On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Mike Panetta wrote:
I am looking for an updated raid driver for kernel 2.3.42+ Does such a
beast exist? I looked on Ingo's site and only found a patch for
kernel 2.3.40. This patch did not patch cleanly at all.
the newest RAID code is being merged into 2.3.43 right
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo
DanielC wrote:
Sorry for the simple question, but I can't find an archive of the list
that isn't suffering from y2k. Where can I find a 0.9 patch for 2.2.14?
--
DanielC
Thanks! I am eagerly waiting! :)
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:05:09PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Mike Panetta wrote:
I am looking for an updated raid driver for kernel 2.3.42+ Does such a
beast exist? I looked on Ingo's site and only found a patch for
kernel 2.3.40.
Hello. Could use a little push here. I just successfully created a Raid0
raid on my Storm Linux box running 2.2.14...no problems. Now I'm trying
to create a Raid5 on my RH6.0 machine. Different SCSI card and drives,
but same kernel. I can successfully partition and mount any of the 4
drives
ok, I feel REALLY dumb now. I guess that's what I get for writing email
after 11:00 PM.
http://www.ami.com/hyperdisk/hyperdisk.html
Sorry about that.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: James Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:12 PM
To:
You'll need to patch your kernel to include support for the 0.90 series raid
code. RedHat 6.0 ships with raidtools-0.90.
Greg
Hi,
I just discovered a weird "bug"/"interaction" between the ncr53c8xx,
aic7xxx scsi modules when it comes to disk allocation. Has anyone
else seen this ?
I have a server, HP Netserver LPR and it boots from the NCR chipset.
It had one disk, a 9GB 10KRPM Cheetah - HP firmware.
The aic7xxx is
the solution for removing, adding, and spinning up a scsi
disk drive is:
echo "scsi remove-single-device a b c d" /proc/scsi/scsi
echo "scsi add-single-device a b c d " /proc/scsi/scsi
in line 2, the space after the d is important due to a bug
where:
a is Host No (usually 0)
b is Channel
[ Wednesday, February 9, 2000 ] Ingo Molnar wrote:
the newest RAID code is being merged into 2.3.43 right now.
(Hopefully) quick question. Will KNI work?
James
[ Wednesday, February 9, 2000 ] Alan T. Malek wrote:
mkraid: aborted, see the syslog and /proc/mdstat for potential clues.
Any suggestions?
Yeah, send us anything that showed up in syslog and the contents
of /proc/mdstat :)
As a
Hi,
I've got three RAID volumes spread across the disks of a
sparcstorage array 100x on an ultra2 running RH6.1/sparc
(2.2.12 kernel / raidtools 0.90).
When I first signed onto this mailing list, I had a problem with
the disklabels for my partitions being eaten away at reboots. I
was told
At 09:08 AM 2/9/2000 -0800, you wrote:
ok, I feel REALLY dumb now. I guess that's what I get for writing email
after 11:00 PM.
http://www.ami.com/hyperdisk/hyperdisk.html
Tiger direct sells this... they have an internal card that goes between the
on board controller and 2 drives to make them
-Original Message-
From: David Cooley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 11:10 AM
To: Gregory Leblanc
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: New(?) IDE hardware RAID device
At 09:08 AM 2/9/2000 -0800, you wrote:
ok, I feel REALLY dumb now. I guess
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, James Manning wrote:
[ Wednesday, February 9, 2000 ] Ingo Molnar wrote:
the newest RAID code is being merged into 2.3.43 right now.
(Hopefully) quick question. Will KNI work?
i'll make sure it works (it certainly didnt in the past) - xor.c can
afford full FPU saves
I'm setting up two 27GB IDE drives for RAID1
with Red Hat 6.1 I haven't applied any patches (yet).
Here's my configuration:
/boot5Mno mirror
hda1
/300Mmirrored
" 5
swap
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:26:20AM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
True, but even with the nifty patches that RedHat has supplied, you can only
boot from RAID 1. I was thinking you could grab two cards like this, and
create RAID-0 arrays on both, and then mirror those using Linux software
RAID
James Manning wrote:
[ Wednesday, February 9, 2000 ] Alan T. Malek wrote:
mkraid: aborted, see the syslog and /proc/mdstat for potential clues.
Any suggestions?
Yeah, send us anything that showed up in syslog and the contents
of /proc/mdstat :)
As a heads-up, if your mdstat has
Here's my configuration:
/boot5M no mirrorhda1
/300M mirrored " 5
swap 256M no mirror " 6
/user_area ~26G mirrored " 7
/boot2 5M no mirrorhdc1
/300M mirrored " 5
Hi,
no not obvious, but the external storage device, a Rack Storage 12,
assigns
the addresses statically 0-3, 8-15. The SCSI card is on ID 7. All
drives
are accessible when put on the same controller. When split across two
controllers, only the first four are accessible from the adaptec,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Yan-Fa Li wrote:
[snip]
no not obvious, but the external storage device, a Rack Storage 12,
assigns the addresses statically 0-3, 8-15. The SCSI card is on ID 7.
All drives are accessible when put on the same controller. When split
across two controllers, only the first
Nope. That wasn't the problem either. The drives were split
1,2,3,8,9,10,11
with 1-8 being in a RAID5 array. It's something that goes on between
the
NCR and the AIC driver. I really don't think it's to do with IDs or
anything
physical. Either these two are duking it out in the background
21 matches
Mail list logo
