Hi Dejan,
If the resource agent is not running correctly it needs to be
restarted. My memory says that OCF_ERR_GENERIC will not cause that
behavior. I believe the spec says you should exit with not running if
it is not functioning correctly. (but I didn't check it, and my memory
isn't that
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:20:23PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> If the resource agent is not running correctly it needs to be
> restarted. My memory says that OCF_ERR_GENERIC will not cause that
> behavior. I believe the spec says you should exit with not running if
> it
On 2012-09-04T19:20:23, Alan Robertson wrote:
> I will likely write a monitor-only resource agent for web servers. What
> would you think about calling it from the other web resource agents?
Sharing code - in this case, the monitor-via-network of the http agents
- seems to make sense, yes.
>
Hi Lars,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:41:17AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-09-04T19:20:23, Alan Robertson wrote:
>
> > I will likely write a monitor-only resource agent for web servers. What
> > would you think about calling it from the other web resource agents?
>
> Sharing code
On 2012-09-05T15:25:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> How about a new element. Something like
>
> primitive vm1 ocf:heartbeat:VirtualDomain
> require vm1 web-test dns-test
How we map this into Pacemaker's dependency scheme is obviously open to
discussion.
> The "require" would imply that the reso
On 06/09/2012, at 12:30 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-09-05T15:25:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
>> How about a new element. Something like
>>
>> primitive vm1 ocf:heartbeat:VirtualDomain
>> require vm1 web-test dns-test
>
> How we map this into Pacemaker's dependency scheme is obv
On 2012-09-05T15:25:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
BTW, FWIW -
> monocf may be just like ocf, sans start and stop operations.
> That would make all ocf RA elligible for this use.
Thinking about this, not entirely. We'd have to fake the start/stop at
least. (In particular the start.)
For probes,
On 09/05/2012 03:32 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> This would be for my new monitoring project, of course
> ;-). But it could then be called by all the HTTP resource agents - or
> used directly - for example by the Assimilation project.
>
> This would be a slight but useful bending of OCF resour
On 2012-09-07T13:46:27, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Well, I presume that one would not tell pacemaker about such agents, as
> they would not be useful to pacemaker. From the point of view of the
> crm command, you wouldn't consider them as "valid" resource agents to
> put in a configuration for p
On 09/08/2012 02:53 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-09-07T13:46:27, Alan Robertson wrote:
>
>> Well, I presume that one would not tell pacemaker about such agents, as
>> they would not be useful to pacemaker. From the point of view of the
>> crm command, you wouldn't consider them as "val
On 2012-09-11T15:04:55, Alan Robertson wrote:
> > Depends. Pacemaker may still care about the status of these agents.
> If it can't start or stop them, what can it do with them?
The status from these agents may feed into operations on other
resources that are fully managed.
Regards,
Lars
On 09/12/2012 05:14 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-09-11T15:04:55, Alan Robertson wrote:
>
>>> Depends. Pacemaker may still care about the status of these agents.
>> If it can't start or stop them, what can it do with them?
> The status from these agents may feed into operations on other
On 2012-09-12T09:01:05, Alan Robertson wrote:
> > The status from these agents may feed into operations on other
> > resources that are fully managed.
>
> Understood.
>
> I believe it will care about those other agents - not these. It
> shouldn't know about these, AFAIK.
I guess then you're
On 09/12/2012 09:11 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-09-12T09:01:05, Alan Robertson wrote:
>
>>> The status from these agents may feed into operations on other
>>> resources that are fully managed.
>> Understood.
>>
>> I believe it will care about those other agents - not these. It
>> sh
14 matches
Mail list logo
