Mike Ricketts wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Philips wrote:
>
> > > then i suggest one uses a 2.4.xx-pre
> > > kernel or whatever.
> > You are wrong.
> > 2.4.* is quite stable on many boxes.
> Er. Nobody said it wasn't. The comments related purely to the 2.4.*-pre*
> kernels. Whi
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Richard Adams wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, you wrote:
>
> > You are wrong.
> > 2.4.* is quite stable on many boxes.
>
> Huum, ok, i am certainly not going to argue, however "development kernels" are
> NOT disscussed here.
>
2.4.* are not development kernels.
2.4.*
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Philips wrote:
> > then i suggest one uses a 2.4.xx-pre
> > kernel or whatever.
> >
>
> You are wrong.
> 2.4.* is quite stable on many boxes.
Er. Nobody said it wasn't. The comments related purely to the 2.4.*-pre*
kernels. Which are development kernels an
Richard Adams wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Philips wrote:
> > I do not want to discuss any kernel details too...
> > I just want to know where can I get latest information. no more no less.
> > and definitely I'm newbie too...
> There used to be a list called "linux-kernel-annou
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Philips wrote:
>
> I do not want to discuss any kernel details too...
>
> I just want to know where can I get latest information. no more no less.
> and definitely I'm newbie too...
There used to be a list called "linux-kernel-announce" i suggest you sen
"Charles E. Gelm" wrote:
>
> Speaking as a 'newbie' and casting my unsolicited vote;
> I do not expect, nor want, to see discussion on beta/prototype
> kernels on the 'newbie' list. If/when there is a concensus/majority
> /belief that a new kernel-level is stable/standard/production,
> by all m
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> You are wrong.
> 2.4.* is quite stable on many boxes.
Huum, ok, i am certainly not going to argue, however "development kernels" are
NOT disscussed here.
> FYI - 2.4 is stable branch.
> I want to be up-to-date with stable branch.
That i
Comment:
Speaking as a 'newbie' and casting my unsolicited vote;
I do not expect, nor want, to see discussion on beta/prototype
kernels on the 'newbie' list. If/when there is a concensus/majority
/belief that a new kernel-level is stable/standard/production,
by all means, include its discussion
Richard Adams wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Hi Philips,
> > I dare say you'll see an announcement when Linus deems 2.4.3 is
> > ready. If you want to be on the bleeding edge, you could always try the
> > 2.4.3-pre patches from the 'testing' directory, but I expect I'll ge
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Hi Philips,
> I dare say you'll see an announcement when Linus deems 2.4.3 is
> ready. If you want to be on the bleeding edge, you could always try the
> 2.4.3-pre patches from the 'testing' directory, but I expect I'll get
> flamed for suggesting that on
Hi Philips,
I dare say you'll see an announcement when Linus deems 2.4.3 is
ready. If you want to be on the bleeding edge, you could always try the
2.4.3-pre patches from the 'testing' directory, but I expect I'll get
flamed for suggesting that on a newbie list.
./Ken
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Phili
On 26-Mar-2001 Philips wrote:
> hello All!
>
> $subject??
> In linix-kernel I see anounces only from Alan Cox...
Hello Linus appears not very often but you can find him at:
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ingo Molnar <>
Subject: Re: [patch] pae-2.4.3-A4
Cc: Alan Cox <
hello All!
$subject??
In linix-kernel I see anounces only from Alan Cox...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
13 matches
Mail list logo
