On 4 May 00, at 13:30, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 08:43:03PM +0200, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
> > linux:~ # yamcfg yam0 io 0x2f8 irq 3 pers 255
>
> > linux:~ # /sbin/ifconfig yam0 44.145.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.0 hw ax25
> > OZ4KK up
> > SIOCSIFFLAGS: Permission denied
> > SIOCSI
Of course you know you are only adding to this CRAP by
posting CRAP of your own.
God!! Im so sick of seeing this.
Every time someone does a reply to comment on it its RE-Spamed.
Lets report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let it go.
What is really sad is I had to reply to it to make my point and RE-spam it
myself yet AGAIN.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I WILL SURF FOR YOU, JUST FOR FILLING OUT A SMALL FORM
> Do you realize how valuable you are as an Internet user? Did you
> know that you can be paid when you?re on the Web? AND off the
> WEB!! Interested? Become an AllAdvantage.com member now!
>
> It's free to joi
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 08:43:03PM +0200, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
> linux:~ # yamcfg yam0 io 0x2f8 irq 3 pers 255
> linux:~ # /sbin/ifconfig yam0 44.145.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.0 hw ax25
> OZ4KK up
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: Permission denied
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: Permission denied
> linux:~ #
>
>
> Whats the
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:39:37PM +0200, Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
> I am using the kde 1.1.2 .debs for potato on a mixed potato/woody
> box.
OK. I obtained the kde debs from the maintainer's site. Now
dhlog won't pass ./configure; it ays it can't find the KDE libraries.
There is no --with-kde= pa
Looks at the header. That was not his real email address...
Lamar Townsend
KB5ZRD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David Benfell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROT
I also get this on all my interfaces when I run kissparms every hour to
reload the params in to my 7 tnc running kiss.
Kernel 2.2.14
ax25-tools-0.0.6
ax25-apps-0.0.4
node-0.3.0
libax25-0.0.7
node-0.3.0
de Paul G4APL
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ed van Mol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>At 17:47
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Joerg Reuter wrote:
> It starts with the question: which IRC? The RFC is long obsoleted
> by the actual implementations. To make it worse, those implementations
> are incompatible with each other, you've got to stick with one
> server type.
At least the client protocol is
Hi.
I'm trying implement my Yam modem here. Here is the results:
linux:~ # yamcfg yam0 io 0x2f8 irq 3 pers 255
yamcfg: Version 0.1 (C) 1998 by Jean-Paul ROUBELAT - F6FBB
Device: yam0
iobase:*02f8
bitrate : 9600 (bps)
irq :*3
baudrate : 19200 (bps)
fulldup : off
txdelay
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 06:10:28PM +0200, Joerg Reuter wrote:
> > Aside from tradition, what's wrong with just using IRC over packet?
>
> It starts with the question: which IRC? The RFC is long obsoleted
> by the actual implementations. To make it worse, those implementations
> are incompatible
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:02:15PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:32:47AM +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
> > Might be slightly easier to get one of the currently used code trees
> > under GPL. That shouldn't be all that hard to do for htpp for example. For
> > most of t
Larry,
I have had very good luck with mgetty/vgetty. I have used it on redhat 4 and 5
with good results.
It is written in c/c++ , but you can configure it to do as much or as little as
you want. It is pretty
straight forward to compile and configure.
Hope this helps,
Dave
kd9gn
[EMAIL PRO
Thought I ask here for something I've been looking for. I need a program
or script which will monitor a CALLER ID enabled modem and allow me to pipe
the CALLER ID info to the mail program so I can email my pager regarding
incoming calls at my office. I would only pipe the CALLER ID strings
c
- Original Message -
From: Pat Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 03 May 2000 14:33
Subject: Re: Spammage: I Surf, YOU GET PAID!! Promise
> I did better than that. I forwarded then to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:01:41PM -0700, Dragos Ruiu
[Still catching up on e-mail]
> This is surely an interesting idea as long as things are concerned
> which are not updated very frequently (i.e. not speed critical stuff).
> But all routing stuff should be done via netlink interface, shouldn´t it?
I'd like to be able to add and remove static rou
> > there is no prepending KISS command byte anymore. That's
> > annoying, but only affects very few tools: AFAIK only listen, net2kiss
> > and ax25rtd. The later will use the netlink interface, I don't know
>
> And some applications -- aprsdigi, aprsmon, aprsd at least.
Hmm, I don't know anythi
Sorry for the late reply...
> But still I thing this is solely the distro´s problem. Applications and
> tools should never read such a file directly or via libax25. They should
> use the socket interface as all other protocol families also do.
The main purpose is to provide the relevant informat
> However, do you really expect Joe Packet to dig into
> an XML file?
Heaven forbid, no!
> I say store it in XML if you really want, but give us an
> easy to use configuration-program/web-front-end
That's the concept.
73,
Joerg Reuter http://poboxes.com/jreu
Jens wrote:
> As I view it we need a script/program/whatever that parses that XML config
> file on bootup and calls the relevant tools/daemons/whatever unsing the
> data contained in the config file to pass it in a formatted way along
> as command line parameters.
By George, I think he's got it
> Aside from tradition, what's wrong with just using IRC over packet?
It starts with the question: which IRC? The RFC is long obsoleted
by the actual implementations. To make it worse, those implementations
are incompatible with each other, you've got to stick with one
server type. The overhead
HP wrote:
> Another question is how to route personal (/m call) messages through a
> network of this style.
And the next one is: how do we recognize that nodes aren't reachable
anymore? Every node has to know the complete topology and quite
frankly I don't have the slightest idea how to keep co
Tomi wrote:
> The original reason for axports was that interfaces could only be
> differentiated by the interface callsign. There was no way to tell the
> kernel to "open a connection through device ax0". It needed to be done
> by telling the kernel to "open a connection through the interface hav
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 07:22:57PM +0900, Ichiro Hieda JE1SGH wrote:
> checking for c++... no
> checking for g++... no
> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C++ compiler (gcc ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler
> cannot create executabl
I did better than that. I forwarded then to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:01:41PM -0700, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
> I would recommend that everyone who received this forward it back to Mr. Pio
> at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to make the point that this is unacceptable behaviour.
>
> Just once e
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:38:41 +1000
> Subject: Call to create conversd that is GPLed
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
>
> I have had a look around all the hamradio converse bridges and found
> that none of them have anything approaching a decent license. This
> means that dis
On 03-May-2000 Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
> Jochen, DG6VJ, did talk about his ideas at the PR-Convention in
> Darmstadt last month. It is in the scriptum, but I think he can
> make it available in postscript (German, though). To summarize the
> ideas: The Network should allow cycles to avoid net-spli
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 09:13:29PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 12:47:51PM +0200, Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
>
> OK well I've been trying these programs. QtLog is in German and I cannot
> get MySQL set up correct. MyVRLog is for KDE and also appears to be
> in German. DHLog
Hi all,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Ed van Mol wrote:
> I'v problems with net2kiss
>
> I'v kernel 2.2.5
> ax25-apps-0.0.4
> ax25-tools-0.0.5
> libax25-0.0.7
>
> I'v:
> /usr/sbin/net2kiss -i ax1 /dev/ptyq0 &
> /usr/sbin/kissattach /dev/ttyq0 digi ${IPADDR}
>
> Net2kiss generats a lot off mess in the
On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 12:47:51PM +0200, Hans-Peter Zorn wrote:
> Browsing radio.linux.org.au I find at least 3 logging programs based
> on MySQL:
>
> MyVRLog : http://www.computertime.de
> DHLog: http://www.home.unix-ag.org/holgu/dhlog/indexe.html
> QtLog: http://www.ewetel.net/~dieter.kumpies/
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:32:47AM +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2000, Craig Small wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose a project to create a converse daemon that is
> > licensed under the GPL. I have seen recent work on patching one or more
> > of the various daemons out ther
An addition:
I think the thing should be distributed under a BSD/X11-style licence
so it can be incorporated in TNN which is has an ALAS licence, and
probably XNet which is closed source. Unfortunally about > 50% of the
convers hosts in the Euro-Network are Xnet or TNN.
- hp
--
Hans-Peter Zorn
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:38:41PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> G'day All,
> I have had a look around all the hamradio converse bridges and found
> that none of them have anything approaching a decent license. This
> means that distributions cannot distrbute them legally and all sorts
> of other
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Kjell Jarl wrote:
> bpq can be set up to give welcome text to the node call as well, usually
> set off though. Some thenet nodes also gives welcome texts, debending on
> the set up, also over long distance (already established link level).
Ok, maybe I shouldn't have stressed
Cool, so you have a server too, would you like to link with us? Anyone
else?
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Robin Gilks wrote:
> I've used IRC on packet and it has a considerable overhead (even at the client
> end) compared to convers.
Right, it's not designed for 1200 bit/s packet. 8-) Setting the p
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Shawn T. Rutledge wrote:
> Aside from tradition, what's wrong with just using IRC over packet?
> (OK, maybe that's a dumb question but I don't mean it to be, I was
> seriously considering trying that...)
Nothing. We have an experimental amprnet IRC network running, current
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Craig Small wrote:
> I would like to propose a project to create a converse daemon that is
> licensed under the GPL. I have seen recent work on patching one or more
> of the various daemons out there and would ask for help from these
> people. Of course they would have to co
On Wed, 03 May 2000, you wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:38:41PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > I would like to propose a project to create a converse daemon that is
> > licensed under the GPL. I have seen recent work on patching one or more
>
> Aside from tradition, what's wrong with just us
38 matches
Mail list logo
