Hi!
I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
(2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
I enter swsusp mode, the
Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
POWER5 machines have a per-hardware-thread register which counts at a
rate which is proportional to the percentage of cycles on which the
cpu dispatches an instruction for this thread (if the thread gets all
the dispatch cycles it counts at the same
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 15:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
POWER5 machines have a per-hardware-thread register which counts at a
rate which is proportional to the percentage of cycles on which the
cpu dispatches an instruction for this thread (if the
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
Larry, it's interesting how you try to distract from the main problem
(which you don't mention with a single word) and instead continues to
badmouth me. Let's take a look.
Short version: let's violate a license.
Wrong, if I wanted to violate the
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Jon Smirl wrote:
Larry has said, write up a proposal for changes you want in bk. Send
it to him for a quote. Come up with the cash and he will do the work.
Here is a simple one: restore the parent information in the gnupatch
option as they were about a year ago
Small update to iproute2 which adds:
* infiniband address decode
* reorganize source for netem distribution files into separate directory
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.10-050209.tar.gz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:31:05 +0100 (CET), Roman Zippel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Jon Smirl wrote:
Larry has said, write up a proposal for changes you want in bk. Send
it to him for a quote. Come up with the cash and he will do the work.
Here is a simple one: restore the
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:13:48PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Are you saying that it is now OK to write scripts that would bit bang
on
the bkbits http interface to fetch patches/comments with the purpose
of
populating an alternate scm? Andreas tried that a while ago but you
threatened to
Andrew, here's a resend of this patch. My earlier version had a few
stupid errors which should be corrected in this one. Please apply.
The PPC64 interrupt code includes a hook to call when an exception
from the performance monitor unit occurs. However, there's no way of
reserving the hook
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 21:07, Prasanna S Panchamukhi wrote:
Hi Badri,
Hi,
I ran into this while playing with jprobes in 2.6.10.
I tried to install jprobe handler on a invalid address,
User should prevent inserting jprobes on an invalid address.
Well, I was hoping register handler
Hello, Bartlomiej. Happy new lunar year.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I would prefer to not teach do_rw_taskfile() about -tf_{in,out}_flags
(and convert all users to use helpers) - it is much simpler this way,
-flags field in ide_task_t is needed anyway (32-bit I/O flag).
New lunar year day
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:52:29 +, Neil Conway wrote:
Howdy...
After much banging of heads on walls, I am throwing in the towel and
asking the experts ;-) ... To cut a long story short:
Is it possible to make a 3TB disk work properly in Linux?
Our disk is 12x300GB in RAID5 (with 1
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:22:39AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
You know, you could change all this. Instead of complaining that we
are somehow hurting you, which virtually 100% of the readers know is
nonsense, you could be producing an alternative answer which is better.
Another smoke
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
(I just sent a similiar mail in private and didn't immediately realize it
didn't went to lkml, so sorry, who gets it twice.)
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:13:48PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
I think what people want here is the tree structure
On Wednesday, 9 of February 2005 17:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 of February 2005 12:04, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The warning is printed right after the image is restored (ie somewhere
around the local_irq_enable() above, but it
Hello Tejun,
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:01:58 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Bartlomiej. Happy new lunar year.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I would prefer to not teach do_rw_taskfile() about -tf_{in,out}_flags
(and convert all users to use helpers) - it is much
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
I can't code for the case of two. Because, first, that's the idea of
generic in the name generic scatterwalk, second, I need at least 3
scatterlists in parallel for LRW.
Can you explain why you need a third scatterlist for the LRW tweak?
My
Sergey S. Kostyliov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is an oops I've just get on my smp system:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 001c
printing eip:
c01afe5b
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: ipt_REJECT ipt_state
Fixed some weird whitespace, solved redundancies (applies to v2.6.10).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- lib/string.cFri Dec 24 13:35:25 2004
+++ \documents and settings\jonathan\desktop/string.cWed Feb 09
16:21:28 2005
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int strnicmp(const char *s1, const
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Michael Ellerman wrote:
The generic and IA-64 versions of alloc_zeroed_user_highpage() don't
check the return value from alloc_page_vma(). This can lead to an oops
if we're OOM. This fixes my oops on PPC64, but I haven't got an IA-64
machine/compiler handy.
Patch looks
* Jonathan Ho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Fixed some weird whitespace, solved redundancies (applies to v2.6.10).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- lib/string.cFri Dec 24 13:35:25 2004
+++ \documents and settings\jonathan\desktop/string.cWed Feb 09
This won't apply
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:14:43AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
[long explanation which is summarized as it's hard]
So doing the work is one thing, getting a result within my lifetime would
be nice too.
I understand the complexity you are facing. This may be hard for you
to believe but we have
Okay, another quick question.
To fix the io_32bit race problem in ide_taskfile_ioctl() (and later
ide_cmd_ioctl() too), it seems simplest to mark the taskfile with
something like ATA_TFLAG_IO_16BIT flag and use the flag in task_in_intr().
However, ATA_TFLAG_* are used by libata, and I think
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:22 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
Hi, Ben.
How kind of you to remember.
Well, mailing lists archives did remember for me :)
Now I have a rewrite of the previous clear/read_pci_errors patch.
The new one adopts iomap infrastructure, considering generality,
capability
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 19:30 -0500, James Morris wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
I can't code for the case of two. Because, first, that's the idea of
generic in the name generic scatterwalk, second, I need at least 3
scatterlists in parallel for LRW.
Can you explain
Fruhwirth Clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It must be
possible to process more than 2 mappings in softirq context.
Adding a few more fixmap slots wouldn't hurt anyone. But if you want an
arbitrarily large number of them then no, we cannot do that.
Taking more than one sleeping kmap at a
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:52:25 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, another quick question.
To fix the io_32bit race problem in ide_taskfile_ioctl() (and later
ide_cmd_ioctl() too), it seems simplest to mark the taskfile with
something like ATA_TFLAG_IO_16BIT flag and use the
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2005, 17:19 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton:
It must be
possible to process more than 2 mappings in softirq context.
Adding a few more fixmap slots wouldn't hurt anyone. But if you want an
arbitrarily large number of them then no, we cannot do that.
Possibly one
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
Because a tweak is different from an IV. There can be an arbitrary
number of tweaks. For instance, EME takes 1 tweak per 512 bytes. If you
have a 4k page to encrypt, you have to process 8 tweaks of whatever
size.
Therefore, you need 3
On a 12-way IA64, with ext3 filesystem on an Ramdisk, when attempting
to run the disk I/O load of OSDL's aim-7 benchmark, I see an oops when
the multiprogramming level reaches around 200.
Turning on CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG shows:
Assertion failure in __journal_file_buffer() at
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:52:25 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, another quick question.
To fix the io_32bit race problem in ide_taskfile_ioctl() (and later
ide_cmd_ioctl() too), it seems simplest to mark the taskfile with
something like
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Running wmcube (an impractical, greedy, little CPU meter), even when
niced, causes lots of xruns. It may be good for worst-case-scenario
desktop load testing.
this phenomenon is very weird.
Firstly, make sure that all relevant threads (including
Two more of these sel_netif_lookup related BUGs were found with
-RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-06:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context ksoftirqd/0(2) at
kernel/rt.c:1448
in_atomic():1 [0001], irqs_disabled():0
[c0104183] dump_stack+0x23/0x30 (20)
[c011be08] __might_sleep+0xd8/0xf0
Ec 2O appe e opoo, oee, e paceaax, opa,
k pmepy 4V, 4mV (39OOA) o 75 ye a . T: 778~7823 Aecap
Ec e o apecy, poy poe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi,
Here's the latest relayfs patch, incorporating the previous round of
suggestions. Thanks to everyone who sent comments. Here's a list of
the major changes:
- replaced remap_page_range() and reserved bits with a nopage()
handler.
- buffers are now allocated/freed as part of inode
David Gibson wrote:
I'm now not entirely clear on whether you want patches against the
netdev bk, or against Linus bk/snapshots.
Please send diff'd against vanilla Linus upstream.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:07:08PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
David Gibson wrote:
I'm now not entirely clear on whether you want patches against the
netdev bk, or against Linus bk/snapshots.
Please send diff'd against vanilla Linus upstream.
Ok, in that case do you want me to resend the
Matt Mackall wrote:
It's a nice self-contained unit test.
By the way, I think it would be useful if there was a more
formalized frame for such unit tests, so that they could be used
in automated kernel testing.
To avoid false positives when grepping through the code, perhaps
such tests could be
Re: Important Message
FROM: Sgt. Michael Doherty
Dear Sir
Good day to you
My name is Michael Doherty I am an American soldier, i am serving
in the military of the 1st Armored Division in Iraq, we have just
been posted to leave Iraq and go back to Germany. I am now in
Kuwait at the mean time, I
Marcos D. Marado Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old
acpi_power_off bug...
...
diff -Nru -p1 linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c
linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mbn1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c
---
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:47:28PM -0500, Todd Shetter wrote:
Running slackware 10 and 10.1, with kernels 2.4.26, 2.4.27, 2.4.28,
2.4.29 with highmem 4GB, and highmem i/o support enabled, I get a
system lockup. This happens in both X and console. Happens with and
David S. Miller wrote:
This document is intended to serve as a guide to Linux port
maintainers on how to implement atomic counter and bitops operations
properly.
Finally, some light is shed into one of the most arcane areas of
the kernel ;-) Thanks !
Unlike the above routines, it is
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 08:12:07PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
(I understand that it's only a proof of concept patch, but I thought I'd
bitch anyway ;))
So. I'll keep the patch as-is in -mm for now. I've Cc'ed linux-acpi.
Perhaps the people there can absorb this and fix it up for real,
Hi,
This patch just moves aas many as possible EXPORT_SYMBOL()s from
arch/ppc64/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c to where the symbols are defined. This has
been compiled on pSeries, iSeries and pmac.
Please apply.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Richard Purdie provided a patch to fix support for XScale1 processors
(this is the PMU version i never had access to initially), we weren't
clearing the overflow flags after an overflow interrupt had triggered
resulting in no additional interrupts occuring. Additionally i've added
basic power
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:23:04AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
What happens if the operation could return a value, but the user
ignores it ? E.g. if I don't like smp_mb__*, could I just use
atomic_inc_and_test(foo);
instead of
smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:44:54PM +0300, Alexander Y. Fomichev wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 04:29, Nathan Scott wrote:
Is that an O_SYNC write, do you know? Or a write to an inode
with the sync flag set?
Yes, it is O_SYNC, as i can see from fcron sources, and, no, kernel
OK,
While I agree with your overall sentiment, please compare apples to
apples regarding the license. You said:
Larry McVoy wrote:
I don't come here every month and ask for
the GPL to be removed from some driver, that's essentially what you are
doing and I think pretty much everyone is sick of it.
Roman, please give up on importing 100% of the history. There's no
point arguing something if you already know what the other person's
answer will be. Larry will not change his mind under any currently
foreseeable circumstances. Yes, there is meta-data lockin whether
anyone at BitMover will
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 08:49:36PM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
[..]
+ */
+struct dentry *relayfs_create_file(const char *name, struct dentry *parent,
+int mode, struct rchan *chan)
+{
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+ int error;
+
+ if (!mode)
+
Comment says that softdog has to go last. Make it so.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/watchdog/Makefile~2005-02-10
01:48:32.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/watchdog/Makefile 2005-02-10 01:49:39.0
-0500
@@ -2,11 +2,6 @@
#
Maneesh Soni writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 08:49:36PM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
[..]
+ */
+struct dentry *relayfs_create_file(const char *name, struct dentry
*parent,
+ int mode, struct rchan *chan)
+{
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+ int error;
Nicolas Pitre [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:06:02AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
So you've somehow managed to trick most kernel developers into
granting you power over not only the BK history
It's exactly the same as a file
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:03:44 -0800, Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a nice self-contained unit test. It's here because I ran into a
strange regparm-related bug when developing the code in userspace and
I wanted to be sure that it was easy to diagnose in the field if a
similar bug
Hi.
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
But... what is the right way to do this?
I think you are looking for:
make kernelrelease
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.10 $ make kernelrelease
make: *** No rule to make target `kernelrelease'. Stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.10 $ cd ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src $ cd
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:49:36 -0600, Tom Zanussi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static inline struct page **alloc_page_array(int size, int *page_count)
+{
+ int n_pages;
+ struct page **page_array;
+
+ size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+ n_pages = size PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+
I hit an obscure bug last night when trying to copy files from an nfs
client to my nfs server. The server is a P3/800 with three IDE disks in
software RAID5 running vanilla 2.6.10 and Debian Sarge. The network is
local 100Mbit/s switched ethernet. The server exports a 220 gig
partition which
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:49:36 -0600, Tom Zanussi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static int relayfs_create_entry(const char *name, struct dentry *parent,
+ int mode, struct rchan *chan,
+ struct dentry **dentry)
+{
+ struct qstr qname;
301 - 358 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
