I cannot be sure. should be these ones.
/var/log/mail
Oct 21 00:30:17 server sendmail[906]: g9KGUAlZ000906:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:07, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=esmtp,
pri=39556, relay=homemail.doregi.com. [203.233.237.24], dsn=5.7.1,
stat=User unknown
Oct 21 00:30:18 server sendmai
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:44:29 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:33:13PM -0700, David Aikema wrote:
> > I've currently got Windows 98 SE (on a 10 gig drive) installed alongside SuSE
> >
> > 7.3 Pro (on an 8.4 gig drive) using a motherboard about 2 1/2 years old. If
> > I
I have a Gateway P5 166 Mh processor, two 8 gig hard drives, a US
Robotics 33.6 K modem. I am trying to get any of COL 3.1.1, Cheapbytes
Bow Tie 7.3, or Mandrake 8.2 installed on 3 gigs of one of the drives.
I have 517 meg swap partition (Lonnie recomends). Everything seems to
work well except I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the release of Undertaker v. 0.6.0 under GPL license.
It can be downloaded from:
https://www.bouissou.net/wws/d_read/spamcombat/Undertaker/
Undertaker is a spam and mail viruses processing system based on procmail,
and
Well, I'm running at home with a /32 and a business network at work with
a /28. I haven't tried yet but I doubt SWBell is going to allow me to
manage my own reverse DNS. Anyone have any suggestions? So far its
only redhat's mail server that is doing this, and although I'm deploying
their product
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:43:43 -0400
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:52:55PM -0500, Matt Nelson wrote:
>
> >
> >
>
> Content-Description: Forwarded message - Totally OT: valid mail server
> > Date: 21 Oct 2002 18:
Requiring a reverse lookup of the sending MTA is a form of spam blocking. We put
the rule in place for about a week and a half on our server. Kept out an amazing
amount of stuff, but also blocked a good number of our members and friendlies.
Finally had to remove it because we didn't want to play ma
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:33:13PM -0700, David Aikema wrote:
> I've currently got Windows 98 SE (on a 10 gig drive) installed alongside SuSE
> 7.3 Pro (on an 8.4 gig drive) using a motherboard about 2 1/2 years old. If
> I were to replace these two drives with a single 60 gig+ drive should I
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:37:53AM -0500, Ben Duncan wrote:
> I need to know a users telneted/rlogin .etc ..etc.. IP on a flat
> network that does not have DNS.
>
> Any Idea how to get it?
>
> Who -l , only does a DNS resolution.
netstat -n
netstat --numeric-hosts
Kurt
--
The gods gave man fi
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:52:55PM -0500, Matt Nelson wrote:
>
>
Content-Description: Forwarded message - Totally OT: valid mail server
> Date: 21 Oct 2002 18:21:05 -0500
> From: Matt Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Totally OT: valid mail server
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailer: Ximian
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 02:45 pm,Net Llama! wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Aikema wrote:
>
> > I seem to recall that Windows 98 has problems seeing all of a
> > larger drive, but IIRC linux can get around any bios restrictions.
> > If the motherboard and/or windows were to only see part o
David Aikema wrote:
I've currently got Windows 98 SE (on a 10 gig drive) installed alongside SuSE
7.3 Pro (on an 8.4 gig drive) using a motherboard about 2 1/2 years old. If
I were to replace these two drives with a single 60 gig+ drive should I
expect to encounter any problems?
My experien
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Aikema wrote:
> I've currently got Windows 98 SE (on a 10 gig drive) installed alongside SuSE
> 7.3 Pro (on an 8.4 gig drive) using a motherboard about 2 1/2 years old. If
> I were to replace these two drives with a single 60 gig+ drive should I
> expect to encounter any
I've currently got Windows 98 SE (on a 10 gig drive) installed alongside SuSE
7.3 Pro (on an 8.4 gig drive) using a motherboard about 2 1/2 years old. If
I were to replace these two drives with a single 60 gig+ drive should I
expect to encounter any problems?
I know that there existed that 8.4
This is the header of the notification message to postmaster.
I'm more interested in the log messages as they appear in syslog.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:43:55 +0800
"m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the full message header:
>
> From - Mon Oct 21 00:46:47 2002
> X-UIDL: 3db2dd240002
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:52:06AM -0500, Ben Duncan wrote:
> Is there a "General" Catagory for the Sxs, and if so, where do I sign up?
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/
Click the General link.
Kurt
--
"But officer, I was only trying to gain enough speed so I could coast
to the nearest gas
If they run Samba or are a Windows box, I always do the following:
# nmblookup -A
Actually, not helping you but to disperse the information, here is the
actual script I use, since I run on a network with multiple WINS servers
and like to lookup using either name or IP without worrying about synt
That could be it. Many MTA's require the sending MTA to be resolvable
(reverse lookup).
From: Matt Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Totally OT: valid mail server
Date: 21 Oct 2002 18:21:05 -0500
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10)
Can anyone tell me why Redhat's
this is a good possibility, since I believe COL still had issues with
netmount not stopping SMB mounts in 3.1. I believe this was fixed for
3.1.1, I forget, I just remember having to fix the scripts on a lot of
boxes.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 21:11:00 -0400
"Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
That would be good. I'd also like to see the Sendmail logs (in COL this
is located in /var/log/mail). I assume this is where the original post
data came from.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:57:28 +0800
"m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could post the whole message header tonight. it's quite a
You could try the command:
# last -i
Brad.
--- Ben Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know a users telneted/rlogin .etc ..etc..
> IP on a flat
> network that does not have DNS.
>
> Any Idea how to get it?
>
> Who -l , only does a DNS resolution.
___
My bad. Maybe
]# finger
is what your looking for...?
Ben Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nope .. still does a FQDN from hosts instead of the IP number ...
>
>tom wrote:
>> Maybe
>>
>> ]# who -H
>>
>> is what your looking for?
>>
---tm---
Linux Registration Number; 184093,
http://co
Nope .. still does a FQDN from hosts instead of the IP number ...
tom wrote:
Maybe
]# who -H
is what your looking for?
Ben Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to know a users telneted/rlogin .etc ..etc.. IP on a flat
network that does not have DNS.
Any Idea how to get it?
Who -l ,
Maybe
]# who -H
is what your looking for?
Ben Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I need to know a users telneted/rlogin .etc ..etc.. IP on a flat
>network that does not have DNS.
>
>Any Idea how to get it?
>
>Who -l , only does a DNS resolution.
>--
>Ben Duncan Phone (601)-355-2574 Fa
Ben Duncan wrote:
I need to know a users telneted/rlogin .etc ..etc.. IP on a flat network
that does not have DNS.
Any Idea how to get it?
Who -l , only does a DNS resolution.
finger?
when someone logs onto my machine its logged in messages as well. maybe
check there.
jim
_
thes signature. look like somthing tricky...
--g9KGUAlZ000906.1035131410/server.donkeyware.org--
--g9KGUAla000906.1035131418/server.donkeyware.org--
m.w.chang wrote:
is it someone trying to use my smtp as a relay but failed?
but how did it trigger my sendmail to do the job? I didn't reply to a
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Robert Black Eagle wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 21 October 2002 3:16 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:16:29 -0400
> > >
> > > Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
the full message header:
From - Mon Oct 21 00:46:47 2002
X-UIDL: 3db2dd240002
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 1000
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by server.donkeyware.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) id g9KGUAla000906;
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:30:18 +0800
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:30:18 +0
I need to know a users telneted/rlogin .etc ..etc.. IP on a flat
network that does not have DNS.
Any Idea how to get it?
Who -l , only does a DNS resolution.
--
Ben Duncan Phone (601)-355-2574 Fax (601)-355-2573 Cell
(601)-946-1220
Business Network Solutions
Matt Nelson wrote:
Subject:
Totally OT: valid mail server
From:
Matt Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
21 Oct 2002 18:21:05 -0500
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone tell me why Redhat's list server is rejecting my subscript
Ben Duncan wrote:
Is there a "General" Catagory for the Sxs, and if so, where do I sign up?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/general
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linu
Is there a "General" Catagory for the Sxs, and if so, where do I sign up?
--
Ben Duncan Phone (601)-355-2574 Fax (601)-355-2573 Cell
(601)-946-1220
Business Network Solutions
336 Elton Road Jackson MS, 39212
"Software is like Sex, it is be
32 matches
Mail list logo
