At 10:49 AM 10/30/99 +0200, Marc Barrot wrote:
>When I try to override this with mkraid --really-force /dev/md0, I get :
>
>DESTROYING the contents of /dev/md0 in 5 seconds, Ctrl-C if unsure!
>handling MD device /dev/md0
>analyzing super-block
>disk 0: /dev/hda3, 2562367kB, raid superblock at 256
Hi Bill,
You need to get the latest raid kernel patch (ignore the errors it gives...
one hunk is included in the 2.2.12/2.2.13 kernel) and the latest raidtools
(0.90).
At 03:17 PM 10/27/99 -0500, Bill Carlson wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to setup your basic RAID0 Software raid and running into
At 08:42 PM 10/21/99 +0200, you wrote:
>Where can I find a description of /proc/mdstat?
>
>For example, what means
>md0 : active raid1 hdc2[1] 15004670 blocks [2/1] [_U]
this means /dev/md0 is running (active) is using software raid1, is using
/dev/hdc2 (raid disk 1 in you r /etc/raidtab) is 15
At 08:47 PM 10/14/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am running 2.2.12. What I don't understand is if both md0 and md1 are
>kicked out, why am I still able to use md2. I can read information
>without any problems at this point. That seems strange.
>
>Also, I'm still unclear on *which* drive
At 11:30 PM 10/13/99 -0700, Hakker wrote:
>I have yet another question for the list. I would like to run my 7 disk
>external scsi drive tower off of my dell poweredge server. The server
>already has 4 internal drives on one host adapter. I can put in an
>external adapter and hookup the external a
At 10:58 AM 10/13/99 +0100, Ben Holme wrote:
>Is there a raid0145-*-2.2.12 available yet?
Nope... Just 2.2.11, but it patches 2.2.12 just fine... answer no to the 2
questions it fails on (already applied one hunk of the patch in the 2.2.12
dist.)
==
At 04:56 PM 10/12/99 +0200, Kay Salzwedel wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>How long does it take to resync a RAID5 array after a disk failure?
>Unfortunately, I have just two disks on my box (OK, I got tree on it but
>one is so packed that I can not use it) so that I cannot try for myself.
>
>Please cc to me
At 11:54 PM 10/10/99 +0200, you wrote:
>In comp.os.linux.hardware you write:
>
> >george wrote:
> >>
> >> EXT2 fs seems to only be able to address files up to 2GB in size, and I
> ^^
>...
> >> Software RAID5. I need to be able to manipulate
At 08:45 PM 10/3/99 -0600, Andan wrote:
>ditto. i got this same result under, um, 2.2.5 i think, and when i backed
>off my linux installation to RH5.2 instead of RH6.0, suddenly,
>everything's fine.
>
>since i like pain, i'm in the midst of trying to get Mandrake 6.1 on the
>box, and make the ra
one of two things...
Most likely you need the raid patch for the Kernel (it's for 2.2.11, but
ignore and answer no to the 2 errors) and the latest 0.90-3 raidtools.
At 07:31 PM 10/3/99 -0700, Rick H. Wesson wrote:
>hello,
>
>i'm having some trouble with making some old sun disks, that were once
At 09:20 AM 10/3/99 +1000, Raid wrote:
>Thanks for your reply David.
>
>I have an NT4 Server that I would like to replace with a Red Hat server. I
>have nearly everything sorted except software RAID. The NT box has two 17Gb
>software-mirrored IDE HDs and I would like to use a similiar system with
At 08:55 AM 10/3/99 +1000, Raid wrote:
>Is anyone subscribed to this list?
a lot of people are... traffic here comes in spurts though.
===
David Cooley N5XMT Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Packet: N5XMT@KQ4LO.#INT.NC
Hi All,
Have a quick question...
Been running Raid 5 on my Sparc ultra 2 with a Sun D1000.
The drives are 12 4.1G seagate Cheetahs.
It's been working fine until tonight... One drive on /dev/md0 was flagged
bad. I checked it with Fdisk, and it came up as: bad sgi disk label magic
000 bad SUN d
At 06:17 PM 9/18/99 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>2.2.12 (and the pre-2.2.13 patches) are better than the 2.2.11 kernel. If
>you apply the 2.2.11 patch to 2.2.12 then you'll get a single reject,
>which you can safely ignore. (it tries to add something that has already
>been merged into the main tre
At 06:41 PM 9/17/99 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:44:54 -0400
>From: "David A. Cooley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Anyone know where I can get a firmware upgrade for the Qlogic SBUS
>cards that will flash them under Lin
Hi All,
Running Kernel 2.2.11 with the raid patch and all is well...
I'm wanting to upgrade to the 2.2.12 kernel just because it's newer...
The 2.2.11 raid patch had some problems on the 2.2.12 source. Is there any
benefit of the 2.2.12 kernel over the 2.2.11 (for sparc) or should I just
stay
Not sure what happened, but I went thru and ran FDISK on every drive in the
raid and re-wrote the partition table to each one... Rebooted and ran
mkraid, now both groups work on different controllers... Something must
have gotten hosed in the partition table somehow, but it was only messed up
Hi All,
I have a Sun Ultra 2 running RedHat 6.0 with all the updates etc.
I have successfully been running RAID5 on it with the following:
Sun D1000 with 12 4.2G drives, seperated into 2 clusters of 6 each... this
is on a single SCSI interface.
I mount the 2 md devices and have no problems.
To
At 04:50 PM 11/4/99 -0500, you wrote:
>What are the consequences of mkraid --reallyforce
>
>I need to test raid on my partitions
>
>/dev/hde1 and /dev/hde2
>
>i have configured the /etc/raidtab file as needed.
>
>when i use mkraid /dev/md0
>
>it tells me to try mkraid --force (i.e. reallyforce).
19 matches
Mail list logo
