26:53 Igor Chudov wrote:
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
Any pointers and suggestions will be gratefully accepted.
Yes. DRBD and pacemaker.
See: www.clusterlabs.org
--
Dr. Michael
The question is too broad. Are you interested in Open Source or
proprietary product? What do you want to achieve?
One of the answers could be AoE (ATA over Ethernet) + OCFS2.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to know if there are relatively
I am interested in finding out Open Source alternative that would
replace both DRBD as well as Heartbeat. I am definitely NOT looking
for pacemaker either.
I am looking for something simple, just file serving ability and
switching NFS and samba would be all I need.
igor
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am interested in finding out Open Source alternative that would
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
DRBD/Pacemaker was complicated, documentation did not exist or
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster
On 12/08/2010 08:39 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
DRBD/Pacemaker
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking
Florian, it is very possible that I overlooked some valuable
documentation. It is also possible that things have improved since I
tried it last summer.
However, at present, my question was to locate and consider
alternatives to drbd and heartbeat.
I will peruse the links that you provided, as,
Igor Chudov wrote:
Florian, it is very possible that I overlooked some valuable
documentation. It is also possible that things have improved since I
tried it last summer.
Having gone through the exercise recently: not really, no. Old-style
configs still work as of 3.0.3, though.
However, at
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
We have a netapp fas2020: it's expensive, not open-sores or lignux
based, but compared to heartbeat/drbd it can easily be cheap at the
price. Especially if you come to work one Sunday afternoon to run yum
update on the
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Wow don't scare me, man! So far my golden rule is: Don't fix it if
it's not broken. But, I'm required to update my machine if there's
security high-vuln.
Decision.. decision... ^^
It's OK when you know. I didn't notice until after the upgrade and
reboot of both nodes
51 matches
Mail list logo
