Hi,
i have a very very very big problem with my current raid setup and i don't
know any further tricks to try..
I have an raid5 setup with an Adaptec 2940UW, 5 disks, kernel 2.2.5,
raidtools 0.9
yesterday my system crashed and after booting the system trys to reconstruct
the raid in the backgro
Marcos Lopez wrote:
> I am attempting to get my system to run RAID 1 for /, /usr, /var, /home
>
> I have moved over all except for / and it works fine.
>
> After reading the howto "Root file system on RAID. by - Jakob
> OEstergaard" I have decided to take the first approach, unfortunately I
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>You need to download the raid patch for your
>kernel... raid0145-19990824-2-2-11.bz2 for 2.2.11/12/13 kernels. The
>kernels ship supporting raidtools 0.42..
Thanks David. I'm now well aware of this. I've found a patch for kernel 2.2.5-15 and
raidtools 0.90 in the R
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Robert wrote:
> This is not really the correct list for this post, but I feel there are
> some very knowledgable people on this list, I figure that someone here may
> very well be qualified or know of someone else who is..Feel free to
> forward this to someone else if
I know this has been covered before but I can't find a searchable archive
of this list anywhere.
We've got DLT's doing backups right now and we're conceiving that it might
be cheaper to setup a system with 2 or 3 linear striped or raid 0 34+gig
ide disks and have 2 sets of these disks that we swa
Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 02:16:57PM -0600, Mark Ferrell wrote:
> > You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
> > LVM does not add it to the raid.
> [snip]
> > "Oh look .. the 90G raid5 array is getting pretty full .. I guess we shou
Hi,
I have a difficult RAID problem.
I was building a system with debian 2.1 using RAID 1 on hdb and hdc
(leaving hda for boot). I managed to get the raid working just fine
but was having to many problems with Oracle and ColdFusion, so I
decided to switch over to RH 6.0 as both products are
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 02:16:57PM -0600, Mark Ferrell wrote:
> You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
> LVM does not add it to the raid.
[snip]
> "Oh look .. the 90G raid5 array is getting pretty full .. I guess we should add
> more drives to it .. oh ..
mkraid fails complaining about the device being too small. Here's the details;
Using raidtools-0.50beta3 and 2.0.38 kernel with
/etc/raidtab;
raiddev /dev/md2
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 128
device /dev
On Mon, 01 Nov 1999, Francisco Jose Montilla wrote:
[Very Good stuff snipped]
> - and raid level 0 sets for disk2 and disk4, as you don't care about
> redundancy w/ index files (you can easily recreate them). I don't know if
> using raid 0 in that machine will give more performance, (although you'
You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
LVM does not add it to the raid.
For example, let's say we have a raid1 array with 2 devices on it, and we have
assigned the array to be part of an LVM. Now, let's say you add a 3rd drive. At
this point you have n
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 08:09:29AM -0800, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> Actually, HP-UX, on HP9000 V-class, has a journaling file system. I've got
that only guarantees filesystem metadata integrity,
not application data integrity.
> EMC coming in this afternoon, I'll ask them about the battery back
This is not really the correct list for this post, but I feel there are
some very knowledgable people on this list, I figure that someone here may
very well be qualified or know of someone else who is..Feel free to
forward this to someone else if the latter is the case.
I am looking for a con
I have an i386 machine running RH6.1, booting from
a small IDE drive and running a 3 disk scsi raid 5 array. I had little trouble
following the How-To to get the array set up, and by all indications it's up and
running. A cat of /proc/mdstat produces
[root@tiki_tiki raid]# cat /proc/mdstat
Actually, HP-UX, on HP9000 V-class, has a journaling file system. I've got
EMC coming in this afternoon, I'll ask them about the battery backup on the
write-back cache. My memory may be fuzzy, but I thought it was an option, on
Symetrix. I build 99.99+% sites ... that's what I do.
> -Origin
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 01:56:06PM +0100, Egon Eckert wrote:
> > There's a new version of the raidreconf utility out. I call it 0.0.2.
>
> Isn't this what supposed 'LVM' to be about? (BTW there seem to be 2
> different implementations of LVM on the web -- one included in 0.90 raid
> patch and o
> There's a new version of the raidreconf utility out. I call it 0.0.2.
Isn't this what supposed 'LVM' to be about? (BTW there seem to be 2
different implementations of LVM on the web -- one included in 0.90 raid
patch and one on http://linux.msede.com/lvm/)
Can someone clarify this?
A few mo
Hi all!
My raid0 config looks as follows:
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks1
persistent-superblock 1
chunk-size128
device/dev/sda5
raid-disk 0
device/dev/sd
We have an HP Netserver which is set up in exactly this way.. but UPS or
not, if someone (perhaps intentionally) removes the power cords from the
power supplys, or the machine (it's never done this yet) just crashes, what
happens to the filesystem on the RAID?
I like the sound of the two technolo
19 matches
Mail list logo
