On 08/04/2000 09:54 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> The usual suggestion is:
>>
>> bzip2 -dc | tar -xf -
>>
or use bzcat, which is exactly the same as bzip2 -dc...
--
+--+----------+
| Tim Walbe
i did 'fsck /dev/md4' but it did'nt help...
>>
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>> patrick
End of included message
--
+--+--+
| Tim Walberg | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| 828 Marshall Ct. | www.concentric.net/~twalberg |
| Palatine, IL 60074 | |
+--+--+
PGP signature
e any reference to "fd" when I list the Hex codes (fdisk v2.9n)
>>
To quote a popular shoe maker... "Just do it". Never mind that fd isn't
in the list; when it asks for the new partition type, type in '0xfd'.
tw
--
uggesting
that - just shoot me now...).
tw
--
+--+--+
| Tim Walberg | Phone: 847-782-2472 |
| TERAbridge Technologies Corp | FAX: 847-623-1717 |
| 1375 Tri-State Parkway | [EM
>>
>> You've got it.
>>
>> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation.. Is there
>> one?
>>
Veritas' VxFS does, but, alas, there's no Linux port. Works
great on Solaris, though.
TED]
>> Tel.:+49-5251-60 64 58
>> ------------
End of included message
--
+--+--+
| Tim Walberg | Phone: 847-782-2472 |
| TERAbridge Techno
27;t have a raidtab to send you, 'cause I've never
built a Linux box big enough to need either option -
I've only ever used two drives at a time so far.)
tw
--
+--+--+
| Tim Walberg
On 09/04/1999 10:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Tim Walberg wrote:
>>
>> > I want to mirror the NT partition when I'm running Linux.
>> > Obviously, the mirror will be broken when I boot under NT,
scenario?
tw
--
+------+--+
| Tim Walberg | Phone: 847-782-2472 |
| TERAbridge Technologies Corp | FAX: 847-623-1717 |
| 1375 Tri-State Parkway | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Gurnee, IL 6003
nt, but hopefully that's
a **very** rare occurrence.
tw
--
+----------+--+
| Tim Walberg | Phone: 847-782-2472 |
| TERAbridge Technologies Corp | FAX: 847-623-1717 |
| 1375 Tri-State Parkway
aching and write gathering algorithms. I don't
know if there's a big enough difference to worry about, but I don't know
there isn't either. That's why I always recommend benchmarking several
different configs.
I still think 2-4 are sufficiently different, though - 2 and 3 a
or
you - I've done this before (but using Solaris/SPARC with Veritas
Volume Manager, and at a previous job - I don't have access to that
kinda stuff at the moment). I/O optimization was pretty much my sole
purpose for living for a year or two... ;o)
tw
k as what you're going to use in production).
Hope that's useful
tw
--
+----------+--+
| Tim Walberg | Phone: 847-782-2472 |
| TERAbridge Technologies Corp | FAX: 847-623-1717
hich
just makes the whole analysis that much more complex...
Hope that's useful info to someone... (Also hope I haven't
goofed something up there... ;-> )
tw
--
+--+--+
| Tim Walberg | P
ay not be everyone's usual case, but it does happen. This is
one of the reasons I will personally not recommend putting a
very busy news server on RAID5 - the expires can easily kill
a machine.
tw
--
+----------+--+
| Tim Wa
>> time to try fixing that problem, but for now uniprocessor is ok for
>> my testing.
>>
>> On a Pentium II/400 I get ~60MB/s reading a file with raid0 on 6 drives,
>> but <40MB/s with raid5 on 8 drives.
>>
>> Thanks,
>&
16 matches
Mail list logo
