GF The orange site is payed for by your money (as a client) and as part of
GF the service you are entitled to.
What also surprises me is that in your face attitude of the webmaster.
Like: we like our site and if you don't, screw you. Though, most
isrraely companies did not grow out of the stage
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
I wonder
would they, say, sell mobile phones that operate only in Hungarian and say
to the customers - we think Hungarian is a magnificent language and we
spent a lot of money to get such phones.
Well, I probably would buy that phone :-)
On Monday, Nov 3, 2003, at 22:35 Asia/Jerusalem, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I regret being so blunt but, no, we are not going to change our
website in
the near future. We have developed an amazing website,
amazing? By this do you mean full of non-portable bells and whistles,
and other idiosyncracies?
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each approach.
gtk:
* not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
* looks funkey on win32
qt:
* not free in win32
Actually it is
Hi list,
Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
remeber, he is the CIO of Kupat Cholim Klalit. He stumbled upon the
last time his name was mentioned on this list (thread starting at
http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Linux/maillists/03/09/msg00296.html),
and wanted
Hi. I am probably in the wrong place. Please direct me to the right place.
I have the regular version of OpenOffice.org, because I want the menus in
English. If I can get English menus in the Hebrew version, please inform
me.
In any case, I can type in Hebrew in the regular version, and
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each approach.
gtk:
* not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
* looks funkey on win32
Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
On Monday, Nov 3, 2003, at 22:35 Asia/Jerusalem, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I regret being so blunt but, no, we are not going to change our
website in
the near future. We have developed an amazing website,
amazing? By this do you mean full of non-portable bells and whistles,
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each approach.
gtk:
* not object oriented (looks un-natural to build
My donation:
Of course not every user can change software on machines in every hospital.
Users can't do a thing.
One of the highlights of a Unix (and of course, a Linux) management, is that
it can be managed from one sigle center point, and easilly.
Assuming, for the matter, that there are zero
Hi,
First, I want to say that this is one of the most interesting emails
I read recently.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi list,
Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
remeber, he is the CIO of Kupat Cholim Klalit. He stumbled
Well it's a bit weird,
for once I remember it was fully GPLed few month ago
now they seem to change it so although there is GPLed
version of QT for windows only academic people can download it
but since it's fully GPLed I don't see how they how they can stop
anyone who isn't academic from copying
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each approach.
gtk:
* not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop
language)
I beg your pardon? Gtk+ is Object-Oriented. And you can do OOP in
btw if you want to even get more confuzed
http://www.trolltech.com/download/index.html
notice the educational version is under the GPL section
if you look on the licence part of the page it would tell you
it's under educational license
so I guess their webpage is a bit not updated to one side
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 07:07:05PM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Was waiting for someone else to mention that, but no one did.
Perhaps PyGTK (Python + GTK bindings) is the best to go these
days. There are thousands of small and large examples out there
to copy from ;-). Ruby + GTK seems
Well it's a bit weird,
for once I remember it was fully GPLed few month ago
now they seem to change it so although there is GPLed
version of QT for windows only academic people can download it
but since it's fully GPLed I don't see how they how they can stop
anyone who isn't academic from
Mail mishaps.
--
Shlomi Fish[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
Writing a BitKeeper replacement is probably easier at this point than getting
its license changed.
Matt
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:03:02AM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi list,
Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
remeber, he is the CIO of Kupat Cholim Klalit. He stumbled upon the
last time his name was mentioned on this list (thread starting at
I have recently upgraded my cell phone to a Motorola C350, a GPRS based phone,
which rose the need to use the Orange Web Site. Up until now I used the nifty
SendSMS script (By Nadav and others) and saw no need to access a
Mirosoftia-only based Web site. Nothing for me over there.
Now I disover
I am one of the developers of the Hebrew support for Nokia 9110, Nokia
9210/9210i and other Symbian based smartphones.
I am also a customer of Orange.
Some of those smartphones have the Opera Web browser built in or available
as an installable application.
This Web browser was designed to be W3C
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
On Monday, Nov 3, 2003, at 22:35 Asia/Jerusalem, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I regret being so blunt but, no, we are not going to change our
website in
the near future. We have developed an amazing website,
amazing? By this do you mean full of
-Original Message-
From: Shlomi Fish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Shachar Shemesh
Cc: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: Meeting with Gadi Gilon
I'm fine with it. Albeit, it could turn into a one against many flame-war.
Then we'll just have to
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each approach.
gtk:
One note:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Now, I tried to point the practical reasons behind the social contract,
and his response rather suprised me. Basically, he has contracts with
all of his software vendors that gives him full access to the source
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: Meeting with Gadi Gilon
http://www.newsforge.com/software/03/10/18/1814211.shtml?tid=132tid=82tid=
89
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:30:15 +0200, Ami Chayun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of results:
1) The rdtscll Pentium instruction (Eran's answer) is very useful. It's
super accurate and right now I decided to use it mostly to benchmark
other
On Tuesday, Nov 4, 2003, at 11:12 Asia/Jerusalem, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
W3C has standards, but IE doesn't support them
It *does* support most of them. It is just that mozilla supports more.
But as the things that IE doesn't support are not done in IE *at all*,
why would that make any
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 14:43, Ehud Karni wrote:
I tested the select call on various machines.
1. It is not accurate enough (2 ms deviations).
Yes it does, you don't seem to use sched_setscheduler in your test program to
give your proccess real time priority. setpriority only changes
Yedidyah Bar-David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and his response rather suprised me. Basically, he has contracts with
all of his software vendors that gives him full access to the source
code in case the company goes under. His basic premesis was I can get
competition over support in
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
And no, Didi, I don't think even Clalit have source code access to
Windows, but I am sure they have a support contract with redmond and a
few MSCEs on staff.
Whatever they have with Clalit makes them comfertable enough.
I agree that this, under no stretch of imagination,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
One note:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Now, I tried to point the practical reasons behind the social contract,
and his response rather suprised me. Basically, he has contracts with
all of his software vendors that gives him full
Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
It can be done. off the top of my head: http://www.espn.com
http://www.csszengarden.com/ http://www.wired.com/
Those are not flashy. Those are just formed. I think they are talking
about DOM things popping up and down on screen sortof thing.
Shachar
--
If you don't set your process to SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR (only possible
as root) and give it realtime priority, you can never be sure to wake up
in time (see Gilad's message in the thread).
From my understanding, if you recompile the kernel with HZ value higher
than 1000, you can use nanosleep or
I'm trying to find a solution for sending SMS alerts which does not rely
on internet connectivity via my LAN. The objective being to send
BigBrother alerts and whatnot via the hardware solution. I've spoken
with Orange and they have some limited solutions and I'm curious what
others have
I'm trying to find a solution for sending SMS alerts which does not rely
on internet connectivity via my LAN. The objective being to send
BigBrother alerts and whatnot via the hardware solution. I've spoken
with Orange and they have some limited solutions and I'm curious what
others have
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 17:45, Nathan Fain wrote:
I'm trying to find a solution for sending SMS alerts which does not rely
on internet connectivity via my LAN. The objective being to send
BigBrother alerts and whatnot via the hardware solution. I've spoken
with Orange and they have some
Nathan Fain wrote:
I'm trying to find a solution for sending SMS alerts which does not rely
on internet connectivity via my LAN. The objective being to send
BigBrother alerts and whatnot via the hardware solution. I've spoken
with Orange and they have some limited solutions and I'm
Hi,
Anyone know of any corporate size linux solution for MIS ?
Thanks
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:45:45PM +0200, Nathan Fain wrote:
I'm trying to find a solution for sending SMS alerts which does not rely
on internet connectivity via my LAN. The objective being to send
BigBrother alerts and whatnot via the hardware solution. I've spoken
with Orange and they
Hi,
Thanks for summazing the discussion for the list - indeed an interesting
subject.
I'm probably issing the context of the discussion, but I really don't
understand why Mr. Gilon feels that a commercial organization should even
consider adopting Open Source software (or anything, for that
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:17, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I brought that example up. He was not impressed. Apparently, Clalit
went, succesfully, through a court proceeding to enforce such a
settelment without even having the actual source mentioned in a contract.
There are two issues: Writing
Evening Sirs,
Here's an article posted few days ago in some Australian Linux magazine
about Open Source / Linux in Israel.
I'd say they made it all look too good, but it's better than making it
look too bad :)
43 matches
Mail list logo
