On Sunday 07 April 2002 07:31 pm, Susan Macchia wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running a pretty much stock SuSE 7.3 distro running XFree 4.1.1 with
kde 2.2.1 and gnome 1.4.
I'm thinking of upgrading to XFree86 4.2 and was wondering if I'd have to
update my kde and gnome packages. Having never
Already did that. That's how I came up with the first version of my
/etc/procmailrc. I am going to steal a few lines from your attached
procmailrc recipe. I still don't quite understand the locking concept in
procmail, and regex, let alone writing my own rules. Need more time...
Well, I
rushing to freshmeat...
Net Llama! wrote:
Actually, i found it. PPPStatus
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
you know how those disk space was being used up?
artwork and animation, plus bloated object-oriented GUI stuffs.
Are they important? well.. any answer wouldn't change the reality.
then the cost of a 60 Gig at Future Shop. When I bought my first 105 Meg HD
($500 Cdn) I wondered how the heck
I also found ethstatus.
I wonder what buzzwords one should use to locate this kind of gimmicks.
[root@server PPPStatus-v0.4.2]# make
cc -O2 -Wall -c -o pppstatus.o pppstatus.c
pppstatus.c:45: net/if_ppp.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [pppstatus.o] Error 1
Net Llama! wrote:
Actually,
about the error:
I used the q-and-d way by changing
net/if_ppp.h to linux/if_ppp.h
any more elegant, graceful solution?
[root@server PPPStatus-v0.4.2]# make
cc -O2 -Wall -c -o pppstatus.o pppstatus.c
pppstatus.c:45: net/if_ppp.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [pppstatus.o] Error 1
Thanks! This was exactly what I was looking for !
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
On Sunday 07 April 2002 19:31, Susan Macchia wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running a pretty much stock SuSE 7.3 distro running XFree 4.1.1 with
kde 2.2.1 and gnome 1.4.
I'm thinking of upgrading to XFree86 4.2 and was
Scribbling feverishly on April 08, m.w.Chang managed to emit:
I also found ethstatus.
I wonder what buzzwords one should use to locate this kind of gimmicks.
[root@server PPPStatus-v0.4.2]# make
cc -O2 -Wall -c -o pppstatus.o pppstatus.c
pppstatus.c:45: net/if_ppp.h: No such file or
I wrote an attendance system using foxpro for my company. :)
Ted Ozolins wrote:
Has anyone come acrossed a time card (time clock) program? I've been using
spread_sheets to keep track of time spent on various contracts but that is
getting to become more of a pain then its worth. I might as
Well after 2 days Dougs help in scripts, I have built installed
have kde3 up and running, then I put xfce to be in front of kde3 HE HE.
Life is good again. One question now. WhenI start xfce from the login screen
I get a xfce that is crippled, I then quit it and the real nice xfce starts.
check /etc/X11/wmsession.d/*
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:29:00 -0800
Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Mandrake 8.1 on the lab rat. Downloaded the KDE3 rpm
binaries for man8.1 and did the install. I can run kde3 from the
console (runlevel 3) How ever even though kde3 appears in
what does you config look like? Do the first lines of each rule make
sense? Or does procmail think you are listing two lock files? You can
typically go without the lockfiles.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 11:36:48 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2002 01:54,
What are the caveats to compiling (or did you get SuSE RPMS)?
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 13:04:19 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2002 13:02, Net Llama wrote:
does it suck?
not for me
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Please. I'd like to see it.
Then if anyone would like to host these and any other COL3.1.x RPMs, I
would like to supply them. I simply don't have to online-space to take
advantage of (yet?).
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:39:52 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2002
Create the symlink tht belong in /usr/include to /usr/src/linux/include
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, m.w.Chang wrote:
about the error:
I used the q-and-d way by changing
net/if_ppp.h to linux/if_ppp.h
any more elegant, graceful solution?
[root@server PPPStatus-v0.4.2]# make
cc -O2 -Wall -c
/usr/include/net/if_ppp.h
/usr/src/linux-2.4.18/include/linux/if_ppp.h
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, m.w.Chang wrote:
I also found ethstatus.
I wonder what buzzwords one should use to locate this kind of gimmicks.
[root@server PPPStatus-v0.4.2]# make
cc -O2 -Wall -c -o pppstatus.o pppstatus.c
Guys! I believe this is a config setting.
Don't ask me what it is, but I'm pretty sure of it.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:36:01 -0700
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the things I don't like is kdm. It seems there used to be a way,
but the current kdm has no way to exit X to a normal
Greetings,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
Guys! I believe this is a config setting.
Don't ask me what it is, but I'm pretty sure of it.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:36:01 -0700
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the things I don't like is kdm. It seems there used to be
On Monday 08 April 2002 10:48, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
What are the caveats to compiling (or did you get SuSE RPMS)?
1. time.
2. dependencies
3. time
I never use rpms if I can avoid it
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep -
THis sounds like it would work, except, what happens if someone wants to
pay for 20MB of space? Sure, you could create a loop back file of 20MB,
but this doesn't seem all that elegant.
Also, copying the contents of one 'allocation' to a larger one is also not
all that elegant.
On Mon, 8 Apr
Morning all:
I have a client that wants to migrate to Linux from Solaris, but one of their
main gotchas is the quota support in Linux. They believe (as do I) that
quotas seem to be the first thing broken (and the last thing fixed) whever a
change is introduced into the fs or block
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
On Monday 08 April 2002 12:56, Net Llama! wrote:
THis sounds like it would work, except, what happens if someone wants to
pay for 20MB of space? Sure, you could create a loop back file of 20MB,
but this doesn't seem all that elegant.
Also,
On Monday 08 April 2002 12:56, Net Llama! wrote:
THis sounds like it would work, except, what happens if someone wants to
pay for 20MB of space? Sure, you could create a loop back file of 20MB,
but this doesn't seem all that elegant.
Also, copying the contents of one 'allocation' to a
On Monday 08 April 2002 14:44, Tim Wunder wrote:
BTW, If I'm compiling qt3 in the directory where it will ultimately be
installed, is there a reason to even perfom a 'make install'?
I unpacked the qt tarball, moved the resulting directory to
/usr/lib/qt-free-x11-3.0.3 (or whatever it was).
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
On Sunday 07 April 2002 14:11, Brian Witowski wrote:
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/qt/qmake'
[ -d /usr/local/qt/bin ] || mkdir -p /usr/local/qt/bin
is this directory getting made?
cp -f /usr/local/qt/bin/qmake /usr/local/qt/bin
this line is
On Monday 08 April 2002 13:13, Net Llama! wrote:
Sure, but would it maintain data integrity, or just give you a gob of data
20MB in size?
dunno. guess I'll go play. methinks /home/netllama looks like a good candidate
;)
(teasing!)
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
On Monday 08 April 2002 14:44, Tim Wunder wrote:
BTW, If I'm compiling qt3 in the directory where it will ultimately be
installed, is there a reason to even perfom a 'make install'?
I unpacked the qt tarball, moved the resulting directory to
On Monday 08 April 2002 02:44 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
OK, I'm getting a similar problem with checkinstall.
My $QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3.0.3
QT compiles, ie make completes without error (I had to add $QTDIR and
$QTDIR/qmake to my $PATH, but it compiled). When I execute
checkinstall, it errors out
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 07:43, Keith Antoine wrote:
I do not know how they make an rpm of qt but you will find that there is no
way to make install. It is supposed to be compiled to /xxx/xxx/kde3 with a
./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/kde3 and a make is all thats required so
checkinstall will
On Monday 08 April 2002 15:14, Tim Wunder wrote:
'checkinstall make'. Wouldn't that work? But, now that I think about it.
that would work.
What's so terribly dificult about rm'ing the directory if I want to
unistall it? I might just forego the checkinstall step altogether...
nothing. but
Scribbling feverishly on April 08, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit:
Morning all:
I have a client that wants to migrate to Linux from Solaris, but one of their
main gotchas is the quota support in Linux. They believe (as do I) that
quotas seem to be the first thing broken (and the
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:33:56 -0500 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on April 07, Collins managed to emit:
All is well in gentoo land (for me at least).
[snip]
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
What is WWTLRD?, pray tell? Anything like WWJD?
What would
Scribbling feverishly on April 07, Collins managed to emit:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:33:56 -0500 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is WWTLRD?, pray tell? Anything like WWJD?
What would the lone ranger do?
Gotcha. thanks.
Kurt
--
Slow day. Practice crawling.
Has anyone else tried this?
FWIW, I found it to be DOA.
1) I tried inserting a chart based on some spreadsheet cells, and it
crapped out 2) I tried keying a document and saving it - crapped out
again, and it left a whole bunch of temp files in my home directory.
I've reverted to 641C. The
Greetings,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
Previously, Jay Nugent chose to write:
Greetings,
snip
You don't EVER have to drop out of X and into a TTY to do work as root.
Not even to update X? or your video driver? or your login manager? or your
window manager? or your
Anyone tried the elx pregold beta release?
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove _NO_SPAM_)!
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
You should give it a try if you don't like IE. But IE is too popular
among the kids to be removed from Win98 or be ignored anyway.
Kurt Wall wrote:
we have 98lite for Window$ 98 to knock out IE.
Never heard of it, but I do as little as possible in the Windows
world.
Is it do-able after
Of one thing that I liked about DOS:
There were little dependence between products. SO you can always
add/remove packages without breaking others. YOu always knew where your
data and the program (games, dbase, wordstar, wordperfect, lotus,
harvard graphics, ...) were (well, at least in my
witht he help of another list mate, I was able to get a wireless access point
up, without the use of their software. Change the admin password via the
webinterface and get my wifes laptop on the move in the house.
the default password is comcomcom, found by Dave Aikema (as I never received
39 matches
Mail list logo
