On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > xterm.
> >
> > Both gnome and kde are just too bloated, when you run many xterms,
> > and one or two "other" programs.
> >
> > WindowMaker is actually optimized for this mode of operation
>
> Can you give more details in what sense (does WindowMaker act
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:37:19AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > My desktop environment management is:
> > -
> > 1. Only KDE.
> > 2. I prefer KDE.
> > 3. Both.
> > 4. I prefer Gnome.
> > 5. Only Gnome.
> > 0. None.
>
> 0
>
> >
> > Reasons (please check all th
Oron Peled wrote:
I simply offered a strategy that may work IMO. Namely, collect
current working practices and "galvanize" them through well designed
API's.
Actually, it doesn't seem to me an impossible task to find a common
denominator (in the sense of API). Indeed, the three widely used type
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:18:13 +0200
Evgeny Stambulchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are you trying to catch me on very
> specific _details_ instead of arguing about the idea/principles?
I just tried to show that the real world creates unique problems
that would destroy the "single config mecha
hi
i am trying to use X on and ibm T-30.
if i start the X when no monitor is connected. i get the resolution I
wanted - 1400x1050 ( the resolution of the LCD)
if i connect the monitor, and try to start the X display, it will only
let me 640x480 mode. (doesn't matter even if i tell the laptop to
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if someone is using here Microsoft Terminal services here.
I'm planning to seperate the CVS version of KRDC from KDE (KRDC = KDE Remote
Desktop Control). In KDE 3.1 it only supports VNC (tightvnc and standard
VNC), and in the CVS version it has support
> That's not an "unsubstantiated rumour". It's a slashdot troll of
> outstanding performance, judging by how people buy into it. You should know
> by now that Slashdot is Internet's official trolling place now.
>
> Hell I even see trolling on ynet (the days I dont troll there myself)
Full story wi
> As for 8 bit color only, thats what rdesktop gives, but I'm almost sure
> that win2k TS gives more colors then 256 (at least with native windows
> client) - after all, RDP 5.0 is not very different from RDP 5.1 specs..
Oops, my mistake. I just tested connecting from Win98 to WIn2k TS server. Yup
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 13:08, you wrote:
> Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The story is filed and should go up early Tuesday morning. Early in
> > the U.S., at least. The essense of the story: SCO Group plans on
> > charging a set of customers using some of its Unix libraries on
>
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 17:39, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:26:34PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if someone is using here Microsoft Terminal services
> > here.
>
> We (cs.tau) use.
>
> That's very interesting. How is it developed? With any
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:26:34PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if someone is using here Microsoft Terminal services here.
We (cs.tau) use.
>
> I'm planning to seperate the CVS version of KRDC from KDE (KRDC = KDE Remote
> Desktop Control). In KDE 3.1 it only supports
Hi,
I was wondering if someone is using here Microsoft Terminal services here.
I'm planning to seperate the CVS version of KRDC from KDE (KRDC = KDE Remote
Desktop Control). In KDE 3.1 it only supports VNC (tightvnc and standard
VNC), and in the CVS version it has support for RDP.
At the momen
My desktop environment management is:
-
> > 1. Only KDE.
> > 2. I prefer KDE.
> > 3. Both.
> > 4. I prefer Gnome.
> > 5. Only Gnome.
> > 0. None.
>
I assume (0. None) is Console mode:
So it's 2 and 0 .
Ran Zahor
Ampersand Advise and Support Ltd.
Mailto:[E
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 10:05, Eli Marmor wrote:
[snip]
> Questions:
> ==
> My desktop environment management is:
> -
> 1. Only KDE.
> 2. I prefer KDE.
> 3. Both.
> 4. I prefer Gnome.
> 5. Only Gnome.
> 0. None.
1(+Icewm+Fluxbox)
> Reasons (please check
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Arik Baratz wrote:
> Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> > Thanks for translating it for me. Does the article really refer to
> > the system the first time as "Linux"?
> >
> I'm afraid so. They write Linux in Hebrew, which is
> Lamed-Yod-Nun-Vav-Kof-Samech. They didn't add GNU.
Th
==
My desktop environment management is:
-
1. Only KDE.
2. I prefer KDE.
3. Both.
4. I prefer Gnome.
5. Only Gnome.
0. None.
4
Reasons (please check all that apply):
--
A. Better Hebrew support.
B. Licensing.
C1
Richard Stallman wrote:
Thanks for translating it for me. Does the article really refer to
the system the first time as "Linux"?
I'm afraid so. They write Linux in Hebrew, which is
Lamed-Yod-Nun-Vav-Kof-Samech. They didn't add GNU. Now that you mention
it, I have never seen the combination G
Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The story is filed and should go up early Tuesday morning. Early in
> the U.S., at least. The essense of the story: SCO Group plans on
> charging a set of customers using some of its Unix libraries on
> Linux systems.
SCO have denied it, others have den
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "forecast: it's going to be HOT
soon...":
> For those who have read Slashdot and for those who haven't - in the upcoming
> few hours you'll see some news about SCO planning to sue some companies -
> there will be more details than what appeared in
Hmm, what do u think about this:
RE: news from SCO?
From: Stephen Shankland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Today 02:41:04
Yep. Big story in the works. Got a lot of new details. Very interesting case.
We were holding out for something besides the SCO state
Title: RE: ssh hangs for a long time
I had something similar last week. Suddenly, wu-ftpd takes a minute to give a prompt, all users were very disappointed due to this fact. My short investigation brought the following results:
1. I did some sniffing, and saw that this #@$%^^& ftp server goes
Hi,
For those who have read Slashdot and for those who haven't - in the upcoming
few hours you'll see some news about SCO planning to sue some companies -
there will be more details than what appeared in Slashdot.org yesterday.
Thats what I received from C|Net..
SCO Group story
From: Stephen
I arrived to the RMS lecture by a ride given to me from TAU by Yedidia
Bar-David (thanks Didi!) and another TAU worker. On the way we talked
about UNIXes, Linux and other stuff.
After we arrived it took some time to find the suitable parking lot, but
then we were instructed to come to the meeting
On 2003-01-14 Eli Marmor wrote:
> Just to clarify:
>
> The meaning of the answer "None" included "other".
OK :)
See below for my survey answers
<<1>> my home machine:
> My desktop environment management is:
0: None/Other (fvwm2)
> Reasons (please check all that apply):
G2: I've got used
Oron Peled wrote:
So Allon presented one flaw in your assumptions and you came with a
solution for this *specific* flaw...
I don't have a solution. It was an example. I used words like "e.g.". Did
I say I had the scheme ready? Why are you trying to catch me on very
specific _details_ instead
Christoph Bugel wrote:
>
> On 2003-01-14 Eli Marmor wrote:
> > My desktop environment management is:
> > -
> > 1. Only KDE.
> > 2. I prefer KDE.
> > 3. Both.
> > 4. I prefer Gnome.
> > 5. Only Gnome.
> > 0. None.
>
> Wait! As an fvwm2 user (at home) I feel thi
Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there will be enough answers, and they will make sense, I'll publish
> a summary. I ask in advance, that when such a summary is published,
> please don't take it's results as a proof for anything, and don't
> conclude that one product is superior.
>
> D
Something that you left out of your survey:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Eli Marmor wrote:
> > p.s.
> > I prefer GNOME over KDE- it has much less of the windows chunkiness
> > that KDE has.
>
> With no intention to raise a religious war, just for curiousity
> purposes, I want you to answer the following
On 2003-01-14 Eli Marmor wrote:
> My desktop environment management is:
> -
> 1. Only KDE.
> 2. I prefer KDE.
> 3. Both.
> 4. I prefer Gnome.
> 5. Only Gnome.
> 0. None.
Wait! As an fvwm2 user (at home) I feel this survey is 'offensive'
There is no right answer
> p.s.
> I prefer GNOME over KDE- it has much less of the windows chunkiness
> that KDE has.
With no intention to raise a religious war, just for curiousity
purposes, I want you to answer the following survey. You can send your
responses personally to my private e-mail, if you prefer. If you are
r
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > What does /etc/host.conf say? /etc/nsswitch.conf? in both cases, hosts
> > should be consulted first, and then the DNS server.
>
> /etc/host.conf:
>
> order hosts,bind
>
> /etc/nsswitch.conf:
>
> hosts: files nisplus dns
>
> Both seem right to me...
Only if yo
Thanks for translating it for me. Does the article really refer to
the system the first time as "Linux"?
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo uns
32 matches
Mail list logo
