Kurt Wall wrote:
> Scribbling feverishly on April 26, Net Llama! managed to emit:
>
>>OK, i've got my webcam working, with sound. I've made a few short (and
>>scary) movies of myself. I've got one remaining & puzzling issue. What
>>does the entry for the audio.o module look like in modules.c
Scribbling feverishly on April 26, Net Llama! managed to emit:
> OK, i've got my webcam working, with sound. I've made a few short (and
> scary) movies of myself. I've got one remaining & puzzling issue. What
> does the entry for the audio.o module look like in modules.conf?
I don't have one
need another notch on your belt?
http://undeadlinux.com/
--
Chris Kassopulo _/\_ Linux User #199893 _/\_ Slackware
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Dige
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:49:15 -0600
Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't figure out how to save bookmarks
right click on the window -> bookmark this page
--
Chris Kassopulo _/\_ Linux User #199893 _/\_ Slackware
___
Linux-users mailing list -
OK, i've got my webcam working, with sound. I've made a few short (and
scary) movies of myself. I've got one remaining & puzzling issue. What
does the entry for the audio.o module look like in modules.conf?
From what i'm reading in various places, there doesn't seem to be a
standard alias
Collins wrote:
>Great news - gentoo is now available from cheapbytes.
>
>You folks with slow internet connections now have one less excuse
>preventing you from trying it out.
>
>
Didn't stop me from getting Gentoo- just get one file at a time. It's
slow, and even now I
don't have everything I w
If you haven't visited the gentoo site in a while, check it out. Not
only cheapbytes cds, but lots of documentation and an online forum
that has really taken off.
Most of the stuff I've bitched about over the last 2 years has been
fixed, most especially documentation.
gentoo is also taking off
This has got to be the most carefully pronounced browser on the
market!
Reminds me, there used to be a group of women folksingers in Denver
who called themselves the Mother Folkers. But I digress.
Someone on the xfce users group pointed this one out, and it's a real
hummer. Tiny, fast, and qui
Great news - gentoo is now available from cheapbytes.
You folks with slow internet connections now have one less excuse
preventing you from trying it out.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
Gentoo_rc6-15(1.1a) 2.4.19pre - xfce + sylpheed + mozilla
Kurt Wall wrote:
> Scribbling feverishly on April 26, Net Llama! managed to emit:
>
>>I was putzing around on 1 of my RedHat based boxes, rebuilding some of the
>>official RH-7.2 SRPMs, and somewhere along the way, i broke something with
>>the way that rpm builds packages.
>>
>>I think something
Scribbling feverishly on April 26, Net Llama! managed to emit:
> I was putzing around on 1 of my RedHat based boxes, rebuilding some of the
> official RH-7.2 SRPMs, and somewhere along the way, i broke something with
> the way that rpm builds packages.
>
> I think something in the fileutils packa
04/26 - Programming on Palm Pilots - New & Updated - (Mike Andrew)
Kurt (on behalf of Llama, who actually posted it)
--
Oh, I don't blame Congress. If I had $600 billion at my disposal, I'd
be irresponsible, too.
-- Lichty & Wagner
___
Scribbling feverishly on April 26, Brian Witowski managed to emit:
> Greetings,
>
> All of a sudden I can't get any Man entries. Anything I do a Man for it
> says "No Manual Entry for ...". And it doesn't matter what command I do it
> for. There is no manual entry. I'm running COL 3.1/2.4.18.
Greetings,
All of a sudden I can't get any Man entries. Anything I do a Man for it
says "No Manual Entry for ...". And it doesn't matter what command I do it
for. There is no manual entry. I'm running COL 3.1/2.4.18.
I have the manuals in /usr/share/man. And it seems to be looking in that
pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I don't know if there's a fileutils steps, in linux-sxs.org, but I
think this small bug (?) should be mentioned somewhere in the site.
PS: You're damn lucky! I've ruined many linux installations while
trying kernel 2.2.20 + ext2 + soft RAID (th
OK, i think i figured out the cause of the mess (it is fileutils):
http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-book/2001/09/0374.html
Quite a while ago, I set CFLAGS to something with -malign-double.
After reinstalling the newly built fileutils, all is back to normal.
*sigh*
On Fri, 2
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> "Net Llama!" wrote:
> >
> > I've really done it this time. I installed a version 4.1 of fileutils,
> > and it appears to have hosed the filesystem in a very bad way. BTW, this
> > box is Redhat based, using XFS.
> >
> > *Every* single file on the box n
"Net Llama!" wrote:
>
> I've really done it this time. I installed a version 4.1 of fileutils,
> and it appears to have hosed the filesystem in a very bad way. BTW, this
> box is Redhat based, using XFS.
>
> *Every* single file on the box now has a size of 16T (yes, terrabytes).
> Now as wonder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Go back to the previous version (and pray).
PS: You DO have a backup, right?
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:26:25 -0400 (EDT), Net Llama! wrote:
>I've really done it this time. I installed a version 4.1 of fileutils,
>and it appears to have hosed the
I've really done it this time. I installed a version 4.1 of fileutils,
and it appears to have hosed the filesystem in a very bad way. BTW, this
box is Redhat based, using XFS.
*Every* single file on the box now has a size of 16T (yes, terrabytes).
Now as wonderful as it would be to have a few pe
I was putzing around on 1 of my RedHat based boxes, rebuilding some of the
official RH-7.2 SRPMs, and somewhere along the way, i broke something with
the way that rpm builds packages.
I think something in the fileutils package is what broke everything, as
that's the last rebuilt package that i wa
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
> begin Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> > > This problem (of bttv having sound but nothing else) is because you're
> > > loading the bttv stuff first. Rip it out, load the sound first, get
> > >
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
begin Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
[snip]
> >
> > This problem (of bttv having sound but nothing else) is because you're
> > loading the bttv stuff first. Rip it out, load the sound first, get
> > it working, then load bttv and all will
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:42:35 +1000
> begin Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:20, David A. Bandel wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, I'm using devfs, so the initial permissions are what the
> > > kernel gives. That sa
Hmmm .. I wondered what happened to all of the COL Posters .. Now I see
they are all over here. Maybe I ought to check my Mail Folders more often.
Anyway, I pre-ordered the 8.0 Professional Upgrade. It came in last week.
The UPGRADE, believe it or not, is the same as the regular release. All
t
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:42:35 +1000
begin Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:20, David A. Bandel wrote:
>
> > Remember, I'm using devfs, so the initial permissions are what the
> > kernel gives. That said, at boot, I deliberately chmod 666
> > /dev/sound/*.
Thanks! When I last visited that page, they weren't there (or maybe I missed
something?).
Anyhow - much appreciated - now I can get the upgrade!
bTW, Has anyone had any problems with the upgrade? (vs. new install)? I have
a few custom things, but can re do whatever was custom since I keep a l
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:20, David A. Bandel wrote:
> Remember, I'm using devfs, so the initial permissions are what the kernel
> gives. That said, at boot, I deliberately chmod 666 /dev/sound/*.
> However, it appears that afterward, permissions change (I'm not sure why
> -- and I use Blackbox).
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
