rackmountable cases as well as RAID5 performance comparisson UDMA33 vs 66...

2000-01-23 Thread remo strotkamp
Hi raider out there, We have a fileserver with software RAID-5 here. It's a rackmountable case with 1 hardisk for the OS on one of the two onboard IDE controllers and 8 DNJA 20GB harddisk in CRU Dataport V cases connected to 4 Promise Ultra 66 cards (each has 2 buses). So we installed a RAID5 ov

Re: Trying to install Red Hat 6.1 on DPT Raid5

2000-01-23 Thread Gregory Leblanc
James Manning wrote: > > > VFS: Cannot open root device 08:02 > > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:02" > > 08:02 is /dev/sda2 which makes more sense. What I'd imagine > is happening is that the support for your RAID controller > was built as a module and that module's no

Some questions relating to recovering from disc failures

2000-01-23 Thread Piete Brooks
Q1) Is a `Medium Error' almost certainly a HDA HW problem ? Q2) Should SCSI errors go to /var/log/messages as well as dmesg ? Q3) Could RAID problems be reported by email ? Q4) How `should' iffy disks be replaced ? Running RedHat 6.1/2.2.12-20smp on a Gigabyte GA-6BXDU (Adaptec 7896), to access

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread Holger Kiehl
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Jakob Østergaard wrote: > > To everyone on linux-raid: > It seems improbable that the 0.90 raid stuff will go into 2.4 currently. This > is catastrophic. We need to try Ingo's patch, and give it all the testing we > can. If enough people try the patch and we can give a

re: kernel patch

2000-01-23 Thread Edward Schernau
Make sure you get a real kernel to start with from kernel.org, not a kernel-o-matic.rpm from RH. -- Edward Schernau http://www.schernau.com Network Architect mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rational Computing Providence, RI, USA, Earth

Re: raid-2.2.14-B1 fails to patch 2.2.14

2000-01-23 Thread Dave Wreski
> > Is this patch expected to patch cleanly? > > It has patched cleanly here and other places. Thanks for the confirmation. Should have known nutscrape would screw up the download. The first couple of pages of text looked ok, or so I thought... Dave

Re: raid-2.2.14-B1 fails to patch 2.2.14

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Dave Wreski wrote: > Hi all. I'm trying to patch 2.2.14 with the patch on Ingo's site, > raid-2.2.14-B1, dated Jan20. However, there are multitudes of errors when > patching an otherwise pristine kernel. > > Is this patch expected to patch cleanly? It has patched

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Michael wrote: > Gee, I'd like to see it in 2.2 and 2.3. I'm getting real tired of > applying the patches to new builds -- which I've been doing now for a > couple of years (like you). How stable does it need to be?? Haven't > had one break yet!!! > > Currently h

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Jakob Østergaard wrote: > It seems improbable that the 0.90 raid stuff will go into 2.4 currently. > This is catastrophic. We need to try Ingo's patch, and give it all > the testing we can. If enough people try the patch and we can give a > reasonable argument that

raid-2.2.14-B1 fails to patch 2.2.14

2000-01-23 Thread Dave Wreski
Hi all. I'm trying to patch 2.2.14 with the patch on Ingo's site, raid-2.2.14-B1, dated Jan20. However, there are multitudes of errors when patching an otherwise pristine kernel. Is this patch expected to patch cleanly? Thanks, Dave

Re: Upgrading kernel 2.0.36 -> 2.2.14 & RAID

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Michael wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone had any experiances or knew of any > > gotcha's for moving from a 2.0.36 kernel with the > > raid0145-19990108-2.0.36 patch and raidtools 0.90 to 2.2.14 on a > > RAID-1 system. Since I have no backups, nor the ability to

Re: Trying to install Red Hat 6.1 on DPT Raid5

2000-01-23 Thread James Manning
[ Saturday, January 22, 2000 ] Jon Preston wrote: > My config is: > > 2x PIII 500 > 128MB Ram > DPT PM3754U2 Raid V Millennium > 3 - IBM 9.1GB Ultra2 LVD 80MB/s > Red Hat 6.1 > >"request_module[block-major-9]: Root fs not mounted Note that block-major-9 is for /dev/md*,

Re: Raid 0.90 for 2.3? (+ RFT!)

2000-01-23 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 12:38:04AM -0500, Joseph Malicki wrote: > Is there a raid patch for 2.3 kernels? Or are they already in? I recently > tried to run 2.3.39 recently and it couldn't find my RAID array created > with RedHat 6.1.. http://people.redhat.com/mingo/ Try the ibc-ext2-raid-2.3

Trying to install Red Hat 6.1 on DPT Raid5

2000-01-23 Thread Jon Preston
My config is: 2x PIII 500 128MB Ram DPT PM3754U2 Raid V Millennium 3 - IBM 9.1GB Ultra2 LVD 80MB/s Red Hat 6.1 I am using the DPT supplied boot and supplemental disks for I2O DPT Raid controllers. After installation the system wigs. After the system tries to boot it gets to w

dumb question

2000-01-23 Thread Michael
I currently have raid 5 setup the "wrong" way with 3 disks on 2 pci/ide controllers (on board). I've added another pci controller card to the system, it recognizes the disk, but linux doesn't seem to see the controller card What am I doing wrong here?? acard 6810U dual DMA/33 Michael [EMAIL

Re: your mail

2000-01-23 Thread Anthon van der Neut
No it is not in the SUSE 6.3 stock kernel, the old md code is in there. There is a raidtool package with only the 0.9 tools, you have to get the patch yourself and patch by hand as the August 1999 code would not work on the source without patch complaining. Anthon - Original Message - Fro

Re: Upgrading kernel 2.0.36 -> 2.2.14 & RAID

2000-01-23 Thread Michael
> > > I was wondering if anyone had any experiances or knew of any > gotcha's for moving from a 2.0.36 kernel with the > raid0145-19990108-2.0.36 patch and raidtools 0.90 to 2.2.14 on a > RAID-1 system. Since I have no backups, nor the ability to do any, > I'm a bit worried about trashing the f

Re: your mail

2000-01-23 Thread Peter Marbaise
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Gabi Schaarschmidt wrote: > > Hallo, > I successfully apply raidtools v 0.90.0 on some mailservers > under SuSe-Linux 5.1 - 6.2 (kernel versions 2.0.36 - 2.2.11). > Now I want to upgrade the systems to SuSe-Linux 6.3 with kernel- > versions 2.2.13 or 2.2.