Back to RedHat and RPM. How to install PHP-4.2.2

Greetings. After avoiding RH solutions as much as I could I now have to deal with RHEL 5 Server. My customer insists on PHP-4.2.2 but when I try to install it I get: # yum install php-4.2.2 Loading "security" plugin Loading "rhnplugin" plugin This system is not registered with RHN. RHN support

Re: Back to RedHat and RPM. How to install PHP-4.2.2

Hi David, I don't know specifically on RHEL5 but from experience it is hard to get new updates for unmaintained versions of Redhat (I had issues finding packages for RedHat 7 which is now ancient :) ). As PHP is fairly easy to compile, have you tried compiling it, I have been able to do it 'qu

Re: Back to RedHat and RPM. How to install PHP-4.2.2

David, If you want to roll PHP 4.2.2 on RHEL 5 (or CentOS), you have 2 options: 1. Either grab the SRPMS from RHEL 4 and recompile them on RHEL 5 based machines (be prepared to modify the SPEC file a bit) 2. Grab the latest 4.2.x PHP source code, recompile, play with the "configure" parameters.

Re: Back to RedHat and RPM. How to install PHP-4.2.2

On Sunday, 21 בSeptember 2008, David Harel wrote: > After avoiding RH solutions as much as I could I now have to deal with > RHEL 5 Server. My customer insists on PHP-4.2.2 > but when I try to install it I get: > # yum install php-4.2.2 > ... > No package php-4.2.2 available. As you can easily c

Re: Back to RedHat and RPM. How to install PHP-4.2.2

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:00:23PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > * Make your customer switch to an older platform (older RHEL/Centos >or an old Debian, etc.) Debian includes a php4 package (alongside php5) in the current Stable release (4.0, Etch). Upcoming version (5.0, Lenny) will no longer h

Re: Back to RedHat and RPM. How to install PHP-4.2.2

On Sunday, 21 בSeptember 2008, Noam Rathaus wrote: > I don't know specifically on RHEL5 but from experience it is hard to get new > updates for unmaintained versions of Redhat (I had issues finding packages > for RedHat 7 which is now ancient :) ). Seems like you mix RHEL5 (Mar 2007) with old Re

no webmin in hardy reposirories. is it outdated ? what is it's successor ?

hi i have just installed a hardy server. i wanted to add easy web-based configuration, but webmin was not found in the repositories ... is there a new preferred software instead of it for ubuntu ? 10x, erez.

Re: no webmin in hardy reposirories. is it outdated ? what is it's successor ?

Hi Erez, Webmin is 'dead' it became 'oldstable' under debian. I do not know why. But happily enough the guys built their own deb, which you can use: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/webadmin/webmin_1.430_all.deb I know its more 'maintained', and since webmin is mainly scripts, there is no da

Re: no webmin in hardy reposirories. is it outdated ? what is it's successor ?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:42:25PM +0300, Noam Rathaus wrote: > Hi Erez, > > Webmin is 'dead' it became 'oldstable' under debian. > > I do not know why. Its maintainer did not have time anymore, and nobody stepped in. > > But happily enough the guys built their own deb, which you can use: > ht

Re: no webmin in hardy reposirories. is it outdated ? what is it's successor ?

thanks all for replying i found some sw called ebox which someone wrote is ubuntu's official replacement for webmin ... well, after 'apt-get install ebox ebox-network etc ...' - it seems nice ... 10x erez. On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Sun, Sep 2

Re: Security question - Clipperz anyone?

Hi amos I checked a little bit about clipperz.com. The fact that it's open source it doesn't make it secure. The passwd is saved on their server (even though it's encrypted). Encrypted data is reversible. No matter what. This raises few questions: 1. How much you trust them. Dictionary attack, b

Telling libtool/automake to be less anal

Hi all, Libtool is a great tool, and it fits nicely with automake and autoconf, making it extremely simple to just take a new project, write a few (less than 10) lines to instructions, and get a project that already builds static and shared libraries, including support for cross build, out of

Re: Security question - Clipperz anyone?

sara fink wrote: Hi amos I checked a little bit about clipperz.com . The fact that it's open source it doesn't make it secure. The passwd is saved on their server (even though it's encrypted). Encrypted data is reversible. No matter what. This raises few questions: 1. H

Clustering/Failover Project

Hi, We are looking for someone to implement a warm-failover, where our existing MySQL, Apache and Linux based system will have complete and immediate failover (two identical servers either working in parallel or one kicking into action when the second one fails, all the while replicating). Obj

Re: Telling libtool/automake to be less anal

On Sunday, 21 בSeptember 2008, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > I have a problem. The libtool/automake duo, in an attempt to educate the > developer crowed, forces you to create a library of the form > "libsomething.so.v.v.v" (where the v's are version numbers). It has no > other form. As far as standar

Re: Clustering/Failover Project

Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm also not interested in replies telling me there's a project that > does exactly that (and only requires a few tiny customizations that > will take days). Well, how about a couple of hours, including RTFM? LinuxHA (heartbeat, http://www.linux-ha.org)

Re: Clustering/Failover Project

I've set up a system just like this and it's been up for over a year happily chugging along... On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm also not interested in replies telling me there's a project that > > does